�ݺ�ߣ

 Overall, our title sequence looks like a original title sequence which is very
important. However, clearly, some of the order of the shots may have been
uncertain.This is because our aim was to make cross cuts thought-out the title
sequence.We planned to cross cut scenes from the science lab to the operating
theatre all the way through. However, for example, in the beginning it was
uncertain whether the character was in the science lab or operating theatre
because he started wearing a lab coat after the science lab scenes, but the lab
coat was usually worn in the operating theatre. In this section the cross cutting
didn't really make sense as it was uncertain where the filming was located-in the
operating theatre or classroom. So there was a confusion on the order of shots
which could make it unclear for the audience.
 We could say that not all of our order of shots were planned. For example, we
started with the school building at the start which was planned but then we
tracked the character for around 3 scenes, which we did not supposedly plan. But
overall, the title sequence was the way we wanted it to look like.We also, had
very important scenes missing that affected the order of the shots.

 The quality of the camera work is mostly good and effective. Some shots looked
very professional because the camera was used very gentle and there was no
shakiness or movement on the camera. For example, the classroom shots at the
beginning were very smooth and it flowed into the film very gently.
 However, some shots didn't look at a good standard. For example, the shot of
blood dripping down the sink looked shaky and the reason for this was because
we used the fig rig.
 We used the tripod for the majority of the shots as this gave a smoother and
professional look to the title sequence.This also enabled us to add creepiness to
out horror film.

 Using variety of shots in our film was essential as in horror movies, we could see
different types of shots change the mood of the film quite swiftly.
 Some of the shots we used were close-up shots, medium shots, panning shots
and Over-The-Shoulder Shot. Etc.
Panning
shots
Follow shot
Over-The-Shoulder Shot

 Overall, we didn't use any extra lighting because we always switched on the
classroom lights when filming in the science class.
 Some of our classroom scenes are darker or brighter than others because we
filmed them on different days.The darkness in some scenes added effect on the
horror mood of the film. However, some scenes still look a little fuzzier than
others because maybe we didn't get the lighting perfect or actually added too
much lighting.
 We also used the natural sunlight instead of electronic lighting because it gave an
effective look on the characters face. The effective lighting from the
sunlight gave the characters face a
different look which made him
and his face creepy.We used the
blinds to do this and this is the
only scene where we switched off
the classroom lights.This also, is a
very appropriate shot to use for
the final scene.

 I believe I acted very positively and strongly made it believable that I was a
teacher. I made it clear just from the start that I was a school teacher. My posture
and gestures reinforced this.
 The weaknesses I faced was that I was not very relaxed when acting. For
example, I took very long to wear the plastics gloves because I was nervous that I
was going to fail to wear the gloves properly, which I ended up always doing.
Managed to always
Look like a teacher,
that was very
important.

Locations:
The science room was a perfect place to film our title sequence. This is because the
lighting, equipment and overall atmosphere in the lab enabled us to be as creative as
possible. Also, we had the chance to use different types of shots.
Props:
The props that we used added fear to the title sequence. For example the scalpels that we
used helped us to resemble the classroom into a operating theatre. Also, the scalpels
helped us to change the genre of the film.The scalpels reflected fearful mood as cutting
and stabbing is usually associated with horror and fear.
Also, the scalpels created an image which linked well with the name of our film;
dissection. Other, props that we used, like gloves helped the audience understand that the
character was a teacher or operator.
Costumes:
The costumes that we used looked effective on the screen. The science lab coat resembled
an operator and the casual smart clothing of the character in the class made it obvious he
was a teacher.

�ݺ�ߣ

Evaluating the rough cut

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Evaluating the rough cut (20)

More from cicea003 (6)

Recently uploaded (20)

Evaluating the rough cut