This document discusses machines that are able to communicate and translate the physical world. It mentions several bots like @mashomatic, @acoluthon, and @ElectricBarthes. It also discusses how everyday objects will have expressive elements like sound, light, and movement. The document advocates for respecting the constraints and demands of non-human machines and protocols when soliciting their assistance. It references works like a model of a Turing machine, Anna Coluthon, and the Electric Barthes Flarf Scarf.
2. Our machines are talking back
were entering a time when sound, light and movement are
equally important parts of the creative palette. Everyday objects
whose expressive elements have long been static will now glow,
sing, vibrate and change position at the drop of a hat.
(NYT, Carla Diana, Talking, Walking Objects, Jan. 26 2013.)
5. Machine Love
No technical object, it is true, will be enamored of the
engineer that whispers sweet nothings into its sockets; to
solicit its assistance is, however to do right by it and respect its
protocols. What is called technical proficiency is a human
actant's mastery of such protocolssurely a kind of human-
nonhuman love, premised on the human's deep respect for
the nonhuman's constraints and demands.
- Kyle McGee, writing on Latours Aramis
6. A Turing Machine (sort of).
Artists model of a Turing machine, Mike Davey
14. A translation of the world
Cyborg politics is the
struggle for language and
the struggle against perfect
communication, against the
one code that translates all
meaning perfectly.
-- Donna Haraway