�ݺ�ߣ

18.404/6.840 Lecture 21
Last time:
- Log-space reducibility
- L = NL? question
- is NL-complete
- is NL-complete
- NL = coNL (unfinished)
Today: (Sipser §9.1)
- Finish NL = coNL
- Time and Space Hierarchy Theorems
1

Theorem (Immerman-Szelepcsényi): NL = coNL
Proof: Show NL
Defn: NTM computes function if for all
1) All branches of on halt with on the tape or reject.
2) Some branch of on does not reject.
Let
Let YES}
Let
= Reachable nodes
= # reachable
YES, if has a path from to
NO, if not
Theorem: If some NL-machine (log-space NTM)
computes , then some NL-machine computes .
Proof: “On input
1. Let
2. For each node
3. If YES, then
4. If NO, then continue
5. Output ”
Next: Converse of above
𝐺
𝑠
𝑅
𝑐=¿𝑅∨¿
NL = coNL (part 1/4)
Check-in 21.1
Check-in 21.1
Let be the graph below.
What is the value of ?
(a) 2 (e) 6
(b) 3 (f) 7
(c) 4 (g) 8
(d) 5 (h) 9
𝑠
𝐺=¿
2

NL = coNL (part 2/4) – key idea
Theorem: If some NL-machine computes , then some NL-machine computes .
Proof: “On input where has nodes
1. Compute
2.
3. For each node
4. Nondeterministically go to (p) or (n)
(p) Nondeterministically pick a path from to of length .
If fail, then reject.
If , then output YES, else set .
(n) Skip and continue.
5. If then reject.
6. Output NO.” [found all reachable nodes and none were }
𝐺
𝑠
𝑅
𝑐=¿𝑅∨¿
3

NL = coNL (part 2/4) – key idea
SIMPLIFIED!!
Proof: “On input where has nodes
1. Compute
2.
3. For each node
4. Nondeterministically pick a path from of length .
If it ends at then output YES and stop.
If it ends at , set .
5. If then reject.
6. Output NO.” [found all reachable nodes and none were }
𝐺
𝑠
𝑅
𝑐=¿𝑅∨¿
4

Proof: “On input
1. Compute
2.
3. For each node
If , then output YES, else set .
5. If then reject.
6. Output NO” [found all reachable nodes and none were }
𝐺
𝑠
𝑅𝑑
𝑐𝑑=¿𝑅𝑑∨¿
Let
Let YES}
Let
YES, if has a path to of length
NO, if not
5

Proof: “On input
1. Compute
2.
3. For each node
If has an edge to , then output YES, else set .
5. If then reject.
6. Output NO.” [found all reachable nodes
and none had an edge to }
𝐺
𝑠
𝑅𝑑
𝑐𝑑+1=¿ 𝑅𝑑+1∨¿
𝑅𝑑+ 1
𝑐𝑑=¿𝑅𝑑∨¿
Corollary: Some NL-machine computes from .
Hence NL
“On input
1. .
2. Compute each from for to .
3. Accept if = NO.
4. Reject if = YES.”
6

L NL P NP PSPACE
Review: Major Complexity Classes
≠
Today
The time and space hierarchy theorems show that
if a TM is given more time (or space) then it can do more.*
* certain restrictions apply.
For example:
TIME TIME [ means proper subset ]
SPACE SPACE
7

Space Hierarchy Theorem (1/2)
Theorem: For any (where satisfies a technical condition)
there is a language where requires space, i.e,
1) is decidable in space, and
2) is not decidable in space
On other words, SPACE SPACE
Notation: SPACEsome TM decides in space
SPACE
SPACE
𝐴
Proof outline: (Diagonalization)
Give TM where
1) runs in space
2) ensures that for
every TM that runs in space.
Let .
8

Goal: Exhibit SPACE but SPACE
Give where and
1) runs in space
2) ensures that
for every TM that runs in space.
“On input
1. Mark off tape cells where .
If ever try to use more tape, reject.
2. If for some TM , reject.
3. Simulate* on for steps
Accept if rejects,
Reject if accepts or hasn’t halted.”
*Note: can simulate with a constant factor
space overhead.
Space Hierarchy Theorem (2/2)
Issues:
1. What if runs in space but has
a big constant? Then won’t have space
to simulate when is small.
FIX: simulate on infinitely many .
2. What if loops? [ must always halt]
FIX: Stop if it runs for steps.
3. How to compute ?
FIX: Assume is space constructible,
i.e., can compute within space.
Nice functions like , , , , , …
are all space constructible.
Mark off
tape
⋯ 𝑤 ⋯ #
𝑤=010110⋯10100000
〈 𝑀〉
𝑛
𝑓 (𝑛)
𝐷
Hide me →
Check-in 21.2
Check-in 21.2
What happens when we run on input ?
a) It loops
b) It accepts
c) It rejects
d) We get a contradiction
e) Smoke comes out
9

Time Hierarchy Theorem (1/2)
Theorem: For any where is time constructible
there is a language where requires time, i.e,
1) is decidable in time, and
2) is not decidable in time
On other words, TIME TIME
Proof outline: Give TM where
1) runs in time
2) ensures that for every TM that runs in time .
Let .
10

Goal: Exhibit TIME but TIME
where
1) runs in time
2) ensures that for every TM
that runs in time.
“On input
1. Compute .
2. If for some TM , reject.
3. Simulate* on for steps.
Accept if rejects,
Reject if accepts or hasn’t halted.”
*Note: can simulate with a log factor
time overhead due to the step counter.
Time Hierarchy Theorem (2/2)
Why do we lose a factor of ?
must halt within time.
To do so, counts the number of steps it uses and
stops if the limit is exceeded. The counter has
size and is stored on the tape.
It must be kept near the current head location.
Cost of moving it adds a overhead factor. So to
halt within time, stops when the counter reaches
.
11

L NL P NP PSPACE
Recap: Separating Complexity Classes
≠
Space Hierarchy Theorem
NL SPACE SPACE PSPACE
Check-in 21.3
Check-in 21.3
Consider these two famous unsolved questions:
1. Does L = P?
2. Does P = PSPACE?
What do the hierarchy theorems tell us about
these questions?
a) Nothing
b) At least one of these has answer “NO”
c) At least one of these has answer “YES”
12

Quick review of today
1. Finish NL = coNL
2. Space hierarchy theorem
3. Time hierarchy theorem
13

MIT OpenCourseWare
https://ocw.mit.edu
18.404J Theory of Computation
Fall 2020
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

�ݺ�ߣ

Finite automata and formal language lecture note

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Finite automata and formal language lecture note (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Finite automata and formal language lecture note