ºÝºÝߣ

ºÝºÝߣShare a Scribd company logo
The Genetic effects of Environmental conditions on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus
Christy A. Twilight, Sue Gordon-Brainard B.S. And Jan Bowman M.S.
ABSTRACT
METHODS
RESULTS
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are known to be highly resilient
bacteria to disinfectants so it was hypothesized that they will still grow even after severe
temperature or UV treatment. Based on previous laboratory experiments from Jamestown
Community College Microbiology classes from several years, a range relative temperatures, UV
exposures, and times were determined for Staphylococcus aureus and E.coli. Pseudomonas
aeruginosa was given a wide range of temperatures, and UV exposure times. All bacteria was
placed in nutrient broth and incubated at 37 Celsius for 48 hours then exposed to various
environmental conditions. The results revealed that Staphylococcus aureus could withstand
temperatures of 90 Celsius for 30 minutes and UV exposure for 15 minutes. P. aeruginosa and
E. coli were able to withstand temperatures of 60 Celsius for 30 minutes and UV exposure of
25 minutes. These results were then resuspended to have their DNA extracted and to be
placed on agar plates with disinfectant exposures. The disinfectant exposure results revealed
no noticeable changes in resistance based on previous data. The DNA will be analyzed for any
genetic changes based on environmental effects.
One of the largest concerns for hospitals today is preventative measures against nosocomial infections. Preventative measures such as UV treatment, and disinfectants
have been taken in order to prevent patient to patient transmission; however, bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus have become
increasingly resistant to these preventative measures and antibiotics. Examples are Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA). Additionally, due to patient volume, an increase of hand sanitizers has been used between patients over hand washing among hospital
staff. The purpose of this research was to reveal any genetic effects from environmental conditions such as UV treatment and temperature, then reveal any changes in
growth and resistance to disinfectants and hand sanitizers.
As shown in figure 1, the results for the UV exposure indicated that all of the bacteria tested withstood at least 15 minutes of shortwave UV
Exposure without any inhibition to growth. P. aeruginosa was able to handle at least 25 minutes. Repeated studies would have to be done
with longer time lengths to see if this trend extends past 25 minutes.
As shown in figure 2, the results for the temperature indicated that unlike previous documented evidence, P.aeruginosa can grow in
temperatures above 42 Celsius and actually grow up to 60 Celsius for 30 minutes. Staphylococcus aureus was able to withstand
temperatures of 90 Celsius for 30 minutes.
As shown in figure 3, the disinfectant results indicated that hand sanitizers such as Germx still have no effect on the growth of the bacteria
even when they have undergone high temperature and UV treatment. In fact, Germx actually caused P. aeruginosa an enhancement of the
blue/green pigmentation. No zones of inhibition were indicated for Staphylococcus aureus either.
Based on the genetic analysis obtained, it can be concluded that the DNA was either too degraded to obtain any sequences, or the DNA was
contaminated by outside factors. Additionally, the DNA exposed to UV may have been unable to be replicated due to the pyrimidine
dimerization that often occurs with UV exposure. Additional extractions must be repeated under more purified techniques such as DNA gel
extractions in order to ensure contamination was not the issue.
Additional work will include continued repeat extraction and analysis under alternate aseptic conditions and analysis of the genetic
sequences between the known strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the DNA sequences environmentally
affected DNA to identify any changes in the genetic structure and more trials to ensure these results are consistent.
CONCLUSIONS/FUTURE WORK
Staphylococcus aureus and Psuedomonas aeruginosa were inoculated in nutrient broth
for 48 hours at 37 Celsius then placed under the following conditions:
UV Exposure
•Shortwave
•Exposure ranged from 5 minutes to 25 minutes
•Plates were evaluated using a scoring range with 2 representing plentiful growth and zero
indicating no growth .
Temperature
•Exposure temperature ranged from 50 Celsius to 90 Celsius
•Exposure Time ranged from 10 minutes to 30 minutes
•Plates were evaluated using a scoring range with 1 representing growth and zero
indicating no growth.
Disinfectant Analysis
•Placed on Agar plates for 48 hours at 37 Celsius
•Highest Time, Temperature or UV were resuspended in nutrient broth
•Plated on Agar plates with disinfectant/hand sanitizer and incubated for 48 hours at 37
Celsius
•Plates were evaluated using a scoring range with 3 representing plentiful growth and zero
indicating no growth.
