The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process but differ in their number of phases and evaluation approach. The ADDIE model is linear with 5 phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation. Dick & Carey has 10 iterative phases and evaluates throughout. While ADDIE is flexible, it does not accommodate user creativity well. Dick & Carey requires clear learning objectives but its components cannot be omitted from the process.
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. Both models are process oriented and goal oriented, focusing on learner needs and utilizing assessments. The main differences are that ADDIE has 5 linear steps with evaluation at the end, while Dick and Carey has 10 interactive steps with ongoing evaluation. ADDIE is more flexible across industries, while Dick and Carey is best for educational settings. Each model offers advantages like structured approaches, but also challenges like time consumption.
The document compares the ADDIE model and the Dick & Carey model in instructional design, outlining their characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. The ADDIE model, developed in the 1970s, consists of five phases and is flexible but can be inefficient, while the Dick & Carey model, created in 1978, includes ten components and is comprehensive yet requires mastery of each step. Both models emphasize the importance of understanding learner needs and establishing clear learning objectives to facilitate effective instructional design.
The ADDIE model is a five stage instructional design process that includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model is a ten step process that includes identifying goals, analyzing learners, designing objectives and assessments, developing and producing instructions, and conducting formative and summative evaluations to revise lessons based on collected data. Both models focus on establishing goals and objectives and aligning instructional strategies based on analysis of learners and ongoing evaluation.
A comparison and contrast between the addie and dick and careyLaura Delaney
?
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey models of instructional design, highlighting their structures, similarities, and differences. ADDIE consists of five stages and is commonly used in business, focusing on end evaluation, while Dick and Carey has ten steps, is prevalent in higher education, and incorporates evaluation throughout the process. Both models emphasize systematic design and the importance of formative and summative assessments, though they differ in flexibility and approach.
The document compares and contrasts two popular instructional design models: ADDIE and Dick and Carey. The ADDIE model follows a linear process consisting of five phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate, while the Dick and Carey model is more collaborative, emphasizing interconnected phases that focus on instructional goals and learner needs. Both models have their advantages and disadvantages, with ADDIE being structured and straightforward, while Dick and Carey is holistic but can be more time-consuming.
The document discusses key aspects of instructional design including:
1. It outlines various instructional design models such as ADDIE, Dick and Carey, and Understanding by Design that provide frameworks for developing effective instruction.
2. Core components of instructional design models are identified as needs analysis, defining objectives, designing instructional strategies, and evaluating outcomes.
3. Effective instructional design considers learner characteristics, ties content to learner experiences, and builds positive expectations for success.
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and Dick & Carey model for instructional design. The ADDIE model consists of 5 phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick & Carey model has 10 phases and promotes a systems view of instruction. Both models focus on input, output, and the process of designing curriculum. The key differences are that ADDIE has 5 phases and is more flexible, while Dick & Carey has 10 detailed and straightforward phases and includes formative and summative evaluations.
The document compares two instructional design models: ADDIE and Dick & Carey. ADDIE includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation phases. Dick & Carey includes recognizing goals, analyzing learners/contexts, writing objectives, developing assessments/instructional strategies/materials, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models identify problems, work through steps, and conclude with evaluation. They focus on learner performance and allow for reliable outcome measurements. The key difference is that Dick & Carey has more detailed steps and incorporates evaluation throughout, while ADDIE evaluates only at the end.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. Both models establish learning objectives aligned to assessment and design objectives to meet learning levels. However, the ADDIE model focuses on meeting organizational goals through skill development, while the Dick and Carey model emphasizes needs assessment and theoretical learning principles. The Dick and Carey model incorporates learner-centered activities and comprehensive evaluation.
ADDIE vs Dick and Carey Model - 狠狠撸share.pptxJamielRivero1
?
The document discusses two instructional design models: ADDIE and Dick and Carey. ADDIE consists of 5 linear phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate. Dick and Carey is a 10 step iterative model that views instructional design from a systems perspective, with evaluation occurring at every stage. Both models provide structured approaches but ADDIE is more flexible while Dick and Carey is more rigorous and comprehensive. The key is choosing the model best suited to the timeframe, audience and organizational culture.
