際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
Public Ownership of
 Sports Franchises
: Investment, Novelty, or Fraud?



      Eugene J. Stroz, Jr;
Introduction
   What is Public ownership?
   Advantages
   Disadvantages
   Investment Bank
The Green Bay Packers
 The first offering stock 1923.
 Stock price 祉祉 5$  200$
 No dividends & minimal voting rights
 No benefits besides receiving a
  certificate & annual meeting
Boston Celtics
 1986 only NBA team to sell shares in
  a public offering
 Different from Packers:
1.Dividends
2.Sell shares
3.No voting right
4.No limitation in use of proceeds
The Florida Panthers
 Differences: A traditional Investment
1.Minimum purchase of 100 shares
2.Diversified operation
3.Attract investors rather than fans
 Similarities
1.No dividends
2.Restricted share holder rights
The Cleveland Indians
 1998 Indians offered stocks to public owner
 Similarities
1.No dividends
2.Minimal voting rights
3.Proceeds in principle owner pocket
 Differences
1.Indirect investment
Pros & Cons of Public ownership

Pros
1.Better than holding a city hostage
2.Fans can be a part of the team
3.Full Disclosure to protect buyer
Cons
 1.No physical invest value
 2.Fans are exploited for their money.
 3.The lack of balance
   between owner & share holders

The fundamental problem with public ownership of sport
franchises lies not in its viability (..) but rather with its
implementation, its impurity, and its startling lack of synergy
Investment, Novelty, or Fraud

 Different from regular investment

 Certificate as a novelty item, social
  personal value
 Where does investors money go?

More Related Content

Zemi 1st project 2012

  • 1. Public Ownership of Sports Franchises : Investment, Novelty, or Fraud? Eugene J. Stroz, Jr;
  • 2. Introduction What is Public ownership? Advantages Disadvantages Investment Bank
  • 3. The Green Bay Packers The first offering stock 1923. Stock price 祉祉 5$ 200$ No dividends & minimal voting rights No benefits besides receiving a certificate & annual meeting
  • 4. Boston Celtics 1986 only NBA team to sell shares in a public offering Different from Packers: 1.Dividends 2.Sell shares 3.No voting right 4.No limitation in use of proceeds
  • 5. The Florida Panthers Differences: A traditional Investment 1.Minimum purchase of 100 shares 2.Diversified operation 3.Attract investors rather than fans Similarities 1.No dividends 2.Restricted share holder rights
  • 6. The Cleveland Indians 1998 Indians offered stocks to public owner Similarities 1.No dividends 2.Minimal voting rights 3.Proceeds in principle owner pocket Differences 1.Indirect investment
  • 7. Pros & Cons of Public ownership Pros 1.Better than holding a city hostage 2.Fans can be a part of the team 3.Full Disclosure to protect buyer
  • 8. Cons 1.No physical invest value 2.Fans are exploited for their money. 3.The lack of balance between owner & share holders The fundamental problem with public ownership of sport franchises lies not in its viability (..) but rather with its implementation, its impurity, and its startling lack of synergy
  • 9. Investment, Novelty, or Fraud Different from regular investment Certificate as a novelty item, social personal value Where does investors money go?