DNA Extraction
•The DNA was extracted using 2-3 ml of isobutanol and water saturated diethyl ether
•The DNA was Precipitated based on the total volume of the culture
•1/10th total volume of 3M NaOAc and 2 times the total volume 95% Ethanol
•DNA was placed in -20C for 48 hours
•The DNA was centrifuged at 12,000xg for 15 minutes, decanted then 200ul of 75%
Ethanol wash was added twice while also resuspended and centrifuged 12,000xg for 10
minutes
•The DNA pellet was dried and resuspended in MilliQ water and the concentration was
tested using a Nanodrop
•DNA was sequenced for analysis
Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
10min
20min
30min
10min
20min
30min
10min
20min
30min
10min
20min
30min
10min
20min
30min
50 C 60 C 70 C 80 C 90 C
Growth(Visual)
Temperature (C) Time (min)
Figure 2: Temperature Effects of Bacterial Growth
P. aeruginosa Staph. aureus E. coli
0 1 2 3
8min
10min
15min
20min
25min
Growth (visual)
Time(min)
Figure 1: UV Effects of Bacterial Growth
E. coli
Staph.
aureus
P.
aeruginosa
strain 60 C 70 C 80 C 90 C
10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min
#27853 - - - - - - - - - - +
#25923 < < < < < < - - - + -
< < < - - - < < - < <
+
-
<
+ + + + + + + - - + +
+ + + - + + - - - - -
strain 8min 10min 15min 20min 25min Name Germx
Lysol Bathroom
cleaner
P. aeruginosa UV 25
minutes 2 2
#27853 + + + + +
P. aeruginosa 60 C
30 minutes 3 1
#25923 ++ ++ ++ - -
Staph. aureus UV 15
minutes 3 2
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Staph. aureus 90C
20 minutes 3 1
E. coli UV 25
minutes 3 1
++
E. coli 60C 30
minutes 3 2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
P. aeruginosa UV 25 minutes
P. aeruginosa 60 C 30 minutes
Staph. aureus UV 15 minutes
Staph. aureus 90C 20 minutes
E. coli UV 25 minutes
E. coli 60C 30 minutes
Growth in the presence of Disinfectant
BacteriaandEnvironmentalConditions
Figure 3: Disinfectant Control of Bacterial Growth
The Works
Lysol Bathroom cleaner
Germx
Germx results of P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus
aureus indicating no zones of inhibition
References
http://www.marvistavet.org/assets/i
mages/Pseudomonas_aeruginosa_G
ram.gif
http://entomologia.net/insectos%20
contra%20bacterias/Staphylococcus
%20aureus.jpg

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Capsule staining
Capsule stainingCapsule staining
Capsule staining
Nagendra P
Ìý
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing – disk diffusion methods
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing – disk diffusion methodsAntimicrobial susceptibility testing – disk diffusion methods
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing – disk diffusion methods
Ann Sam
Ìý
Staining techniques
Staining techniquesStaining techniques
Staining techniques
RESHMASOMAN3
Ìý
Candida
CandidaCandida
Candida
9844003833
Ìý
Bacillus
BacillusBacillus
Bacillus
MUKESH SINGH
Ìý
MIC Testing
MIC TestingMIC Testing
MIC Testing
Dr. Samira Fattah
Ìý
Cultivation of virus
Cultivation of virus Cultivation of virus
Cultivation of virus
microbiology Notes
Ìý
Cultivation of viruses
Cultivation of virusesCultivation of viruses
Cultivation of viruses
U. P. Veterinary University (DUVASU), Mathura
Ìý
Types of staining techniques in microbiology
Types of staining techniques in microbiology Types of staining techniques in microbiology
Types of staining techniques in microbiology
Tahir Ali,Punjab University Lahore
Ìý
Preparation of fungal culture media
Preparation of fungal culture media Preparation of fungal culture media
Preparation of fungal culture media
Vamsi kumar
Ìý
Salmonella
SalmonellaSalmonella
Salmonella
prakashtu
Ìý
15. shigella
15. shigella15. shigella
15. shigella
Ratheeshkrishnakripa
Ìý
Antifungal Susceptibility Test
Antifungal Susceptibility TestAntifungal Susceptibility Test
Antifungal Susceptibility Test
Abhijit Prasad
Ìý
16. vibrio cholera
16. vibrio cholera16. vibrio cholera
16. vibrio cholera
Ratheeshkrishnakripa
Ìý
Bacteriocin and its typing
Bacteriocin and its typingBacteriocin and its typing
Bacteriocin and its typing
Shyam Mishra
Ìý
Serological tests
Serological testsSerological tests
Serological tests
dream10f
Ìý
Bacterial staining
Bacterial stainingBacterial staining
Bacterial staining
Hari, Thoothukudi Govt. Medical College, Thoothukudi
Ìý
M I C
M I C M I C
M I C
Ahmed Gamal Afify
Ìý
Bacillus
Bacillus Bacillus
Bacillus
