Material evaluation
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes553 views
To evaluate materials effectively, one must first define evaluation criteria based on the needs of the course. Both subjective and objective analysis should then be used to analyze how well materials meet the criteria. This involves subjectively determining desired criteria fulfillment and objectively analyzing how the materials realize the criteria. Finally, materials are matched to needs by assessing how closely the materials fulfill the defined criteria.
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Recommended
Material evaluation
Material evaluation悽慍 悋悋忰愕悋
油
To evaluate materials effectively, one must first define evaluation criteria based on the needs of the course. Both subjective and objective analysis should then be used to analyze how well materials meet the criteria. This involves subjectively determining desired criteria fulfillment and objectively analyzing how the materials realize the criteria. Finally, materials are matched to needs by assessing how closely they fulfill the defined criteria.Esp materials evaluation
Esp materials evaluationlarka
油
The document outlines a process for systematically evaluating materials by first identifying requirements, then analyzing selected materials against those requirements using objective and subjective criteria. Materials are scored on a scale based on how well they match desired features, with the highest-scoring materials that match the most important criteria being selected. The evaluation process aims to match needs with available solutions in a way that saves effort and possible reveals existing materials that fulfill requirements.Matirial evaluation BY WAQAR
Matirial evaluation BY WAQARWaqar Azam
油
There are three ways to develop teaching materials: selecting existing materials, writing new materials, or modifying existing materials. Material evaluation involves judging materials based on defined criteria to determine how well they fit the intended purpose. The major steps of evaluation are defining criteria, subjective analysis of desired criteria, objective analysis of how the material meets criteria, and matching the material to needs. Evaluation provides ideas on both best practices and pitfalls to avoid when writing new materials.Material evaluation (Chapter 1)
Material evaluation (Chapter 1)H. R. Marasabessy
油
Material evaluation involves measuring the potential value of learning materials. It generally follows four steps: analysis of the target situation, material analysis, matching materials to the situation, and evaluation. Evaluation criteria focus on how well materials relate to learners' wants and lives, stimulate emotional engagement, and promote visualization. Effective materials give learners something useful to take away, teach something felt to be useful, provide a sense of achievement, present learning in an interesting way, and allow for individual practice and self-assessment. Material evaluation can be done before, during, or after use, and though time-consuming, helps evaluators learn about teaching and materials while giving insights to improve course design.Materials evaluation
Materials evaluationNina Zotina
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on the needs and requirements of a specific course. It involves identifying requirements across topics like aims, content, skills, methodology, and aids. Then existing materials are analyzed against the same criteria to determine how well they match the identified needs. Results are compared and scored to help select materials that provide the best match overall or in important areas. The evaluation process aims to identify suitable existing materials and avoid duplicating effort, while ensuring a methodical matching of needs with available solutions.Material evaluation
Material evaluationDina El Dik
油
In this presentation, a quick simple evaluation is conducted on the Alef Baa Book in teaching elementary Level Students of Arabic.Material evaluation esp group 5
Material evaluation esp group 5Reni Putri Gemini
油
It is a presentasion that might help you. It is full of pictures so I hope you might not feel bored to see it.Standard approaches to material evaluation
Standard approaches to material evaluationJuvrianto Chrissunday Jakob
油
The document discusses criteria for evaluating materials and selecting coursebooks for teaching English. It explains that criteria can be developed by brainstorming universal standards, subdividing categories, revising the list, organizing it, and specifying context-based factors. When selecting materials, the needs of both teachers and learners should be considered, as well as how the materials will be used. Coursebooks fulfill practical needs in non-English environments where teachers lack training, and they provide a structure for lessons by mapping content over time.Materials evaluation
Materials evaluationRoksana Novruzova
油
The document provides guidance on evaluating educational materials. It outlines a process for systematically analyzing materials requirements, evaluating available materials options, and selecting materials that best meet identified needs. Key steps include defining evaluation criteria, conducting subjective and objective analyses of learner and content needs, and comparing needs analyses to features of existing materials while assigning point values to identify the best match. The goal is to systematically select materials through a matching process rather than duplicating effort.Evaluating Teaching: MERLOT
Evaluating Teaching: MERLOTDamian T. Gordon
油
The document outlines the three stages that are evaluated for educational software in the MERLOT Model:
1. Quality of Content - Evaluates whether the concepts, models and skills presented are valid and educationally significant for the discipline. Content should be core curriculum that is difficult to teach and learn.
2. Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-Learning Tool - Evaluates if the software is likely to improve teaching and learning based on how faculty and students could use it. It should support multiple stages of the learning process and have clear learning objectives tailored for the target learners.
3. Ease of Use - Evaluates how easy it is for users to use the software for the first time. It shouldMaterial lect5
Material lect5Salina Saharudin
油
This document discusses different types of textbook evaluation:
- Pre-use evaluation occurs before a book is used and examines potential performance.
- In-use evaluation happens while a book is being used to monitor newly introduced or aging materials.
- Post-use evaluation provides a retrospective assessment of a book's performance after it has been used.
It also outlines factors to consider for external evaluation of a book's description and claims, and internal evaluation of how language skills, materials, and tests are presented. The overall evaluation examines a book's usability, general features, adaptability, and flexibility.Lecture 6 
Lecture 6 Salina Saharudin
油
This document discusses evaluation criteria for English language teaching materials from several studies and sources:
- Rahimpour & Hashemi (2011) evaluate content, physical make-up, and practical concerns. Jayakaran & Nimechisalem (2011) consider compatibility with teaching principles and balance of language skills.
- Tsiplakides (2011) evaluate how tasks contribute to language acquisition and development and how activities progress and vary.
- Inal (2006) lists 11 criteria including relevance of subjects/contents and language, interest, variety, authenticity, and cultural sensitivities.
- Robinett (1978) cited in Yilmaz (2005) considers goals, students, approachesResearch on Teaching Reading
Research on Teaching ReadingROTR
油
The document summarizes research on teaching reading. It identifies several factors that impact reading instruction, including student proficiency, age, first language, motivation, cognitive processing abilities, teacher skills, and institutional settings. It also outlines various abilities needed for effective reading comprehension, such as word recognition fluency, vocabulary, background knowledge, language skills, comprehension strategies, understanding text structure, strategic reading skills, reading fluency, extensive reading practice, and intrinsic motivation. Finally, it lists specific instructional techniques and approaches that can be used to develop these abilities and promote reading comprehension.Engaging Lessons for GED Test Prep: Start with Standards
Engaging Lessons for GED Test Prep: Start with StandardsMeagen Farrell
油
This document provides an overview of objectives and best practices for GED test preparation instruction. It discusses mixing and matching GED assessment targets in four intertwined subjects: reasoning through language arts, science, social studies, and mathematical reasoning. The document also reviews basics of the computer-based GED test, including its alignment with common core state standards and emphasis on standards-based, in-depth questions.Materials_evaluation
Materials_evaluationMaria Malshakova
油
The presentation was made within the course "English for Specific Purposes" and contains information about the materials evaluationMaterials evaluation
Materials evaluationLubasweet
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on the needs and requirements of a target audience and course. Key steps include:
1) Identifying requirements based on audience, aims, content, skills, methodology, and other factors.
2) Analyzing existing materials based on the same criteria.
3) Comparing requirements against existing materials and awarding points to materials based on how closely they match requirements.
