際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
New Literacies and
Online Reading Comprehension
(thoughts and ideas from The UConn Research Team)
Terry Atkinson  East Carolina University
Tar River Reading Council Meeting
November 18, 2010
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
CHANGE
Important milestones in literacy
history
 Late 2008-more than 1.5 billion individuals
using the Internet http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
 Online anyone can be a reader or writer
 no other technology for reading, writing, and
communication has been adopted by so many
people, in so many places in so short a time
(Leu, Zawilinski, Castek, Banerjee, Housand, Liu, and ONeil, 2007)
The workplace has changed
 The business community reports significant productivity
gains due to Internet use for sharing information,
communicating, and solving problems
(van Ark, Inklaar, & McGuckin, 2003; Friedman, 2005; Matteucci, OMahony,
Robinson, & Zwick, 2005)
The likelihood that todays students will
work for an international company, or
that a close acquaintance or someone in
their family will, is 100%.
(Zhao, 2009)
Students have changed
 Students aged 8-18 in the U.S. spend more time
reading online per day than reading offline: 48
minutes per day vs. 43 minutes per day. (Kaiser
Family Foundation, 2005).
 In Accra, Ghana:
66% of 15-18 year olds report having gone
online previously; (Borzekowski, Fobil, &
Asante, 2006).
 Japan has broadband in nearly every
home that is 16 times faster than the
broadband in US homes for $22 per
month. (Bleha, 2005)
This generations defining technology for reading.
 Mexico is following e-Mexico, a
policy designed to provide every
citizen and every school with an
Internet connection (Ludlow, 2006).
This generations defining technology for reading.
The U.S. situation:
Not a single state in the U.S.
measures...
 ...students ability to read search
engine results during state reading
assessments.
 ...students ability to critically
evaluate information that is found
online to determine its reliability.
This generations defining technology for reading.
Not a single state measures...
 ...students ability to compose clear and
effective email messages in their state
writing assessment.
 Not a single state requires all students to
use a word processor on their state writing
assessment.*
*
See Russell & Plati, 1999; 2000; 2001. They report
effect sizes of .57  1.25 for word processor use on MCAS.
See also Russell & Tao, 2004 who report 19% more 4th grade
students classified as Needs Improvement would move up to the
Proficient performance level with word processors.
National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP)
 NAEP made a deliberate decision to exclude
online reading comprehension from the
2009 NAEP reading framework in the U.S.
The next NAEP assessment
will be administered in 2019.
This generations defining technology for reading.
What can we
conclude?
 The Internet is this generations
defining technology for reading.
 Some states and nations place their
students at risk by continued
inaction or poorly informed public
policies.
What can we
conclude?
 No individual can keep up with the
many new literacies that appear
online
 Collaboration is keynew models of
instruction must allow students to
share their own insights..the
EXPANDED ZPD
ULTIMATELYWhat can
we conclude?
 Because schools are not going to
magically morph into technology-rich
spaces with huge shifts in pedagogy in
the foreseeable future.
ITS UP TO TEACHERS TO CHARGE AHEAD
INTO THE CLOUDTHE WEB 2.0 WORLD!
First, teachers must understand.
THE COMMON ELEMENTS OF NEW LITERACIES.
1. new technologies require us to bring new potentials to
literacy tasks.
2. new literacies are central to fullparticipation in a global
community.
3. new literacies are deictic; they rapidly change as defining
technologies change.
4. new literacies are multiple, multimodal, and
multifacetedthey benefit from analysis that brings multiple
points of view to understanding them.
(Leu, OByrne, Zawilinski, McVerry, Everett-Cacopardo, 2009)
Online and Offline
 reading comprehension are not the same.
If this were true, high-achieving offline
readers would always be high-achieving online
readers and vice versa.
 reading comprehension are not
ISOMORPHIC (having similar appearance, ignoring
finely-grained, but significant differences)
The New Literacies of Online
Reading Comprehension
  the Internetrequires readers
to have novel literacy skills, and little
is known about how to analyze or
teach those skills. (RAND Reading
Research Study Group, 2002. p. 4).
