Presentation1dvb
Download as pptx, pdf0 likes267 views
The document summarizes feedback received about a documentary. It notes that the voiceover and images during interviews were cohesive, the voxpops helped break up the documentary, scrolling through an article should have been slower to allow reading, and some cutaways could have been lengthened to make viewing easier. The feedback was learned from audience questionnaires and helped identify ways to improve the documentary.
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Ad
Recommended
Audience Feedback
Audience FeedbackChloeHicks
?
The audience feedback for a documentary was generally positive. 7 out of 7 viewers thought the opening sequence, music choice, voiceover, and camerawork were good quality and represented the topic well. Most also said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and that the fonts/colors suited the topic. While the target audience was seen as fitting by 6 viewers, 1 thought it could be broader. Positives included the interesting topic, creative opening, and archive footage. Suggested changes were to include a more varied range of interviews and archive footage. All 7 viewers felt the documentary was a good fit for the channel it aired on.Media question
Media question Shannon Louise Morrison
?
The document reflects on learning from a preliminary task to a full product. The author learned to use Quark and Photoshop more effectively by spending more time with the programs and utilizing different tools. Specifically for Quark, the author found it was easy to use and important for producing quality media work. For Photoshop, the author learned to use various tools more accurately and felt the final image was of better quality than before.Questionnaire results
Questionnaire resultsShannon Louise Morrison
?
The document appears to be a questionnaire asking respondents for demographic information like age, gender, status and occupation. It also asks viewing habits such as most watched TV channel, preferred time of day to watch TV, how often TV is watched and expectations for when documentaries may air. Personal preferences are queried around chocolate, including favorite and disliked types as well as when chocolate is mainly consumed and whether supermarket or handmade chocolate is preferred.Questionnaire results
Questionnaire resultsShannon Louise Morrison
?
This document appears to be the results of a questionnaire that asks respondents about their demographic information like age and gender. It also asks questions about TV viewing habits such as favorite channels, times of day watched, and documentary preferences. Additionally, it inquires about chocolate preferences including frequency of consumption, favorite and least favorite kinds, and whether supermarket or handmade chocolate is preferred.11costtrendspricediffreport
11costtrendspricediffreportClementineJouard
?
Hospital care accounts for approximately 30% of total national healthcare expenditures and is projected to remain at this level for the next decade. From 2000-2009, hospital revenues closely tracked rising cost increases, with both increasing by around 5% annually. Labor costs, which make up over half of hospital expenses, grew between 5-8% per year in this period. Additionally, hospitals face growing shortfalls from Medicare/Medicaid and uncompensated care. Analyses show hospital prices are directly related to their costs of providing services.Local
Local智傑 詹
?
台中华盛顿双语小学注重於多元语言能力及本土教育的融入，透过生活化、趣味化及情境化的教学原则，提升学生对母语及本土文化的热爱。学校以闽南语為授课重点，并积极参与本土教育活动与研习，以丰富的课程与活动，如语文週及户外教学，让学生深刻体验本土教育的美感与内涵。Questionnaire Results
Questionnaire ResultsShannon Louise Morrison
?
- The largest age group of respondents was 16 and under, fitting the target audience.
- NME was the most popular magazine.
- Blue and black were the most popular colors, so those colors will be prominently featured.
- People mainly buy magazines fortnightly, so the magazine will be published fortnightly.Media evaluation question 3
Media evaluation question 3PattenK1
?
The document summarizes feedback from questionnaires given to audiences of a documentary, radio trailer, and double-page article. For the documentary, most respondents said the sound levels and video transitions were good, and all learned something new. Feedback on the radio trailer was also positive regarding scripting, sound levels, and background music. While the article and images received mostly positive feedback, most felt the double-page spread could be improved, such as by adding more color.Question 3
Question 3mediarosanna
?