4) Selecting materials that receive the highest scores across important criteria and documenting the decision.Esp751
Esp751Inga Temirova
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials to determine how well they match required criteria for a new course. It involves identifying needs based on questions about learners, aims, content, methodology, exercises, and more. Existing materials are then analyzed by answering the same questions. The analyses are compared to see how closely the materials match the desired features. The materials that provide the best match across important criteria are selected. Documentation of the evaluation can then support decisions made regarding material selection. The process aims to identify suitable existing materials to reduce duplication of effort in developing new ones from scratch.Materials evaluation
Materials evaluationAlena Mikrukova
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on a set of criteria. It involves identifying requirements for materials based on questions about learners, aims, content, methodology, exercises, and other factors. Then existing materials are analyzed by answering the same questions. The analyses are compared to see how well the materials match the identified requirements. Points are awarded based on the degree of matching. The materials that receive the highest overall scores best meet the most important requirements and are the best choice. The evaluation process helps ensure available materials are fully exploited to meet needs and avoid duplication of effort in developing new materials.Evaluation
EvaluationPerm State Teacher Training University
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on a set of criteria. It involves identifying requirements for materials based on questions about learners, aims, content, methodology, exercises, and other factors. Then existing materials are analyzed by answering the same questions. The analyses are compared to see how well the materials match the identified requirements. Points are awarded based on the degree of matching. The materials that receive the highest scores across important criteria are selected. Documentation is prepared to justify the selection. The evaluation process is intended to identify existing materials that can fully or partially meet needs in order to save effort compared to fully developing new materials.Developing instruction materials
Developing instruction materialscw8842
油
This document outlines the process for developing instructional materials. It discusses the designer's role in materials development and instructional delivery. When developing materials, the designer must consider factors like production constraints, level of facilitation, and existing materials that may require revisions to media selections or delivery systems. An instructional package includes course information, assessments, and instructional content. The designer also selects appropriate draft materials and develops final materials based on the given instructional strategy and available resources.Facilitating Lesson Study Discussion
Facilitating Lesson Study DiscussionJimmy Keng
油
The document discusses facilitating lesson study discussions. It describes observing a research lesson using frameworks to guide observations. The facilitator will then demonstrate a post-lesson discussion focusing on six elements: the key question, instructions between desks, polishing, turning point of the lesson, summing up, and board writing. Professional learning goals are discussed to guide observations and the post-lesson discussion. An example format of observation-interpretation-question is provided for observers to share findings. The difference between post-lesson and lesson refinement discussions is defined.Creating Meaningful Rubrics 
Creating Meaningful Rubrics OPEN NH / NH e-Learning for Educators
油
This professional development workshop teaches participants how to create meaningful rubrics that assess student learning. The workshop will provide tools for identifying the goals and objectives of student work and assessing various aspects of student products. Participants will investigate theories of rubric design, review online rubric creators, and practice developing rubrics that enhance student work while focusing on assignment goals and objectives. The workshop agenda includes discussions on starting with learning outcomes, formative and summative assessment, and designing valid and reliable rubrics using both holistic and analytic approaches.Jodi Student Generated Rubrics
Jodi Student Generated RubricsKevin Hodgson
油
The document discusses introducing student-generated rubrics in an elementary classroom writing program. It describes the teacher's current practice of using teacher-generated rubrics and daily writing activities. The teacher questions whether student involvement in rubric generation could improve writing growth. Research suggests student-generated rubrics help students better understand quality standards and assessment criteria. The teacher plans to have students assess and revise their own writing using a rubric they helped create, and compare results to the teacher-generated rubric approach.#D2LIgnite 2013 Illinois - Creating & Grading Custom Rubrics - Rhonda Gregory
#D2LIgnite 2013 Illinois - Creating & Grading Custom Rubrics - Rhonda GregoryD2L Barry
油
This document discusses using rubrics in the Desire2Learn learning management system. It provides information on the presenter's background and experience in instructional technology. It then outlines how rubrics can be created, best practices for using them, and the advantages they provide for clearly communicating expectations and providing consistent feedback. The document explains the differences between holistic and analytic (multidimensional) rubrics and various scoring options. It demonstrates how rubrics can be applied to discussions and dropboxes to evaluate student work and discusses how students and instructors interact with rubrics during and after the grading process.Creating Rubrics
