This document provides information about the North Carolina State Improvement Project's (NCSIP) math instruction foundation training course. The course aims to help teachers improve math instruction for students with disabilities through understanding research-based teaching strategies. It covers topics like number sense, assessment, and connections. Requirements include participating in workshops, readings, and assessments. Research-based math programs discussed include Transitional Mathematics, which has shown growth in student math proficiency at Statesville Middle School. Factors in sustained implementation of programs include assessment data, support systems, and leadership commitment.
Learning Force is a flexible supplemental education program for math and reading that has proven successful in improving student skills. It uses research-based lesson plans, assessments, and progress monitoring to target learning gaps. Students using the Math Force module gained 16 percentile points on average in one year compared to a 9 point decline for non-participants. Parents were highly satisfied, with 94% reporting their children's skills improved in reading and math. The program provides comprehensive teacher support and resources to ensure student success.
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study schoolMartin Brown
油
The document outlines a 6-step process for a case study school to evaluate its teaching and learning in the area of literacy using self-evaluation.
Step 1 involves gathering evidence from various sources on 3 themes: learner outcomes, learning experience, and teachers' practice.
Step 2 analyzes the evidence against evaluation criteria to benchmark the school's performance.
Step 3 draws conclusions from the findings. Step 4 reports the findings and areas for improvement. Step 5 plans targeted actions. Step 6 implements and monitors the targets set in the school improvement plan.
This document provides information on school self-evaluation (SSE) with a focus on literacy and numeracy. It discusses SSE workshops that will cover topics like choosing effective evaluation tools, target setting, and developing a school improvement plan. The workshops aim to help schools engage in evidence-based self-evaluation to improve student learning outcomes, particularly in literacy and numeracy. Sample evaluation tools and data sources are presented. Guidelines emphasize using multiple qualitative and quantitative data sources to identify strengths and areas for improvement to inform a three-year school improvement plan with specific literacy and numeracy targets.
This document provides information about a school self-evaluation process focused on improving teaching and learning. It outlines the six steps of the school self-evaluation process, which includes gathering evidence, analyzing data, developing an improvement plan, writing a report, implementing/monitoring the plan. It emphasizes that the process is collaborative and can be used to evaluate aspects of the new Junior Cycle, such as key skills. The document directs schools to resources and provides dates for completing self-evaluation reports and improvement plans. It also describes supports available from the PDST.
This document outlines the agenda and key aspects of a school self-evaluation (SSE) in-service for post-primary school leaders. The in-service will cover the six steps of the SSE process and link initiatives to improve student learning outcomes. Attendees will learn about gathering and analyzing evidence from teachers, students and tests, drawing conclusions, and drafting the SSE report and school improvement plan. The document emphasizes that SSE is a reflective, collaborative process aimed at continuously improving student learning. It provides guidance on reflection, evidence gathering tools, and support available from the Professional Development Service for Teachers.
Using the SSE process, a school could:
- Look at its current junior cycle curriculum and practices in light of the new Framework's statements of learning and key skills;
- Determine time allocation and resources to better align with the Framework; and
- Analyze feedback from teachers, students, and parents to help develop short courses and assessment approaches for implementing the new junior cycle program.
The document provides a summary of a school's self-evaluation of literacy teaching and learning. The following are the key points:
- Analysis of student test results and written work found literacy skills need improvement, with many errors in spelling, punctuation and use of subject-specific vocabulary.
- Surveys found students enjoy reading fiction but need more opportunities for group work and note-taking. Teachers agreed literacy and ICT skills need more focus.
- Priorities identified were increasing writing standards across subjects, using editing checklists, developing comprehension and group work strategies, and reflecting on teaching approaches like pair/group work.
School Self Evaluation Guidelines post primaryMartin Brown
油
School self-evaluation is a collaborative process where a school reflects on its work and student learning. It involves gathering evidence, making judgements about strengths and weaknesses, writing a self-evaluation report, creating an improvement plan, and monitoring progress. The guidelines provide schools with a framework to evaluate teaching and learning through a six-step process of gathering evidence, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, reporting findings, planning improvements, and implementing changes.
This document outlines Keith Elementary School's plan to improve students' mathematical problem solving proficiency through continuous improvement efforts from 2012 to 2015. The plan focuses on developing students' ability to make connections in math problems. Initial data analysis identified connections as an area of weakness. Steps taken include setting a SMART goal, implementing formative assessment practices like using learning targets and feedback, and providing targeted instruction with resources like problem-solving lessons and math notebooks. Analysis of benchmark, MEAP, and other test data shows progress towards the goal, with mathematical proficiency increasing across grades and subgroups over the two-year period.
