際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Utilitarianism
The greatest happiness for the greatest number
Basic statements
 Happiness is the only thing that is good in itself
 It is moral to sacrifice ones desires to help the greatest number
happiness.
 Democracy?
Quantitative Utilitarianism
 Jeremy Bentham
 Hedonic calculus
 Its intensity
 Its duration
 Its certainty or uncertainty
 Its nearness or remoteness how wide
ranging is it?
 Its ability to continue. How continuous is
the pleasure?
 Its purity  the chance it has of not
producing the opposite .
 Who is affected by it?
Qualitative Utilitarianism
 John Stuart Mill 1806  1873
 Mill rejected Benthams use of the
Hedonic Calculus. In his view some
pleasures are of a higher quality than
others.
 higher pleasures  intellectual
But pleasures of the body are lower
pleasures  appetite.
Situation Ethics
All you need is love
Basic Statements
 It is moral to set aside a rule if we have a good reason for
doing so.
 Ethical decisions should follow flexible guidelines rather than
absolute rules, and be taken on a case by case basis.
 Only one thing is intrinsically good: love.
 Doing good is a matter of acting in love. All we need is love.
A christian approach
 Joseph Fletcher (1905-1991)
 Moral judgments are decisions, not conclusions
 Only one thing is intrinsically good, namely,
love: nothing else
 Love "wills the neighbour's good" [desires the
best for our neighbour] whether we like them
or not
 Love and justice are the same, for justice is love
distributed
 The rightness depends on many factors
 Love as agape
 Rules are not to guide but to illuminate.
Essay
 Is it OK to approve same-sex marriage and stem cell studies?
 According to your answer, do you consider yourself a
utilitarian/situational ethicists?

More Related Content

Utilitarianism

  • 1. Utilitarianism The greatest happiness for the greatest number
  • 2. Basic statements Happiness is the only thing that is good in itself It is moral to sacrifice ones desires to help the greatest number happiness. Democracy?
  • 3. Quantitative Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham Hedonic calculus Its intensity Its duration Its certainty or uncertainty Its nearness or remoteness how wide ranging is it? Its ability to continue. How continuous is the pleasure? Its purity the chance it has of not producing the opposite . Who is affected by it?
  • 4. Qualitative Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill 1806 1873 Mill rejected Benthams use of the Hedonic Calculus. In his view some pleasures are of a higher quality than others. higher pleasures intellectual But pleasures of the body are lower pleasures appetite.
  • 6. Basic Statements It is moral to set aside a rule if we have a good reason for doing so. Ethical decisions should follow flexible guidelines rather than absolute rules, and be taken on a case by case basis. Only one thing is intrinsically good: love. Doing good is a matter of acting in love. All we need is love.
  • 7. A christian approach Joseph Fletcher (1905-1991) Moral judgments are decisions, not conclusions Only one thing is intrinsically good, namely, love: nothing else Love "wills the neighbour's good" [desires the best for our neighbour] whether we like them or not Love and justice are the same, for justice is love distributed The rightness depends on many factors Love as agape Rules are not to guide but to illuminate.
  • 8. Essay Is it OK to approve same-sex marriage and stem cell studies? According to your answer, do you consider yourself a utilitarian/situational ethicists?