The document discusses Basel regulations on bank capital requirements. It provides an overview of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III. Basel I introduced uniform capital adequacy calculations but had limitations. Basel II aimed to address Basel I deficiencies by introducing operational risk and more risk-sensitive credit risk calculations. Basel III further strengthened regulations by requiring higher quality capital holdings and introducing leverage ratios. The implications for small- and medium-sized enterprises include potentially higher credit costs, an increased focus on risk ratings, and a need for greater financial transparency.
The document discusses the Basel II Accords, which establish international standards for banking regulations and capital requirements. Basel II aims to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by measuring credit, operational, and market risks. It introduces a three pillar framework: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital standards; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. Implementation of Basel II varies by country and bank sophistication in risk measurement. The overall goal is a safer, more stable global banking system.
Basel II is an international standard that aims to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management within the banking sector. It improves upon Basel I by making capital requirements more risk sensitive and aligning regulatory capital more closely with underlying bank risks. Basel II consists of three pillars that cover minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Implementation of Basel II varies across countries and regulators but aims to modernize capital adequacy standards to be more comprehensive and risk sensitive.
Basel iii Compliance Professionals Association (BiiiCPA) - Part ACompliance LLC
油
Certified Basel iii Professional (CBiiiPro)
Objectives: The seminar has been designed to provide with the knowledge and skills needed to understand the new Basel III framework and to work in Basel III Projects.
Target Audience: This course is intended for managers and professionals working in Banks, Financial Organizations, Financial Groups and Financial Conglomerates who need to understand the new Basel III requirements, challenges and opportunities. It is also intended for management consultants, vendors, suppliers and service providers working for financial organizations.
This course is highly recommended for:
- Managers and Professionals involved in Basel III (decision making and implementation)
- Risk and Compliance Officers
- Auditors
- IT Professionals
- Strategic Planners
- Analysts
- Legal Counsels
- Process Owners
Basel III, albeit delayed, is set to change the banking landscape. More capital and greater liquidity will change the way banks do business in the future. More interestingly, Basel III could well lead a change in the financial services landscape globally. A "Shadow Banking Sector" is already a reality and Basel III opens up significant opportunities for capital rich emerging market banks.
This is a first in a series of presentations exploring Basel III, its impact on the global banking sector and most importantly possible response strategies banks could adopt to gain competitive advantage.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. It outlines Basel I, introduced in 1988, which focused on credit risk. Basel II, introduced in 2004, takes a three pillar approach focusing on minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive. Some benefits of Basel II include improved risk management and efficiency, while challenges include lack of historical data and difficulty accounting for diversity across countries.
The regulation of banking industry (basel accord)Amrita Debnath
油
The document summarizes the Basel Accords, which are international agreements that establish regulations on bank capital adequacy. Basel I established minimum capital requirements and risk weightings for assets. Basel II introduced more risk-sensitive capital requirements and three pillars for supervision. Basel III strengthened capital requirements after the 2008 crisis by requiring higher quality capital reserves and introducing leverage ratios and liquidity standards. The accords aim to promote global financial stability by reducing risk in the banking system.
The document provides information on the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Basel I accord. It discusses that BIS was established in 1930 by central banks and continues to serve as a forum for international cooperation on banking supervision. Basel I, released in 1988, was the first international banking accord that set minimum capital requirements for credit risk. It established risk weights for various types of assets and exposures. However, it only addressed credit risk and was later improved by Basel II and III.
Basel II is an international standard that establishes capital requirements for banks to guard against financial and operational risks. It consists of three pillars: minimum capital requirements to cover credit, market and operational risks; supervisory review to ensure adequate capital to cover all risks; and market discipline through disclosure requirements. While Basel II aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive, Indian banks face challenges in implementing it due to lack of risk management expertise, need for technology investments, and restructuring of non-performing assets. A gradual implementation process will help ensure a smooth transition to the new framework.
Basel II and III are international banking regulatory accords that establish capital requirements and risk management standards. Basel II, established in 1988, focused on credit risk but did not adequately address operational and market risk. Basel III, developed after the 2008 crisis, strengthened capital and liquidity requirements and introduced leverage and liquidity ratios. The Basel accords aim to ensure banks maintain adequate capital reserves to absorb losses and promote stable, risk-sensitive banking globally.