The document provides information about school self-evaluation and assessment in Ireland, including:
1. Schools are required to engage in self-evaluation, implement 3-year improvement plans focused on literacy and numeracy, and use assessment data to identify targets.
2. Standardized test scores and report cards from primary school will be transferred to post-primary schools to monitor student progress in reading, math, and other subjects.
3. Test results are reported using STEN, standard, and percentile scores to indicate performance levels and are one part of evaluating student learning alongside teacher observations.
Pdf final october 15th school improvement seminarclairematthews
油
This document outlines an agenda for a seminar on improving literacy through the school self-evaluation (SSE) process. The seminar will explore literacy in a broad sense and how schools can use data analysis and the six steps of SSE to develop improvement plans and monitor progress in literacy. Participants will learn strategies for oral language, reading, writing and vocabulary instruction and how to establish a whole-school approach to literacy.
The six-step school self-evaluation process involves gathering evidence, analyzing it using evaluation criteria, drawing conclusions by benchmarking against quality statements, producing a self-evaluation report, creating an improvement plan with targets and actions, and implementing and monitoring the plan. Key steps include collecting data from various tools, analyzing the data on themes of teaching and learning, learners' outcomes and experience, and teachers' practice, and using the analysis to identify strengths and areas for improvement to guide school-level actions.
The role of research in graduate education ASEAN 2015Carlo Magno
油
The document discusses ASEAN integration and its implications for education and research. Key points include:
- ASEAN aims to reduce development gaps within member states through initiatives focused on infrastructure, human resource development, and economic integration.
- Integration will allow for easier movement of educational services, materials, and professionals between ASEAN countries. It will also facilitate collaboration between researchers.
- Philippine graduates will need to prepare for an integrated ASEAN market by gaining international experience and perspectives. Research quality will need to improve to compete regionally through publications in abstracted journals and collaboration with foreign researchers.
Handout 6: SSE case study school (sample targets)Martin Brown
油
The document outlines literacy, numeracy, and key skills targets for students over three years. For literacy, targets include increasing oral presentation confidence, decreasing those who find reading boring, and improving writing standards. Numeracy targets are to increase liking of math, higher level math attempts, and competency in fractions/decimals. Key skills targets include increasing digital technology use to express opinions, demonstrating ability to make connections, and increasing higher order questioning use.
The document outlines an agenda for a seminar on school self-evaluation for post-primary school principals. The first session will introduce the guidelines and six step process for school self-evaluation. It will also have the principals reflect on where their own schools currently are in the process. The second session will demonstrate applying the process to literacy and focus on target setting. Overall, the seminar aims to help principals better understand and implement the school self-evaluation process.
Numeracy worked example 15th dec 2012 0Martin Brown
油
This document summarizes the findings of a school's self-evaluation of numeracy teaching and learning across subjects for first year students. Key findings include test results that show students' numeracy skills are below national norms. Students engage in learning but some areas need improvement like checking answers and explaining math concepts. Teachers are aware of numeracy's importance but collaboration with the math department and whole-school approaches could be better. Priorities for improvement include developing common math operations/language, creating a numeracy-rich environment, and increasing skills in areas like fractions.
Handout 4 SSE case study school (school improvement plan for literacy)Martin Brown
油
The 3-sentence summary is:
This school improvement plan for literacy outlines targets and actions from 2013 to 2016 to improve student engagement in learning and teaching approaches. Key areas of focus include increasing reading for enjoyment, developing skills for working in pairs and groups, improving attainment in state exams, and promoting self-assessment of written work. A variety of actions are proposed, such as establishing reading programs, providing staff training, incorporating literacy resources into student and teacher journals, and analyzing student work samples.
Design developmentally and culturally appropriate curricula and instructional units to improve equity and academic achievement for 21st. century learners.
An introduction-to-school-self-evaluation-of-teaching-and-learning-in-post-pr...Martin Brown
油
School self-evaluation (SSE) is a collaborative process where a school evaluates aspects of its work, particularly teaching and learning. It involves gathering evidence from sources like student outcomes and surveys. This evidence is then analyzed against evaluation criteria to identify strengths and areas for development. The school writes a self-evaluation report and improvement plan focusing on developing areas. The plan is implemented and monitored to improve teaching and learning in the school. SSE should involve all teachers and be led by the principal to enhance practice and benefit students.
The document describes Learning Force, an academic intervention program for math and reading. It provides flexible curriculum and resources to schools for supplemental education services, response to intervention programs, and tutoring. Learning Force uses research-based lessons, assessments to measure student growth, and support for teachers. It has demonstrated effectiveness through improved student test scores and high parent satisfaction rates.