Creating Rubricschedisky
油
The document provides guidance on creating and using rubrics for grading complex assignments. It defines rubrics as tools that explicitly state criteria for assignments and may be used for grading. The workshop objectives are to describe rubrics, their purpose, types of rubrics, characteristics of good rubrics, and develop a rubric for an assignment. Guidance is provided on creating analytic and holistic rubrics, including identifying criteria and defining performance levels.preparing a TOS
preparing a TOSRoxette Layosa
油
The document discusses the importance and process of creating a Table of Specification (TOS) for constructing tests. A TOS is a two-way chart that describes the topics and objectives to be assessed on a test and the number of items or points associated with each. It helps teachers ensure their tests have content validity by covering the appropriate material. The key steps in preparing a TOS include identifying topics and objectives, determining time spent on each topic, calculating the percentage allocation for topics, and distributing test items to objectives based on importance.Epc 2 part i updated
Epc 2 part i updatedSavitaShinde5
油
This document outlines the activities and assessments for Part I of a course divided into reading and reflecting on texts. It involves 5 activities: 1) reading comprehension and answering questions, 2) watching media/observing websites and preparing summaries, 3) reading texts and participating in group discussions, 4) searching materials and presenting to groups, and 5) reading and reflecting. For each activity, the objectives and expectations are provided, such as having students read texts and answer questions to demonstrate comprehension, or search relevant materials from sources to summarize and present to peers.ELA Proposed Curriculum Adoption: Journeys
ELA Proposed Curriculum Adoption: JourneysLynn McMullin
油
This document summarizes a school district's process for adopting a new English Language Arts program. It outlines the committee members who led the process. Key considerations included aligning with the Common Core shifts, balancing literary and informational texts, and increasing text complexity. The committee piloted two programs, Wonders and Journeys, and visited exemplar schools using each. They selected a balanced literacy model incorporating Reading and Writing Workshop, leveled readers, and online teacher resources. An implementation plan was outlined, including initial and ongoing professional development. The total projected cost for the new program over three years was $400,000.Methodology
MethodologyKhuzain Terate
油
This document discusses several key aspects of second language learning. It states that language learning is an active process that requires learners to use knowledge, not just possess it. It also involves psycho-motor and language processing activities. Language learning is a decision-making process where learners must determine what is new, relevant information. It is not just a matter of linguistic knowledge, but also involves matching conceptual abilities to the language. Learning a second language can be challenging when one's subject knowledge is high but linguistic knowledge is low, as in ESP.Media of instruction 1st
Media of instruction 1stKhuzain Terate
油
This document discusses the use of instructional media in teaching and learning. It explains that media should be used with guiding principles about how learners will process the experiences contained in the media. Without a theoretical rationale, using specific materials may become mechanical. The document also discusses developing conceptual bases for choosing media and materials based on understanding how media relates to the learning process, the attributes of different media, and communication models. Finally, it notes that learning effectiveness depends not only on the selected media but also how the learner processes the information presented.More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Materials evaluation
Materials evaluationRoksana Novruzova
油
The document provides guidance on evaluating educational materials. It outlines a process for systematically analyzing materials requirements, evaluating available materials options, and selecting materials that best meet identified needs. Key steps include defining evaluation criteria, conducting subjective and objective analyses of learner and content needs, and comparing needs analyses to features of existing materials while assigning point values to identify the best match. The goal is to systematically select materials through a matching process rather than duplicating effort.Evaluating Teaching: MERLOT
Evaluating Teaching: MERLOTDamian T. Gordon
油
The document outlines the three stages that are evaluated for educational software in the MERLOT Model:
1. Quality of Content - Evaluates whether the concepts, models and skills presented are valid and educationally significant for the discipline. Content should be core curriculum that is difficult to teach and learn.
2. Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-Learning Tool - Evaluates if the software is likely to improve teaching and learning based on how faculty and students could use it. It should support multiple stages of the learning process and have clear learning objectives tailored for the target learners.
3. Ease of Use - Evaluates how easy it is for users to use the software for the first time. It shouldMaterial lect5
Material lect5Salina Saharudin
油
This document discusses different types of textbook evaluation:
- Pre-use evaluation occurs before a book is used and examines potential performance.