The document summarizes the history and development of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel Accords. It discusses how the Basel Committee was formed in 1974 in response to banking crises. It then describes the three Basel Accords - Basel I established minimum capital requirements in 1988, Basel II introduced additional risk-based requirements in 2004, and Basel III strengthened capital and liquidity standards following the 2008 financial crisis. The document provides details on the pillars and key provisions of each accord.
Basel III is a global regulatory framework that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduces new regulations on bank liquidity and leverage. It seeks to raise the quality of capital held by banks and strengthen their ability to absorb losses. The document outlines the key components of Basel III, including higher capital requirements, a new leverage ratio, and liquidity standards. It also discusses the potential macroeconomic impact and advantages of Basel III, as well as country-level implementations like in the US.
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrastSyed Ashraf Ali
油
The Basel Accords is referred to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking regulations). Basel I, Basel II and Basel III was issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of
recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
This document discusses capital requirements for banks and the Basel accords. It provides context for why capital requirements are needed due to risks banks face from loans and investments. It summarizes the objectives and key aspects of Basel I, which was an initial international agreement on capital standards in 1988. It then discusses weaknesses in Basel I that led to its revision and the introduction of Basel II in 2004, which aimed to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive. The document outlines the three pillars of Basel II - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It also provides details on the approaches to calculating capital requirements for credit, market and operational risks under Basel II.
The document summarizes key points from an RMA Insurance Roundtable discussion on risk management and regulation. Some of the main topics discussed include:
- The importance of enterprise risk management (ERM) and moving away from siloed risk approaches.
- Increased regulation is expected in areas like governance, liquidity, capital requirements, and product suitability.
- Macroprudential oversight will focus on systemic risk.
- Canada is actively engaging in international regulatory reforms through organizations like the G20 and OSFI.
- Proposed Canadian guidelines will address issues like governance, risk management, interest rate and liquidity risk.
- Establishing an effective ERM framework requires quantifying risks, reliable data, and
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel Accords. It provides background on the Basel Committee, describing it as an organization established in 1930 that develops banking supervision standards. It outlines the three pillars of Basel II, which include minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline through disclosure. The goals of Basel II were to make capital allocation more risk sensitive, separate and quantify operational and credit risk, and better align economic and regulatory capital.
Basel III is the third set of banking regulations by the Basel Committee that aims to improve banks' ability to withstand financial and economic stress through better risk management, governance, transparency, and capital adequacy requirements. It establishes minimum capital requirements calculated based on credit, market and operational risk, as well as capital buffers, leverage ratios and liquidity ratios to increase banks' resilience. The regulations also strengthen supervisory review and market discipline through improved disclosures.
The document summarizes the history and key aspects of Basel Accords, which are international standards for bank capital adequacy, stress testing, and liquidity risk. It outlines regulations pre-1988, Basel I in 1988, amendments in 1996 and proposed Basel II in 1999. Basel I first introduced capital requirements. Basel II in 2007 improved this with three pillars for minimum capital, supervision, and disclosure. It introduced risk-weighted capital requirements and recognized credit risk mitigants. However, both accords were criticized for issues like pro-cyclicality and regulatory arbitrage.
Basel 3 is an update to the Basel Accords that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduce new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and leverage. Key changes include tighter definitions of Tier 1 capital, a leverage ratio, countercyclical capital buffers, and new liquidity standards. The goals are to promote a more resilient banking system and reduce risk of financial crises. Basel 3 also seeks to address procyclicality concerns by promoting capital conservation and countercyclical buffers.
Basel 1 and Basel 2 promote banking safety and soundness. Basel 1 introduced risk-based capital requirements but had weaknesses. Basel 2 builds on Basel 1 with three pillars: minimum capital requirements calculated based on credit, market and operational risk; supervisory review of risk management; and market discipline through disclosure. It utilizes internal ratings-based and standardized approaches to determine capital requirements in a more risk-sensitive manner.