The document provides an overview of the Los Angeles Unified School District's 2014-2015 Common Core Math 8 Curriculum Map. It introduces the curriculum map as a tool that organizes the math standards and provides resources for teachers. It describes the components of the curriculum map, including the standards, enduring understandings, essential questions, instructional strategies, assessments and differentiation approaches. It explains that the map is intended to be a flexible guide for teachers to select lessons and activities to meet the needs of their students, rather than a rigid pacing plan.
This document provides a summary of a presentation about supporting charter schools to serve increased numbers of students with disabilities. The presentation was given by Bob Farran, a consultant and former SELPA Director, and Christine Suh, Ed.D, the Executive Director of Program Development at DirectEd Specialized Services. Contact information is provided for Mihal Spiegel at DirectEd for those seeking more information. The presentation covers the history of charter schools and service delivery models, the continuum of service options available to support students with disabilities, and considerations for implementing expanded services at charter schools.
This document provides an agenda and background information for a virtual meeting as part of the TOWN 2013 Phase 2 numeracy initiative. The meeting will focus on continuous assessment, feedback strategies, and planning for sustainability of the program. Teachers are asked to complete tasks between meetings, including assessing students during a lesson, providing feedback on the lesson and assessment, and continuing to update student progress records. The next meeting will be on November 4th to discuss feedback from continuous assessments, implementing self-feedback activities, and completing tracking sheets and assessments for the program.
intended vs implemented vs achieved curriculumobemrosalia
油
The document discusses the intended, implemented, and achieved curriculum. It defines each type of curriculum: the intended curriculum refers to the objectives and goals set out at the beginning, the implemented curriculum consists of the learning activities and experiences provided to students, and the achieved curriculum reflects the learning outcomes based on evaluations of students' performance. The document also provides examples of how each type of curriculum could be assessed and compared.
This document provides an instructional plan for a course on budgeting and finance for young adults. The plan includes an assessment of needs, instructional goals and objectives, assessments, learner characteristics, delivery methods, resources, implementation timeline, and evaluation strategies. The course aims to teach students how to manage a household budget, open and use a bank account, and understand basic banking and financial concepts.
This ppt present literature on the meaning, purpose, and characteristics of continuous assessment, rational for adopting and implementing continuous assessment. It goes further to highlight problems of continuous assessment implementation, and present some guidelines of Planning and Organizing Continuous Assessment for more improved learning system.
Empowering Pre-Service & New Math Teachers to Use the Common Core Practice St...DreamBox Learning
油
How prepared are the K-12 teachers of tomorrow to inspire the next generation of young mathematicians? In this webinar for the edWeb.net Adaptive Math Learning community, attendees learned how essential it is for pre-service teachers to learn, develop, and model the Standards for Mathematical Practice to improve learning for their future students. Ben Braun, Associate Professor of Mathematics at the University of Kentucky, and Tim Hudson, Senior Director of Curriculum Design at DreamBox Learning, discussed ways to ensure that pre-service teachers start their careers understanding how mathematical proficiency requires more than simply content knowledge. Tim and Ben shared ideas for K-12 school leaders and mentor teachers who are responsible for new teacher induction, as well as, implications for college and university faculty teaching both math methods and content courses. They also discussed potential disconnects between pre-service content and methods courses and also eventual in-service expectations, while providing examples of math problems to engage pre-service and new teachers. View the webinar to better understand how to use the Standards for Mathematical Practice.
The six levels were: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. (The taxonomy's levels were later revised as remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, revising, and creating.)
This document outlines a framework for ensuring strategic coherence in education. It emphasizes aligning goals, measures of success, and practices at the district, school, and teacher levels to support student learning. The district identifies high-leverage student skills and measures of success. Schools then set goals aligned with the district's, and teachers create student learning objectives and professional goals tied to the school's. Measures and practices at each level are also aligned upward from teachers to schools to the district to ensure coherence across the system.
This document outlines Keith Elementary School's plan to improve students' mathematical problem solving proficiency through continuous improvement efforts from 2012 to 2015. The plan focuses on developing students' ability to make connections in math problems. Initial data analysis identified connections as an area of weakness. Steps taken include setting a SMART goal, implementing formative assessment practices like using learning targets and feedback, and providing targeted instruction with resources like problem-solving lessons and math notebooks. Analysis of benchmark, MEAP, and other test data shows progress towards the goal, with mathematical proficiency increasing across grades and subgroups over the two-year period.
