際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo

How news organisations used video footage of the Lee Rigby killers

Download as PPTX, PDF
A
Andrew Hobbs

Analysis of how the media used cameraphone footage of the killers of Lee Rigby in Woolwich, London, May 2013 Lecture for JNC001 Journalism Issues, journalism foundation module, University of Central Lancashire

1 of 19
Download to read offline
Coverage of the Lee Rigby killing Journalism Matters JNC001 24 March 2014
Did the media show the video because the public deserved to know, or because they wanted to grab audience share?
It provided a platform to inspire more terrorism It was too violent and shocking It was screened when children could see it It was shown partly to gain audience share/boost newspaper sales It was illegal contempt of court harmed chances of a fair trial It left traditional journalism trying to catch up with a new world of smartphones and viral videos What was wrong with the coverage?
Sun managing editor Richard Caseby: This was very graphic and disturbing content Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages? These are difficult moral dilemmas played out against tight deadlines intense competition and a desire to be respectful to the dead and their loved ones."
Sun managing editor Richard Caseby: This was very graphic and disturbing content Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages?
Royal Barnes laughs as he passes hundreds of flower tributes left for Fusilier Rigby in Woolwich in one of the three videos the man posted shortly after the soldier's death
Alan Rusbridger, Guardian editor This was an extraordinary, perhaps unprecedented, event. In broad daylight on a British street a man was hacked to death allegedly by someone who then essentially gave a press conference, using Islamist justifications.
Sun managing editor Richard Caseby: This was very graphic and disturbing content Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages? These are difficult moral dilemmas played out against tight deadlines intense competition and a desire to be respectful to the dead and their loved ones."
No chance of a fair trial?
Alan Rusbridger, Guardian editor It was, by any standards, a unique news picture but in a new media context in which the killer's message had already been distributed around the world virtually in real time.
In the era of cameraphones and social media, is there any need for journalists?
How news organisations used video footage of the Lee Rigby killers
How the video spread through the news eco-system
Sunder Katwala, New Statesman But The fact that everything is available somewhere on the internet does not absolve editors. There is plenty of stuff out there on extremist jihadi websites that does not get put on TV.
Where does this leave journalism? Can only certain people be journalists (a profession)? Or can anyone do journalism (an activity open to all)? What can professional journalists add? Find information Provide context Provide balance Select Check/verify Publish to wide audiences But Ordinary members of the public can do all these things, if they have the right skills and attitudes.
What was right with the coverage? A major international story of legitimate public interest so overrides some ethical and regulatory problems Killers justification helped audience to understand motivation Public needs to understand level of violence Some broadcasters cut confession and most grisly footage Most broadcasters gave a warning Audiences already knew what to expect
What judgments did editors have to make about the video footage?
Dilemmas To screen or not to screen? When to screen? How to edit? To pay or not to pay? How to compete with amateur viral news?
References Allan, Stuart, News Culture, ch 10: Citizen journalism in times of crisis, pp218-29, 239-44. Banks, David, Woolwich attack footage will stir debate over contempt laws, Guardian 24 May 2013 [http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2013/may/24/woolwich-attack-footage-contempt-laws] Elliott, Chris, The readers' editor on the Guardian's coverage of the Woolwich murder, Guardian, 26 May 2013 Frost, Chris. Journalism Ethics and Regulation. Harlow; New York: Longman/Pearson, 2011, pp167-174 Halliday, Josh, Woolwich attack: ITV removes content from suspect's video 'confession', Guardian, 24 May 2013 [http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/may/24/woolwich-attack-itv-michael-adebolajo-confession] Hollander, Gavriel, Sun and ITV Defend Public Interest in Showing Woolwich Terror Video Sky Judged Too Distressing, Press Gazette, May 24, 2013. Katwala, Sunder. After Woolwich: how the media got it wrong and how the public can get it right, New Statesman 23 May, 2013 Knight, Megan, and Clare Cook. Social Media for Journalists: Principles and Practice. SAGE, 2013, 112-13, Breaking news and the accidental journalist, 113-14, Active citizens and active sources, 118-119, User- generated content and audience-sourced news material, 119-20, The forms of user-generated content, 160- 161, What is a journalist?, Bloggers vs journalists. Ofcom, Broadcast news coverage of the Woolwich incident on 22 May 2013, Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue number 245 6 January 2014 [http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast- bulletins/245/obb245.pdf], pp22-25, pp37-51 Sabbagh, Dan, After the Woolwich attack the media must continue to aim for openness, Guardian 2 June 2013 [http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2013/jun/02/woolwich-attack-media-openness]

