This document outlines the key issues in the debate around UK nuclear power. It discusses the background of nuclear power in the UK, including the number of existing reactors and plants. The main issues covered are safety, reliability, cost, environmental impact, security, and alternatives to nuclear power. Both arguments for and against nuclear power are presented under each issue. The future of energy production in the UK is considered highly controversial as there are valid arguments on both sides of the nuclear power debate.
3.
Background
First plant opened in UK in1956 at Windscale
16 reactors at 9 plants
Produces 20% of UK energy down from 26% in 1997
All existing UK plants to close by 2023
Permission for 8 new private plants in England
Scottish government ban on new nuclear plants
Future UK energy production highly controversial e.g. wind power in
UK
5.
Safety
AGAINST NP
1. Old technology
2. Poor safety systems
3. Poor safety record Windscale, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island,
Fukushima.
4. Negative public perception
5. Long term safety of nuclear waste disposal
6. Possibility of nuclear catatasrophe
6.
Safety
FOR NP
Less accidents and casualties than oil and gas
New plants safer than old
Issue of poor siting of plants NOT poor plant design
e.g. Fukushima
Public perception of safety does not match reality
7.
Reliability
AGAINST NP
Closure of 4 UK reactors and 3 Belgian reactors 22 of
same type of reactor worldwide
Closures in EU and USA due to drought
Criticism of unreliable alternative energy wrong Delaware
study = renewable can power a grid 99.9% of the time
8.
Reliability
FOR NP
Alternatives unreliable wind, wave, solar dependent on weather
Nuclear available 24/7
Nuclear can be adapted to demand alternatives not
Not subject to global instability
Proven reliability in past
UK expertise in nuclear technology
9.
Cost
Against NP
Plant construction, insurance, waste disposal,
decommissioning expensive needs government money UK
waste 贈56 bn for last 50yrs
For NP
Production costs cheap
Predictable costs not subject to global uncertainty
10.
Environmental Impact
Against NP
waste radioactive for thousands of years disposal problems
Nuclear power needs fossil fuel for mining uranium, shipping and
disposal
Only 4% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2025
11.
Environmental Impact
For NP
Less land use than alternatives such as solar and
wind power one nuclear reactor produces
equivalent of 15-180 square miles wind turbines
Less CO2, nitrous oxide, sulphur dioxide helps fight
against climate change
12.
Security
Against NP
Link between civil and military use
Possibility of terrorist attack or hijack of nuclear fuel
or waste
Expansion of nuclear programme = less global
security as more countries with technology
13.
Alternatives
Against
Wind and solar intermittent, excessive land use, unsightly, lack of
control
Water expensive, inefficient, unreliable
Biomass fuel excessive CO2 emissions
Shale gas expensive, environmental impact fracking
Fossil fuels CO2 emissions, environmental damage, cost
14.
Alternatives
For
Safety
Security
Not as dependent on high technology as nuclear
No waste storage problems
Increased employment (coal)
Increased flexibility coal, gas, oil, biomass fuels used for and hot
water not just electricity generation
15.
The Future
Controversial subject linked to
1.Environmental impact
2.Economic considerations
3.Global and national security
4.Public safety
5.Reliable and efficient production
BUT Dwindling energy sources + increasing
industrialization in developing world = rapid solutions
needed