Cognitive behavior therapy theory and practiceWuzna Haroon
?
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was developed in the 1960s by Aaron Beck based on his research challenging the psychoanalytic view of depression. Beck observed that depressed clients had negative biases in interpreting events that contributed to cognitive distortions. He developed CBT which focuses on identifying and modifying dysfunctional thoughts and beliefs. The key assumptions of CBT are that cognitions influence behaviors and emotions, and that maladaptive thinking can be identified and changed. Common techniques include cognitive restructuring to challenge irrational thoughts, behavioral experiments, and homework assignments.
The document summarizes Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) techniques. It discusses cognitive, emotive, and behavioral techniques used in REBT. The cognitive techniques aim to dispute irrational beliefs through rational analysis, changing language from "musts" and "oughts" to preferences, and reframing negative events. Emotive techniques help clients develop unconditional self-acceptance through rational-emotive imagery, role playing, and exercises to reduce shame. Behavioral techniques encourage clients to modify beliefs through exposure, risk-taking, paradoxical behavior, and postponing gratification.
25. ??????? ????? ?? : ???? ???? ??
????
??? (1997). ??? ????. ??: ???.
??? ? ?? (2001). ???? ????. ??: ???.
???£¬ ???£¬ ???£¬ ???£¬ ???£¬ ??? ?? (2004). ???? ????
? ??? ?? ??: ???.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects
revisited. Journ.al of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.
Beck, A. T. (976). Cognitiue Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. New
Y ork: Intemational Universities Press.
Bower, G. H. (981). Mood and Memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (997). Beliefs about worry and
intrusions: the Metacognitions Questionnaire. Journ.al of Anxiety
Disorders, 11, 279-315.
Davies, M. I., & Clark, D. M. (998). Thought suppression produces a
rebound effect with analogue post-traumatic intrusions. Behauiour
Research and Therapy, 36, 571-582.
EmmelKamp, P. M. G., & Aardema, A. (999). Metacognitive, specific
obsessive compulsive beliefs and obsessive compulsive behavior. Clinical
Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 139-146 (Special Issue, Metacognition
and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy).
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (975). Public and private
self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journ.al of Consulting and
Clinica! Psycho!ogy, 43, 522-527.
Heward, W. L., & Silvestri, S. M. (2004). The neutralization of special
education. In ]. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.) , Fads:
Dubious and improbable treatments for deuelopmental disabilities.
Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
Higgins, E. T. (991). Personality, social psychology, and person-situation
relations: standards and knowledge activation as a common language.
In: L.A. Pervin (EdJ , Handbook of Personality Theory and Research
(pp. 301-338). New York: Guilford.
Konopasek, D., & Fomess, S. R. (2004). Research regarding the use of
- 25-
26. ?? ¡¤ ??????(? 23 ? ? 2?)
psychopharmacology in the treatment of emotional and behavioral
disorders. In R. B. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn, & S. R. Mathur (EdsJ ,
Handbook 01 research in emotional and behavioral disorders. New
Y ork: Guilford.
Matthews, G., Hillyard, E. ]. & Campbell, S. E. (999). Metacognition and
maladaptive coping as components of test anxiety. Clinical Psychology
and Psychotherapy, 6, 111-126 (Special Issue, Metacognition and
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy).
Mattews, G., Mohamed, A., & Lochrie, B. (1998). Dispositional self-focus of
attention and individual differences in appraisal and coping. In: ].
Bermadez, A.M. Perez, A. Sanchez-Elvira G.K. van Heck (Eds),
Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 6, (pp. 278-285). Tilburg:
Tilburg University Press.
McNally, R. ]., & Ricciardi, ]. N. (996). Suppression of negative and neutral
thoughts. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24, 17-25.
Nelson, T. 0., Kruglanski, A. W., & Jost, T. ]. (998). Knowing thyself and
others: progress in metacognitive social psychology. In: V.Y. Yzerbyt, G.