The document provides information about school self-evaluation and assessment in Ireland, including:
1. Schools are required to engage in self-evaluation, implement 3-year improvement plans focused on literacy and numeracy, and use assessment data to identify targets.
2. Standardized test scores and report cards from primary school will be transferred to post-primary schools to monitor student progress in reading, math, and other subjects.
3. Test results are reported using STEN, standard, and percentile scores to indicate performance levels and are one part of evaluating student learning alongside teacher observations.
Pdf final october 15th school improvement seminarclairematthews
油
This document outlines an agenda for a seminar on improving literacy through the school self-evaluation (SSE) process. The seminar will explore literacy in a broad sense and how schools can use data analysis and the six steps of SSE to develop improvement plans and monitor progress in literacy. Participants will learn strategies for oral language, reading, writing and vocabulary instruction and how to establish a whole-school approach to literacy.
The six-step school self-evaluation process involves gathering evidence, analyzing it using evaluation criteria, drawing conclusions by benchmarking against quality statements, producing a self-evaluation report, creating an improvement plan with targets and actions, and implementing and monitoring the plan. Key steps include collecting data from various tools, analyzing the data on themes of teaching and learning, learners' outcomes and experience, and teachers' practice, and using the analysis to identify strengths and areas for improvement to guide school-level actions.
The role of research in graduate education ASEAN 2015Carlo Magno
油
The document discusses ASEAN integration and its implications for education and research. Key points include:
- ASEAN aims to reduce development gaps within member states through initiatives focused on infrastructure, human resource development, and economic integration.
- Integration will allow for easier movement of educational services, materials, and professionals between ASEAN countries. It will also facilitate collaboration between researchers.
- Philippine graduates will need to prepare for an integrated ASEAN market by gaining international experience and perspectives. Research quality will need to improve to compete regionally through publications in abstracted journals and collaboration with foreign researchers.
Handout 6: SSE case study school (sample targets)Martin Brown
油
The document outlines literacy, numeracy, and key skills targets for students over three years. For literacy, targets include increasing oral presentation confidence, decreasing those who find reading boring, and improving writing standards. Numeracy targets are to increase liking of math, higher level math attempts, and competency in fractions/decimals. Key skills targets include increasing digital technology use to express opinions, demonstrating ability to make connections, and increasing higher order questioning use.
The document outlines an agenda for a seminar on school self-evaluation for post-primary school principals. The first session will introduce the guidelines and six step process for school self-evaluation. It will also have the principals reflect on where their own schools currently are in the process. The second session will demonstrate applying the process to literacy and focus on target setting. Overall, the seminar aims to help principals better understand and implement the school self-evaluation process.
Numeracy worked example 15th dec 2012 0Martin Brown
油
This document summarizes the findings of a school's self-evaluation of numeracy teaching and learning across subjects for first year students. Key findings include test results that show students' numeracy skills are below national norms. Students engage in learning but some areas need improvement like checking answers and explaining math concepts. Teachers are aware of numeracy's importance but collaboration with the math department and whole-school approaches could be better. Priorities for improvement include developing common math operations/language, creating a numeracy-rich environment, and increasing skills in areas like fractions.
Handout 4 SSE case study school (school improvement plan for literacy)Martin Brown
油
The 3-sentence summary is:
This school improvement plan for literacy outlines targets and actions from 2013 to 2016 to improve student engagement in learning and teaching approaches. Key areas of focus include increasing reading for enjoyment, developing skills for working in pairs and groups, improving attainment in state exams, and promoting self-assessment of written work. A variety of actions are proposed, such as establishing reading programs, providing staff training, incorporating literacy resources into student and teacher journals, and analyzing student work samples.
Design developmentally and culturally appropriate curricula and instructional units to improve equity and academic achievement for 21st. century learners.
An introduction-to-school-self-evaluation-of-teaching-and-learning-in-post-pr...Martin Brown
油
School self-evaluation (SSE) is a collaborative process where a school evaluates aspects of its work, particularly teaching and learning. It involves gathering evidence from sources like student outcomes and surveys. This evidence is then analyzed against evaluation criteria to identify strengths and areas for development. The school writes a self-evaluation report and improvement plan focusing on developing areas. The plan is implemented and monitored to improve teaching and learning in the school. SSE should involve all teachers and be led by the principal to enhance practice and benefit students.
The document describes Learning Force, an academic intervention program for math and reading. It provides flexible curriculum and resources to schools for supplemental education services, response to intervention programs, and tutoring. Learning Force uses research-based lessons, assessments to measure student growth, and support for teachers. It has demonstrated effectiveness through improved student test scores and high parent satisfaction rates.
