�ݺ�ߣ

Prof. M.R.Ezhilkumar
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology
Coimbatore
ezhilkumar@skcet.ac.in
I only feel angry when I see waste.
When I see people throwing away
things we could use. – Mother
Teresa
1
17CE413
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS
WASTE MANAGEMENT
2.6 – Types of transfer stations

SHWM – Module 2 – MUNICIPAL OF SOLID WASTES HANDLING AND MANAGEMENT  Mr.M.R.Ezhilkumar 2
Learning Outcomes
☼ What is a transfer station
☼ Functions of transfer station
☼ Types of transfer station
2.6 – Types of transfer stations

Video Session
Click on the image to watch
the video

SHWM – Module 2 – MUNICIPAL OF SOLID WASTES HANDLING AND MANAGEMENT  Mr.M.R.Ezhilkumar
 Waste transportation costs will be substantial if the distance between a collection
zone and the final destination (e.g., landfill, incinerator) is significant.
 In the interest of economics, many municipalities choose to transfer waste from
neighborhood collection trucks or stationary containers to larger vehicles before
transporting it to the disposal site.
 A transfer station may be established between the waste collection sources and the
final destination to serve in this capacity.
 At a transfer station, waste is transferred from smaller collection vehicles to larger
transfer vehicles, such as a tractor and trailer, a barge, or a railroad car.
4
Transfer Station

Transfer Station

 The primary objective in using a transfer station is to reduce the traffic of smaller
vehicles to the disposal site, ultimately resulting in reduced transport costs including
labor (crews spend less time traveling to the disposal site) and fuel.
 In addition to lower collection costs, transfer stations offer benefits including
₼ Reduced maintenance costs for collection vehicles
₼ Increased flexibility in the selection of disposal facilities
₼ The opportunity to recover recyclable materials at the transfer site
₼ The opportunity to process wastes (shred or bale) prior to disposal
6
Transfer Station

 In determining whether a transfer station is appropriate, municipal decision makers
should compare the costs and savings associated with the construction and operation
of the facility with costs for the direct shipping of the wastes from local neighborhoods
to the landfill.
 Transfer stations are often difficult to site and permit, particularly in urban areas.
 The farther the ultimate disposal site is from the collection area, the greater the
savings attained from the use of a transfer station.
7
Transfer Station

 The disposal site is typically at least 10 to 15 miles from the generation area before a
transfer station is economically justified.
 Transfer stations are sometimes used for shorter hauls to complete other duties such
as sort wastes or allow the shipment of wastes to more distant landfills (U.S. EPA,
2003).
8
Transfer Station

Assumptions used to create this sample comparison
were as follows:
 Cost to construct, own and operate transfer station
($/ton) ----> $10
 Average payload of collection truck hauling directly to
landfill (tons) ----> 7
 Average payload of transfer truck hauling from transfer
station to landfill (tons) ----> 21
 Average trucking cost (direct or transfer hauling)
($/mile) ----> $3
9
Transfer Station
Comparison of waste hauling costs with and without a
transfer station (U.S. EPA, 2002).

 Sometimes a transfer station is required regardless of distance to a landfill.
 To minimize the traffic and air pollution impacts at a landfill, a permit may limit the
landfill to only receiving waste from transfer stations.
 This significantly reduces the number of vehicles travelling to a landfill.
10
Transfer Station

 The type of station that would be most appropriate for a community depends on
several design variables, for example (U.S. EPA, 2003):
﴿ Capacity for waste storage
﴿ Types of wastes received
﴿ Processes necessary to recover material from wastes
﴿ Types of collection vehicles using the facility
﴿ Types of transfer vehicles to be accommodated
﴿ Site access
11
Types of Transfer Station

[1] Small to Medium Transfer Stations (capacity of less than 100 to 500 tons/day)
1) Small to medium transfer stations are usually “direct-discharge” facilities that provide
little area for interim waste storage.
2) Such stations are equipped with operating areas for waste collection trucks and are
often provided with drop-off areas for use by the public.
3) Direct-discharge stations are often constructed with two operating floors.
4) A compactor or open-top container is located on the lower level. Users enter the
upper level and dump wastes into hoppers attached to these containers.
12

