This document summarizes a study on technology-enhanced learning in schools in Catalonia. It analyzes educational policy documents and conducts case studies of 4 schools. The analysis finds that while ICT infrastructure has improved, there remains a disconnect between policy goals of technology integration and reality in schools. Successful ICT adoption depends on motivated individuals rather than systemic support. Teacher professional development and accountability are lacking. Overall the study highlights gaps between educational policy and practice when it comes to technology-enhanced learning.
1 of 11
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Ecer 09 viena_tech_enhancedlearning
1. Technology-Enhanced Learning in Action:
Institutional Dimensions and Issues
ECER Vienna, September 2009
Juana M捉 Sancho (*), Silvina Casablancas (*), Teresa Romeu (**),
Oscar Molto (*), J旦rg M端ller (**), Paulo Padilla Petry (*)
(*) University of Barcelona (UB)
(**) Open University of Catalonia (UOC)
2. The Project: Context & Objectives
Policy and Practice Regarding ICT in Education:
Implications for Educational Innovation and Improvement.
(Ministerio de Educaci坦n y Ciencia SEJ2007-67562) Duration: 2007-2010
La Large scale policy initiatives for introducing ICT into
education in majority of industrialized countries
Without substantial improvements in learning processes
and outcomes
Relation between educational policy and educational practice.
What conceptions of ICT and educational change emerge from policy and
professionals?
3. Methodological Framework
Critical Discourse Analysis
Policy texts; historical documents
Education department pedagogical resources
In-depth, Semistructure Interviews
12 interviews with policy makers Education Dept.
School headmaster, teachers, ICT coordinator
Case Studies
2 Primary Schools 2 Secondary Schools
Analysis of multimedia pedagogical materials
Participant observations in schools / classes.
4. ICT & Educational Policy in Catalonia
1986 PIE: Institutionalization of Introducing ICT into schools; learning
ICT policy about ICT
1992 LOGSE Basic structure of Integration of ICT into curriculum
the education system
includes reference to ICT
2000 Creation of sub-department Priority still administration of ICT to
for ICT within the schools
Educational Dept.
2005 Digital Competencies Learning with technology instead
about it.
2007 Restructuring of Education Separation and equality between ICT
Dept. infrastructure (TIC) and learning
usage (TAC)
5. New Service: TAC Details
Four areas
Digital Inclusion
Collaborative Projects Online
Digital Resources
Standards and Technological Innovation
Changes of Teachers Role
Cooperative activities; more active role of teachers and students
New diversified professional development
Creation of TAC commissions across Catalonia
6. Case Study I IES Salgado
Schools & Teachers
Considered innovation leader
Participation in national & international projects
Strategic ICT innovation plan tied to professional development
Incorporation of families in ICT activities
20 out of 65 teachers participate
ICT Resources
150 computers
One computer in each class-room + beamer
Curriculum
Increase of didactic units that use ICT
Innovation driven by pioneer teachers and third-
party resources (AMPA & project money)
7. Case Study II IES Rayola
Schools & Teachers
ICT fostered by headmaster & team
ICT related professional development courses (50% participation)
Freeing up of resources through TIC TAC separation; more time for
pedagogical concerns
ICT Resources
Linux based, client oriented computing
Light-weight OS has allowed recycling of old computers
Google Aps (cloud computing)
Curriculum
Disciplinary and fragmented curriculum
Lack of participation of students in their learning
processes
8. Case Study III CEIP Heime
Schools & Teachers
Innovation lead by headmaster and ICT coordinator
Teachers scarce implication in ICT innovation activities
ICT Resources
Good ICT resources, including laptops
Pertain to redTIC -> ICT infrastructure
Curriculum
Low pedagogical innovation with ICT: with and without curriculum.