The Basel Accords are agreements established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that provide recommendations on banking regulations and standards. The purpose is to ensure that banks have sufficient capital reserves to protect against unexpected financial risks. Basel I established initial capital requirements and risk weights. Basel II introduced refined risk management standards. Basel III was released in 2010 in response to the financial crisis to strengthen capital and liquidity standards for banks.
Hse lecture iii (may 23, 2011) basel i and basel ii (1)Rohan Rustagi
油
This document provides a history of the evolution of bank capital regulation from early US practices to the Basel I and Basel II accords. It discusses key events that led to the development of international capital standards, including the 1988 Basel I Accord which established the first risk-based capital requirements. It then outlines the development of the 2006 Basel II Accord, which refined capital requirements to incorporate banks' internal risk models and added a pillar for operational risk. The document also notes some criticisms of the accords and implications for regulation going forward.
Understanding Basel III, January 2012 to June 2012Compliance LLC
油
The document discusses the importance of high-quality risk disclosure for promoting financial stability and market discipline. It notes that risk disclosure is good for markets, regulators, and financial stability. However, disclosure must be complemented by incentives for monitoring. The public sector has a role to play in promoting transparency to address market failures around information production and contagion risks. Regulators have focused on improving disclosure templates and data to strengthen the third pillar of Basel III on market discipline.
Basel iii impacts on ifsi and role of the ifsb by abdullah haronUmer Ahmed, CIFP
油
The document discusses the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) and Basel III. The IFSB is an international standard-setting body that serves Islamic financial regulatory and supervisory agencies. It complements standard-setting bodies like the Basel Committee. The document provides an overview of the IFSB, including its objectives, membership details, and the development of its standards. It then discusses Basel III and its potential impacts on Islamic financial institutions, given differences in their risk profiles and balance sheets compared to conventional banks. The role of the IFSB in addressing these differences is also mentioned.
Risk Trends - Parkview Newsletter September 2010ugulvadi
油
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Act") was signed into law on July 21, 2010 to address the causes of the financial crisis. The Act introduces increased regulation of banks and other financial institutions to prevent future crises and ensure taxpayers are not forced to bail out firms that are "too big to fail". It also aims to protect consumers, reform executive compensation, and bring transparency and accountability to the financial system. However, some question if the Act will truly prevent future crises or simply react to the most recent one.
Under the Basel II framework, Standardized Approach for Credit Risk allows consideration of External Credit Ratings for the calculation of risk weighted assets/capital charge. This presentation provides an overview of the approach as prescribed for Indian Banking Industry by RBI.
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel Accords. It provides background on the BIS and establishes that the Basel Committee published Basel I in 1988 to establish minimum capital requirements for banks. Basel I focused on credit risk and classified assets into risk weight categories. It aimed to strengthen stability in international banking and decrease competitive inequality. However, Basel I had limitations like simplistic risk differentiation and a static view of default risk. This led to the development of Basel II.
The document outlines the Treasury's framework for regulatory reform, focusing first on containing systemic risk. It discusses establishing a single regulator for systemically important firms, higher capital and risk management standards for such firms, requiring registration of large hedge funds, regulating over-the-counter derivatives markets, strengthening money market fund regulation, and creating stronger resolution authority for failing complex institutions. The framework aims to modernize financial oversight and prevent future crises.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of the banking sector. It describes the key aspects of Basel I, issued in 1988, and Basel II, issued in 2004. Basel II built on Basel I by establishing three pillars: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital requirements; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. The overall goal was to better align regulatory capital with risks and encourage sound risk management practices.
This document provides an overview of risk management and Basel II. It discusses key concepts such as types of capital, economic capital, regulatory capital, expected and unexpected loss. It also summarizes the three pillars of Basel II including minimum capital requirements, supervisory review process, and market discipline. Approaches for credit risk, operational risk and market risk management under Basel II are outlined. The document also covers topics like value at risk, credit risk mitigation, and best practices in credit risk management.
The document discusses the evolution of the Basel Accords from 1988 to the present. It highlights that:
1) Basel I, adopted in 1988, aimed to strengthen bank stability and create equal competition. However, it only considered credit risk and encouraged regulatory arbitrage.