The document discusses audience feedback collected on a documentary, double-page magazine spread, and radio trailer about Twitter. Questionnaires provided useful feedback on what the target audience expected and their interest. The feedback was overall positive, with some suggestions for improvement, such as ensuring consistent audio levels in the documentary and making the magazine spread look more realistic. The feedback validated that the products met expectations and codes of their genres.Question 3
Question 3HartwellT1
?
Thomas Hartwell collected audience feedback throughout the project to inform their documentary on rising university fees. During research, questionnaires found most people knew about rising fees and felt it would moderately impact them. This helped direct the documentary to portray a balanced argument showing the majority view it as unfair. Feedback from students requesting informative facts and interesting shots was also incorporated. Evaluation questionnaires after found the documentary and radio trailer were mostly enjoyed and professionally made. While most felt entertained and learned, some said they only learned relatively, suggesting more facts could be included next time. Overall, the feedback helped make successful products that achieved their goals.Audience feedback statistics
Audience feedback statisticsgabbi_abi
?
The document provides audience feedback statistics from a survey with 8 questions about a video. Based on the yes or no responses to each question, the majority of viewers found the video engaging and different from conventions, with effective use of mise-en-scene and location shooting creating atmosphere. Some elements like the music pacing stood out, and some felt changes could improve it further.Media question 3
Media question 3 amara786
?
The document summarizes feedback received from viewers of a documentary about multiculturalism. Graphs show that 100% of viewers felt the documentary fulfilled its purpose and engaged them within the first minute. Feedback also indicated the editing, sound levels, and appeal to the target age range were successful. Some areas for improvement included titles being too slow and sound levels. Feedback on a radio trailer and double-page article spread was also positive overall.Evaluation - Question Three
Evaluation - Question ThreeShaf Rahman
?
The document summarizes feedback from 15 people who viewed the documentary, listened to the radio trailer, and read the magazine article. Most said they would continue watching the full documentary. Responses to the quality of interviews and flow of the documentary were positive. While most felt the sound suited the topic, some thought the music was too upbeat. Minor changes like adding background music and speeding up the start were suggested. All felt the documentary effectively raised awareness of cyberbullying as intended. The radio trailer and article were also well-received except a few thought the trailer too slow. Gaining audience perspective provided useful insights and confirmed the documentary met its goal of informing viewers about cyberbullying.Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAlexHanJames
?
The audience provided feedback on the documentary in the form of a questionnaire with ratings. Most people rated the documentary as average, giving it a 7 out of 10. While it was not seen as poor, there was still room for improvement to receive more top ratings. When asked about used codes and conventions, interviews were identified as an effective element. However, the ancillary tasks were only viewed as effectively promoting the documentary by 61% of respondents. Verbal feedback noted good sound and music but identified inconsistencies between voiceover and on-screen text as an area for improvement.Questionnaire feedback
Questionnaire feedbackAndie-gurtiie Bp
?
This document contains the results of a 17 question questionnaire about a documentary on sweets. The questions covered demographics of respondents, their opinions on different aspects of the documentary such as entertainment value and technical quality, reactions to advertising for the documentary, and evaluation of marketing materials. The data is presented primarily in bar graphs that show the distribution of answers for closed-ended questions.What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)
What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)samclark337
?
The student created a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine article for a class project. They surveyed audiences to gather feedback. While most respondents felt the projects resembled real products and had positive elements, feedback also identified areas for improvement. Sound levels were inconsistent across the documentary and radio trailer. The summaries highlighted both what worked well and what could be enhanced, showing the value of audience feedback for creating successful media.What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)
What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)samclark337
?
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires about media products created by the author's group. 83% of respondents felt they learned something from the documentary, but there is room for improvement as 17% did not. Sound levels were inconsistent according to 77% of respondents. For the radio trailer, 72% said sound levels were not consistent throughout. However, 94% felt the magazine resembled a real life product. In the future, the author will focus on improving sound consistency based on this feedback.Question 3 Audience Feedback
Question 3 Audience FeedbackToniMorris
?