Both the ADDIE and CAREY models are instructional design models that help organize the process of developing instruction. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-phase model (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) while the CAREY model has 10 iterative phases and includes more detailed analysis. Both models focus on input, output, and the design process as a system. The key difference is that ADDIE is more linear while CAREY is more iterative and includes ongoing evaluation between phases.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick & Carey model. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-stage process developed in 1975, while the Dick & Carey model from 1978 is iterative with 10 stages and is more detailed. Both follow a systems approach and use evaluation, but the Dick & Carey model incorporates formative evaluation at multiple points while ADDIE only has summative evaluation at the end. The ADDIE model is simpler and faster but less flexible, while the Dick & Carey model allows for more revision and flexibility. In conclusion, both models are effective tools for instructional design despite their differences.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is linear and comprises five stages (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation), while the Dick and Carey model has 10 iterative stages and incorporates evaluation throughout. Both provide frameworks for designing effective training, but the Dick and Carey model is more detailed and flexible for experienced designers, while ADDIE is more commonly used and structured.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: ADDIE and the Dick and Carey model. Both models follow a systematic approach of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the Dick and Carey model has more detailed steps that are interrelated compared to ADDIE's linear 5 phases. Additionally, the Dick and Carey model incorporates formative evaluation throughout and a final summative evaluation, while ADDIE focuses evaluation at the end. Both models have benefits like flexibility but can also be time-consuming and challenging to apply depending on variables.
The document compares the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model of instructional design, highlighting their development, similarities, and differences. ADDIE is a linear model with five phases, while the Dick and Carey model is iterative with ten phases, incorporating evaluations throughout. Both models significantly contribute to instructional design, enhancing the effectiveness of training and learning initiatives.
This document compares two common models of instructional design: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of five sequential phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate. It is widely used but can limit creativity. The Dick and Carey model is also called the Systems Approach Model. It is a 10-step process used often in education that includes ongoing formative and summative evaluations. Both models are systematic in their approach and focus on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but the Dick and Carey model has more steps and allows for incremental improvements.
This document outlines two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of five linear phases (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation), while the Dick and Carey model includes ten iterative phases focused on detailed analysis and continuous evaluation. Despite differences in structure, both models aim to improve instruction and learning effectiveness.
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the Dick & Carey model has 10 specific steps and emphasizes formative evaluation throughout the process. It is more detailed and iterative than the linear 5-step ADDIE model. Overall, the models provide structure for instructional designers but also have limitations depending on the context and needs of the instruction.
This document discusses two common instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is a five step process of analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. It is widely used and accepted but allows flexibility between steps. The Dick and Carey model has ten more detailed steps including identifying goals, analyzing learners/context, developing objectives and assessments, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on inputs, outputs, and designing curriculum to achieve learning goals, and emphasize evaluation and revision to improve training.
Compare and contrast the ID Models - ADDIE & the Dick and CareyRaquel Minns
?
The document discusses and compares the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. It notes that ADDIE is a traditional linear model with 5 phases, while Dick & Carey is more interactive with 10 phases and evaluation after each step. Both aim to view instruction as a system, but Dick & Carey requires clear learning objectives and cannot skip steps. The document concludes that instructional designers should consider the models' characteristics to select the best approach for their needs.
The document summarizes and compares two instructional design models: ADDIE and the Dick and Carey model.
The ADDIE model follows five sequential phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model involves 10 steps that include identifying goals, analyzing learners, designing objectives, developing and producing instructions, and conducting formative and summative evaluations.
Both models establish learning objectives aligned to assessments and craft content to develop skills. However, the Dick and Carey model focuses more on learner needs, skills, and context based on learning principles, while ADDIE is designed more for training based on expected outcomes. The Dick and Carey model also comprehensively evaluates data to measure instruction
Comparing and Contrasting ADDIE & Dick and Carey ModelJasmineSaunders4
?