Guddeti Prashanth Kumar
Ìý
E coli
E coliE coli
E coli
Noman-Hafeez khosa
Ìý

Similar to Microbiology Poster Presentation (20)

Uv Keyboard Report
Uv Keyboard ReportUv Keyboard Report
Uv Keyboard Report
guest52bef
Ìý
Scientific report article presentation
Scientific report article presentationScientific report article presentation
Scientific report article presentation
Govinda Navale
Ìý
Dhruti Avlani - Biological Indicators
Dhruti Avlani - Biological  IndicatorsDhruti Avlani - Biological  Indicators
Dhruti Avlani - Biological Indicators
DHRUTI AVLANI
Ìý
Unit 2 ppt new.pptx
Unit 2 ppt new.pptxUnit 2 ppt new.pptx
Unit 2 ppt new.pptx
DeepaGupta541057
Ìý
Rotavirus Review
Rotavirus ReviewRotavirus Review
Rotavirus Review
Charlotte Bates
Ìý
CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptx
CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptxCONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptx
CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptx
ProfPwavenoHBamaiyi
Ìý
The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...
The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...
The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...
iosrjce
Ìý
viruses-08-00300 (1)
viruses-08-00300 (1)viruses-08-00300 (1)
viruses-08-00300 (1)
Fabrizio Di Pinto
Ìý
INFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .ppt
INFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .pptINFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .ppt
INFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .ppt
ssuser8adf34
Ìý
5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)
5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)
5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)
Guide_Consulting
Ìý
Microbial control seminar corrected
Microbial control seminar correctedMicrobial control seminar corrected
Microbial control seminar corrected
Rajarshi Gupta
Ìý
Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...
Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...
Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...
Alexander Decker
Ìý
Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...
Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...
Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...
IRJET Journal
Ìý
Sterilization and disinfection final
Sterilization and disinfection finalSterilization and disinfection final
Sterilization and disinfection final
Sonica Sondhi
Ìý
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 SymposiumOverview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Eastern Pennsylvania Branch ASM
Ìý
Multi drug resistant organisims
Multi drug resistant organisimsMulti drug resistant organisims
Multi drug resistant organisims
Jayant Balani
Ìý
Bioensayos de efectividad
Bioensayos de efectividadBioensayos de efectividad
Bioensayos de efectividad
Aquiles Salazar
Ìý
Isolation and characterization of Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus
Isolation and characterization  of  Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureusIsolation and characterization  of  Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus
Isolation and characterization of Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus
virendraanjali24806
Ìý
Tesina V.2 EN
Tesina V.2 ENTesina V.2 EN
Tesina V.2 EN
Evaqsd
Ìý
SARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN TEST PPT
SARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN  TEST PPTSARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN  TEST PPT
SARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN TEST PPT
Vindhya Vidhyadharan
Ìý
Uv Keyboard Report
Uv Keyboard ReportUv Keyboard Report
Uv Keyboard Report
guest52bef
Ìý
Scientific report article presentation
Scientific report article presentationScientific report article presentation
Scientific report article presentation
Govinda Navale
Ìý
Dhruti Avlani - Biological Indicators
Dhruti Avlani - Biological  IndicatorsDhruti Avlani - Biological  Indicators
Dhruti Avlani - Biological Indicators
DHRUTI AVLANI
Ìý
CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptx
CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptxCONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptx
CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH VMP 304 APRIL 2024.pptx
ProfPwavenoHBamaiyi
Ìý
The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...