The new literacies of online reading comprehension
The UConn Model for Teaching Online Reading
Comprehension in 1-1 Classrooms:
Internet Reciprocal Teaching (IRT)
The New Literacies Of Online Reading
Comprehension:
Read to identify important questions or solve
problems;
Read to locate information;
Read to critically evaluate the usefulness of
that information;
Read to synthesize information to answer
those questions; and
Read to communicate the answers to others.
(Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, & Cammack, 2004, p. 1570)
The new literacies of online reading comprehension
IRT - Scaffolding students
ability to read online
1) Teacher-led Whole Group Instruction
2) Collaborative Modeling of Online Reading
Strategies
3) Inquiry
- Initially, within the class.
- Then, with others around
the world.
How? What is realistic???
LINK OLD WITH
NEW
traditional literacy
practices with NEW
LITERACIES
Reality Recap
1. The Internet is this generations defining
technology for reading and learning.
2. Current public policies may actually increase
reading achievement gaps.
3. NCLB-Students in poorest schools have less
Internet access at home and schools do not always
prepare them for new literacies of ORC at school.
4. Recent research: The Internet requires new
literacies -- additional online reading
comprehension (ORC) skills.
SO, where would we begin?
 Search engines
 Search basics
http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/a
nswer.py?hl=en&answer=136861&rd=1
 Reading and Evaluating Search Results
new literacies
new literacies + Uconn
new literacies  Uconn
Critical Evaluation Plays
a Crucial Part in
 Evaluating Relevancy: Reading search engine results
 Evaluating Relevancy: Previewing a website
 Evaluating Accuracy: Verifying/refuting author claims
 Evaluating Reliability: Investigating author credibility
 Critically Evaluating Online Information
 Evaluating Bias: Separating fact from opinion
 Developing an overall healthy skepticism
Continuing the conversation
 Article by Leu, D.J., OByrne, W.I., Zawilinski,
L., McVerry, J. G., Everett-Cacopardo, H., 2009.
Educational Researcher, 38, 4, 264-269. doi
10.3102/0013189X09336676. Available online
at:
http://edr.sagepub.com/content/38/4/264.full
.pdf+html
 Teachers Activity Guide
REFERENCES
 Leu, D.J., OByrne, W.I., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J. G., Everett-Cacopardo, H.,
2009. Educational Researcher, 38, 4, 264-269. doi
10.3102/0013189X09336676. Available online at:
http://edr.sagepub.com/content/38/4/264.full.pdf+html
 Leu D. J., Zawilinski, L. , Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y. &
ONeil, M., (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading
comprehension? In L. S. Rush, A. J. Eakle, & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary
school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practice. Urbana, IL:
NCTE.
 Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or leading the way: Education in the age of
globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Ad

Recommended

Leu Iespp Final
Leu Iespp Final
djleu
1-22-11 Norwich Free Academy - Leu session1
1-22-11 Norwich Free Academy - Leu session1
djleu
Bristol keynote 8/30/10
Bristol keynote 8/30/10
djleu
NRC 2009
NRC 2009
djleu
Don's Presentation 12-7-2010
Don's Presentation 12-7-2010
djleu
New Orleans Keynote
New Orleans Keynote
djleu
Rochester
Rochester
djleu
TASA talk
TASA talk
djleu
Leu keynotenli2010
Leu keynotenli2010
Derek Pizzuto
China talkw hiller
China talkw hiller
djleu
Leu Finland Pp Final2
Leu Finland Pp Final2
djleu
Luncheon keynote NASBE
Luncheon keynote NASBE
djleu
Katy ISD - Main Talk
Katy ISD - Main Talk
djleu
WORD keynote
WORD keynote
djleu
Talk2 elementary
Talk2 elementary
djleu
NYC Talk
NYC Talk
djleu
Keynote
Keynote
djleu
EDCI 4110W Online reading comprehension I
EDCI 4110W Online reading comprehension I
djleu
Leader Keynote Pp Final
Leader Keynote Pp Final
djleu
Leu Keynote Pp Final Jordan, Utah
Leu Keynote Pp Final Jordan, Utah
djleu
Final Virginia State Reading Association Keynote
Final Virginia State Reading Association Keynote
djleu
18th european conference on reading scira
18th european conference on reading scira
djleu
Leu Keynote Peace Corps
Leu Keynote Peace Corps
djleu
Norway talk #1 dual level theory ppt
Norway talk #1 dual level theory ppt
djleu
Leu Keynote at Mass Reading 2014
Leu Keynote at Mass Reading 2014
djleu
Leu AASL 11-14-13
Leu AASL 11-14-13
djleu
18th european conference on reading scira
18th european conference on reading scira
djleu
Booth bay dinner talk
Booth bay dinner talk
djleu
MassCUE Keynote
MassCUE Keynote
djleu
New literacies by Rosaen & Terpstra 2010
New literacies by Rosaen & Terpstra 2010
Yamith Jos辿 Fandi単o Parra

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Leu keynotenli2010
Leu keynotenli2010
Derek Pizzuto
China talkw hiller
China talkw hiller
djleu
Leu Finland Pp Final2
Leu Finland Pp Final2
djleu
Luncheon keynote NASBE
Luncheon keynote NASBE
djleu
Katy ISD - Main Talk
Katy ISD - Main Talk
djleu
WORD keynote
WORD keynote
djleu
Talk2 elementary
Talk2 elementary
djleu
NYC Talk
NYC Talk
djleu
Keynote
Keynote
djleu
EDCI 4110W Online reading comprehension I
EDCI 4110W Online reading comprehension I
djleu
Leader Keynote Pp Final
Leader Keynote Pp Final
djleu
Leu Keynote Pp Final Jordan, Utah
Leu Keynote Pp Final Jordan, Utah
djleu
Final Virginia State Reading Association Keynote
Final Virginia State Reading Association Keynote
djleu
18th european conference on reading scira
18th european conference on reading scira
djleu
Leu Keynote Peace Corps
Leu Keynote Peace Corps
djleu
Norway talk #1 dual level theory ppt
Norway talk #1 dual level theory ppt
djleu
Leu Keynote at Mass Reading 2014
Leu Keynote at Mass Reading 2014
djleu
Leu AASL 11-14-13
Leu AASL 11-14-13
djleu
18th european conference on reading scira
18th european conference on reading scira
djleu
Booth bay dinner talk
Booth bay dinner talk
djleu
Leu keynotenli2010
Leu keynotenli2010
Derek Pizzuto
China talkw hiller
China talkw hiller
djleu
Leu Finland Pp Final2
Leu Finland Pp Final2
djleu
Luncheon keynote NASBE
Luncheon keynote NASBE
djleu
Katy ISD - Main Talk
Katy ISD - Main Talk
djleu
WORD keynote
WORD keynote
djleu
Talk2 elementary
Talk2 elementary
djleu
NYC Talk
NYC Talk
djleu
Keynote
Keynote
djleu
EDCI 4110W Online reading comprehension I
EDCI 4110W Online reading comprehension I
djleu
Leader Keynote Pp Final
Leader Keynote Pp Final
djleu
Leu Keynote Pp Final Jordan, Utah
Leu Keynote Pp Final Jordan, Utah
djleu
Final Virginia State Reading Association Keynote
Final Virginia State Reading Association Keynote