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a 5-step process that is accepted worldwide in instructional design. The Dick and Carey model uses a 10-step approach. Both models incorporate analysis of learner needs and evaluation. The models differ in the number of steps and when evaluation occurs in the process.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model includes five sequential phases of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model consists of 10 iterative steps and is used more for developing school curriculums. While both aim to effectively design educational experiences, the ADDIE model takes a more linear approach while the Dick and Carey model is more iterative in nature.
Compare and Contrast ADDIE to Dick and Carey Jenica Harris
?
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model has five linear phases of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model addresses instruction as an entire system with 10 interconnected components including identifying goals, analyzing learners/context, writing objectives, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. While both are well-known models, ADDIE is more flexible but linear, whereas Dick and Carey provides more detailed and systematic guidance but cannot skip steps.
The document discusses two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey Systems Approach model. Both models provide frameworks for organizing instruction, but they differ in their structure and approach. The ADDIE model is a traditional, linear 5-phase approach, while the Dick and Carey model takes a more iterative, systems-based 10-step approach. While each has advantages like flexibility or a systematic process, they also have challenges such as lack of flexibility or complexity that can deter users. Overall, these models provide important guidelines to help create effective teaching initiatives.
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey instructional design model. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-stage process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It provides structured guidance and flexibility. However, it can be time consuming and assume learner requirements are already understood. The Dick and Carey model has more detailed iterative phases and focuses on analyzing, organizing content, and evaluating throughout the process. However, it may be too specific, rigid, and not use all necessary steps. Both models take a systematic approach and share similarities in focusing on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but differ in their number of phases and approach to evaluation.
The ADDIE model is an instructional design framework that focuses on creating effective educational experiences by analyzing learner needs, defining instructional goals, and developing interventions through five phases: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Each phase addresses specific aspects of instructional planning, from understanding learner characteristics to developing content and assessing outcomes. Historically rooted in cognitive and behavioral psychology, the model has evolved to include influences from constructivism.
How to Write a Powerful Resume for Career Development?StrengthsTheatre
?
Master these resume techniques to present yourself with clarity, confidence, and professionalism. For a personality development course, visit - sanjeevdatta.com
The document compares two instructional design models: ADDIE and Dick & Carey. ADDIE includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation phases. Dick & Carey includes recognizing goals, analyzing learners/contexts, writing objectives, developing assessments/instructional strategies/materials, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models identify problems, work through steps, and conclude with evaluation. They focus on learner performance and allow for reliable outcome measurements. The key difference is that Dick & Carey has more detailed steps and incorporates evaluation throughout, while ADDIE evaluates only at the end.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. Both models establish learning objectives aligned to assessment and design objectives to meet learning levels. However, the ADDIE model focuses on meeting organizational goals through skill development, while the Dick and Carey model emphasizes needs assessment and theoretical learning principles. The Dick and Carey model incorporates learner-centered activities and comprehensive evaluation.
ADDIE vs Dick and Carey Model - 狠狠撸share.pptxJamielRivero1
?
The document discusses two instructional design models: ADDIE and Dick and Carey. ADDIE consists of 5 linear phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate. Dick and Carey is a 10 step iterative model that views instructional design from a systems perspective, with evaluation occurring at every stage. Both models provide structured approaches but ADDIE is more flexible while Dick and Carey is more rigorous and comprehensive. The key is choosing the model best suited to the timeframe, audience and organizational culture.
