The document discusses different approaches to focusing in motivational interviewing. There are three potential sources of focus: the client, the setting or context, and the clinician's expertise. There are also three styles of focusing - directing, where the clinician determines focus; following, where the focus follows the client's agenda; and guiding, a collaborative approach between client and clinician. Focusing is a process that involves finding achievable goals to provide direction, and can take different forms depending on the various agendas involved.
2. Focusing
The focusing process within MI is about finding that
direction and within it more specific achievable goals.
This naturally blends into evoking and planning to explore
specific ways for moving in that direction.
It involves navigating these often tricky waters to find
and maintain a clear direction.
If you don¡¯t know where you are going, any road will get
you there. ¡ªLEWIS CARROLL
3. Three source of focus
With varying agenda present, there are different possible
sources from which to derive focus and direction.
4. The client
The most common source of direction is from the client him- or
herself,If the provider is comfortable and competent to provide the
help requested then there is a natural match of guide and traveler.
This does not mean that the journey is necessarily easy, only that
there is a shared beginning agreement about direction.
5. The setting
The direction of service can also be focused by the
setting itself. The agency is funded to address specific
issues and provide certain services.
6. Clinical expertise
A third potential source of focus is the clinician. Quite
commonly, people will seek services with one goal in
mind, and in the course of consultation the clinician
working with them
7. Three styles of focusing
With all of these agenda present from client, context,
and clinician, how do you identify a focus or direction?
8. Directing
In a directing approach, the provider determines the
focus, rooted in his or her own agenda or that of the
agency.
There are certainly circumstances in which a directing
style is appropriate in establishing a focus, but as a
default approach for promoting client change it has
serious limitations (Rollnick et al., 2008).
9. Following
In a following style of focusing you try to understand the
client¡¯s agenda and do your best to allow the direction,
momentum, and content of the conversation to follow
accordingly
A following style can enhance engagement, which is itself
a therapeutic process.
10. Guiding
Guiding Midway between directing and following sits a
guiding style. Guiding promotes a collaborative search for
direction, a meeting of expertise in which the focus of
treatment is negotiated. The client¡¯s agenda are
important, and any limitations inherent in the context are
taken into account. The clinician¡¯s expertise is also a
possible source of goals. The focusing process of MI
commonly starts in this middle ground between directing
and following, where the focus, momentum, and content
are mutually forged
11. Conversation, not transaction
Focusing in motivational interviewing is not like buying
salt or seeing a doctor about an infected toe, where the
choices are few, the challenge is clear, and a transaction
takes place. Conversations about change are not like
this; the relationship is important, aspirations vary and
fluctuate, and choices are made about large and small
conversation streams that you could go down.
12. Key points
The process of focusing involves finding one or more specific
goals or intended outcomes that provide direction for
consultation.
Focus can arise from the client, the context, or the clinician.
The general counseling styles of directing, guiding, and
following also describe three approaches to focusing.
Sometimes there is a clear single focus, sometimes there are
several possible topics, and sometimes the focus is quite
unclear and exploration is needed.