2) Basel II, introduced in 2004, aimed to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by incorporating banks' internal risk management. It included three pillars for minimum capital, supervisory review, and market discipline.
3) While Basel III, finalized in 2010 after the financial crisis, aims to mitigate past damage, the results of its stricter capital standards are still to be seen as countries implement its guidelines.
Basel II and III are international banking regulatory accords that establish capital requirements and risk management standards. Basel II, established in 1988, focused on credit risk but did not adequately address operational and market risk. Basel III, developed after the 2008 crisis, strengthened capital and liquidity requirements and introduced leverage and liquidity ratios. The Basel accords aim to ensure banks maintain adequate capital reserves to absorb losses and promote stable, risk-sensitive banking globally.
The document summarizes the history and development of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel Accords. It discusses how the Basel Committee was formed in 1974 in response to banking crises. It then describes the three Basel Accords - Basel I established minimum capital requirements in 1988, Basel II introduced additional risk-based requirements in 2004, and Basel III strengthened capital and liquidity standards following the 2008 financial crisis. The document provides details on the pillars and key provisions of each accord.
Basel III is a global regulatory framework that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduces new regulations on bank liquidity and leverage. It seeks to raise the quality of capital held by banks and strengthen their ability to absorb losses. The document outlines the key components of Basel III, including higher capital requirements, a new leverage ratio, and liquidity standards. It also discusses the potential macroeconomic impact and advantages of Basel III, as well as country-level implementations like in the US.
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrastSyed Ashraf Ali
油
The Basel Accords is referred to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking regulations). Basel I, Basel II and Basel III was issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of
recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
This document discusses capital requirements for banks and the Basel accords. It provides context for why capital requirements are needed due to risks banks face from loans and investments. It summarizes the objectives and key aspects of Basel I, which was an initial international agreement on capital standards in 1988. It then discusses weaknesses in Basel I that led to its revision and the introduction of Basel II in 2004, which aimed to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive. The document outlines the three pillars of Basel II - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It also provides details on the approaches to calculating capital requirements for credit, market and operational risks under Basel II.
The document summarizes key points from an RMA Insurance Roundtable discussion on risk management and regulation. Some of the main topics discussed include:
- The importance of enterprise risk management (ERM) and moving away from siloed risk approaches.
- Increased regulation is expected in areas like governance, liquidity, capital requirements, and product suitability.
- Macroprudential oversight will focus on systemic risk.
- Canada is actively engaging in international regulatory reforms through organizations like the G20 and OSFI.
- Proposed Canadian guidelines will address issues like governance, risk management, interest rate and liquidity risk.
- Establishing an effective ERM framework requires quantifying risks, reliable data, and
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel Accords. It provides background on the Basel Committee, describing it as an organization established in 1930 that develops banking supervision standards. It outlines the three pillars of Basel II, which include minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline through disclosure. The goals of Basel II were to make capital allocation more risk sensitive, separate and quantify operational and credit risk, and better align economic and regulatory capital.
Basel III is the third set of banking regulations by the Basel Committee that aims to improve banks' ability to withstand financial and economic stress through better risk management, governance, transparency, and capital adequacy requirements. It establishes minimum capital requirements calculated based on credit, market and operational risk, as well as capital buffers, leverage ratios and liquidity ratios to increase banks' resilience. The regulations also strengthen supervisory review and market discipline through improved disclosures.
The document summarizes the history and key aspects of Basel Accords, which are international standards for bank capital adequacy, stress testing, and liquidity risk. It outlines regulations pre-1988, Basel I in 1988, amendments in 1996 and proposed Basel II in 1999. Basel I first introduced capital requirements. Basel II in 2007 improved this with three pillars for minimum capital, supervision, and disclosure. It introduced risk-weighted capital requirements and recognized credit risk mitigants. However, both accords were criticized for issues like pro-cyclicality and regulatory arbitrage.
Basel 3 is an update to the Basel Accords that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduce new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and leverage. Key changes include tighter definitions of Tier 1 capital, a leverage ratio, countercyclical capital buffers, and new liquidity standards. The goals are to promote a more resilient banking system and reduce risk of financial crises. Basel 3 also seeks to address procyclicality concerns by promoting capital conservation and countercyclical buffers.