Both the ADDIE and CAREY models are instructional design models that help organize the process of developing instruction. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-phase model (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) while the CAREY model has 10 iterative phases and includes more detailed analysis. Both models focus on input, output, and the design process as a system. The key difference is that ADDIE is more linear while CAREY is more iterative and includes ongoing evaluation between phases.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick & Carey model. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-stage process developed in 1975, while the Dick & Carey model from 1978 is iterative with 10 stages and is more detailed. Both follow a systems approach and use evaluation, but the Dick & Carey model incorporates formative evaluation at multiple points while ADDIE only has summative evaluation at the end. The ADDIE model is simpler and faster but less flexible, while the Dick & Carey model allows for more revision and flexibility. In conclusion, both models are effective tools for instructional design despite their differences.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is linear and comprises five stages (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation), while the Dick and Carey model has 10 iterative stages and incorporates evaluation throughout. Both provide frameworks for designing effective training, but the Dick and Carey model is more detailed and flexible for experienced designers, while ADDIE is more commonly used and structured.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: ADDIE and the Dick and Carey model. Both models follow a systematic approach of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the Dick and Carey model has more detailed steps that are interrelated compared to ADDIE's linear 5 phases. Additionally, the Dick and Carey model incorporates formative evaluation throughout and a final summative evaluation, while ADDIE focuses evaluation at the end. Both models have benefits like flexibility but can also be time-consuming and challenging to apply depending on variables.
The document compares the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model of instructional design, highlighting their development, similarities, and differences. ADDIE is a linear model with five phases, while the Dick and Carey model is iterative with ten phases, incorporating evaluations throughout. Both models significantly contribute to instructional design, enhancing the effectiveness of training and learning initiatives.
This document compares two common models of instructional design: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of five sequential phases - Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate. It is widely used but can limit creativity. The Dick and Carey model is also called the Systems Approach Model. It is a 10-step process used often in education that includes ongoing formative and summative evaluations. Both models are systematic in their approach and focus on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but the Dick and Carey model has more steps and allows for incremental improvements.
This document outlines two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model consists of five linear phases (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation), while the Dick and Carey model includes ten iterative phases focused on detailed analysis and continuous evaluation. Despite differences in structure, both models aim to improve instruction and learning effectiveness.
The document compares the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. Both models follow a systematic process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. However, the Dick & Carey model has 10 specific steps and emphasizes formative evaluation throughout the process. It is more detailed and iterative than the linear 5-step ADDIE model. Overall, the models provide structure for instructional designers but also have limitations depending on the context and needs of the instruction.
This document discusses two common instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model is a five step process of analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. It is widely used and accepted but allows flexibility between steps. The Dick and Carey model has ten more detailed steps including identifying goals, analyzing learners/context, developing objectives and assessments, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. Both models focus on inputs, outputs, and designing curriculum to achieve learning goals, and emphasize evaluation and revision to improve training.
Compare and contrast the ID Models - ADDIE & the Dick and CareyRaquel Minns
?
The document discusses and compares the ADDIE and Dick & Carey instructional design models. It notes that ADDIE is a traditional linear model with 5 phases, while Dick & Carey is more interactive with 10 phases and evaluation after each step. Both aim to view instruction as a system, but Dick & Carey requires clear learning objectives and cannot skip steps. The document concludes that instructional designers should consider the models' characteristics to select the best approach for their needs.
The document summarizes and compares two instructional design models: ADDIE and the Dick and Carey model.
The ADDIE model follows five sequential phases - analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model involves 10 steps that include identifying goals, analyzing learners, designing objectives, developing and producing instructions, and conducting formative and summative evaluations.
Both models establish learning objectives aligned to assessments and craft content to develop skills. However, the Dick and Carey model focuses more on learner needs, skills, and context based on learning principles, while ADDIE is designed more for training based on expected outcomes. The Dick and Carey model also comprehensively evaluates data to measure instruction
Comparing and Contrasting ADDIE & Dick and Carey ModelJasmineSaunders4
?
This document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model is a 5-step process that is accepted worldwide in instructional design. The Dick and Carey model uses a 10-step approach. Both models incorporate analysis of learner needs and evaluation. The models differ in the number of steps and when evaluation occurs in the process.
The document compares and contrasts two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey model. The ADDIE model includes five sequential phases of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the Dick and Carey model consists of 10 iterative steps and is used more for developing school curriculums. While both aim to effectively design educational experiences, the ADDIE model takes a more linear approach while the Dick and Carey model is more iterative in nature.
