DYNAMICALLY-TACTICAL GEOMETRY in my SYSTEMS OF PLAY and APPLIED MATHEMATIC in PERCENTAGES (3-3-3-1 ; 2-5-3 ; 4-6-0 ; 4-4-2 Rhomboid ) (ENGLISH VERSION) - by Branko Nikovski ( the creator of the Method 5x5 and the Morpho 5 Cycle)
36 likes4,574 views
This document presents a detailed analysis of dynamically-tactical geometry in football systems of play, highlighting offensive strategies and how they evolve during a game. It divides the pitch into specific zones to create tactical situations, emphasizing the importance of numerical superiority in various zones to dominate possession and score. The author compares their innovative systems against traditional approaches using applied mathematics and statistical evaluations.
DYNAMICALLY-TACTICAL GEOMETRY in my SYSTEMS OF PLAY and APPLIED MATHEMATIC in PERCENTAGES (3-3-3-1 ; 2-5-3 ; 4-6-0 ; 4-4-2 Rhomboid ) (ENGLISH VERSION) - by Branko Nikovski ( the creator of the Method 5x5 and the Morpho 5 Cycle)
- 1. DYNAMICALLY-TACTICAL GEOMETRY in my SYSTEMS OF PLAY and APPLIED MATHEMATIC IN PERCENTS 3-3-3-1 2-5-3 4-6-0 4-4-2 Rhomboid by BRANKO NIKOVSKI ( the creator of the Method 5x5 and the Morpho 5 Cycle)
- 2. 1. Even if , on the pictures, the systems of play are demonstrated in static way, during the development of the game, the Dynamically-Tactical Geometry has a offensive progression : 1) Win the ball with offensive high pressing 2) Domination of the game (space and time) via the ball possession 3) Scoring goals via multiplex offensive actions (via the Dynamically-Tactical Geometry)
- 3. 2. The division of the football pitch in 4 MERIDIANS and 4 PARALLELS 2.1 Why 4 MERIDIANS and 4 PARALLELS ? -When you divide +/- 105 x 68 pitch in 4x4 , the result is 16 equal rectangles with +/-26,25 x 17 dimensions. -In everyone of this rectangles, we create (we will create) a real tactical and technical football situations : 1vs0, 2vs0, 3vs0, 2vs1, 1vs1, 2vs2, 3vs2, 3vs3 , developing and implementing our football philosophy / vision/ ideas via the Dynamically-Tactical Geometry. 2.2 Specific : 4 Horizontal Zones and 3 Vertical Zones 2.2.1 : Horizontal Zones : -Horizontal Zone 1 : the Zone of Conceiving (of the Offensive action) -Horizontal Zone 2 : the Zone of Constructing (of the Offensive action) -Horizontal Zone 3: the Zone of Imagination and Creation (of the Offensive action) -Horizontal Zone 4 : the Zone of Finalization and Conclusion (of the Offensive action)
- 4. 2.2.2 Vertical Zones : - Left and Right Zones : creating a lateral offensive actions - Central Zone : created of 8 equal rectangles is fundamental for conceiving, constructing, creating and finalizing the offensive actions. - The big central rectangle (Horizontal Zones 2 and 3) is fundamental for domination of the space and time via the ball possession
- 5. 3. DYNAMICALLY-TACTICAL GEOMETRY in my SYSTEMS OF PLAY 3-3-3-1
- 7. 2-5-3
- 9. 4-6-0
- 11. 4-4-2 Rhomboid
- 13. 4. the POSITIONING of the SYSTEMS OF PLAY in DEFENSIVE PHASE ( depending of the opponent ) 4-1-4-1
- 14. 4-4-1-1
- 15. 5-4-1
- 16. THE APPLIED MATHEMATIC IN PERCENTS MY SYSTEMS OF PLAY VERSUS THE REST OF THE WORLD -Based on the fact that in the football world exist 10 classic systems of play and the specificity of my systems of play , I decided to use the Applied Mathematic in Percents to see (via empirical and rational way) which of the two systems of play (the classic vs the mine) will win. -The football pitch is divided in 4 Meridians and 4 Parallels. The Confrontation between the Systems of play will be divided in the Horizontal and Vertical Zones, and in the end everything will depends of the numerical superiority in specific Zone/s.
- 17. FUNDAMENTAL : from my optic, is fundamental to create a numerical superiority in Horizontal Zones 1, 2 and 3 (Central Vertical Zone), -In this (golden or normal) rectangle , you will dominate and win the game.
- 19. 3-3-3-1 versus the CLASSIC SYSTEMS
- 26. 3-3-3-1 versus 4-4-2 Rhomboid
- 30. 2-5-3 versus the CLASSIC SYSTEMS
- 37. 2-5-3 versus 4-4-2 Rhomboid
- 41. 4-6-0 versus the CLASSIC SYSTEMS
- 48. 4-6-0 versus 4-4-2 Rhomboid
- 52. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus the CLASSIC SYSTEMS
- 53. 4-4-2 Romboide versus 3-5-2
- 54. 4-4-2 Romboide versus 3-5-1-1
- 55. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 3-4-3
- 56. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 3-4-1-2
- 57. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 3-4-2-1
- 58. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 4-4-2
- 59. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 4-2-3-1
- 60. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 4-3-2-1
- 61. 4-4-2 Rhomboid versus 4-3-3