From the Where 2.0 (2011) Conference, a discussion of how the places you go influences what kind of person you are.
1 of 16
Downloaded 137 times
More Related Content
Where You Go Is Who You Are
1. Where you go is
who you are
April 21, 2011
Clay Smith
@smithclay
2. Youre an average of the 5
people you spend the most
time with
--Jim Rohn, motivational speaker guy
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
3. What are the 5 places you
spend the most time in?
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
4. 5 places you spend
the most time in.
5 people you spend
the most time with.
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
5. 5 places you spend
the most time in.
5 people you spend
the most time with.
Your check-ins
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
6. My foursquare
check-ins in
Chicago over a few
months from
wheredoyougo.net.
Where I am in a given day
Going Out
18%
Home
46%
Work
36%
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
8. Ch
an
s
CVS
-in
ce
ck
of e
he
m re?
fc
th
ee
ro
Events,
tin
be
airports
g
fri
m
'
e
Nu
nd
s
Community spaces, parks, etc
Restaurants, bars
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
9. Neighborhood
Bar Check-in Airport Check-in
"Shared sociocultural
framework" or
macro-social order
Ironic Check-in, French Laundry
amusing badges Check-in
Adventure Check-in
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
10. Check-ins are special. They
have interactional potency.
We can use check-ins to build
better applications.
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
11. Case Study: I'm
hungry.
Recommendation Engines Experts The Masses
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
12. We can make recommendation engines smarter
with geo-context.
Whats the SpotRank of the places you typically eat dinner/
lunch at the times you typically eat dinner? Do you prefer
locations that have a high SpotRank vs a low SpotRank?
And the big one...
Where have you been? And where have other people
been that have been to similar places as you?
All of these question can be answered with publicly-
available APIs. More or less.
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
13. Exploiting social symmetries and asymmetries
Applications should use this knowledge to make interesting
decisions, outside of the scope of (most?) recommendation
engines.
Example 1: All youre friends are visiting airports. But youre not.
Why not get some travel recommendations? (social symmetries)
Example 2: The past few weeks, all your friends have been going to
the same 3 dive bars. Why not recommend a new wine bar, with a
20% off coupon? (social asymmetries)
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
14. The power of memory and location
When we check-in somewhere, we create a persistent record of that
event.
Imagine you checked in at every location where an important event
in your life took place. What would that enable us to do?
We dont have great memory of all the places weve been.
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
15. Check-ins are driven by strong social forces.
Were just beginning to understand how to
use this data.
The data we share on location-based
social networks is a critical part of our
online identity, and and incredibly rich
context.
Social data is growing exponentially. And
theres an API.
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
16. Lets use this information to build
smarter applications
Facebook has a sense of
humor. Example of
something that could get
smarter.
Where 2.0, Where You Go Is Who You Are April 21, 2011
Editor's Notes
#2: I want to talk about how the places you go, particularly your check-ins on a location-based social network of choice, are an inherently “social action” that establish an individual’s identity. So, from that, we get the title “Where you go is who you are.” The next part of the title is how we can use this incredibly rich context to build awesome applications.\n\nI want to first explain how I arrived at the conclusion that “where you go is who you are,” go into why I think check-ins on location-based social networks are really special, and then elaborate on how I think we can use this information to build better applications. I am a software engineer, after all.\n
#3: Let’s start with social. Who do you spend the most time with? Naturally related to location.\n
#4: A more interesting question. These two questions are related.\n
#5: These overlap fairly closely, possibly even perfectly in some cases. The places you spend the most time in share space with the people you spend the most time with.\n
#6: Check-ins are a special case. Since they are passive (not always tracking your every move), they don’t particularly represent the places you spend the most time in.\n
#7: These aren’t a representation of everywhere I’ve been, but where I want people to know I’ve been. A small slice of where I actually spend my time.\n\nWhere you live and you work is also interesting, but these two places are mostly static.\n
#8: These aren’t a representation of everywhere I’ve been, but where I want people to know I’ve been. A small slice of where I actually spend my time.\n\nWhere you live and you work is also interesting, but these two places are mostly static.\n
#9: I’m really interested in what causes us to check-in certain places, since it’s a fair assumption that we don’t really check-in every place we ever visit.\n\nThis is one way I thought of breaking down the frequency of places I check-in to. It’s not backed up by strong data.\n
#10: Each of these check-ins references a different bit of socialcultural knowledge. Check-ins have to power to create social symmetries and asymmetries within a group, and are “social action.”\n
#11: Check-ins are special, because they so powerfully index shared socialcultural knowledge. They aren’t unique in this way (tweets, foursquare status updates essentially do the same thing), but a location is a heck of a lot easier to parse than natural language.\n
#12: All of these services have some “location-aware” capacity that can answer what’s essentially a local-search question. Which one does the best job?\n
#13: Recommendation engines for local searches are really compelling. But it’s a much, much more complicated problem that Netflix or Pandora. Fortunately, we can get lots of information from APIs about a particular location (thanks SimpleGeo!)\n\nOther examples:\nWhat’s the weather like? Is the weather improving or getting worse?\nAre there are major events going on in your neighborhood? Want to avoid them? Or not?\n
#14: Related to this local search recommendation engine problem is what happens when we start applying social ‘symmetries’ and ‘asymmetries’ to the data. Interesting stuff could happen, and we could get even more interesting recommendations.\n\nApplications should exploit social symmetries and asymmetries.\n
#15: Lastly, there’s the question of historical check-in data. I’m reminded of the best meal I’ve ever had, but details are fuzzy.\n\nThink it’s recognized in this conference that there’s a lot we can do with digital storytelling when we have a list of places a person has been. How do the places and experiences we’ve had shape us as people? Cool stuff possible here over long term.\n