djleu
18th european conference on reading scira
18th european conference on reading scira
djleu
Leu Keynote Peace Corps
Leu Keynote Peace Corps
djleu
Norway talk #1 dual level theory ppt
Norway talk #1 dual level theory ppt
djleu
Leu Keynote at Mass Reading 2014
Leu Keynote at Mass Reading 2014
djleu
Leu AASL 11-14-13
Leu AASL 11-14-13
djleu
18th european conference on reading scira
18th european conference on reading scira
djleu
Booth bay dinner talk
Booth bay dinner talk
djleu

Similar to TRRC (18)

MassCUE Keynote
MassCUE Keynote
djleu
New literacies by Rosaen & Terpstra 2010
New literacies by Rosaen & Terpstra 2010
Yamith Jos辿 Fandi単o Parra
Cra digital literacy_october_2013_bosco
Cra digital literacy_october_2013_bosco
Cathybosco
20170129-newliteraciesrosaenterpstra2010-170130040113.ppt
20170129-newliteraciesrosaenterpstra2010-170130040113.ppt
Marjorie Malveda
What Is New about New Literacies
What Is New about New Literacies
marleneubc
Online reading comprehension ii
Online reading comprehension ii
djleu
Online reading comprehension i
Online reading comprehension i
djleu
Castek Leu Hartman 2005 Comprehension Online Learning
Castek Leu Hartman 2005 Comprehension Online Learning
Douglas K. Hartman
Module 3 BENLAC. New literacy , functional literacy and multi literacy
Module 3 BENLAC. New literacy , functional literacy and multi literacy
ClaireAnneMaala
Multimedia tec538 del mar
Multimedia tec538 del mar
MrsDelMarsClass
Jill castek presentation
Jill castek presentation
Michelle Boquist
Online Reading Comprehension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Next Steps
Online Reading Comprehension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Next Steps
Julie Coiro
Teaching Online Research & Comprehension Skills
Teaching Online Research & Comprehension Skills
Timothy Neville
Vilnius Lithuania 20-01-17 Digital Literacies and the challenge for Language ...
Vilnius Lithuania 20-01-17 Digital Literacies and the challenge for Language ...
Jeroen Clemens
Moskou 12/20 Keynote Digital Literacy
Moskou 12/20 Keynote Digital Literacy
Jeroen Clemens
Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities (Brazil 2014)
Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities (Brazil 2014)
Julie Coiro
Institute keynote 2011
Institute keynote 2011
djleu
Challenges, change and trends
Challenges, change and trends
Derek Wenmoth
MassCUE Keynote
MassCUE Keynote
djleu
Cra digital literacy_october_2013_bosco
Cra digital literacy_october_2013_bosco
Cathybosco
20170129-newliteraciesrosaenterpstra2010-170130040113.ppt
20170129-newliteraciesrosaenterpstra2010-170130040113.ppt
Marjorie Malveda
What Is New about New Literacies
What Is New about New Literacies
marleneubc
Online reading comprehension ii
Online reading comprehension ii
djleu
Online reading comprehension i
Online reading comprehension i
djleu
Castek Leu Hartman 2005 Comprehension Online Learning
Castek Leu Hartman 2005 Comprehension Online Learning
Douglas K. Hartman
Module 3 BENLAC. New literacy , functional literacy and multi literacy
Module 3 BENLAC. New literacy , functional literacy and multi literacy
ClaireAnneMaala
Multimedia tec538 del mar
Multimedia tec538 del mar
MrsDelMarsClass
Jill castek presentation
Jill castek presentation
Michelle Boquist
Online Reading Comprehension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Next Steps
Online Reading Comprehension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Next Steps
Julie Coiro
Teaching Online Research & Comprehension Skills
Teaching Online Research & Comprehension Skills
Timothy Neville
Vilnius Lithuania 20-01-17 Digital Literacies and the challenge for Language ...
Vilnius Lithuania 20-01-17 Digital Literacies and the challenge for Language ...