More Related Content

How news organisations used video footage of the Lee Rigby killers

  • 1. Coverage of the Lee Rigby killing Journalism Matters JNC001 24 March 2014
  • 2. Did the media show the video because the public deserved to know, or because they wanted to grab audience share?
  • 3. It provided a platform to inspire more terrorism It was too violent and shocking It was screened when children could see it It was shown partly to gain audience share/boost newspaper sales It was illegal contempt of court harmed chances of a fair trial It left traditional journalism trying to catch up with a new world of smartphones and viral videos What was wrong with the coverage?
  • 4. Sun managing editor Richard Caseby: This was very graphic and disturbing content Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages? These are difficult moral dilemmas played out against tight deadlines intense competition and a desire to be respectful to the dead and their loved ones."
  • 5. Sun managing editor Richard Caseby: This was very graphic and disturbing content Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages?
  • 6. Royal Barnes laughs as he passes hundreds of flower tributes left for Fusilier Rigby in Woolwich in one of the three videos the man posted shortly after the soldier's death
  • 7. Alan Rusbridger, Guardian editor This was an extraordinary, perhaps unprecedented, event. In broad daylight on a British street a man was hacked to death allegedly by someone who then essentially gave a press conference, using Islamist justifications.
  • 8. Sun managing editor Richard Caseby: This was very graphic and disturbing content Would it only serve as propaganda, feeding further outrages? These are difficult moral dilemmas played out against tight deadlines intense competition and a desire to be respectful to the dead and their loved ones."
  • 9. No chance of a fair trial?
  • 10. Alan Rusbridger, Guardian editor It was, by any standards, a unique news picture but in a new media context in which the killer's message had already been distributed around the world virtually in real time.
  • 11. In the era of cameraphones and social media, is there any need for journalists?
  • 13. How the video spread through the news eco-system
  • 14. Sunder Katwala, New Statesman But The fact that everything is available somewhere on the internet does not absolve editors. There is plenty of stuff out there on extremist jihadi websites that does not get put on TV.
  • 15. Where does this leave journalism? Can only certain people be journalists (a profession)? Or can anyone do journalism (an activity open to all)? What can professional journalists add? Find information Provide context Provide balance Select Check/verify Publish to wide audiences But Ordinary members of the public can do all these things, if they have the right skills and attitudes.
  • 16. What was right with the coverage? A major international story of legitimate public interest so overrides some ethical and regulatory problems Killers justification helped audience to understand motivation Public needs to understand level of violence Some broadcasters cut confession and most grisly footage Most broadcasters gave a warning Audiences already knew what to expect
  • 17. What judgments did editors have to make about the video footage?
  • 18. Dilemmas To screen or not to screen? When to screen? How to edit? To pay or not to pay? How to compete with amateur viral news?
  • 19. References Allan, Stuart, News Culture, ch 10: Citizen journalism in times of crisis, pp218-29, 239-44. Banks, David, Woolwich attack footage will stir debate over contempt laws, Guardian 24 May 2013 [http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2013/may/24/woolwich-attack-footage-contempt-laws] Elliott, Chris, The readers' editor on the Guardian's coverage of the Woolwich murder, Guardian, 26 May 2013 Frost, Chris. Journalism Ethics and Regulation. Harlow; New York: Longman/Pearson, 2011, pp167-174 Halliday, Josh, Woolwich attack: ITV removes content from suspect's video 'confession', Guardian, 24 May 2013 [http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/may/24/woolwich-attack-itv-michael-adebolajo-confession] Hollander, Gavriel, Sun and ITV Defend Public Interest in Showing Woolwich Terror Video Sky Judged Too Distressing, Press Gazette, May 24, 2013. Katwala, Sunder. After Woolwich: how the media got it wrong and how the public can get it right, New Statesman 23 May, 2013 Knight, Megan, and Clare Cook. Social Media for Journalists: Principles and Practice. SAGE, 2013, 112-13, Breaking news and the accidental journalist, 113-14, Active citizens and active sources, 118-119, User- generated content and audience-sourced news material, 119-20, The forms of user-generated content, 160- 161, What is a journalist?, Bloggers vs journalists. Ofcom, Broadcast news coverage of the Woolwich incident on 22 May 2013, Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, Issue number 245 6 January 2014 [http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast- bulletins/245/obb245.pdf], pp22-25, pp37-51 Sabbagh, Dan, After the Woolwich attack the media must continue to aim for openness, Guardian 2 June 2013 [http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2013/jun/02/woolwich-attack-media-openness]