Lories & B. Dardenne (Eds), Metacognition: Cognitive and Social
Dimensions (pp. 69-89). London: Sage.
Nelson, O. T., Stuart, R. B., Howard, G., & Crawley, M. (999).
Metacognition and clinical psychology: a preliminary framework for
research and practice. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 73-80
(Special Issue, Metacognition and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy).
Nelson, T. 0., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework
and some new findings. In: G.H. Bower (EdJ. The Psychology 01
Learning and M otivation (pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
Purdon, C., & Clark, D. A. (200¨¹a). Suppression of obsession-like thoughts in
non-clinical individuals. Part 1. Impact on thought frequency, appraisal
and mood state (submitted for publication).
Remschmidt, H., & Quaschmer, K. (2001). Psychodynamic therapy. In H.
Remschmidt (EdJ, Psychotherapy with children and adolescents (pp.
81-97). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salkovski, P. M., & Campbell, P. (994). Thought suppression induces
intrusions in naturally occurring negative intrusive thoughts. Behaviour
%
¦Ø
27. ??????? ????? ?? : ???? ???? ??
Research and Therapy, 32, 1-8.
Schwarz, N., & Clore. G. L. (988). How do 1 feel about it? Infonnational
function of affective states. In K. Fiedler & ].P. Forgas (Eds), Affect,
Cognition and Social Behaviour (pp. 44-62). Toronto: Hogrefe
International.
Teasdale, ]. D., & Barnard, P. ]. (993). ??ct£¬ Cognition and Change:
Remodelling Depressive Thought. Hove: Erlbaum.
Waldman, 1. D., & Lillenfield, S. O. (995). Diagnosis and classification. In M.
Hersen., & R. T. Ammennan (Eds.) , Advanced abnormal child
psychology (pp. 21-36) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Walker, H. M., R?nsey £¬ E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in
school: Strategies and best practices (2nd ed.J. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Wells, A., & Mattews, G. (994). Attention and Emotion. A Clinical
Perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.
Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and Me?cognition: Innovative
cognitive therapy. NY John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (996). Mode1ling cognition in emotional disorder:
The S-REF model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 867-870
Williams, ]. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (988).
Cognitive P?cholo? and Emotional Disorders. Chichester: Wiley.
York, D., Borkovec, T. D., Vasey, M., & Stern, R. (987). Effects of worry
and somatic anxiety induction on thoughts, emotion and physiological
activity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 523-526.
I?? ??: 2007. 04. 30. / ??? ??: 2007. 06. 11. / ?? ??: 2007. 06. 18.>
?
28. ?? ¡¤ ??????(? 23 ? ? 2?)
Abstract
Meta-Cognitive Intervention to Emotional-?ehavioral Disorders :
Self-Regulatory Executive Function Model
Jung, Dae Y oung
The purpose of this paper was to introduce the self-regulatory executive
function(S-REF) based on meta-cognitive approach in order to explore the
possibilities of expanding the domain of education object and diversifying
techniques of teaching emotional behavioral disorders.
Based on the observation of Meta-cognitive intervention to
emotional-behavioral disorders, a self-regulatory executive function model, the
following implications were derived in relation to the special education:
First, the range of emotional behavioral disorder must be expanded.
Second, various approaches must be explored and applied beyond behavioral
or ¡¯ cognitive-behavioral ¡¯ approach to special education for children with
emotional behavioral disorder. Third, a systematic effort must be made to
expand and apply meta-cognitive approach for children with
, emotional-behavioral¡¯ disorder that has not been given proper attention in
the field of special education.
Considering the wide-ranging domains of sub-disorder that can
appropriately apply meta-cognitive functions to the field of
emotional-behavioral disorder, special education based on those approaches
needs to be stimulated even more and specific intervention strategy must be
developed.
Key Words: Meta-Cognition, Schema Theory, Self-Regulatory Executive Function.
- 28-