[1] Small to Medium Transfer Stations (capacity of less than 100 to 500 tons/day)
5) Some smaller transfer stations used in rural areas may use simple drop-off
collection, in which a series of open-top containers are filled by users.
6) The containers are then emptied into a larger vehicle at the station or hauled directly
to the disposal site.
7) The number and size of containers at the facility depends on the size and population
density of the area served and the frequency of collection.
13

[2] Large Transfer Stations
 Large transfer stations are designed for heavy commercial use by private and
municipal collection vehicles.
 When collection vehicles arrive at the site, they are checked in for billing, weighed,
and directed to the appropriate dumping area.
 Check-in and weighing procedures are often automated for regular users.
 Collection vehicles travel to the dumping area and empty wastes into a trailer, pit, or
onto a platform.
 Transfer vehicles are weighed after loading to just under maximum legal weights; this
maximizes payloads and minimizes weight violations. 14

[2] Large Transfer Stations
 Transfer vehicles are weighed after loading to just under maximum legal weights; this
maximizes payloads and minimizes weight violations.
 Several different designs for larger transfer operations are common depending on the
transfer distance and vehicle type.
 Most designs fall into one of three categories (U.S.EPA, 2003):
(1) Direct-discharge non-compaction stations
(2) platform/pit noncompaction stations
(3) compaction stations
15

[a] Direct-discharge non-compaction stations
 These stations are generally designed with two operating floors.
 In the transfer operation, wastes are dumped directly from collection vehicles on the
top floor through a hopper and into open-top trailers on the lower floor.
 The trailers are often positioned on scales so that dumping is halted when the
maximum payload is reached.
 These stations are efficient because waste is handled only once.
 However, some provision for waste storage must be provided at peak drop-off times
or during system interruptions.
16

[a] Direct-discharge non-compaction stations
17

[b] Platform or Pit noncompaction Stations
 In platform or pit stations, collection vehicles dump their wastes onto an area where
wastes are temporarily stored and sorted for recyclables or unacceptable materials.
 The waste is then pushed into open-top trailers by front-end loaders (Figure 5.8).
 Platform stations are also constructed with two levels.
 Temporary storage is provided that can accommodate peak inflow of wastes.
 Construction costs may be higher with this type of station because of the increased
floor space; however, the ability to temporarily store wastes results in a need for
fewer trucks and trailers.
18

[b] Platform or Pit noncompaction Stations
 Also, facility operators can haul wastes at night or during other slow traffic periods
(U.S. EPA, 2003).
19

[c] Compaction Stations
 Compaction transfer stations use mechanical equipment to compact wastes before
they are transferred.
 A hydraulically powered compactor is commonly used to compress wastes.
 Wastes are fed into the compactor through a chute either directly from collection
trucks or after storage in a pit.
 The hydraulic ram pushes waste into the transfer trailer, which is mechanically linked
to the compactor.
20

 Compaction stations are used when
i. Wastes must be baled for shipment (e.g., rail haul) or for delivery to a balefill
ii. Open-top trailers cannot be used because of size restrictions such as viaduct
clearances
iii. The site layout does not accommodate a multilevel building conducive to
loading open-top trailers
21

22

23

Typical Transfer
station types
24
Dump to container Dump to trailer
Store and dump to truck trailer Dump to compactor

Transfer Station in Coimbatore

Transfer Station in Surat

Assessment Time
Review
Question
MSW compaction in a collection truck allows for increased
volumes of waste to be transported; however, if this compacted
material is brought to a materials recovery facility, there are
potential disadvantages.
Discuss these problems.

End of this topic

�ݺ�ߣ

Types of transfer stations - Municipal Solid Wastes

More Related Content

Types of transfer stations - Municipal Solid Wastes