This document discusses General Sundarji's actions during the 1987 Brasstacks military exercises and the propaganda surrounding it. It makes three key points:
1) The author, who served in the Pakistani armored division at the time, sees claims that General Gul strategically outmaneuvered Sundarji as exaggerated propaganda. There was no strategic brilliance - the units were defensive and morale was low.
2) Sundarji wanted to provoke Pakistan into war to gain glory, but Pakistan did not take the bait. When he lost track of Pakistan's armored division, Sundarji lost his nerve due to his own weak character, not because of any Pakistani actions.
3) After tensions normalized
1 of 25
More Related Content
What to do if General Sundarji was such a nervous wreck
1. What to do if General Sundarji was such a nervous
wreck
Major A.H Amin (Retired)
What to do if General Sundarji was such a
nervous wreck
December 2020
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35626.85443
Project: How History Moves
2. Agha H Amin
In 1987 much propaganda was done in Pakistan
about the strategic genius of General Hameed Gul
in moving the armoured division and unnerving
the Indian army chief Sundarji.
Some officers like Brigadier Khalid (Gujjar) credited
General K.M Arif of my parent regiment for this so
called Herculean strategic master stroke !
As an officer serving in the armoured division I saw
this propaganda as a big joke and massive
exaggeration of facts as we saw in December 1986-
January 1987 !
Possibly INDIA TODAY was HEFTILY BRIBED by
some to PUBLISH the story about SUNDARJI being
unnerved !
4. INDIA TODAY HAS TO SELL .
EMPLOYEES HAVE TO BE PAID . BUT
THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU
MAKE BULL SHIT OF HISTORY .
INDIA TODAYS ZIA-RAJIV 1987
CONFLICT BULL SHIT-COMMENTS
Agha.H.Amin
1-during my course of stay in afghanistan
this subject was much discussed with indian
retired officers visiting afghanistan.
2- my regiment was part of 1987 mobilisation
from november 1986 to march 1987.we were
issued first line tank ammunition in 1st armd
div.
3-archival evidence reveals that indian army
chief sundarji was looking for glory in
brasstacks , the idea to provoke pakistan into
war.pakistan army did not buy the idea , did
5. not get provoked because pakistan was in no
position to fight a war .the reason why the
indians lost track of first armoured division
which was largely hameed guls brilliance ,
although i dont agree with many of his ideas.
hameed gul alone , not even saroop the corps
commander who wanted to give hameed gul a
bad report ?
There was no glory in the moves.the units
were morose . the commanding officers were
lifeless.it was a very defensive move .
That sunderji was unnerved was a weak
mans response.
I am perfectly aware that the GHQ ordered
the move but the brilliant way in which it was
executed was the real reason why the indians
failed to detect where the division went. Here
the deception plan of First Armoured
Division and the secrecy with which the move
was executed was crucial.
6. And by the way there was great confusion on
pakistan side as the areas of move were
changed about 30 times.
Perhaps I will rephrase the assessment . i
have no interest in projecting hameed gul.
Such was the state of demoralisation that
when Maj Gen Hameed Gul asked for a
volunteer squadron commander to take an
advance position near the border , only one
man Captain Tariq Khan volunteered . He
was later marched in and given a reprimand
for disagreeing with both 5 Armoured
Brigade Commander and Hameed Gul . Now
LTG Tariq Khan made a very interesting
remark when asked by Gul about his
ideas.He said words to the effect that it was
technically sound but tactically stupid.
We were hiding in forests and told not to
move anywhere but later when Sundarji lost
7. his nerve because of his own weak character
many Pakistanis tried to take glory for this
event.This glory part started appearing after
April 1987 when the situation had
normalised.
The bastard child zia regime which was
never exactly popular in Pakistan projected
the event as a great military achievement of
zia . Ironically Indian press made this job
easier ?
We at a very personal level knew that the
period November 1986 to March 1987 was
not exactly very glorious.There was an air of
gloom everywhere .
At a personal level when both saroop and
hameed gul who did not get along well except
on one point , getting me dismissed from
service for boozing were snubbed by the then
army de facto chief , the VCOAS K.M Arif
who snubbed them and told them that he will
8. not sign dismissal orders of an 11 Cavalary
officer.Here a short whisper in his year by his
ADC and my dear friend Captain Khalid
Gujjar that I was old 11 Cavalry did the
miracle !This was March 1987.
Credit to Hameed Gul that he exonerated me
later on 19 March 1987 from all charges in
writing . However when he left for the ISI his
orders were not honoured by his successors.
Interestingly it was not the main intention of
Pakistanis to terrorise Sundarji by moving
the First Armoured Division.The intention
was to move into a central position from
where a counter offensive could be launched
against the expected Indian attack.
However Sundarji lost his nerve when he lost
track of Pakistans First Armoured Division
and simply lost the moral courage and
resolution to do what he intended.I discussed
9. this incident to the ire of many in Command
and Staff Colleges Citadel Journal in 1993.
4- even rajid gandhi never bought the idea as
revealed by various archives including
principal secretary S.S Gills testimony .
5- in the end sundarjis ambition failed .
brasstacks did not provoke pakistan , rajiv
gandhi also did not bite sundarjis bait.
6- real threat to pakistan was in september-
november 1984 when my regiment was part
of 1 corps mobilisation. at that time only two
sikh officers saved pakistan by pumping
bullets in durga devi .
12. =
View Post on Facebook 揃 Edit Email Settings 揃
Reply to this email to add a comment.
Indian civil servant SS Gill denied that Sundarjis
grandiose plans to attack Pakistan in 1987 had any
official approval:--
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319256927_The_Dynasty-
_Critical_Triple_Biography_of_Jawaharlal_Nehru_Indira_Gandhi_and_Rajiv_Gandhi_by_emin
ent_Indian_bureucrat_SS_Gill-Book_Review
14. I was pleasantly surprised to see
my 1999-2000 friend Col Gill
quote my article in Pakistans Daily
Nation newspaper ( Pakistans
most influential because of slanted
agenda and not paying thosewho
write most quoted articles on its
oped pages-This paper of crooks
never paid this scribe for over 50
articles published on its OPED and
Editorial pages between 2001 and
2011) in the NATO DEFENSE
COLLEGE research paper titled as
below:--