Jeroen Clemens
Moskou 12/20 Keynote Digital Literacy
Moskou 12/20 Keynote Digital Literacy
Jeroen Clemens
Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities (Brazil 2014)
Online Reading Comprehension: Challenges and Opportunities (Brazil 2014)
Julie Coiro
Institute keynote 2011
Institute keynote 2011
djleu
Challenges, change and trends
Challenges, change and trends
Derek Wenmoth
Ad

TRRC

  • 1. New Literacies and Online Reading Comprehension (thoughts and ideas from The UConn Research Team) Terry Atkinson East Carolina University Tar River Reading Council Meeting November 18, 2010
  • 3. Important milestones in literacy history Late 2008-more than 1.5 billion individuals using the Internet http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm Online anyone can be a reader or writer no other technology for reading, writing, and communication has been adopted by so many people, in so many places in so short a time (Leu, Zawilinski, Castek, Banerjee, Housand, Liu, and ONeil, 2007)
  • 4. The workplace has changed The business community reports significant productivity gains due to Internet use for sharing information, communicating, and solving problems (van Ark, Inklaar, & McGuckin, 2003; Friedman, 2005; Matteucci, OMahony, Robinson, & Zwick, 2005) The likelihood that todays students will work for an international company, or that a close acquaintance or someone in their family will, is 100%. (Zhao, 2009)
  • 5. Students have changed Students aged 8-18 in the U.S. spend more time reading online per day than reading offline: 48 minutes per day vs. 43 minutes per day. (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2005). In Accra, Ghana: 66% of 15-18 year olds report having gone online previously; (Borzekowski, Fobil, & Asante, 2006).
  • 6. Japan has broadband in nearly every home that is 16 times faster than the broadband in US homes for $22 per month. (Bleha, 2005) This generations defining technology for reading.
  • 7. Mexico is following e-Mexico, a policy designed to provide every citizen and every school with an Internet connection (Ludlow, 2006). This generations defining technology for reading.
  • 8. The U.S. situation: Not a single state in the U.S. measures... ...students ability to read search engine results during state reading assessments. ...students ability to critically evaluate information that is found online to determine its reliability. This generations defining technology for reading.
  • 9. Not a single state measures... ...students ability to compose clear and effective email messages in their state writing assessment. Not a single state requires all students to use a word processor on their state writing assessment.* * See Russell & Plati, 1999; 2000; 2001. They report effect sizes of .57 1.25 for word processor use on MCAS. See also Russell & Tao, 2004 who report 19% more 4th grade students classified as Needs Improvement would move up to the Proficient performance level with word processors.
  • 10. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) NAEP made a deliberate decision to exclude online reading comprehension from the 2009 NAEP reading framework in the U.S. The next NAEP assessment will be administered in 2019. This generations defining technology for reading.
  • 11. What can we conclude? The Internet is this generations defining technology for reading. Some states and nations place their students at risk by continued inaction or poorly informed public policies.
  • 12. What can we conclude? No individual can keep up with the many new literacies that appear online Collaboration is keynew models of instruction must allow students to share their own insights..the EXPANDED ZPD
  • 13. ULTIMATELYWhat can we conclude? Because schools are not going to magically morph into technology-rich spaces with huge shifts in pedagogy in the foreseeable future. ITS UP TO TEACHERS TO CHARGE AHEAD INTO THE CLOUDTHE WEB 2.0 WORLD!
