際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Twitter Free Iran

     Alex Burns & Ben Eltham


Communications Policy Research Forum 2009
          20th November 2009
What is Twitter?
            Value Proposition
      Founded in 2006, CEO Biz
       Stone
      Microblogging platform
      140 character short messages:
       real-time comment & hashtags

       Venture Capital Valuation
      Feb. 2009: $US35 million
      Sep. 2009: $US1 billion
Dipnote: US State Departments Twitter Page
Launched February 2009 and praised by US Secretary
       of State Hilary Clinton in June 2009
The Twitter Effect: Real-Time Chatter
#IranElection: 12h June  5th August 2009
#IranElection Events: June 2009
SUN     MON   TUE   WED   THU   FRI   SAT


                                12    13


14       15   16    17    18    19    20


21       22   23    24    25    26    27


28       29   30     1     2     3     4


 5       6     7     8     9    10    11
Research Questions
 Did Twitter benefit from Irans 2009 election?


 What role did Twitters users play and how
 effective was it?

 Why did the US State Department intervene
 with Twitter?
Conceptual Theorists
   Theorist           Level of Analysis

 Graham Allison          Perspectives

  Terry Deibel       Foreign Policy, Policy
                         Instruments
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.        Soft Power

  Charles Tilly      Regimes, Collective
                          Violence
Study Frameworks
 Perspectivism (Allison): competing explanatory and conceptual
  frameworks to explain the same events:

   Twitter and hedge fund traders on oil/commodities markets
   Global activist campaigns
   Iranian protestors versus Iranian Basij paramilitary forces
   US State Department versus Neoconservatives, and other agencies


 Event Studies coding (Tilly) of election events


 Foreign Policy levers (Deibel) and Soft Power (Nye)
Deibels Foreign Policy Feedback Loops
Charles Tillys Coding
         Columbia University historian and
          political scientist and sociologist
         Coding framework for comparative
          analysis and events
         Actors use violence as a strategic
          means to pursue goals
         Reveals the interactive dynamics and
          complexity of #IranElection
          protests, and the pivotal role of
          Irans Basij paramilitary forces
Neoconservative Worldview

     Twitter
      Effect
                  Peaceful
                  Regime
                  Change?
  Demonstration
     Effect
Tilly Coding for #IranElection Events
Date                  Event                         Tilly Category

13th-15th June 2009   Tehran street protests        Violent Ritual

17th June 2009        Iranian football team wears   Opportunism; Non-Violent
                      green                         Protest

18th June 2009        Central Tehran protests       Non-Violent Protests, Brawls,
                                                    Scattered Attacks

20th June 2009        IRINN report of death near    Opportunism, Scattered
                      Khomeinis mausoleum          Attacks

20th June 2009        Basij shoot Neda Soltan       Individual Aggression,
                                                    Opportunism
Arik Fraimovichs Help Iran Election
CPRF09 Presentation: Twitter Free Iran
Irans Basij Paramilitaries
Neda Soltan
       Neda Soltan shot
        opportunistically by
        Basij on 20th June 2009
       Shooting filmed on
        camera-phone,
        uploaded to YouTube
       Soltan became an
        emotive symbol for
        Iranian protestors
US State Department Role
 Asked Twitter to delay server upgrade on 16th June 2009: reported
  in The NewYork Times, TheWashington Post, and Time
 Twitters CEO Biz Stone distances himself from the request


 Possible deeper motivations for US State Department request:
   History of Radio Free broadcasts in Cold War Europe and Iran
   Aware of diaspora satellite broadcasts and Irans 1999 student riots
   Interested in social media platforms for public diplomacy
   Open up opportunities for Iranian dissent during a tine-window
   Respond to neoconservative critics who contend it has little experience
   Potential quasi-experimental test of rumour vectors and propaganda
Evaluating Twitter
 Twitter
   Benefited indirectly from the election events: VC valuation increase


 Twitter Users  Global Activists
   Mobilised to support Irans protestors, shared communitarian ideals


 Twitter Users  Basij paramilitary forces
   Used Twitter to identify, hunt down, and in some cases kill protestors


 US State Department
   May have monitored Twitters chatter during election crisis
Conclusion
 Soft Power and social media are limited to effect outcomes
  such as peaceful regime change
 Twitter may be prone to rumour and social contagion effects
 US policymakers were unable to understand Iran on its own
  terms (RAND intelligence expert Gregory Treverton)
 Different actors will use new technologies for their own ends:
  understanding and anticipating such different uses is critical
 Those who championed Twitters use in Irans 2009 election
  may not have considered this  some paid for their enthusiastic
  adoption of Twitter with their lives
CPRF09 Presentation: Twitter Free Iran
Thank You!
Alex Burns: alex@alexburns.net and @alexburns