The document provides an overview of the Los Angeles Unified School District's 2014-2015 Common Core Math 8 Curriculum Map. It introduces the curriculum map as a tool that organizes the math standards and provides resources for teachers. It describes the components of the curriculum map, including the standards, enduring understandings, essential questions, instructional strategies, assessments and differentiation approaches. It explains that the map is intended to be a flexible guide for teachers to select lessons and activities to meet the needs of their students, rather than a rigid pacing plan.
This document provides a summary of a presentation about supporting charter schools to serve increased numbers of students with disabilities. The presentation was given by Bob Farran, a consultant and former SELPA Director, and Christine Suh, Ed.D, the Executive Director of Program Development at DirectEd Specialized Services. Contact information is provided for Mihal Spiegel at DirectEd for those seeking more information. The presentation covers the history of charter schools and service delivery models, the continuum of service options available to support students with disabilities, and considerations for implementing expanded services at charter schools.
This document provides an agenda and background information for a virtual meeting as part of the TOWN 2013 Phase 2 numeracy initiative. The meeting will focus on continuous assessment, feedback strategies, and planning for sustainability of the program. Teachers are asked to complete tasks between meetings, including assessing students during a lesson, providing feedback on the lesson and assessment, and continuing to update student progress records. The next meeting will be on November 4th to discuss feedback from continuous assessments, implementing self-feedback activities, and completing tracking sheets and assessments for the program.
intended vs implemented vs achieved curriculumobemrosalia
油
The document discusses the intended, implemented, and achieved curriculum. It defines each type of curriculum: the intended curriculum refers to the objectives and goals set out at the beginning, the implemented curriculum consists of the learning activities and experiences provided to students, and the achieved curriculum reflects the learning outcomes based on evaluations of students' performance. The document also provides examples of how each type of curriculum could be assessed and compared.
This document provides an instructional plan for a course on budgeting and finance for young adults. The plan includes an assessment of needs, instructional goals and objectives, assessments, learner characteristics, delivery methods, resources, implementation timeline, and evaluation strategies. The course aims to teach students how to manage a household budget, open and use a bank account, and understand basic banking and financial concepts.
This ppt present literature on the meaning, purpose, and characteristics of continuous assessment, rational for adopting and implementing continuous assessment. It goes further to highlight problems of continuous assessment implementation, and present some guidelines of Planning and Organizing Continuous Assessment for more improved learning system.
Empowering Pre-Service & New Math Teachers to Use the Common Core Practice St...DreamBox Learning
油
How prepared are the K-12 teachers of tomorrow to inspire the next generation of young mathematicians? In this webinar for the edWeb.net Adaptive Math Learning community, attendees learned how essential it is for pre-service teachers to learn, develop, and model the Standards for Mathematical Practice to improve learning for their future students. Ben Braun, Associate Professor of Mathematics at the University of Kentucky, and Tim Hudson, Senior Director of Curriculum Design at DreamBox Learning, discussed ways to ensure that pre-service teachers start their careers understanding how mathematical proficiency requires more than simply content knowledge. Tim and Ben shared ideas for K-12 school leaders and mentor teachers who are responsible for new teacher induction, as well as, implications for college and university faculty teaching both math methods and content courses. They also discussed potential disconnects between pre-service content and methods courses and also eventual in-service expectations, while providing examples of math problems to engage pre-service and new teachers. View the webinar to better understand how to use the Standards for Mathematical Practice.
The six levels were: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. (The taxonomy's levels were later revised as remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, revising, and creating.)
This document outlines a framework for ensuring strategic coherence in education. It emphasizes aligning goals, measures of success, and practices at the district, school, and teacher levels to support student learning. The district identifies high-leverage student skills and measures of success. Schools then set goals aligned with the district's, and teachers create student learning objectives and professional goals tied to the school's. Measures and practices at each level are also aligned upward from teachers to schools to the district to ensure coherence across the system.
This document discusses classroom-based assessment tools. It defines classroom assessment as a process of identifying, gathering, organizing and interpreting information about what learners know and can do. The document lists different types of assessment tools used in the classroom, including quizzes, tests, essays, demonstrations, presentations, and performance-based assessments. It distinguishes between formative and summative assessment, noting that formative assessment is used to help students improve their learning, while summative assessment occurs at the end of a learning period to measure student achievement. The key goal of assessment is to use the information gathered to provide remediation, enrichment, or reinforcement activities to help students perform better.