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to classmates on a documentary project. Key points:
1. Classmates understood the topic and most said they would consider watching it outside of class. Some didn't find the topic interesting.
2. The combination of audio and visuals worked effectively but some felt it could have better informed through added statistics.
3. Feedback on radio trailer and double page spread was mostly positive, though some improvements were noted on sound levels and effects.
4. Most classmates found the double page spread professional, genre-appropriate and encouraging to watch the documentary.Question 3 Audience Feedback By Toni
Question 3 Audience Feedback By ToniToniMorris
?
The document summarizes feedback received from classmates on a documentary and its accompanying radio trailer and double-page article. Most of the feedback was positive. For the documentary, classmates understood the topic and most would consider watching it outside of class. Audiovisuals worked effectively together but some felt it did not inform them. For the radio trailer, most felt it had typical characteristics, grabbed attention, and had consistent sound levels. Most also felt the double-page article looked professional and its style was appropriate. Most would be encouraged to watch the documentary based on the article. Some areas for improvement were noted.Media q3
Media q3a2columnd12
?
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to viewers of a student documentary about cyberbullying. Key findings included:
1) 100% of viewers said they would continue watching the full documentary after seeing the opening.
2) Viewers provided varied feedback on what they liked most, showing different elements appealed to different tastes.
3) Most said they would not change anything, but some suggested interviewing a victim or their family.
4) Viewers unanimously said the sound suited the topic and the documentary was well composed with good flow.
5) All viewers said the documentary made them more aware of cyberbullying.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3a2columnd12
?
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience of 15 people who viewed a documentary, listened to a radio trailer, and looked at a double page spread created by the author. The audience completed an anonymous 12 question survey. The author tallied the feedback and presented it in graphs showing what aspects of the projects the audience liked and suggested changing. Overall, the feedback was positive, with most audience members enjoying the documentary and radio trailer and not wanting to change anything. The feedback will help the author improve future media projects.Media
Mediaa2columnd12
?
The document discusses how the filmmakers analyzed conventions used in camera work, sound, editing, and composition in other documentaries to inform their own documentary production. They studied techniques like handheld camera for interviews and tripod shots for formal interviews. They also applied conventions like background music, rule of thirds framing, fading transitions, and voiceovers in their documentary and radio trailer to make their pieces more professional. The conclusion states they adhered to documentary, radio, and magazine conventions without challenging norms.Experiments
ExperimentsBertieStasiulevicuis
?
Bertie created a 6-second animated logo in After Effects that includes the text "Bertie's media" and the title of his factual work ("Tattoos and body piercings") to use for his current and future projects. He tested different locations on his college campus to record interview audio with his camera's microphone and found that a quiet corridor on the second floor provided the best environment. Bertie also made mock poster designs for his documentary in Photoshop, adding the title from his animation and "Bertie's media" to a stock image and adding a black border.Evaluation
EvaluationMicaRossHarris
?
The document discusses the conventions used in the student's documentary and radio trailer project. It examines how they employed typical documentary conventions like voiceovers, interviews, titles/captions, and stock footage. It also analyzed their radio trailer based on conventions from existing radio programs, such as using intro music/sounds to set the topic and a voiceover to convey information. The student aimed to follow real conventions to make their media products seem professional while utilizing the forms and styles of documentary films and radio programs.Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Ellie Marsh
?
The focus group felt that the documentary, radio trailer, and double page spread were effectively linked together through shared elements like music and imagery. While the content may not appeal to some male viewers, most of the female focus group members expressed interest in watching the documentary based on the promotional materials. The materials were seen as more engaging than other documentaries on similar topics.Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationTillyBrown3
?
The document summarizes the process of creating a documentary video project from start to finish. It describes completing paperwork, conducting interviews, recording a band, and addressing issues that came up during production and post-production. Overall, the process went smoothly though some audio issues required multiple drafts to fix. The project helped improve the author's video editing and sound editing skills.Production Logs
Production LogsJackMungeMedia
?