Ben Eltham: ben.eltham@gmail.com and @beneltham

More Related Content

CPRF09 Presentation: Twitter Free Iran

  • 1. Twitter Free Iran Alex Burns & Ben Eltham Communications Policy Research Forum 2009 20th November 2009
  • 2. What is Twitter? Value Proposition Founded in 2006, CEO Biz Stone Microblogging platform 140 character short messages: real-time comment & hashtags Venture Capital Valuation Feb. 2009: $US35 million Sep. 2009: $US1 billion
  • 3. Dipnote: US State Departments Twitter Page Launched February 2009 and praised by US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in June 2009
  • 4. The Twitter Effect: Real-Time Chatter
  • 5. #IranElection: 12h June 5th August 2009
  • 6. #IranElection Events: June 2009 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
  • 7. Research Questions Did Twitter benefit from Irans 2009 election? What role did Twitters users play and how effective was it? Why did the US State Department intervene with Twitter?
  • 8. Conceptual Theorists Theorist Level of Analysis Graham Allison Perspectives Terry Deibel Foreign Policy, Policy Instruments Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Soft Power Charles Tilly Regimes, Collective Violence
  • 9. Study Frameworks Perspectivism (Allison): competing explanatory and conceptual frameworks to explain the same events: Twitter and hedge fund traders on oil/commodities markets Global activist campaigns Iranian protestors versus Iranian Basij paramilitary forces US State Department versus Neoconservatives, and other agencies Event Studies coding (Tilly) of election events Foreign Policy levers (Deibel) and Soft Power (Nye)
  • 10. Deibels Foreign Policy Feedback Loops
  • 11. Charles Tillys Coding Columbia University historian and political scientist and sociologist Coding framework for comparative analysis and events Actors use violence as a strategic means to pursue goals Reveals the interactive dynamics and complexity of #IranElection protests, and the pivotal role of Irans Basij paramilitary forces
  • 12. Neoconservative Worldview Twitter Effect Peaceful Regime Change? Demonstration Effect
  • 13. Tilly Coding for #IranElection Events Date Event Tilly Category 13th-15th June 2009 Tehran street protests Violent Ritual 17th June 2009 Iranian football team wears Opportunism; Non-Violent green Protest 18th June 2009 Central Tehran protests Non-Violent Protests, Brawls, Scattered Attacks 20th June 2009 IRINN report of death near Opportunism, Scattered Khomeinis mausoleum Attacks 20th June 2009 Basij shoot Neda Soltan Individual Aggression, Opportunism
  • 14. Arik Fraimovichs Help Iran Election
  • 17. Neda Soltan Neda Soltan shot opportunistically by Basij on 20th June 2009 Shooting filmed on camera-phone, uploaded to YouTube Soltan became an emotive symbol for Iranian protestors
  • 18. US State Department Role Asked Twitter to delay server upgrade on 16th June 2009: reported in The NewYork Times, TheWashington Post, and Time Twitters CEO Biz Stone distances himself from the request Possible deeper motivations for US State Department request: History of Radio Free broadcasts in Cold War Europe and Iran Aware of diaspora satellite broadcasts and Irans 1999 student riots Interested in social media platforms for public diplomacy Open up opportunities for Iranian dissent during a tine-window Respond to neoconservative critics who contend it has little experience Potential quasi-experimental test of rumour vectors and propaganda
  • 19. Evaluating Twitter Twitter Benefited indirectly from the election events: VC valuation increase Twitter Users Global Activists Mobilised to support Irans protestors, shared communitarian ideals Twitter Users Basij paramilitary forces Used Twitter to identify, hunt down, and in some cases kill protestors US State Department May have monitored Twitters chatter during election crisis
  • 20. Conclusion Soft Power and social media are limited to effect outcomes such as peaceful regime change Twitter may be prone to rumour and social contagion effects US policymakers were unable to understand Iran on its own terms (RAND intelligence expert Gregory Treverton) Different actors will use new technologies for their own ends: understanding and anticipating such different uses is critical Those who championed Twitters use in Irans 2009 election may not have considered this some paid for their enthusiastic adoption of Twitter with their lives
  • 22. Thank You! Alex Burns: alex@alexburns.net and @alexburns Ben Eltham: ben.eltham@gmail.com and @beneltham