The document provides an overview of the Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) used to evaluate teachers in Georgia. TKES uses 3 components to generate a Teacher Effectiveness Measure: professional growth (20%), teacher assessment on 10 performance standards (50%), and student growth (30%). Teachers of tested subjects use Student Growth Percentiles while other teachers use LEA Determined Measures. The document reviews the TKES process, components, performance standards, and teacher responsibilities for goal-setting and evaluation conferences.
The document outlines monitoring processes and plans for a school district. It discusses implementing plans to help subgroups not making adequate yearly progress. It describes monitoring implementation of school improvement plans and targeted professional growth plans for teachers. It provides checklists for differentiated accountability requirements. It lists action steps and responsibilities for school-based reading, math, and science coaches to monitor data, provide professional development and support, and ensure alignment with district and state initiatives.
The document discusses the Piedmont K-5 school district's adoption of the Everyday Mathematics program for their elementary math curriculum. It provides an overview of the goals and philosophy for K-5 mathematics, as well as the criteria and review process used to select the new program. Key aspects of the Everyday Mathematics program are outlined, including its emphasis on conceptual understanding, balanced instruction, and differentiation strategies.
Introduction to Designing Assessment Plans Workshop 1Lisa M. Snyder
油
At the completion of this workshop, participants will be able to:
Identify the components of an assessment plan and explain to colleagues the purpose and process of assessment
Write observable, measurable learning outcomes for their program
Draft a curriculum map that identifies specific courses where program learning outcomes are addressed
Develop a plan, including a timeline, to gather, analyze, and interpret assessment data
This document outlines the agenda and key aspects of a school self-evaluation (SSE) in-service for post-primary school leaders. The in-service will cover the six steps of the SSE process and link initiatives to improve student learning outcomes. Attendees will learn about gathering and analyzing evidence from teachers, students and tests, drawing conclusions, and drafting the SSE report and school improvement plan. The document emphasizes that SSE is a reflective, collaborative process aimed at continuously improving student learning. It also provides resources and support for schools from the Professional Development Service for Teachers.
The document outlines the 2010 Secondary Education Curriculum for Mathematics in the Philippines. It discusses the conceptual framework, which focuses on developing core competencies like problem solving, communicating mathematically, reasoning mathematically, and making connections through representations. It describes the three-stage curriculum design process and the refinement of standards, assessments, and learning plans based on feedback from stakeholders and pilot testing. Key features of the lean yet rich curriculum include an emphasis on essential understandings, high performance standards, and developing students' multiple intelligences through special programs in areas like arts, sports, journalism, science, and vocational education.
This document provides guidance on using the six step school self-evaluation process to evaluate an aspect of teaching and learning in the new Junior Cycle. It emphasizes that school self-evaluation is about improving learner outcomes through an inclusive, reflective, collaborative process. Key dates related to school self-evaluation and the Junior Cycle are provided. Resources for supporting the school self-evaluation process, including PDST seminars, workshops and school supports, are also listed.
This document summarizes key concepts about proportional reasoning. It defines proportional reasoning as a mathematical relationship between two quantities that involves a constant multiplicative relationship. It discusses proportional reasoning as developing between concrete and formal operations. It also provides examples of using proportional relationships to solve problems and discusses research on how to best teach proportional reasoning concepts to students.
Unit 6 presentation base ten equality form of a number with trainer notes 7.9.08jcsmathfoundations
油
The document discusses concepts related to base ten, equality, and forms of numbers. It defines these concepts, examines how students develop an understanding through research on cognitive development, and provides classroom applications and strategies for teaching these concepts effectively. Diagnostic questions are presented to assess student understanding, and examples show how to respond to common student errors or misconceptions in working with numbers.
Presentation 5 quantity magnitude and numeration january 2jcsmathfoundations
油
1. The document provides information about teaching quantity, magnitude, and numeration to students. It includes definitions of key concepts, early indicators of difficulties with these topics, and assessments to diagnose students' skills.
2. The research section discusses concrete, representational, and abstract approaches to teaching concepts like subitizing. It recommends hands-on materials and strategies to develop number sense.
3. The classroom application section gives examples of linking physical quantities to numerical representations using tools like number lines and algebra blocks.
The document discusses the importance of using the "Components of Number Sense" to connect math lessons and build students' understanding. It lists the components as Quantity and Magnitude, Numeration, Equality, Base Ten, Form of a Number, Proportional Reasoning, Algebraic and Geometric Thinking. Examples are given showing how story problems can be used to teach the components. The document emphasizes using language to develop mathematical understanding and representing problems visually and symbolically.
1. The document discusses using the "Components of Number Sense" framework to connect math lessons and build students' understanding of mathematical concepts.