Absence of TAC discourse in the educational
community
9. Case Study IV CEIP Gaudi
Schools & Teachers
Dysfunctional school building
Division between permanent and flexible staff
ICT activities as extras to normal school activities
ICT Resources
1 computer per classroom; 1 computing room with 15 computers, 1
computer in the library
Digital Blackboard; little used
Curriculum
Partial attempts of interdisciplinary work with ICT
Activities related to ICT remain isolated in time and
space, bound to individual motivations of single
teachers
10. Missing Links between Schools and Administration
While ICT infrastructure is still lacking, the new TAC discourse is introduced
Mismatch between schools culture and administrative visions (teachers autonomy, beliefs,
curriculum organization)
Bureaucratic, standardized administrative responses to dynamic innovation needs
Innovation depends on pioneer teachers, motivated individuals; not systemic.
Professional development of teachers is absent from policy discourse
Lack of accountability and professionalism of teachers and administration
#3: Restructuring as NPM strategies. Decentralization means in many cases the administrative decentralization of finance from the state to municipalities. Ear-marked money for education from the state gets abolished. Deregulation means control of actions gets replaced by control of results and target setting. Managerialism : school principales as responsible for their school to municipalities. Competition markets: choice of parents between schools Performativity : high-stakes testing and publishing of results. The literature (PISA, Education at a Glance, etc.) speaks of an overall trend towards the introduction of accountability mechanisms in Europe and OECD countries in general as one NPM strategy among others to streamline an apparently oversized and inefficient bureaucratic public sector and to contain costs. Main result, conclusion of my talk: However, there are many more accountability mechanisms in place combined with a huge variety of teachers experiences. The same measures can be valued quite differently by teachers. Despite this variety, what emerges as a common theme among teachers, that accountability no matter of which type is not really an effective means to solver their problems and concerns.
#4: Main aim of the case studies was to facilitate our understanding of how teachers have experienced different waves of educational reform and how they cope with new social demands. The case studies were therefore not geared towards drawing generalizations about the overall situation of teachers in each country but rather to gain insights into how teachers' worklifes are affected by socio-demographic shifts and policy reform. Interest in comparison consists in mapping the space of possible teachers' experiences and reactions to welfare restructuring. In which ways do teachers feel accountable and how do they experienced different forms of accountability mechanisms? The qualitative case studies are therefore not representative of each country in question. When speaking of English, Irish, Portuguese teachers, this is done to identify each case but not to be representative for the national situation.
#5: Comparing welfare regimes in Europe the literature speaks of a certain convergence towards stalled social protection spending. However, taking into account the historical trajectories it gets apparent that behind this supposedly global and homogeneous neoliberal restructuring trends there lurks a certain variety of welfare and educational agendas, reforms, schedules. Restructuring measures England: 88 Education Act, Ofsted, League tables, National Curr. 97/98 Lit.; 99 PRP Sweden: 89 Munici. Teachers; 90-4 Quasi-markets independent schools, 92 voucher system, 93 state subsidies as lump sums. Welfare and education system buildup: Dictatorship until: Spain (1975), Greece (1974), Portugal (1974) Modern education system: Spain (1990 LOGSE), Portugal (1986 Edu Act), Greece (democratization, welfare buildup 81-85: abolish school inspectorate, new textbooks, teacher edu in university) This de-synchronizity has also consequences for research : not to import concepts from the English-speaking, northern countries assuming that the southern welfare states are northern types in an inferior stage of development. E.g. decentralization.
#6: Case of Ireland: recent reforms 2000 Education Welfare Act, 2003 SEN bill, 2004 Nat. Council SEN. Teachers have to familiarize themselves with assessment and diagnostic procedures, with providing for a wide range of special needs or the needs of children who are learning through a second language. They have to document that a child persistently fails despite intervention before they can claim additional support. They have to detect all sorts of abuses or child neglect.
#11: Finland: introduction of the Framework Curriculum in 1994 which abolished external evaluation enforces and strengthens teachers working morale. Teachers autonomy results in strong professional culture of collaboration and mutual control between peers. Sweden: also stuck out a more collaborative approach to education, class work, the new requirements of dealing with the municipalities and voucher system. Ireland: specially assigned senior staff to guide and introduce junior teachers. Specially assigned collaboration meetings and planning. The profound reforms of the education system is only possible by fostering team-spirit and collaboration between teachers. Spain: observation of how staff resists attempts of the principal to document and open up what teachers do in their class (teachers diary). School principals elected by staff which grants them little authority when dealing with their colleagues.