- In-use evaluation happens while a book is being used to monitor newly introduced or aging materials.
- Post-use evaluation provides a retrospective assessment of a book's performance after it has been used.
It also outlines factors to consider for external evaluation of a book's description and claims, and internal evaluation of how language skills, materials, and tests are presented. The overall evaluation examines a book's usability, general features, adaptability, and flexibility.Lecture 6
Lecture 6 Salina Saharudin
油
This document discusses evaluation criteria for English language teaching materials from several studies and sources:
- Rahimpour & Hashemi (2011) evaluate content, physical make-up, and practical concerns. Jayakaran & Nimechisalem (2011) consider compatibility with teaching principles and balance of language skills.
- Tsiplakides (2011) evaluate how tasks contribute to language acquisition and development and how activities progress and vary.
- Inal (2006) lists 11 criteria including relevance of subjects/contents and language, interest, variety, authenticity, and cultural sensitivities.
- Robinett (1978) cited in Yilmaz (2005) considers goals, students, approachesResearch on Teaching Reading
Research on Teaching ReadingROTR
油
The document summarizes research on teaching reading. It identifies several factors that impact reading instruction, including student proficiency, age, first language, motivation, cognitive processing abilities, teacher skills, and institutional settings. It also outlines various abilities needed for effective reading comprehension, such as word recognition fluency, vocabulary, background knowledge, language skills, comprehension strategies, understanding text structure, strategic reading skills, reading fluency, extensive reading practice, and intrinsic motivation. Finally, it lists specific instructional techniques and approaches that can be used to develop these abilities and promote reading comprehension.Engaging Lessons for GED Test Prep: Start with Standards
Engaging Lessons for GED Test Prep: Start with StandardsMeagen Farrell
油
This document provides an overview of objectives and best practices for GED test preparation instruction. It discusses mixing and matching GED assessment targets in four intertwined subjects: reasoning through language arts, science, social studies, and mathematical reasoning. The document also reviews basics of the computer-based GED test, including its alignment with common core state standards and emphasis on standards-based, in-depth questions.Materials_evaluation
Materials_evaluationMaria Malshakova
油
The presentation was made within the course "English for Specific Purposes" and contains information about the materials evaluationMaterials evaluation
Materials evaluationLubasweet
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on the needs and requirements of a target audience and course. Key steps include:
1) Identifying requirements based on audience, aims, content, skills, methodology, and other factors.
2) Analyzing existing materials based on the same criteria.
3) Comparing requirements against existing materials and awarding points to materials based on how closely they match requirements.
4) Selecting materials that receive the highest scores across important criteria and documenting the decision.Esp751
Esp751Inga Temirova
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials to determine how well they match required criteria for a new course. It involves identifying needs based on questions about learners, aims, content, methodology, exercises, and more. Existing materials are then analyzed by answering the same questions. The analyses are compared to see how closely the materials match the desired features. The materials that provide the best match across important criteria are selected. Documentation of the evaluation can then support decisions made regarding material selection. The process aims to identify suitable existing materials to reduce duplication of effort in developing new ones from scratch.Materials evaluation
Materials evaluationAlena Mikrukova
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on a set of criteria. It involves identifying requirements for materials based on questions about learners, aims, content, methodology, exercises, and other factors. Then existing materials are analyzed by answering the same questions. The analyses are compared to see how well the materials match the identified requirements. Points are awarded based on the degree of matching. The materials that receive the highest overall scores best meet the most important requirements and are the best choice. The evaluation process helps ensure available materials are fully exploited to meet needs and avoid duplication of effort in developing new materials.Evaluation
EvaluationPerm State Teacher Training University
油
The document outlines a systematic process for evaluating existing teaching materials based on a set of criteria. It involves identifying requirements for materials based on questions about learners, aims, content, methodology, exercises, and other factors. Then existing materials are analyzed by answering the same questions. The analyses are compared to see how well the materials match the identified requirements. Points are awarded based on the degree of matching. The materials that receive the highest scores across important criteria are selected. Documentation is prepared to justify the selection. The evaluation process is intended to identify existing materials that can fully or partially meet needs in order to save effort compared to fully developing new materials.Developing instruction materials
Developing instruction materialscw8842
油