The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...
The Effect of Ultra Violet Radiation on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus ...
iosrjce
Ìý
INFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .ppt
INFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .pptINFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .ppt
INFECTION CONTROL and STERLIZATION in DENTISTRY .ppt
ssuser8adf34
Ìý
5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)
5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)
5.1.3. Efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP 5.0)
Guide_Consulting
Ìý
Microbial control seminar corrected
Microbial control seminar correctedMicrobial control seminar corrected
Microbial control seminar corrected
Rajarshi Gupta
Ìý
Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...
Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...
Inactivation of bacillus cereus spores in liquid food by combination treatmen...
Alexander Decker
Ìý
Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...
Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...
Selection and Efficacy Biocontrol Agents in Vitro against Fire Blight (Erwini...
IRJET Journal
Ìý
Sterilization and disinfection final
Sterilization and disinfection finalSterilization and disinfection final
Sterilization and disinfection final
Sonica Sondhi
Ìý
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 SymposiumOverview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Eastern Pennsylvania Branch ASM
Ìý
Multi drug resistant organisims
Multi drug resistant organisimsMulti drug resistant organisims
Multi drug resistant organisims
Jayant Balani
Ìý
Bioensayos de efectividad
Bioensayos de efectividadBioensayos de efectividad
Bioensayos de efectividad
Aquiles Salazar
Ìý
Isolation and characterization of Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus
Isolation and characterization  of  Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureusIsolation and characterization  of  Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus
Isolation and characterization of Bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus
virendraanjali24806
Ìý
Tesina V.2 EN
Tesina V.2 ENTesina V.2 EN
Tesina V.2 EN
Evaqsd
Ìý
SARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN TEST PPT
SARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN  TEST PPTSARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN  TEST PPT
SARS-CoV-2 Rapid ANTIGEN TEST PPT
Vindhya Vidhyadharan
Ìý

Microbiology Poster Presentation

  • 1. The Genetic effects of Environmental conditions on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Christy A. Twilight, Sue Gordon-Brainard B.S. And Jan Bowman M.S. ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are known to be highly resilient bacteria to disinfectants so it was hypothesized that they will still grow even after severe temperature or UV treatment. Based on previous laboratory experiments from Jamestown Community College Microbiology classes from several years, a range relative temperatures, UV exposures, and times were determined for Staphylococcus aureus and E.coli. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was given a wide range of temperatures, and UV exposure times. All bacteria was placed in nutrient broth and incubated at 37 Celsius for 48 hours then exposed to various environmental conditions. The results revealed that Staphylococcus aureus could withstand temperatures of 90 Celsius for 30 minutes and UV exposure for 15 minutes. P. aeruginosa and E. coli were able to withstand temperatures of 60 Celsius for 30 minutes and UV exposure of 25 minutes. These results were then resuspended to have their DNA extracted and to be placed on agar plates with disinfectant exposures. The disinfectant exposure results revealed no noticeable changes in resistance based on previous data. The DNA will be analyzed for any genetic changes based on environmental effects. One of the largest concerns for hospitals today is preventative measures against nosocomial infections. Preventative measures such as UV treatment, and disinfectants have been taken in order to prevent patient to patient transmission; however, bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus have become increasingly resistant to these preventative measures and antibiotics. Examples are Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA). Additionally, due to patient volume, an increase of hand sanitizers has been used between patients over hand washing among hospital staff. The purpose of this research was to reveal any genetic effects from environmental conditions such as UV treatment and temperature, then reveal any changes in growth and resistance to disinfectants and hand sanitizers. As shown in figure 1, the results for the UV exposure indicated that all of the bacteria