The document provides details from Jack Munge's production log for his music video project. It describes his planning, preparation, filming, and editing process. Some key points:
- He filmed 4-5 vox pops to understand his target audience's views on music videos. Equipment issues forced him to use a lower quality camera.
- He storyboarded, gained audience feedback, and took more photos for the album cover and advert while continuing to film footage.
- In editing, he worked on building suspense in the introduction by gradually increasing the brightness and opacity of slow motion running clips to match the increasing pace of the song.Presentation1dvb
Presentation1dvbShannon Louise Morrison
?
The document provides feedback on a documentary project. It notes that the images, voiceover, and voxpops were cohesive and helped break up the documentary. However, it suggests scrolling slower through an article to give viewers more time to read, and lengthening some cutaways to improve the viewing experience.Questionnaire results...
Questionnaire results...Shannon Louise Morrison
?
The document outlines the questions from a questionnaire and the reasons each question was chosen. The questions were aimed at understanding the target audience for a documentary about chocolate consumption in order to determine the best time, channel, and format to air the documentary to reach the largest number of viewers. Specifically, the questions focused on demographics, media viewing habits, chocolate preferences and consumption patterns to help optimize promotion and distribution of the documentary.More Related Content
Similar to Presentation1dvb (20)
Media evaluation question 3
Media evaluation question 3PattenK1
?
The document summarizes feedback from questionnaires given to audiences of a documentary, radio trailer, and double-page article. For the documentary, most respondents said the sound levels and video transitions were good, and all learned something new. Feedback on the radio trailer was also positive regarding scripting, sound levels, and background music. While the article and images received mostly positive feedback, most felt the double-page spread could be improved, such as by adding more color.Question 3
Question 3mediarosanna
?
The document discusses audience feedback collected on a documentary, double-page magazine spread, and radio trailer about Twitter. Questionnaires provided useful feedback on what the target audience expected and their interest. The feedback was overall positive, with some suggestions for improvement, such as ensuring consistent audio levels in the documentary and making the magazine spread look more realistic. The feedback validated that the products met expectations and codes of their genres.Question 3
Question 3HartwellT1
?
Thomas Hartwell collected audience feedback throughout the project to inform their documentary on rising university fees. During research, questionnaires found most people knew about rising fees and felt it would moderately impact them. This helped direct the documentary to portray a balanced argument showing the majority view it as unfair. Feedback from students requesting informative facts and interesting shots was also incorporated. Evaluation questionnaires after found the documentary and radio trailer were mostly enjoyed and professionally made. While most felt entertained and learned, some said they only learned relatively, suggesting more facts could be included next time. Overall, the feedback helped make successful products that achieved their goals.Audience feedback statistics
Audience feedback statisticsgabbi_abi
?
The document provides audience feedback statistics from a survey with 8 questions about a video. Based on the yes or no responses to each question, the majority of viewers found the video engaging and different from conventions, with effective use of mise-en-scene and location shooting creating atmosphere. Some elements like the music pacing stood out, and some felt changes could improve it further.Media question 3
Media question 3 amara786
?
The document summarizes feedback received from viewers of a documentary about multiculturalism. Graphs show that 100% of viewers felt the documentary fulfilled its purpose and engaged them within the first minute. Feedback also indicated the editing, sound levels, and appeal to the target age range were successful. Some areas for improvement included titles being too slow and sound levels. Feedback on a radio trailer and double-page article spread was also positive overall.Evaluation - Question Three
Evaluation - Question ThreeShaf Rahman
?
The document summarizes feedback from 15 people who viewed the documentary, listened to the radio trailer, and read the magazine article. Most said they would continue watching the full documentary. Responses to the quality of interviews and flow of the documentary were positive. While most felt the sound suited the topic, some thought the music was too upbeat. Minor changes like adding background music and speeding up the start were suggested. All felt the documentary effectively raised awareness of cyberbullying as intended. The radio trailer and article were also well-received except a few thought the trailer too slow. Gaining audience perspective provided useful insights and confirmed the documentary met its goal of informing viewers about cyberbullying.Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAlexHanJames
?