Compare and Contrast ADDIE to Dick and Carey Jenica Harris
?
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE and Dick and Carey instructional design models. The ADDIE model has five linear phases of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The Dick and Carey model addresses instruction as an entire system with 10 interconnected components including identifying goals, analyzing learners/context, writing objectives, and conducting formative and summative evaluations. While both are well-known models, ADDIE is more flexible but linear, whereas Dick and Carey provides more detailed and systematic guidance but cannot skip steps.
The document discusses two instructional design models: the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey Systems Approach model. Both models provide frameworks for organizing instruction, but they differ in their structure and approach. The ADDIE model is a traditional, linear 5-phase approach, while the Dick and Carey model takes a more iterative, systems-based 10-step approach. While each has advantages like flexibility or a systematic process, they also have challenges such as lack of flexibility or complexity that can deter users. Overall, these models provide important guidelines to help create effective teaching initiatives.
The document compares and contrasts the ADDIE model and the Dick and Carey instructional design model. The ADDIE model is a linear 5-stage process of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. It provides structured guidance and flexibility. However, it can be time consuming and assume learner requirements are already understood. The Dick and Carey model has more detailed iterative phases and focuses on analyzing, organizing content, and evaluating throughout the process. However, it may be too specific, rigid, and not use all necessary steps. Both models take a systematic approach and share similarities in focusing on inputs, outputs, and the design process, but differ in their number of phases and approach to evaluation.
The ADDIE model is an instructional design framework that focuses on creating effective educational experiences by analyzing learner needs, defining instructional goals, and developing interventions through five phases: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Each phase addresses specific aspects of instructional planning, from understanding learner characteristics to developing content and assessing outcomes. Historically rooted in cognitive and behavioral psychology, the model has evolved to include influences from constructivism.
How to Write a Powerful Resume for Career Development?StrengthsTheatre
?
Master these resume techniques to present yourself with clarity, confidence, and professionalism. For a personality development course, visit - sanjeevdatta.com
2025年极速办巴斯克大学毕业证【q薇1954292140】学历认证流程巴斯克大学毕业证西班牙本科成绩单制作【q薇1954292140】海外各大学Diploma版本,因为疫情学校推迟发放证书、证书原件丢失补办、没有正常毕业未能认证学历面临就业提供解决办法。当遭遇挂科、旷课导致无法修满学分,或者直接被学校退学,最后无法毕业拿不到毕业证。此时的你一定手足无措,因为留学一场,没有获得毕业证以及学历证明肯定是无法给自己和父母一个交代的。
【复刻巴斯克大学成绩单信封,Buy Universidad del País Vasco Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单(q微1954292140)新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率,以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
巴斯克大学成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力,包括巴斯克大学课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。(q微1954292140)具体来说,成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分,因此,成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明,也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据!
我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张(原版纸质、底色、纹路)我们工厂拥有全套进口原装设备,特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作,仿真度基本可以达到100%,所有成品以及工艺效果都可提前给客户展示,不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整,直到满意为止!
【主营项目】
一.巴斯克大学毕业证【q微1954292140】巴斯克大学成绩单、留信认证、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等!
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证(教育部存档!教育部留服网站永久可查)
四.办理国外各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
CCNA Training in Chandigarh: Launch Your Career in Networking Todaynitish1240728
?
Looking to kickstart your career in networking? Our CCNA training in Chandigarh offers hands-on learning, industry-focused modules, and expert guidance to prepare you for high-paying IT jobs. Learn core skills like IP addressing, routing, switching, and network security with real-time lab experience. Whether you're a beginner or an IT graduate, this course is your gateway to global networking certifications and opportunities.
鉴于此,办理SUNY Alfred大学毕业证纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校毕业证书【q薇1954292140】留学一站式办理学历文凭直通车(纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校毕业证SUNY Alfred成绩单原版纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校学位证假文凭)未能正常毕业?【q薇1954292140】办理纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校毕业证成绩单/留信学历认证/学历文凭/使馆认证/留学回国人员证明/录取通知书/Offer/在读证明/成绩单/网上存档永久可查!