2. It explains how the Components of Number Sense align with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards and help teachers teach the standards more effectively.
3. The Components of Number Sense include quantity and magnitude, numeration, equality, base ten, form of a number, proportional reasoning, and algebraic and geometric thinking.
1. The document discusses using the "Components of Number Sense" framework to connect math lessons and build students' understanding of mathematical concepts.
2. It explains how the Components of Number Sense align with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards and help teachers effectively teach the standard domains like number and operations.
3. The Components of Number Sense include concepts like quantity, numeration, equality, proportional reasoning, and others that can be incorporated into math lessons.
The document discusses differences between how American and Chinese teachers approach teaching elementary math concepts. It analyzes teacher responses to sample math problems involving subtraction, multiplication, and division of fractions. American teachers tended to focus on procedures and memorization, while Chinese teachers emphasized mathematical structure and developing conceptual understanding. The document advocates for teaching math in a way that builds students' number sense and understanding of mathematical concepts and properties.
- The document discusses research on mathematics education in the United States, finding that only about a third of students are proficient in math based on national assessments. It also discusses research showing US students performing poorly compared to other nations.
- The research emphasizes the need for a well-designed curriculum, quality teacher preparation, and explicitly teaching concepts and making connections to help students succeed in algebra and beyond. It discusses characteristics of students with learning difficulties in math.
- The document provides an overview of effective teaching practices informed by research, including concrete-representational-abstract instruction, explicit teaching, sequencing skills appropriately, and providing cumulative practice and review.
1. Math Instruction Foundation Training: Research to Practice Text: Liping Ma Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics James Royer Ed. Mathematical Cognition (Recommended)
2. Unit 1: Foundations of Mathematics Purpose and Overview of the Course Selection of Mathematics Programs Components of Effective Implementation http://www.ncsip.org
3. NCSIP II: Purpose North Carolina State Improvement Project (NCSIP II) works to significantly improve the performance and success of students with disabilities in North Carolina . Do not duplicate or alter without permission of NC SIP
4. NCSIP Personnel Development Process Workshops Content Foundations Model Training Tasks/Skills Student Progress Evaluation Research- Based Practices Reading Writing Mathematics On-site Fidelity Observations 3 per year On-site Program Reviews Annually Review Research Literature Identify Instructional Principles Content Topical Outline Training Strategies/ Tasks Instruction Programs Develop- mental Reviews Analysis & Formal Feedback Trained Observers Feedback & Coaching Evaluation & Reporting OSEP Long-Term Performance Indicators AYP Student Characteristics Project Characteristics
5. Purpose Of Course NCSIPs course will provide you with an understanding of the instructional principles derived from scientific-based research and a solid foundation of knowledge and skills to begin using research-proven teaching strategies with students with disabilities who have persistent mathematical problems.
6. Why Does The Course Matter? Effective teachers are the only absolutely essential element for an effective school. Allington & Cunningham, 1996
7. Why Does The Course Matter? Research has borne out that the key factor in students achievement is the quality of teaching... Teachers are central to the process of education, assessing students progress, selecting and using a variety of approaches and materials, and organizing for instruction. Braunger & Lewis, 1999
8. Course Goals To develop participant understanding of basic principles of effective teaching and how they apply to instruction in the math content area To increase participant understanding of the importance of language with mathematics instruction for all children
9. Course Goals (contd) To increase participant understanding of math difficulties and of how to help struggling math students To provide opportunity and develop skills of participant to review, discuss, and make sound judgments about research, instructional practices, and materials
10. Course Topics Overview of Research Demystifying Math Components of Number Sense Quantity/Magnitude & Numeration Reflection Equality , Base Ten, & Form of a Number Proportional Reasoning & Algebraic and Geometric Thinking Assessment Connections
11. Requirements For Level I Foundation Training Level 1 participation earns 4.0 CEU credits. Requirements include : Research agreement to use data from pre and post tests. Participation in all workshops. Study online reading and respond to discussion questions appointed for Level 1 training. Completion of all learning tasks appointed for Level 1 training. In-class participation in group tasks.
12. Requirements For Level 2 Level 2 participation earns 3 additional CEU credits and also qualifies participant to enter training to become a foundation trainer. Requirements include : All of the requirements of Level I. Discussion questions and Learning Tasks appointed for Level 2 training. Complete the entire training twice. Shadow or team train in your first training with a satisfactory evaluation by a master trainer (observation on 3 of 5 training days). Performance on post training Math assessment that demonstrates 80% accuracy.