The audience provided feedback on the documentary in the form of a questionnaire with ratings. Most people rated the documentary as average, giving it a 7 out of 10. While it was not seen as poor, there was still room for improvement to receive more top ratings. When asked about used codes and conventions, interviews were identified as an effective element. However, the ancillary tasks were only viewed as effectively promoting the documentary by 61% of respondents. Verbal feedback noted good sound and music but identified inconsistencies between voiceover and on-screen text as an area for improvement.Questionnaire feedback
Questionnaire feedbackAndie-gurtiie Bp
?
This document contains the results of a 17 question questionnaire about a documentary on sweets. The questions covered demographics of respondents, their opinions on different aspects of the documentary such as entertainment value and technical quality, reactions to advertising for the documentary, and evaluation of marketing materials. The data is presented primarily in bar graphs that show the distribution of answers for closed-ended questions.What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)
What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)samclark337
?
The student created a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine article for a class project. They surveyed audiences to gather feedback. While most respondents felt the projects resembled real products and had positive elements, feedback also identified areas for improvement. Sound levels were inconsistent across the documentary and radio trailer. The summaries highlighted both what worked well and what could be enhanced, showing the value of audience feedback for creating successful media.What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)
What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)samclark337
?
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires about media products created by the author's group. 83% of respondents felt they learned something from the documentary, but there is room for improvement as 17% did not. Sound levels were inconsistent according to 77% of respondents. For the radio trailer, 72% said sound levels were not consistent throughout. However, 94% felt the magazine resembled a real life product. In the future, the author will focus on improving sound consistency based on this feedback.Question 3 Audience Feedback
Question 3 Audience FeedbackToniMorris
?
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to classmates on a documentary project. Key points:
1. Classmates understood the topic and most said they would consider watching it outside of class. Some didn't find the topic interesting.
2. The combination of audio and visuals worked effectively but some felt it could have better informed through added statistics.
3. Feedback on radio trailer and double page spread was mostly positive, though some improvements were noted on sound levels and effects.
4. Most classmates found the double page spread professional, genre-appropriate and encouraging to watch the documentary.Question 3 Audience Feedback By Toni
Question 3 Audience Feedback By ToniToniMorris
?
The document summarizes feedback received from classmates on a documentary and its accompanying radio trailer and double-page article. Most of the feedback was positive. For the documentary, classmates understood the topic and most would consider watching it outside of class. Audiovisuals worked effectively together but some felt it did not inform them. For the radio trailer, most felt it had typical characteristics, grabbed attention, and had consistent sound levels. Most also felt the double-page article looked professional and its style was appropriate. Most would be encouraged to watch the documentary based on the article. Some areas for improvement were noted.Media q3
Media q3a2columnd12
?
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to viewers of a student documentary about cyberbullying. Key findings included:
1) 100% of viewers said they would continue watching the full documentary after seeing the opening.
2) Viewers provided varied feedback on what they liked most, showing different elements appealed to different tastes.
3) Most said they would not change anything, but some suggested interviewing a victim or their family.
4) Viewers unanimously said the sound suited the topic and the documentary was well composed with good flow.
5) All viewers said the documentary made them more aware of cyberbullying.Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3a2columnd12
?
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience of 15 people who viewed a documentary, listened to a radio trailer, and looked at a double page spread created by the author. The audience completed an anonymous 12 question survey. The author tallied the feedback and presented it in graphs showing what aspects of the projects the audience liked and suggested changing. Overall, the feedback was positive, with most audience members enjoying the documentary and radio trailer and not wanting to change anything. The feedback will help the author improve future media projects.Media
Mediaa2columnd12
?