Basel 1 and Basel 2 promote banking safety and soundness. Basel 1 introduced risk-based capital requirements but had weaknesses. Basel 2 builds on Basel 1 with three pillars: minimum capital requirements calculated based on credit, market and operational risk; supervisory review of risk management; and market discipline through disclosure. It utilizes internal ratings-based and standardized approaches to determine capital requirements in a more risk-sensitive manner.
The Basel Accords are agreements established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that provide recommendations on banking regulations and standards. The purpose is to ensure that banks have sufficient capital reserves to protect against unexpected financial risks. Basel I established initial capital requirements and risk weights. Basel II introduced refined risk management standards. Basel III was released in 2010 in response to the financial crisis to strengthen capital and liquidity standards for banks.
Hse lecture iii (may 23, 2011) basel i and basel ii (1)Rohan Rustagi
油
This document provides a history of the evolution of bank capital regulation from early US practices to the Basel I and Basel II accords. It discusses key events that led to the development of international capital standards, including the 1988 Basel I Accord which established the first risk-based capital requirements. It then outlines the development of the 2006 Basel II Accord, which refined capital requirements to incorporate banks' internal risk models and added a pillar for operational risk. The document also notes some criticisms of the accords and implications for regulation going forward.
Understanding Basel III, January 2012 to June 2012Compliance LLC
油
The document discusses the importance of high-quality risk disclosure for promoting financial stability and market discipline. It notes that risk disclosure is good for markets, regulators, and financial stability. However, disclosure must be complemented by incentives for monitoring. The public sector has a role to play in promoting transparency to address market failures around information production and contagion risks. Regulators have focused on improving disclosure templates and data to strengthen the third pillar of Basel III on market discipline.
Basel iii impacts on ifsi and role of the ifsb by abdullah haronUmer Ahmed, CIFP
油
The document discusses the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) and Basel III. The IFSB is an international standard-setting body that serves Islamic financial regulatory and supervisory agencies. It complements standard-setting bodies like the Basel Committee. The document provides an overview of the IFSB, including its objectives, membership details, and the development of its standards. It then discusses Basel III and its potential impacts on Islamic financial institutions, given differences in their risk profiles and balance sheets compared to conventional banks. The role of the IFSB in addressing these differences is also mentioned.
Risk Trends - Parkview Newsletter September 2010ugulvadi
油
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Act") was signed into law on July 21, 2010 to address the causes of the financial crisis. The Act introduces increased regulation of banks and other financial institutions to prevent future crises and ensure taxpayers are not forced to bail out firms that are "too big to fail". It also aims to protect consumers, reform executive compensation, and bring transparency and accountability to the financial system. However, some question if the Act will truly prevent future crises or simply react to the most recent one.
Under the Basel II framework, Standardized Approach for Credit Risk allows consideration of External Credit Ratings for the calculation of risk weighted assets/capital charge. This presentation provides an overview of the approach as prescribed for Indian Banking Industry by RBI.
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel Accords. It provides background on the BIS and establishes that the Basel Committee published Basel I in 1988 to establish minimum capital requirements for banks. Basel I focused on credit risk and classified assets into risk weight categories. It aimed to strengthen stability in international banking and decrease competitive inequality. However, Basel I had limitations like simplistic risk differentiation and a static view of default risk. This led to the development of Basel II.
The document outlines the Treasury's framework for regulatory reform, focusing first on containing systemic risk. It discusses establishing a single regulator for systemically important firms, higher capital and risk management standards for such firms, requiring registration of large hedge funds, regulating over-the-counter derivatives markets, strengthening money market fund regulation, and creating stronger resolution authority for failing complex institutions. The framework aims to modernize financial oversight and prevent future crises.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of the banking sector. It describes the key aspects of Basel I, issued in 1988, and Basel II, issued in 2004. Basel II built on Basel I by establishing three pillars: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital requirements; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. The overall goal was to better align regulatory capital with risks and encourage sound risk management practices.