tested withstood at least 15 minutes of shortwave UV Exposure without any inhibition to growth. P. aeruginosa was able to handle at least 25 minutes. Repeated studies would have to be done with longer time lengths to see if this trend extends past 25 minutes. As shown in figure 2, the results for the temperature indicated that unlike previous documented evidence, P.aeruginosa can grow in temperatures above 42 Celsius and actually grow up to 60 Celsius for 30 minutes. Staphylococcus aureus was able to withstand temperatures of 90 Celsius for 30 minutes. As shown in figure 3, the disinfectant results indicated that hand sanitizers such as Germx still have no effect on the growth of the bacteria even when they have undergone high temperature and UV treatment. In fact, Germx actually caused P. aeruginosa an enhancement of the blue/green pigmentation. No zones of inhibition were indicated for Staphylococcus aureus either. Based on the genetic analysis obtained, it can be concluded that the DNA was either too degraded to obtain any sequences, or the DNA was contaminated by outside factors. Additionally, the DNA exposed to UV may have been unable to be replicated due to the pyrimidine dimerization that often occurs with UV exposure. Additional extractions must be repeated under more purified techniques such as DNA gel extractions in order to ensure contamination was not the issue. Additional work will include continued repeat extraction and analysis under alternate aseptic conditions and analysis of the genetic sequences between the known strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the DNA sequences environmentally affected DNA to identify any changes in the genetic structure and more trials to ensure these results are consistent. CONCLUSIONS/FUTURE WORK Staphylococcus aureus and Psuedomonas aeruginosa were inoculated in nutrient broth for 48 hours at 37 Celsius then placed under the following conditions: UV Exposure •Shortwave •Exposure ranged from 5 minutes to 25 minutes •Plates were evaluated using a scoring range with 2 representing plentiful growth and zero indicating no growth . Temperature •Exposure temperature ranged from 50 Celsius to 90 Celsius •Exposure Time ranged from 10 minutes to 30 minutes •Plates were evaluated using a scoring range with 1 representing growth and zero indicating no growth. Disinfectant Analysis •Placed on Agar plates for 48 hours at 37 Celsius •Highest Time, Temperature or UV were resuspended in nutrient broth •Plated on Agar plates with disinfectant/hand sanitizer and incubated for 48 hours at 37 Celsius •Plates were evaluated using a scoring range with 3 representing plentiful growth and zero indicating no growth. DNA Extraction •The DNA was extracted using 2-3 ml of isobutanol and water saturated diethyl ether •The DNA was Precipitated based on the total volume of the culture •1/10th total volume of 3M NaOAc and 2 times the total volume 95% Ethanol •DNA was placed in -20C for 48 hours •The DNA was centrifuged at 12,000xg for 15 minutes, decanted then 200ul of 75% Ethanol wash was added twice while also resuspended and centrifuged 12,000xg for 10 minutes •The DNA pellet was dried and resuspended in MilliQ water and the concentration was tested using a Nanodrop •DNA was sequenced for analysis Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 50 C 60 C 70 C 80 C 90 C Growth(Visual) Temperature (C) Time (min) Figure 2: Temperature Effects of Bacterial Growth P. aeruginosa Staph. aureus E. coli 0 1 2 3 8min 10min 15min 20min 25min Growth (visual) Time(min) Figure 1: UV Effects of Bacterial Growth E. coli Staph. aureus P. aeruginosa strain 60 C 70 C 80 C 90 C 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min 30min 10min 20min #27853 - - - - - - - - - - + #25923 < < < < < < - - - + - < < < - - - < < - < < + - < + + + + + + + - - + + + + + - + + - - - - - strain 8min 10min 15min 20min 25min Name Germx Lysol Bathroom cleaner P. aeruginosa UV 25 minutes 2 2 #27853 + + + + + P. aeruginosa 60 C 30 minutes 3 1 #25923 ++ ++ ++ - - Staph. aureus UV 15 minutes 3 2 ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Staph. aureus 90C 20 minutes 3 1 E. coli UV 25 minutes 3 1 ++ E. coli 60C 30 minutes 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 P. aeruginosa UV 25 minutes P. aeruginosa 60 C 30 minutes Staph. aureus UV 15 minutes Staph. aureus 90C 20 minutes E. coli UV 25 minutes E. coli 60C 30 minutes Growth in the presence of Disinfectant BacteriaandEnvironmentalConditions Figure 3: Disinfectant Control of Bacterial Growth The Works Lysol Bathroom cleaner Germx Germx results of P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus indicating no zones of inhibition References http://www.marvistavet.org/assets/i mages/Pseudomonas_aeruginosa_G ram.gif http://entomologia.net/insectos%20 contra%20bacterias/Staphylococcus %20aureus.jpg