This document outlines the process for developing instructional materials. It discusses the designer's role in materials development and instructional delivery. When developing materials, the designer must consider factors like production constraints, level of facilitation, and existing materials that may require revisions to media selections or delivery systems. An instructional package includes course information, assessments, and instructional content. The designer also selects appropriate draft materials and develops final materials based on the given instructional strategy and available resources.Facilitating Lesson Study Discussion
Facilitating Lesson Study DiscussionJimmy Keng
油
The document discusses facilitating lesson study discussions. It describes observing a research lesson using frameworks to guide observations. The facilitator will then demonstrate a post-lesson discussion focusing on six elements: the key question, instructions between desks, polishing, turning point of the lesson, summing up, and board writing. Professional learning goals are discussed to guide observations and the post-lesson discussion. An example format of observation-interpretation-question is provided for observers to share findings. The difference between post-lesson and lesson refinement discussions is defined.Creating Meaningful Rubrics
Creating Meaningful Rubrics OPEN NH / NH e-Learning for Educators
油
This professional development workshop teaches participants how to create meaningful rubrics that assess student learning. The workshop will provide tools for identifying the goals and objectives of student work and assessing various aspects of student products. Participants will investigate theories of rubric design, review online rubric creators, and practice developing rubrics that enhance student work while focusing on assignment goals and objectives. The workshop agenda includes discussions on starting with learning outcomes, formative and summative assessment, and designing valid and reliable rubrics using both holistic and analytic approaches.Jodi Student Generated Rubrics
Jodi Student Generated RubricsKevin Hodgson
油
The document discusses introducing student-generated rubrics in an elementary classroom writing program. It describes the teacher's current practice of using teacher-generated rubrics and daily writing activities. The teacher questions whether student involvement in rubric generation could improve writing growth. Research suggests student-generated rubrics help students better understand quality standards and assessment criteria. The teacher plans to have students assess and revise their own writing using a rubric they helped create, and compare results to the teacher-generated rubric approach.#D2LIgnite 2013 Illinois - Creating & Grading Custom Rubrics - Rhonda Gregory
#D2LIgnite 2013 Illinois - Creating & Grading Custom Rubrics - Rhonda GregoryD2L Barry
油
This document discusses using rubrics in the Desire2Learn learning management system. It provides information on the presenter's background and experience in instructional technology. It then outlines how rubrics can be created, best practices for using them, and the advantages they provide for clearly communicating expectations and providing consistent feedback. The document explains the differences between holistic and analytic (multidimensional) rubrics and various scoring options. It demonstrates how rubrics can be applied to discussions and dropboxes to evaluate student work and discusses how students and instructors interact with rubrics during and after the grading process.Creating Rubrics
Creating Rubricschedisky
油
The document provides guidance on creating and using rubrics for grading complex assignments. It defines rubrics as tools that explicitly state criteria for assignments and may be used for grading. The workshop objectives are to describe rubrics, their purpose, types of rubrics, characteristics of good rubrics, and develop a rubric for an assignment. Guidance is provided on creating analytic and holistic rubrics, including identifying criteria and defining performance levels.preparing a TOS
preparing a TOSRoxette Layosa
油
The document discusses the importance and process of creating a Table of Specification (TOS) for constructing tests. A TOS is a two-way chart that describes the topics and objectives to be assessed on a test and the number of items or points associated with each. It helps teachers ensure their tests have content validity by covering the appropriate material. The key steps in preparing a TOS include identifying topics and objectives, determining time spent on each topic, calculating the percentage allocation for topics, and distributing test items to objectives based on importance.Epc 2 part i updated
Epc 2 part i updatedSavitaShinde5
油
This document outlines the activities and assessments for Part I of a course divided into reading and reflecting on texts. It involves 5 activities: 1) reading comprehension and answering questions, 2) watching media/observing websites and preparing summaries, 3) reading texts and participating in group discussions, 4) searching materials and presenting to groups, and 5) reading and reflecting. For each activity, the objectives and expectations are provided, such as having students read texts and answer questions to demonstrate comprehension, or search relevant materials from sources to summarize and present to peers.ELA Proposed Curriculum Adoption: Journeys
ELA Proposed Curriculum Adoption: JourneysLynn McMullin
油
This document summarizes a school district's process for adopting a new English Language Arts program. It outlines the committee members who led the process. Key considerations included aligning with the Common Core shifts, balancing literary and informational texts, and increasing text complexity. The committee piloted two programs, Wonders and Journeys, and visited exemplar schools using each. They selected a balanced literacy model incorporating Reading and Writing Workshop, leveled readers, and online teacher resources. An implementation plan was outlined, including initial and ongoing professional development. The total projected cost for the new program over three years was $400,000.More from Khuzain Terate (16)