The document discusses how the filmmakers analyzed conventions used in camera work, sound, editing, and composition in other documentaries to inform their own documentary production. They studied techniques like handheld camera for interviews and tripod shots for formal interviews. They also applied conventions like background music, rule of thirds framing, fading transitions, and voiceovers in their documentary and radio trailer to make their pieces more professional. The conclusion states they adhered to documentary, radio, and magazine conventions without challenging norms.Experiments
ExperimentsBertieStasiulevicuis
?
Bertie created a 6-second animated logo in After Effects that includes the text "Bertie's media" and the title of his factual work ("Tattoos and body piercings") to use for his current and future projects. He tested different locations on his college campus to record interview audio with his camera's microphone and found that a quiet corridor on the second floor provided the best environment. Bertie also made mock poster designs for his documentary in Photoshop, adding the title from his animation and "Bertie's media" to a stock image and adding a black border.Evaluation
EvaluationMicaRossHarris
?
The document discusses the conventions used in the student's documentary and radio trailer project. It examines how they employed typical documentary conventions like voiceovers, interviews, titles/captions, and stock footage. It also analyzed their radio trailer based on conventions from existing radio programs, such as using intro music/sounds to set the topic and a voiceover to convey information. The student aimed to follow real conventions to make their media products seem professional while utilizing the forms and styles of documentary films and radio programs.Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Ellie Marsh
?
The focus group felt that the documentary, radio trailer, and double page spread were effectively linked together through shared elements like music and imagery. While the content may not appeal to some male viewers, most of the female focus group members expressed interest in watching the documentary based on the promotional materials. The materials were seen as more engaging than other documentaries on similar topics.Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationTillyBrown3
?
The document summarizes the process of creating a documentary video project from start to finish. It describes completing paperwork, conducting interviews, recording a band, and addressing issues that came up during production and post-production. Overall, the process went smoothly though some audio issues required multiple drafts to fix. The project helped improve the author's video editing and sound editing skills.Production Logs
Production LogsJackMungeMedia
?
The document provides details from Jack Munge's production log for his music video project. It describes his planning, preparation, filming, and editing process. Some key points:
- He filmed 4-5 vox pops to understand his target audience's views on music videos. Equipment issues forced him to use a lower quality camera.
- He storyboarded, gained audience feedback, and took more photos for the album cover and advert while continuing to film footage.
- In editing, he worked on building suspense in the introduction by gradually increasing the brightness and opacity of slow motion running clips to match the increasing pace of the song.More from Shannon Louise Morrison (7)
Presentation1dvb
Presentation1dvbShannon Louise Morrison
?
The document provides feedback on a documentary project. It notes that the images, voiceover, and voxpops were cohesive and helped break up the documentary. However, it suggests scrolling slower through an article to give viewers more time to read, and lengthening some cutaways to improve the viewing experience.Questionnaire results...
Questionnaire results...Shannon Louise Morrison
?
The document outlines the questions from a questionnaire and the reasons each question was chosen. The questions were aimed at understanding the target audience for a documentary about chocolate consumption in order to determine the best time, channel, and format to air the documentary to reach the largest number of viewers. Specifically, the questions focused on demographics, media viewing habits, chocolate preferences and consumption patterns to help optimize promotion and distribution of the documentary.Scheduling
SchedulingShannon Louise Morrison
?
The document discusses TV scheduling and programming on UK channels BBC1, BBC2, ITV1, Channel 4, and Channel 5. It defines the common scheduling segments of breakfast, daytime, lunchtime, children's, primetime, and post-watershed. It outlines the target audiences for each channel and programming genres. It provides data on the percentage of repeats for each channel and notes that Channels 4 and 5 have more imported shows to keep costs lower since they don't rely on advertising revenue like the other channels.Scheduling
SchedulingShannon Louise Morrison
?
The document discusses TV scheduling and programming on UK channels BBC1, BBC2, ITV1, Channel 4, and Channel 5. It defines the common scheduling segments of breakfast, daytime, lunchtime, children's, primetime, and post-watershed. It outlines the target audiences for each channel and programming genres. It provides data on the percentage of repeats for each channel and notes that Channels 4 and 5 have more imported shows to keep costs lower since they don't rely on advertising revenue like the other channels.Scheduling
SchedulingShannon Louise Morrison
?