  • 14. First, teachers must understand. THE COMMON ELEMENTS OF NEW LITERACIES. 1. new technologies require us to bring new potentials to literacy tasks. 2. new literacies are central to fullparticipation in a global community. 3. new literacies are deictic; they rapidly change as defining technologies change. 4. new literacies are multiple, multimodal, and multifacetedthey benefit from analysis that brings multiple points of view to understanding them. (Leu, OByrne, Zawilinski, McVerry, Everett-Cacopardo, 2009)
  • 15. Online and Offline reading comprehension are not the same. If this were true, high-achieving offline readers would always be high-achieving online readers and vice versa. reading comprehension are not ISOMORPHIC (having similar appearance, ignoring finely-grained, but significant differences)
  • 16. The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension the Internetrequires readers to have novel literacy skills, and little is known about how to analyze or teach those skills. (RAND Reading Research Study Group, 2002. p. 4). The new literacies of online reading comprehension
  • 17. The UConn Model for Teaching Online Reading Comprehension in 1-1 Classrooms: Internet Reciprocal Teaching (IRT)
  • 18. The New Literacies Of Online Reading Comprehension: Read to identify important questions or solve problems; Read to locate information; Read to critically evaluate the usefulness of that information; Read to synthesize information to answer those questions; and Read to communicate the answers to others. (Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, & Cammack, 2004, p. 1570) The new literacies of online reading comprehension
  • 19. IRT - Scaffolding students ability to read online 1) Teacher-led Whole Group Instruction 2) Collaborative Modeling of Online Reading Strategies 3) Inquiry - Initially, within the class. - Then, with others around the world.
  • 20. How? What is realistic??? LINK OLD WITH NEW traditional literacy practices with NEW LITERACIES
  • 21. Reality Recap 1. The Internet is this generations defining technology for reading and learning. 2. Current public policies may actually increase reading achievement gaps. 3. NCLB-Students in poorest schools have less Internet access at home and schools do not always prepare them for new literacies of ORC at school. 4. Recent research: The Internet requires new literacies -- additional online reading comprehension (ORC) skills.
  • 22. SO, where would we begin? Search engines Search basics http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/a nswer.py?hl=en&answer=136861&rd=1 Reading and Evaluating Search Results new literacies new literacies + Uconn new literacies Uconn
  • 23. Critical Evaluation Plays a Crucial Part in Evaluating Relevancy: Reading search engine results Evaluating Relevancy: Previewing a website Evaluating Accuracy: Verifying/refuting author claims Evaluating Reliability: Investigating author credibility Critically Evaluating Online Information Evaluating Bias: Separating fact from opinion Developing an overall healthy skepticism
  • 24. Continuing the conversation Article by Leu, D.J., OByrne, W.I., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J. G., Everett-Cacopardo, H., 2009. Educational Researcher, 38, 4, 264-269. doi 10.3102/0013189X09336676. Available online at: http://edr.sagepub.com/content/38/4/264.full .pdf+html Teachers Activity Guide
  • 25. REFERENCES Leu, D.J., OByrne, W.I., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J. G., Everett-Cacopardo, H., 2009. Educational Researcher, 38, 4, 264-269. doi 10.3102/0013189X09336676. Available online at: http://edr.sagepub.com/content/38/4/264.full.pdf+html Leu D. J., Zawilinski, L. , Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y. & ONeil, M., (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. S. Rush, A. J. Eakle, & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practice. Urbana, IL: NCTE. Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or leading the way: Education in the age of globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Editor's Notes

  • #3: ----- Meeting Notes (11/17/10 19:58) -----None of us would argue with the fact that just as our world has experienced (and continues to experience) DRAMATIC CHANGES during the last two decades, so has how we read and write. Here's what I used to learn to read in ELEM school. Here is what I use to read now.....
  • #4: At this rate, > half of worlds population will be online in 7 years, MOST of world online in the next 10-15 yearsMention motivationwriting for REAL audiences highly impacts motivation
  • #22: Knobel and Lankshear document that it is the MOST efficient system in our history for delivering new technologies to read, write, and communicate!Poorer schools are under greatest pressure to raise test scores that have NOTHING to do with online reading comprehension (Henry, 2007)
  • #23: LINK OLD to NEWFRAMING THE INTERNET AS A LITERACY ISSUE, NOT A TECHNOLOGY ISSUE..INTERNET INSTRUCTION INTEGRATED INTO ALL SUBJECT AREAS, TAUGHT BY ALL TEACHERS