如果您处于以下几种情况:
◇在校期间,因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证
◇面对父母的压力,希望尽快拿到;
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备;
◇回国时间很长,忘记办理;
◇回国马上就要找工作,办给用人单位看;
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
【办理纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校成绩单Buy State University of New York, College of Technology at Alfred Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单(q微1954292140)新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率,以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力,包括纽约州立大学阿尔弗雷德分校课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。(q微1954292140)具体来说,成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分,因此,成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明,也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据!
Power BI Jobs in Jaipur Your Gateway to Data Analytics Careers in Rajasthan.pptxvinay salarite
?
Unlock your future in data with high-demand Power BI jobs in Jaipur! As businesses across Rajasthan embrace data-driven strategies, skilled Power BI professionals are more valuable than ever. From startups to established enterprises, the demand for data visualization and analytics experts is skyrocketing.
Whether you're a fresher or an experienced analyst, Jaipur offers excellent opportunities for career growth in business intelligence and data analytics.
4. Instruction
? Instruction is the intentional facilitation of
learning toward identified learning goals.
? Driscoll (1994) defines instruction from a
similar perspective: "the deliberate
arrangement of learning conditions to promote
the attainment of some intended goal" (p. 332).
? “ Purposeful activity intended to cause ,
guide or support learning”
5. Training
Instructional experiences are focused upon
individuals acquiring very specific skills that
they will normally apply almost immediately.
https://dixieching.wordpress.com/
2010/02/03/instructional-design-ch-1-smith-
ragan/
6. Teaching
Learning experiences that are facilitated by a
human being – not a videotape, textbook,
or computer program, but a live teacher.
7. Difference between Training and Teaching
? Training usually has a more specific focus
than teaching, which seeks to in still a
deeper knowledge over a longer period of
time.
? Training, on the other hand, seeks to help
people master a specific skill or skill set,
until they are able to execute it efficiently .
? Training is usually a one-time or short-term
event, as with job training.
8. Difference between Training and Teaching
? Teaching is usually broader in focus than
training .
? It generally is theoretical, while training is
the practical application of knowledge.
? Teaching seeks to impart new knowledge,
while training equips the already
knowledgeable with tools and techniques to
develop a specific skill set .
9. Difference between Training and
Teaching
? Teaching is usually within the context of the
academic world , while training is generally
associated with the commercial realm .
? Teaching usually deals with a subject or
topic , while training deals with a duty or
function. Teachers generally give students
feedback, while trainers receive feedback
from trainees
10. Difference between Training and Teaching
? Teaching is also a never ending process.
? Teaching is both formal and informal .
? It is formal when it occurs inside the
classroom or informal when you learn things
outside the portals of the school.
? When we talk about instruction, it's not as
complex as teaching. Instruction is simply
giving direction.
12. Design
“...a plan or drawing produced to show the look
and function or workings of something“
Design implies a systematic or intensive planning
and ideation process prior to the development of
something or the execution of some plan in order
to solve a problem.
13. Instructional Design
?Instructional Design is a systematic process by
which the instructional materials are designed,
developed and delivered
? Instructional Design is the entire process of
analysis of learning needs and goals and the
development of delivery system to meet the needs.
?It includes development of instructional materials
and activities and try out all instruction and learner
activities
14. Key elements of Instructional
Design
? There is a genuine need for learning
? The learning events are well designed.
? Quality learning materials are developed
? Learning events are implemented using the
appropriate strategies and approaches
? Learning events are evaluated to ensure
learning has actually taken place.
15. The Instructional Design Process
The process involved in the systematic planning of
instruction. The instructional designer’s job is to
answer -
1.Where are we going? (What are the goals of the
instruction?)
2.How will we get there? (What is the instructional
strategy and the instructional medium?)
3.How will we know when we have arrived? (What
should our tests look like? How will we evaluate and
revise the instructional materials?)