This document provides an overview of risk management and Basel II. It discusses key concepts such as types of capital, economic capital, regulatory capital, expected and unexpected loss. It also summarizes the three pillars of Basel II including minimum capital requirements, supervisory review process, and market discipline. Approaches for credit risk, operational risk and market risk management under Basel II are outlined. The document also covers topics like value at risk, credit risk mitigation, and best practices in credit risk management.
The document discusses the evolution of the Basel Accords from 1988 to the present. It highlights that:
1) Basel I, adopted in 1988, aimed to strengthen bank stability and create equal competition. However, it only considered credit risk and encouraged regulatory arbitrage.
2) Basel II, introduced in 2004, aimed to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by incorporating banks' internal risk management. It included three pillars for minimum capital, supervisory review, and market discipline.
3) While Basel III, finalized in 2010 after the financial crisis, aims to mitigate past damage, the results of its stricter capital standards are still to be seen as countries implement its guidelines.
Risk management in banking sector project report mba financeBabasab Patil
油
This document discusses risk management in the banking sector. It introduces the concepts of risk management and provides definitions of key risk types including credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and regulatory risk. It also summarizes Basel II, the international banking accord that introduced a risk-based capital adequacy framework. The framework has three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Effective risk management and maintaining adequate capital are important for banking stability and soundness.
Basel III and its impact on the Indian banking sector. Basel I, II, and III are international banking accord that set capital requirements for banks to reduce risks. Basel III strengthens bank capital and liquidity rules following the 2008 crisis. For India, Basel III means banks must increase capital, manage liquidity risks better, and improve transparency. This will impact bank profitability, capital raising, and consolidation in the Indian banking system.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was created in 1974 by central bank governors of Group of Ten nations. It meets four times a year at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. The Basel I Accord of 1988 aimed to strengthen banking stability and consistency. It assigned risk weights to asset classes from 0% to 100%. Basel II, created in response to Basel I limitations, introduced three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Pillar 1 separates credit and operational risk. Pillar 2 covers banks' risk assessments and supervisory review. Pillar 3 mandates risk disclosures. The RBI implemented Basel I in 1993 and Basel II in 2007 for Indian banks, using standardized approaches
Basel II is an international banking accord that establishes capital requirements for banks. It aims to create an international standard for how much capital banks need to put aside to guard against financial and operational risks. Basel II includes three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It addresses deficiencies in Basel I by incorporating additional risk categories like credit and operational risk. Implementing Basel II poses challenges for Indian banks like increased capital requirements, the need for risk management expertise and technology investments. However, gradual implementation could help Indian banks migrate smoothly to the new framework.
Caruana discusses Basel II and its goals of introducing a more forward-looking, risk-sensitive approach to capital requirements that incentivizes banks to improve risk management. He outlines how Basel II incorporates lessons learned about financial stability, trends in financial innovation and risk management, and aims to promote stability through more risk-sensitive capital rules, incentives for better internal risk management, and enhanced market discipline and supervision cooperation across jurisdictions. While Basel II may not address all areas,
The document discusses Basel, an international banking standards organization. It provides background on Basel I and II, which established minimum capital requirements and risk management standards for banks. Basel II had three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III was then introduced after the 2008 financial crisis to strengthen regulations with stricter capital and liquidity standards, as well as additional buffers to improve banks' ability to withstand financial stress.
Basel III is a global regulatory standard that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduce new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and leverage. It was implemented in response to deficiencies in the previous Basel II framework that were exposed by the global financial crisis. The goals of Basel III include improving the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks, reducing systemic risk, and increasing transparency. It establishes stricter capital standards, introduces capital buffers, and imposes new liquidity measures including the liquidity coverage ratio and net stable funding ratio.