Methodology
MethodologyKhuzain Terate
油
This document discusses several key aspects of second language learning. It states that language learning is an active process that requires learners to use knowledge, not just possess it. It also involves psycho-motor and language processing activities. Language learning is a decision-making process where learners must determine what is new, relevant information. It is not just a matter of linguistic knowledge, but also involves matching conceptual abilities to the language. Learning a second language can be challenging when one's subject knowledge is high but linguistic knowledge is low, as in ESP.Media of instruction 1st
Media of instruction 1stKhuzain Terate
油
This document discusses the use of instructional media in teaching and learning. It explains that media should be used with guiding principles about how learners will process the experiences contained in the media. Without a theoretical rationale, using specific materials may become mechanical. The document also discusses developing conceptual bases for choosing media and materials based on understanding how media relates to the learning process, the attributes of different media, and communication models. Finally, it notes that learning effectiveness depends not only on the selected media but also how the learner processes the information presented.Materials design
Materials designKhuzain Terate
油
Dokumen tersebut merangkum desain silabus, rencana pelajaran, dan bahan ajar untuk mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris. Terdapat standar kompetensi, indikator pencapaian, alokasi waktu, dan referensi yang disediakan. Rencana pembelajaran mencakup kegiatan membaca teks, fokus kosa kata, latihan kosa kata, pembentukan kalimat, komunikasi lisan, dan tulisan. Beberapa teknik yang disebutkanMaterial evaluation
Material evaluationKhuzain Terate
油
To evaluate materials effectively, one must first define evaluation criteria based on the needs of the course. Both subjective and objective analysis should then be used to analyze how well materials meet the criteria. This involves subjectively determining desired criteria fulfillment and objectively analyzing how the materials realize the criteria. Finally, materials are matched to needs by assessing how closely the materials fulfill the defined criteria.Materi ke 3
Materi ke 3Khuzain Terate
油
The document discusses the evolution of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) as an approach to language teaching. It notes there have been shifts in ESP theory and practice over time, with different stages focusing on linguistic aspects, but all taking an essentially language-centered approach. ESP is defined as not a product or variety of English, but rather an approach where all decisions around content and method are based on meeting the specific needs of learners. The document outlines various branches of ESP including English for academic, occupational, and vocational purposes.Language description4
Language description4Khuzain Terate
油
This document discusses different approaches to language description and analysis throughout history. It begins by explaining that language description breaks down a language system to describe grammar and generate sentences. Next, it outlines some traditional and modern approaches, including structural linguistics, transformational generative grammar, and language variation analysis. Finally, it discusses how language variation analysis led to the development of English for Specific Purposes based on identifying language features associated with specific contexts.Development of esp
Development of espKhuzain Terate
油
The document discusses the evolution of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) through three main phases: 1) expanding demand for English to suit particular needs, 2) developments in linguistics, and 3) educational psychology. It describes approaches such as register analysis, discourse analysis, target situation analysis, and a learning-centered approach that place learner needs at the center of course design. ESP analysis and teaching materials have shifted focus from sentence-level grammar to discourse patterns and organizational structures in texts.Approaches to course design
Approaches to course designKhuzain Terate
油
This document discusses different approaches to course design for teaching English for specific purposes. It describes language-centered course design, which directly connects the analysis of students' target language situations to course content. It also covers skills-centered design, which focuses on the underlying skills and strategies students use to communicate. Additionally, it mentions learning-centered design, which views learning as determined by students and how they make sense of new information. The key aspects of effective course design involve understanding students' language needs and situations, selecting an appropriate theoretical approach, and creating a syllabus, materials, and evaluations.Language description4
Language description4Khuzain Terate
油
This document discusses different approaches to language description and analysis throughout history. It begins by explaining that language description breaks down a language system to describe grammar and generate sentences. Next, it outlines some traditional and modern approaches, including structural linguistics, transformational generative grammar, and language variation analysis. Finally, it discusses how language variation analysis led to the development of English for Specific Purposes based on identifying language features of different contexts.