16. The Instructional Design
Process
Major activities that an instructional designer
completes during the design and development
process:
? Perform an instructional analysis to determine
"where we’re going.“
? Develop an instructional strategy to determine
"how we’ll get there.“
? Develop and conduct an evaluation to determine
"how we’ll know when we’re there."
17. The Instructional Design Process
? Instructional designers insist on creating instruction
in which the goals, the instructional strategy, and the
evaluation all match.
? By "match," we mean that the strategy
(instructional method) that is used is appropriate for
the learning task (goals) and that the tests measure
how well the learners have achieved the learning task
(assessment).
Instructional method <=> goals <=> assessment
19. Different Instructional Design
Model
? ADDIE Model
? Dick and Carey Model
?Kemp's Instructional Design Model
? Kirkpatrick's 4 Levels of Training Evaluation
20. ADDIE
? ADDIE is the traditional and systematic ID model
that consists of 5 phases – Analysis, Design,
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The
outcome of each step is critical for one after in the
sequence.
? ADDIE’s main characteristic is that it is a linear
approach.
? It provides a clear-cut step by step sequence of
events in teaching a lesson.
21. The Analyse Phase
The Learning Problems
Goals and Objectives
The needs of the learner
The Existing Knowledge
The Environment
Constraint
The Delivery Option
25. The Evaluation Phase
Assess Criteria Used
Gather Learner Feedback
? Formative evaluation is present in each stage of
the ADDIE process
? Summative evaluation is conducted on finished
instructional programs or products.
27. Strengths of ADDIE
? Most widely used model and is the foundation for other ID
models.
? It is flexible and can be used for traditional instruction and
across many industries.
? Is most effective when testing for easily measurable criteria
? Allows for collaboration at each level and at any and every
stage
? Evaluation is a key component built into ADDIE
? Structured guidance for design
28. Weaknesses of ADDIE
? ADDIE is linear model, which is not amenable to
accommodating user generated content
? You cant get to the next phase without addressing the one
before it.
? It is time consuming and costly
? Evaluation is a key component built into ADDIE
? Does not allow for designer creativity.
? Furthermore, storyboards are not always effective in creating
and conveying good design. Because the process is so detailed,
it sometimes deters the creative process
http://sarwathusain.weebly.com/ci--5921/addie-vs-dick-and-carey-model
29. Dick and Carey Model
? The Dick and Carey Systems Approach Model
(published in 1978) promotes a “systems” view of
instruction instead of viewing instruction as a sum
of isolated parts.
? In other words, the model engages instruction as
an entire system, including the interrelationships
between context, content, learning and instruction.
? The Dick and Carey Model is widely known and
forms the base-line for many other system models.
30. Dick and Carey Model
The components of the Dick and Carey Model are the following:
? Identify Instructional Goals
? Conduct Instructional Analysis
? Analyze Learners and Contexts
? Write Performance Objectives
? Develop Assessment Instruments
? Develop Instructional Strategy
? Develop and Select Instructional Materials
? Design and Conduct Formative Evaluation of Instruction
? Revise Instructional Design and Conduct Summative Evaluation
32. Dick and Carey Model
Strengths
The main strength of the model is that the designer
requires clear and measurable learning objectives,
thereby developing instruction as a systematic
process.
Weakness
It is base on the premise that every one of its
components are essential, and therefore none can be
skipped.
33. ADDIE model and The Dick and Carey
model (Differences)
(1). The ADDIE model has five phases, while the Dick and
Carey model has ten phases that are more detail.
(2) The ADDIE model has an evaluation at the last phases of
the model, while the Dick and Carey model has two big parts
of evaluations.
- First is the evaluations that are done in every steps that
have purpose to revise the instruction in every each steps.
-Second is the last evaluation that evaluates the instructions
that have been evaluated formatively and sufficiently revised
to meet the standards of the design.
34. ADDIE model and The Dick and Carey
model (Similarity)
It is the system approaches that are focus on
both models. The system approaches that
are focused by both models are on the input,
the output and the process of designing the
curriculum.