The document then discusses the key aspects of Basel I and Basel II accords. Basel I, introduced in 1998, required banks to hold capital equal to at least 8% of total assets, measured according to their riskiness across four buckets (0%, 20%, 50%, 100%). Basel II, published in 2004, consists of three pillars - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It introduced a risk
Changes to Basel Regulation Post 2008 CrisisIshan Jain
油
Subprime crisis
Basel Committee objectives and history
Pillars of Basel 2 and Basel 3
Basel 3 Capital Requirements
capital Rations
Capital Buffers
Leverage Ratios
Global Liquidity Standards
macroeconomic factors
Value at Risk
Expected Shortfall
SoSeBa Bank - Risk Managment of a fictitious BankAlliochah Gavyn
油
The document discusses risk management at SoSeBa Bank in Mauritius. It introduces the bank and outlines its mission to provide banking services to the working class population. It then discusses key risks like credit, liquidity, and market risk that the bank needs to measure and manage. It provides an overview of banking regulations in Mauritius as well as international standards like the Basel Accords. The document emphasizes the importance of robust risk management practices like risk modeling, exposure limits, and stress testing for the long-term success of the new bank.
Basel III is an international regulatory framework that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduce new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and leverage. It was implemented in Bangladesh to improve regulation of banks and address shortcomings of previous Basel accords. Key aspects include higher capital conservation buffers, a countercyclical capital buffer, and eliminating tier 3 capital. The buffers were phased in fully by 2019 and must be met with high-quality Common Equity Tier 1 capital to ensure banks can withstand periods of financial stress. Basel III thus enhances capital standards and promotes a more stable and resilient banking sector in Bangladesh.
The Basel Accords are a series of banking regulations established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The document discusses the history and objectives of the Basel Accords. It explains that the Basel Committee was established in 1974 to improve banking supervision globally and set minimum capital requirements for banks. The Basel I Accord established the first capital requirements in 1988. Subsequent accords like Basel II and III enhanced regulations around capital adequacy ratios, risk management, disclosure, and liquidity to promote global financial stability.
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel accords. It provides background on the Basel Committee, describing how it was established in 1974 and its goal of strengthening banking regulations internationally. It then summarizes the key aspects of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III, including their capital requirements, risk categorizations, and goals of improving risk management and financial stability. The summaries highlight how each accord built upon the previous one by incorporating additional risk types and making requirements more risk-sensitive.
Basel II is an international banking standard that recommends regulations for how much capital banks must hold. It aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive by aligning them with banks' financial and operational risks. The three pillars of Basel II are: 1) Minimum capital requirements based on credit, market, and operational risk; 2) Supervisory review of risk profiles and capital adequacy; 3) Market discipline through disclosure and transparency. Implementing Basel II poses challenges for Indian banks like additional capital requirements and favoring large banks with stronger risk management.
3. - To operate as the Central Bank of Europe,
- To organize international payments system formed by
central banks of countries.
- The oldest international financial institution
- Remains the principal center for international central
bank cooperation.
3
4. Basel Committee Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Founded in 1975 by the central bank governors of the
Group of Ten countries
Main Goals:
- To improve the understanding
of key challenges in supervision
- To improve quality of banking
supervision worldwide
4
5. BASEL I
The purpose of Basel I standards was to introduce a
uniform way of calculating capital adequacy
Risk Weight % Asset Category
0% for governments of OECD countries
10 % public institutions of OECD countries
20 % OECD countries banks
50 % credits for housing mortgage securities.
100 % for other countries governmental and
private institutions 5
7. The bank has to maintain capital equal to at least 8% of
its risk-weighted assets.
7
8. BENEFITS OF BASEL I STANDARDS
- Substantial increases in capital adequacy ratios of
internationally active banks;
- Relatively simple structure;
- Worldwide adoption;
- Increased competitive equality among internationally
active banks;
- Greater discipline in managing capital;
- A benchmark for assessment by market participants.
8
9. WEAKNESSES OF
BASEL I
STANDARDS
Limited differentiation of credit risk
Static measure of default risk
No recognition of term-structure of credit risk
Lack of recognition of portfolio diversification effects.
9
10. BASEL II STANDARDS Prepared in 2001
Published in 2004
Basel I Applied in 2007
to set the minimal capital requirements
Basel II
to remove the deficiencies of Basel I Accords
to measure the risks with more sensitive methods
to set an effective risk management system,
to develop a market discipline,
To increase the efficiency of measurement of capital
requirements constructing a robust banking system
and ensuring financial stability 10
12. Pillar one explains the new capital adequacy ratio. Basel II
standards added the operational risk to the denominator of
capital adequacy ratio for the first time. In addition, credit
risk is detailed whereas the market risk remains the same.
