This document discusses the peer review process used by various biomedical journals. It notes that authors generally prefer double-blind peer review, where the identity of both the author and reviewer are unknown, while editors prefer single-blind review. The document also examines issues like the number of reviewers, who serves as reviewers, review timelines, and reviewer rewards. It provides some examples of journals that take different approaches to peer review, such as PLoS ONE which practices open peer review. The document concludes by arguing that scientific papers were historically anonymous and that journals should consider adopting more open peer review practices.
This document provides instructions for writing an abstract. It states that abstracts should be no more than 300 words for reports of original data, reviews and meta-analyses. It should include a structured format with sections for background, methods, results and conclusions. For other major manuscripts, the abstract should be no more than 200 words and summarize the objective, main points and conclusions. Abstracts are not required for editorials, commentaries or some special features. It is important that nothing is included in the abstract that is not also in the main article and any abbreviations should be explained.
This presentation contains suggestions for training agendas. From my large training portfolio you can create your own agenda that might best address your needs. Feel free to contact me for details!
Marko Batista Temporary Objects And Hybrid Ambients Batistandumuseika
油
Marko Batista Temporary Objects And Hybrid Ambients Batista
Marko Batista Temporary Objects And Hybrid Ambients Batista
Marko Batista Temporary Objects And Hybrid Ambients Batista
Organizational Jazz Extraordinary Performance Through Extraordinary Leadershi...lgtbhrqejv2126
油
Organizational Jazz Extraordinary Performance Through Extraordinary Leadership David Napoli
Organizational Jazz Extraordinary Performance Through Extraordinary Leadership David Napoli
Organizational Jazz Extraordinary Performance Through Extraordinary Leadership David Napoli
6. 僚虜流 隆竜虜僚龍溜竜龍竜凌: IMRAD
Hill S. Susan TESOL Quarterly. 1982; 16(3): 333-47
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
離龍竜龍竜
Sollacci LB. et al. J Med Libr Asoc 92(3) July
2004
And
13. 僚竜龍流虜留侶留
≒Uniform Requirements for Submission to
Biomedical Journals International
Committee of Medical Journal Editors
www.icmje.org
CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of
Reporting Trials,
www.consort-statement.org
14. 旅旅留 Checklists
Checklist 溜隆凌 竜粒留龍溜留 URL
CONSORT Randomized controlled trials http://www.consort-statement.org
STARD Studies of diagnostic accuracy www.stard-statement.org
PRISMA (留了旅略 QUOROM) Systematic reviews and meta-
analyses
http://www.consort-
statement.org/resources/related-
guidelines-and-initiatives/
STROBE Observational studies in
epidemiology (cohort, case-
control, cross-sectional)
http://www.strobe-statement.org
MOOSE systematic reviews of
observational studies
http://www.consort-
statement.org/about-
consort/impact-of-
consort/influence-on-related-
reporting-guidelines/
REMARK Tumor marker prognostic studies
TREND Non-randomized evaluations of
behavioural and public health
interventions
19. Authorship credit should be based on
1) substantial contributions to conception and
design, acquisition of data, or analysis and
interpretation of data;
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content; and
3) final approval of the version to be published.
Authors should meet conditions 1, 2, and 3.
http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html
Authorship: ICMJE criteria