The document discusses TV scheduling and programming on UK channels BBC1, BBC2, ITV1, Channel 4, and Channel 5. It defines the common scheduling segments of breakfast, daytime, lunchtime, children's, primetime, and post-watershed. It outlines the target audiences for each channel and programming genres. It provides data on the percentage of repeats for each channel and notes that Channels 4 and 5 have more imported shows to keep costs lower since they don't rely on advertising revenue like the other channels.That thing
That thingShannon Louise Morrison
?
The documentary analyzes the cultural impact of the video game character Lara Croft. It uses a mixed documentary style with elements of narrative, interviews, and archive footage. Various filming techniques are used including close-ups, point-of-view shots, and superimposition. The documentary examines themes of sexuality, gaming culture, and the representation of women in media through the lens of Lara Croft's popularity and influence.Evaluation Question 5
Evaluation Question 5Shannon Louise Morrison
?
The document summarizes how the author attracted and addressed their intended audience for a music magazine. First, they ensured the magazine's style and content matched the target audience's interests through a questionnaire. Second, they used direct eye contact on the cover to engage readers. Third, they incorporated large fonts, white text on blue, and a contest to make the cover eye-catching.Ad
Recently uploaded (20)
制作颁颈迟测学费单英国伦敦城市大学学历认证范本,颁颈迟测成绩单骋笔础修改
制作颁颈迟测学费单英国伦敦城市大学学历认证范本,颁颈迟测成绩单骋笔础修改taqyed
?
2025年极速办伦敦城市大学毕业证【q薇1954292140】学历认证流程伦敦城市大学毕业证英国本科成绩单制作【q薇1954292140】海外各大学Diploma版本，因为疫情学校推迟发放证书、证书原件丢失补办、没有正常毕业未能认证学历面临就业提供解决办法。当遭遇挂科、旷课导致无法修满学分，或者直接被学校退学，最后无法毕业拿不到毕业证。此时的你一定手足无措，因为留学一场，没有获得毕业证以及学历证明肯定是无法给自己和父母一个交代的。
【复刻伦敦城市大学成绩单信封,Buy London Metropolitan University Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单（q微1954292140）新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率，以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
伦敦城市大学成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力，包括伦敦城市大学课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。（q微1954292140）具体来说，成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分，因此，成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明，也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据！
我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（原版纸质、底色、纹路）我们工厂拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有成品以及工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！
【主营项目】
一.伦敦城市大学毕业证【q微1954292140】伦敦城市大学成绩单、留信认证、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理国外各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)Cuma Di Kancah4D Yang Pasti Cuan,Banyak Scatter Muncul!.pdf
Cuma Di Kancah4D Yang Pasti Cuan,Banyak Scatter Muncul!.pdfmarketing and administrasi
?
Cuma Di Kancah4D Yang Pasti Cuan,Banyak Scatter Muncul!
======================
? BONUS NEW MEMBER 50% (Pragmatic)
? BONUS NEW MEMBER 20% (PG Soft
? BONUS HARIAN 10%
? BONUS LUCKY SPIN SETIAP HARI
? BONUS REFERALL 2,5%
? BONUS CASHBACK
? CAN VIA E-WALLET, BANK, QRIS, AND CREDIT
========================
MIN DP : 20RB
MIN WD : 50RB
Google : kancah4dkita.info最新版美国威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校毕业证（鲍奥厂毕业证书）原版定制
最新版美国威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校毕业证（鲍奥厂毕业证书）原版定制Taqyea
?