So the new ratio shaped like the following
Capital Adequacy Ratio:
Capital
8%
Credit Risk + Market Risk + Operational Risk 12
13. Pillar two basically
focuses on the duty and
responsibilities of the
regulatory authorities
According to the pillar two, banks need to construct more
powerful risk management systems and increase the
importance of internal control.
Provides a framework for dealing with all the other risks a
bank may face (such as systematic risk, liqudity risk)
Recommends active interaction between banks and their
supervisors
13
14. Basel II should maintain security
and robustness in financial system
therefore protect the capital at least
in its current state.
Aims to promote greater stability in the financial system.
Encourages prudent management and transparency in
financial reporting of banks.
Focuses on effective disclosure of information and
specifies the nature and type of information that should be
reported to market participants.
14
15. COMPARISON
BASEL 1 BASEL 2
Consideration of only credit A more comprehensive
and market risks. approach to CAR and
consideration of operational risk.
Use of risk ratings given by
Differentiation of OECD credit rating institutions to
membership to determine credit determine credit risks.
risks. Alternative methods for each
Use of only one method of risk risk category and use of banks
quantification. risk measurement methods.
Emphasis on risk management.
Same supervisory approach 3 pillars concept, emphasis on
for all financial institutions. supervisory and market discipline
and regulations on these issues.
Emphasis is only on
minimum CAR.
15
16. BASEL III
Basel III is a new global regulatory standards on bank
capital adequacy, leverage and liquidity to strenghten
supervision and risk management of banking sector.
Requires banks to hold more capital and higher quality of
capital than Basel II requirements.
16
17. PROPOSED CHANGES
1 - The quality, consistency, and transparency of the new
capital base will be raised.
Tier1: Capital must be common shares and retained
earnings.
Tier2: Instruments will be harmonized.
Tier3: Capital will be eliminated
2 - The risk coverage of the capital framework will be
strengthened.
17
18. 3 - The committee will introduce a leverage ratio as a
supplementary measure to the Basel II risk based
framework
4 - The committee is reviewing the need for additional
capital, liquidity or other supervisory measures to reduce
the externalities created by systematically important
situations.
18
19. IMPORTANCE OF SMEs
- SMEs tend to employ more labor-intensive production
processes than large enterprises. Accordingly, they
contribute significantly to the new employment
opportunities, the generation of income and ultimately,
the reduction of poverty.
- SMEs are keys to the transition of agricultural to
industrial economies as they provide simple opportunities
for processing activities
- SMEs are good examples for entrepreneurship
development, innovation and risk taking behavior and the
transition towards larger enterprises
19
20. SMEs
support the building up of systemic productive capacities.
help to absorb productive resources at all levels of the
economy
contribute to the creation of flexible economic systems in
which small and large firms are interlinked.
20
21. IMPLICATIONS ON SMEs
In order to determine capital adequacy in Basel II, SME
classification limits are determined according to total gross
sales.
21
22. If banks do not use the advanced methodologies that Basel
II proposes, their capital needs will increase and this will
bring out the situation that they convey this extra cost to
their credit packages. The consequence has noticeable
implications on SMEs especially in developing countries.
In contrast, if banks apply Basel II Standard and its total
loan exceed one million Euros, it will be evaluated in the
corporate portfolio and the risk rating note that is given by
external rating agencies will be considered by the banks.
This situation will inevitably affect the enterprises that use
high amount of loans.
22
23. The percentage of SMEs out of the total number of firms
in OECD countries is greater than 97 percent, generating
over half of private sector employment.
Their contribution to employment, adoptability to new
developments due to their flexible nature, creation of
product differentiation, provision of intermediate goods are
considerable attribution for an economy.
23
26. - Definition of SMEs has been changed
- Credit pricing will be made related to risk
- SMEs will have to take a degree from banks or rating
agencies in order to determination of its credit risk
- The assets that can be showed as a warranty has
been redefined.
-Registration and reporting of financial information and
transparency has become much more important.
-The SMEs will try to seek different sources of finances
26