Materi ke 3
Materi ke 3Khuzain Terate
油
The document discusses the evolution of ESP (English for Specific Purposes) as an approach to language teaching. It notes there have been shifts in ESP theory and practice over time, with different stages focusing on linguistic aspects, but all taking an essentially language-centered approach. ESP is defined as not a product or variety of English, but an approach where all decisions around content and method are based on meeting the specific needs of learners. The document outlines various branches of ESP including English for academic, occupational, and vocational purposes.Language description4
Language description4Khuzain Terate
油
This document discusses different approaches to language description and analysis throughout history. It describes traditional grammar, structural linguistics, transformational generative grammar, and language variation and register analysis. Transformational generative grammar argued that structural descriptions were too superficial because they only described surface structure and not deeper relationships of meaning. The concept of language variation led to the development of English for Specific Purposes, which analyzed registers of language associated with specific contexts such as fields of knowledge.Handout drama 05092012
Handout drama 05092012Khuzain Terate
油
The document discusses the history and development of drama across different cultures and time periods. It begins with an overview of Greek drama and its origins in dithyrambs honoring Dionysus. It then covers the developments of tragedy, comedy, and satire in ancient Greece. Next it discusses the traditions of drama in Rome, the Middle Ages focusing on religious plays, and the Renaissance with a focus on developments in Italy, France, Spain, and England. It concludes with an overview of 18th century sentimental comedy and the rise of realism and melodrama in the 19th century.
C
CKhuzain Terate
油
Syar'u man qablana (hukum agama terdahulu) dibagi menjadi tiga kategori dalam Islam: 1) yang telah dinaskhkan, 2) yang diwarisi, dan 3) yang statusnya tidak jelas dalam al-Quran dan hadis. Kategori ketiga ini menimbulkan perbedaan pendapat ulama tentang apakah masuk syariat Islam atau tidak. Sebagian mengatakan masuk, sebagian lagi tidak karena tidak ada dalil tegas. Perbedaan ini menjadi intiApproaches to course design
Approaches to course designKhuzain Terate
油
This document discusses different approaches to course design for teaching English for specific purposes. It describes language-centered course design, which directly connects the analysis of students' target language situations to course content. It also covers skills-centered design, which focuses on the underlying skills and strategies students use to communicate. Additionally, it mentions learning-centered design, which views learning as determined by students and how they make sense of new information. The key aspects of effective course design involve understanding students' language needs and situations, selecting an appropriate theoretical approach, and creating a syllabus, materials, and evaluations.Material evaluation
- 2. 1. Why evaluate material ? 2. How do you evaluate materials ?
- 3. Evaluation is basically matching process: matching needs to available solutions. If this matching is to be done as objectively as possible, it is best to look at the needs and solutions separately.
- 4. Defining criteria Subjective analysis Objective analysis Matching
- 5. Define Criteria On what bases will you judge materials? Which criteria will be more important Subjective Analysis What realization of the criteria do you want in your course ? Objective analysis How does the material being evaluated realise the criteria Matching How far does the material of much your needs ?