Royal Star Foods, a large seafood processing plant in Eastern Canada, underwent a productivity enhancement program to improve efficiency and increase revenues. The program, led by consulting firm ICS, analyzed operations and identified specific process improvements. These included eliminating an unnecessary step in lobster processing that improved taste, redesigning equipment to process previously discarded lobster parts, and adjusting staffing levels and assignments on processing lines. Overall productivity increased nearly 16% and projected annual savings are 89%. The program instilled new attitudes among employees and agreement on clear company directions.
The document discusses how the student's media product opening scene both fits and challenges conventions of independent films. It fits conventions by using sad music to elicit sympathy for the plain protagonist and focusing on her daily life with minimal dialogue. However, it challenges conventions by showing the sad rather than jolly part of the story at the start and having titles in bold colors rather than plain like typical independent films. The student aimed to represent the genre but also try something different from their previous horror genre work.
Gold prices fell due to positive equities markets and mild corrections in crude oil, while investors awaited developments in Greece's debt negotiations. China's natural gas pipeline imports from Turkmenistan and Myanmar increased substantially in March compared to the previous year. Copper prices rose sharply due to bottom fishing and a weaker US dollar, testing highs and lows during the session.
This document contains a sample assessment with questions on English comprehension, quantitative ability, logical ability, computer programming and principles and applications. The assessment contains multiple choice questions to test comprehension, logical reasoning, quantitative and analytical skills. It provides examples of different types of questions commonly asked in assessments to evaluate basic skills in various domains.
Do you think that your data is not secured in the cloud? Is that one of the reasons for you to not migrate at least some workloads there? Things changed in the last few months in terms of Azure security. In this session we will take a closer look at what the features Row Level Security(RLS) and Dynamic Data Masking can do for your business and how they can help you secure your databases.
The document appears to be a collection of random symbols, numbers, and punctuation that do not form coherent sentences or convey meaningful information. It includes strings of letters, numbers, mathematical symbols and other special characters with no discernible pattern or structure.
CASE Queensland Food CorpIn early January 2003, the senior-mana.docxjasoninnes20
?
CASE: Queensland Food Corp
In early January 2003, the senior-management committee of Queensland Food Corp was to meet to draw up the firm¡¯s capital budget for the new year. Up for consideration were 11 major projects that totaled over $20.8 million. Unfortunately, the board of directors had imposed a spending limit of only $8.0 million; even so, investment at that rate would represent a major increase in the firm¡¯s asset base of $65.6 million. Thus the challenge for the senior managers of Queensland Food Corp was to allocate funds among a range of compelling projects nominated for consideration.?
The Company
Queensland Food Corp, headquartered in Brisbane, Australia, was a producer of high-quality ice cream, yogurt, bottled water, and fruit juices. Its products were sold throughout two states (Queensland, New South Wales) and two territories (ACT and Northern Territory).? (See Exhibit 1 for map of the company¡¯s marketing region.)
Exhibit 1 ¨C Queensland Food Corp, located in Australia
Queensland Food Corp sales had been static since 2000 (see Exhibit 2), which management attributed to low population growth in Northern Territory and market saturation in some areas. Outside observers, however, faulted recent failures in new-product introductions.
Exhibit 2 - Summary of Financial Results (millions AUD except per share amounts)
End of Fiscal Year
2000
2001
2002
Gross Sales
$100.8
$100.7
$100.8
Net Income
5.1
4.9
3.7
Dividends
2.0
2.0
2.0
Earnings Per Share
0.85
0.82
0.66
Shareholders¡¯ Equity (Book Value)
18.2
20.6
23.5
Shareholders¡¯ Equity (Market value)
45.3
39.0
22.9
Total Assets
47.7
58.0
65.6
Most members of management wanted to expand the company¡¯s market presence and introduce more new products to boost sales.
Resource Allocation
The capital budget at Queensland Food Corp was prepared annually by a committee of senior managers who then presented it for approval by the board of directors. The committee consisted of five managing directors, the president Chief Executive (CEO), and the chief finance officer (CFO). Typically, the CEO solicited investment proposals from the managing directors. The proposals included a brief project description, a financial analysis, and a discussion of strategic or other qualitative consideration.
As a matter of company policy, investment proposals at Queensland Food Corp were subjected to two financial tests, payback and internal rate of return (IRR). Financial tests were considered hurdles and had been established in 2001 by the management committee and varied according to the type of project:
Exhibit 3 -Company Policy for Project Approval
Project Type
Minimum Acceptable IRR
Maximum Acceptable Payback (Years)
1. Market/Product Extension
12%
6
2. New Product/Markets
10%
5
3. Efficiency Improvements
8%
4
4. Environmental/Safety
Not required
Not Applicable
In January 2003, the estimated weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Queensland Food Corp was 10.5 percent. In describing the capital-budgeting proce ...
CASE Queensland Food CorpIn early January 2003, the senior-.docxcowinhelen
?
