際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Using forest inventory data to
assess exposure of U.S. forest
land to nearby disturbances and
land-use change
Jennifer Costanza
Karen Schleeweis, Kurt Riitters
April 12, 2021
Disturbances nearby add pressure to forests
Mike Lewelling, forest-atlas.fs.fed.us
Sam Beebe, Flickr Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Francis Eatherington, forest-atlas.fs.fed.us
Disturbances to U.S. Forests and Rangelands
 How much disturbance and land-use change have
forests in the conterminous U.S. been exposed to?
 A spatial neighborhood approach
 How does exposure vary by forest type group
(broad vegetation type), ownership, and
protection status?
Tuesday: T-11, Landscape Change
Kurt Riitters: Forest gain and loss in a
shifting landscape mosaic
FIA: inventory of forest land to support
estimation
Forest plots across the
conterminous US
FIA
database
Area expansion factor
Allows stratification by:
 Forest type group
 Ownership
 Protection status
Disturbance and land-use change
Schleeweis et al. 2020
doi: 10.3390/f11060653
https://daac.ornl.gov
Land-use change
2001-2011 (NLCD)
Conversion to agricultural land use
Conversion to urban land use
Removals
Fire
Stress
Stable forest
https://www.mrlc.gov
Forest canopy disturbances
2001-2010 (NAFD-ATT)
Linking plots and pixels via a neighborhood
Area expansion factor
 Forest type group
 Ownership
 Protection status
Inventory
147,000 plots, circa 2013
Canopy disturbance
and land-use change
2001-2010
Exposure of forest land to
disturbance or increases in ag or
urban land use within a 4.4-ha
neighborhood
7x7 window
Neighborhood
Exposure of all U.S. forest land to disturbance
and land-use change, 2001-2010
*Categories are
not mutually
exclusive
Who owns forest land that was exposed to
disturbance?
Private ownership
Public ownership
23%
80% 72%
15% 7%
What is the protection status of forest land
that was exposed to disturbance?
FIA forest type groups: broad forest types
East
West
Exposure by forest type group
Western US Eastern US
Most
common
Least
common
Most
common
Least
common
Removal
Stress
Fire
Exposure by forest type group
Private ownership
Public ownership
Western US Eastern US
Most
common
Least
common
Most
common
Least
common
Exposure to multiple disturbances
Private ownership
Public ownership
Western US
Most
common
Least
common
Fire
Stress
Removal
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0
13% of forest had exposure to
co-occurring disturbances, 2001-2010
Proportion
of
Douglas-fir
forest
Exposure to multiple disturbances
Private ownership
Public ownership
Eastern US
Most
common
Least
common
Removal
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
Proportion
of
Longleaf
/
slash
pine
forest
Ag. Or dev.
Stress
Fire
15% of forest had exposure to co-occurring disturbances
or land-use change, 2001-2010
Conclusions
 Benefits of the neighborhood approach
 Leverage the strengths of inventory and raster maps
 Develop consistent metrics across the U.S.
 Can be used for monitoring multiple disturbances over time
 Should be a first filter and prompt a deeper look at sensitivities,
vulnerability, conservation, and management actions
 Sets the stage for further analysis and insights: link with other
attributes from the FIA inventory
 Additional stratification
 Statistical estimation of effects of exposure to disturbance
Thanks!
Contact me:
jennifer.Costanza@usda.gov
Karen Schleeweis
Kurt Riitters

More Related Content

Using forest inventory data to assess exposure of U.S. forest land to nearby disturbances and land-use change

  • 1. Using forest inventory data to assess exposure of U.S. forest land to nearby disturbances and land-use change Jennifer Costanza Karen Schleeweis, Kurt Riitters April 12, 2021
  • 2. Disturbances nearby add pressure to forests Mike Lewelling, forest-atlas.fs.fed.us Sam Beebe, Flickr Fort Bragg, North Carolina Francis Eatherington, forest-atlas.fs.fed.us
  • 3. Disturbances to U.S. Forests and Rangelands How much disturbance and land-use change have forests in the conterminous U.S. been exposed to? A spatial neighborhood approach How does exposure vary by forest type group (broad vegetation type), ownership, and protection status? Tuesday: T-11, Landscape Change Kurt Riitters: Forest gain and loss in a shifting landscape mosaic
  • 4. FIA: inventory of forest land to support estimation Forest plots across the conterminous US FIA database Area expansion factor Allows stratification by: Forest type group Ownership Protection status
  • 5. Disturbance and land-use change Schleeweis et al. 2020 doi: 10.3390/f11060653 https://daac.ornl.gov Land-use change 2001-2011 (NLCD) Conversion to agricultural land use Conversion to urban land use Removals Fire Stress Stable forest https://www.mrlc.gov Forest canopy disturbances 2001-2010 (NAFD-ATT)
  • 6. Linking plots and pixels via a neighborhood Area expansion factor Forest type group Ownership Protection status Inventory 147,000 plots, circa 2013 Canopy disturbance and land-use change 2001-2010 Exposure of forest land to disturbance or increases in ag or urban land use within a 4.4-ha neighborhood 7x7 window Neighborhood
  • 7. Exposure of all U.S. forest land to disturbance and land-use change, 2001-2010 *Categories are not mutually exclusive
  • 8. Who owns forest land that was exposed to disturbance? Private ownership Public ownership 23% 80% 72% 15% 7%
  • 9. What is the protection status of forest land that was exposed to disturbance?
  • 10. FIA forest type groups: broad forest types East West
  • 11. Exposure by forest type group Western US Eastern US Most common Least common Most common Least common Removal Stress Fire
  • 12. Exposure by forest type group Private ownership Public ownership Western US Eastern US Most common Least common Most common Least common
  • 13. Exposure to multiple disturbances Private ownership Public ownership Western US Most common Least common Fire Stress Removal 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0 13% of forest had exposure to co-occurring disturbances, 2001-2010 Proportion of Douglas-fir forest
  • 14. Exposure to multiple disturbances Private ownership Public ownership Eastern US Most common Least common Removal 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 Proportion of Longleaf / slash pine forest Ag. Or dev. Stress Fire 15% of forest had exposure to co-occurring disturbances or land-use change, 2001-2010
  • 15. Conclusions Benefits of the neighborhood approach Leverage the strengths of inventory and raster maps Develop consistent metrics across the U.S. Can be used for monitoring multiple disturbances over time Should be a first filter and prompt a deeper look at sensitivities, vulnerability, conservation, and management actions Sets the stage for further analysis and insights: link with other attributes from the FIA inventory Additional stratification Statistical estimation of effects of exposure to disturbance