鉴于此，定制威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校学位证书提升履历【q薇1954292140】原版高仿威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校毕业证(UWS毕业证书)可先看成品样本【q薇1954292140】帮您解决在美国威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校未毕业难题，美国毕业证购买，美国文凭购买，【q微1954292140】美国文凭购买，美国文凭定制，美国文凭补办。专业在线定制美国大学文凭，定做美国本科文凭，【q微1954292140】复制美国University of Wisconsin-Superior completion letter。在线快速补办美国本科毕业证、硕士文凭证书，购买美国学位证、威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校Offer，美国大学文凭在线购买。
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
【复刻一套威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校毕业证成绩单信封等材料最强攻略,Buy University of Wisconsin-Superior Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单（q微1954292140）新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率，以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力，包括威斯康星大学苏必利尔分校课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。（q微1954292140）具体来说，成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分，因此，成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明，也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据！Indian_Constitution_Presentation_Final.pptx
Indian_Constitution_Presentation_Final.pptxjaglandushyant
?
The presentation includes:
Constitution overview
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
Constituent Assembly
Preamble of the Constitution
Indian ParliamentLearn the basic of illustration with examples.pptx
Learn the basic of illustration with examples.pptxrodelrimando83
?
Ppt for illustration. good for classroom tools class observation (JHS and SHS) animationa and Illustration classes最新版美国中佛罗里达大学毕业证（鲍颁贵毕业证书）原版定制
最新版美国中佛罗里达大学毕业证（鲍颁贵毕业证书）原版定制taqyea
?
2025原版中佛罗里达大学毕业证书pdf电子版【q薇1954292140】美国毕业证办理UCF中佛罗里达大学毕业证书多少钱？【q薇1954292140】海外各大学Diploma版本，因为疫情学校推迟发放证书、证书原件丢失补办、没有正常毕业未能认证学历面临就业提供解决办法。当遭遇挂科、旷课导致无法修满学分，或者直接被学校退学，最后无法毕业拿不到毕业证。此时的你一定手足无措，因为留学一场，没有获得毕业证以及学历证明肯定是无法给自己和父母一个交代的。
【复刻中佛罗里达大学成绩单信封,Buy University of Central Florida Transcripts】
购买日韩成绩单、英国大学成绩单、美国大学成绩单、澳洲大学成绩单、加拿大大学成绩单（q微1954292140）新加坡大学成绩单、新西兰大学成绩单、爱尔兰成绩单、西班牙成绩单、德国成绩单。成绩单的意义主要体现在证明学习能力、评估学术背景、展示综合素质、提高录取率，以及是作为留信认证申请材料的一部分。
中佛罗里达大学成绩单能够体现您的的学习能力，包括中佛罗里达大学课程成绩、专业能力、研究能力。（q微1954292140）具体来说，成绩报告单通常包含学生的学习技能与习惯、各科成绩以及老师评语等部分，因此，成绩单不仅是学生学术能力的证明，也是评估学生是否适合某个教育项目的重要依据！
我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（原版纸质、底色、纹路）我们工厂拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有成品以及工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！
【主营项目】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理毕业证|办理文凭: 买大学毕业证|买大学文凭【q薇1954292140】中佛罗里达大学学位证明书如何办理申请？
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理美国成绩单中佛罗里达大学毕业证【q薇1954292140】国外大学毕业证, 文凭办理, 国外文凭办理, 留信网认证windfarmnoise-vandehei.ppteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
windfarmnoise-vandehei.ppteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeAhaf5
?
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeAd
Presentation1dvb
- 2. ? I have learned from my audience feedback that all of the images during the interviews were cohesive with the interviews themselves and that the voiceover worked well within in the documentary. 12 10 8 6 Yes 4 No 2 0 Do you think that the voiceover and images in the interviews worked well?
- 3. ? I have also learned that the voxpops were good and helped to break up the documentary. I learned this from my questionnaire results.
- 4. ? I have learnt that I should have scrolled slower on the article so that the audience had time to read small parts of it and understand what the interviewees were talking about. I again learned this from my questionnaire results.
- 5. ? Also, I have learned that I could have lengthened some of the cutaways to make the viewing easier and more enjoyable. I learnt this from my questionnaire.