David andersonpresentation01
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes169 views
David Anderson is a neurobiologist who gave a talk arguing that the brain is too complex to be treated like a "bag of chemicals" by psychiatric drugs. He demonstrated that different neurons trigger different reactions in separate brain regions, so modifying the entire brain uniformly is ineffective. This "pour it all in" approach also causes dangerous side effects. Instead of this blind method, he advocates studying similar animals to determine the specific sources of problems and develop more targeted solutions. While rats and fruit flies provide an accessible model, he remains curious despite uncertainties about their emotional experiences.
![Portafoli 2n trimestre [desat automticament]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/portafoli2ntrimestredesatautomticament-130318055715-phpapp02-thumbnail.jpg?width=560&fit=bounds)
More Related Content
Similar to David andersonpresentation01 (17)
David andersonpresentation01
- 2. Neurobiologist at the California David Anderson: Institute of Technology
- 3. In his talk entitled: Your brain is more than a bag of Chemicals He talks about the idea that Modern psychiatric drugs treat the chemistry of the brain as a collective bag instead of the incredibly complex organ that it really is.
- 4. He supports this through the demonstration that certain neurons trigger different reactions in different sections of the brain. Meaning that modifying the entire brain, like pouring oil on the engine block, is not effective.
- 5. Furthermore, all of the dangerous side effects of these forms of medication results from this pour it all in kind of methodology. Its dangerous because were not treating sources, were effectively going in blind. Instead of looking for the sources of these problems.
- 6. His idea then, is to study animals that are similar to humans and determine where these problems arise. Through that, we can create more effective solutions. He believes that its currently impossible to do these kinds of tests on Humans. Thus, laboratory rats and fruit flies are an easy, simple, and cost effective alternative.
- 7. He remains curious and passionate about his work. Maintaining his work despite not being sure that the Fruit Flies he is working with, are capable of complex emotional states.
- 8. The raise your hand if you know anyone who suffers from a Mental Illness immediately gathers Your attention and He clearly cares about, describes his interest in and is passionate about a single question. his cause. Befitting his disposition and nature, I give him a 4/5.
- 9. His slides focus on his overall statement. While some of his slides are not chosen for artistic quality
- 10. Most of his supplement his points as he goes about his speech. Appearing to the audience to visually demonstrate a verbal point.
- 11. His speech remains informative and clear. His intention is to explain his view, as he is aware that his audience is not well versed within his area of expertise. Treating his audience as king, he respectfully reveals information in an appropriate and straightforward manner.
- 12. In comparison: Both Sir Ken Robinson, and David Anderson speak passionately about their beliefs. Supporting these beliefs with intelligent, well worded commentary and reasoning.
- 13. In contrast, Sir Robinson focuses on humor, connecting with his audience and the urgency that he believes his cause must be applied.
- 14. Mr. Anderson, in contrast comes across as patient, knowing that his studies will probably continue as things move forward as they may lead to newer and better methods to resolve their problems.
- 15. Ultimately, be passionate. If you are interested in your work, your interest will show through your inflection, through how you carry yourself.