13. Course Benefits For You And Students For You: CEU Requirements for License Renewal Teaching of Mathematics Standards for the New Special Education General Curriculum License For Students: Your teaching skills will translate into higher levels of mathematics performance for students with disabilities enrolled in the standard curriculum.
14. Getting to Know You Do you teach Middle or High School? How many years have you been teaching? What percentage of your students struggle in math? Why are you here?
15. Unit 1: Foundations of Mathematics Purpose and Overview of Course Selection of Mathematics Programs Components of Effective Implementation
16. Questions To Answer About Mathematics Programs Is it scientifically research-based? Does it contain multisensory strategies? Does it include systematic, explicit and direct instruction? Does it give attention to understanding fundamental operations with number? Does it provide teacher support for working with students at different levels? Does it include organized on-going assessments?
17. Other Questions To Ask About Mathematics Programs Is training and/or mentorship required for the program? Is there a cost for student and teacher materials and/or the training? Is there software and on-line support? Does the program contain placement tests? Are there benchmark assessments to use at various points in the program?
18. Middle School Math Resources Holt Text Book Math Notebooks Remedial Warm-ups Transitional Mathematics Super Source Teaching Student Centered Math Algebra Ready Algebra 1 Rescue
19. Examples of Research-Based Math Programs used in NC: Transitional Mathematics Number Worlds Voyages-Excursion Note: This is not an exhaustive list.
20. Transitional Math Teaches fewer topics in greater depth Provides numerous visual representations to help conceptualize the mathematics Meets individual student needs Provides a logical sequence, ample practice, and an appropriate pace Aligns with National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards Ensures accurate placement and progress monitoring Provides a solid alternative to basal curricula Supports teachers with ongoing professional development Provides a balance between procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding Source: Sopris West, Transitional Math Link: http://store.cambiumlearning.com/ProgramPage.aspx?parentId =019005298&functionID=009000008&pID=Transitional%20Mathematics&site= sw
21. Statesville Middle School and TRANSITIONAL MATH Heavily cited by the National Math Panel, TransMath is specifically designed for upper elementary or middle school students who score at or below the 40th percentile on national math tests. An EC initiated pilot program in its second year
22. TransMath Model at SMS Implemented as a co-teaching model utilizing a general ed math teacher and an EC teacher Class sizes limited to 15-20 students including EOG level 1 & 2 students and EC math inclusion students Both teachers are now Foundations of Math trained as well as TransMath trained
23. SMS EOG Growth for TransMath Students from 07-08 Math EOG to 08-09 Math EOG in 6th, 7th, and 8 th grades 6 th Grade Growth 8.1 7 th Grade Growth 9 8 th Grade Growth 13.6 TransMath EOG Proficiency from 07-08 to 08-09 SMS TRANSMATH DATA
24. Websites For Program and Assessment Information http://ncsip.org (SIP site) www.nrcld.org (National Research Center for Learning Disabilities) www.interventioncentral.org (Intervention Central) http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/ (Research to Practice) http://www.whatworks.ed.gov (What Works) http://www.studentprogress.org (National Center on Student Progress Monitoring) http://www.aimsweb.com (Progress Monitoring & RTI)
26. Factors In Sustained Use Of Research-Based Mathematics Programs A deliberate and realistic plan An understanding of the rationale of the program A support systems in place Sufficient administrative support An explicit link between assessment data and changes in instruction
27. Developing An Implementation Plan Who? What? How? Target students Identification process Assessment tools and areas to assess Data collection and Analysis
28. Developing An Implementation Plan What and How? Select research-based Math programs Provide training for teachers Group students based on assessments Determine intensity and duration of instruction Staff support and program fidelity
29. Reform by the Book Why have curriculum materials played an uneven role in teacher practice? What are the influences that teachers have in enacting the curriculum? What contributions might curriculum materials make in enacting the curriculum? What are some considerations with regard to curriculum materials?
30. Unit 1: Foundations of Mathematics Purpose and Overview of Course Selection of Mathematics Programs Components of Effective Implementation
31. Developing An Implementation Plan How do we know it works? Frequent assessment of students Assessment drives instruction Formal review process of student progress and program effectiveness Strong leadership and commitment of all involved
32. To Be Effective, Instruction For Students With Reading Difficulties, Must Be more intensive, more relentless, more precisely delivered, more highly structured and direct, and more carefully monitored for procedural fidelity. Ken Kavale, 1996
33. To Be Effective, You Must: Know your stuff, Know who youre stuffing, Know why youre stuffing, Stuff every minute of every lesson.
34. The North Carolina State Improvement Project THANKS YOU for your time and support. Questions: 919-843-5037 [email_address] www.ncsip.org