CASE: Queensland Food Corp
In early January 2003, the senior-management committee of Queensland Food Corp was to meet to draw up the firm¡¯s capital budget for the new year. Up for consideration were 11 major projects that totaled over $20.8 million. Unfortunately, the board of directors had imposed a spending limit of only $8.0 million; even so, investment at that rate would represent a major increase in the firm¡¯s asset base of $65.6 million. Thus the challenge for the senior managers of Queensland Food Corp was to allocate funds among a range of compelling projects nominated for consideration.?
The Company
Queensland Food Corp, headquartered in Brisbane, Australia, was a producer of high-quality ice cream, yogurt, bottled water, and fruit juices. Its products were sold throughout two states (Queensland, New South Wales) and two territories (ACT and Northern Territory). ?(See Exhibit 1 for map of the company¡¯s marketing region.)
Exhibit 1 ¨C Queensland Food Corp, located in Australia
Queensland Food Corp sales had been static since 2000 (see Exhibit 2), which management attributed to low population growth in Northern Territory and market saturation in some areas. Outside observers, however, faulted recent failures in new-product introductions.
Exhibit 2 - Summary of Financial Results (millions AUD except per share amounts)
End ??of Fiscal Year
2000
2001
2002
Gross ??Sales
$100.8
$100.7
$100.8
Net ??Income
5.1
4.9
3.7
Dividends
2.0
2.0
2.0
Earnings ??Per Share
0.85
0.82
0.66
Shareholders¡¯ ??Equity (Book Value)
18.2
20.6
23.5
Shareholders¡¯ ??Equity (Market value)
45.3
39.0
22.9
Total ??Assets
47.7
58.0
65.6
Most members of management wanted to expand the company¡¯s market presence and introduce more new products to boost sales.
Resource Allocation
The capital budget at Queensland Food Corp was prepared annually by a committee of senior managers who then presented it for approval by the board of directors. The committee consisted of five managing directors, the president Chief Executive (CEO), and the chief finance officer (CFO). Typically, the CEO solicited investment proposals from the managing directors. The proposals included a brief project description, a financial analysis, and a discussion of strategic or other qualitative consideration.
As a matter of company policy, investment proposals at Queensland Food Corp were subjected to two financial tests, payback and internal rate of return (IRR). Financial tests were considered hurdles and had been established in 2001 by the management committee and varied according to the type of project:
Exhibit 3 -Company Policy for Project Approval
Project ??Type
Minimum ??Acceptable IRR
Maximum ??Acceptable Payback (Years)
1. ??Market/Product Extension
12%
6
2. ??New Product/Markets
10%
5
3. ??Efficiency Improvements
8%
4
4. ??Environmental/Safety
Not ??required
Not ??Applicable
In Janu.
Wayne Johnson is seeking a challenging position fully utilizing his managerial, analytical, engineering, and financial skills. He has 20+ years of experience in facilities management, maintenance, and engineering roles in the food processing industry. His experience includes overseeing maintenance programs, energy management, process improvements, budgeting, and project management. He holds an MSc in Engineering Management and has extensive training in areas like project management, maintenance, and food safety.
Unit 2 Group AssignmentGroup Assignment (suggested level of effo.docxadkinspaige22
?
Unit 2 Group Assignment
Group Assignment (suggested level of effort by each group member: 4 hours)
Now that your team is assembled, a mini-case is presented below with several questions.? Read the case and prepare responses to the questions.
CASE: Queensland Food Corp
In early January 2003, the senior-management committee of Queensland Food Corp was to meet to draw up the firm¡¯s capital budget for the new year. Up for consideration were 11 major projects that totaled over $20.8 million. Unfortunately, the board of directors had imposed a spending limit of only $8.0 million; even so, investment at that rate would represent a major increase in the firm¡¯s asset base of $65.6 million. Thus the challenge for the senior managers of Queensland Food Corp was to allocate funds among a range of compelling projects nominated for consideration.?
The Company
Queensland Food Corp, headquartered in Brisbane, Australia, was a producer of high-quality ice cream, yogurt, bottled water, and fruit juices. Its products were sold throughout two states (Queensland, New South Wales) and two territories (ACT and Northern Territory).? (See Exhibit 1 for map of the company¡¯s marketing region.)
Exhibition 1 (See Attached)
Exhibition 2 (See Attached)
Most members of management wanted to expand the company¡¯s market presence and introduce more new products to boost sales.
Resource Allocation
The capital budget at Queensland Food Corp was prepared annually by a committee of senior managers who then presented it for approval by the board of directors. The committee consisted of five managing directors, the president Chief Executive (CEO), and the chief finance officer (CFO). Typically, the CEO solicited investment proposals from the managing directors. The proposals included a brief project description, a financial analysis, and a discussion of strategic or other qualitative consideration.
As a matter of company policy, investment proposals at Queensland Food Corp were subjected to two financial tests, payback and internal rate of return (IRR). Financial tests were considered hurdles and had been established in 2001 by the management committee and varied according to the type of project:
Exhibition 3 (See Attached)
In January 2003, the estimated weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Queensland Food Corp was 10.5 percent. In describing the capital-budgeting process, the CFO, Tony Austin, said, ¡°We use the sliding scale of IRR tests as a way of recognizing differences in risk among the various types of projects. Where the company takes more risk, we should earn more return. The payback test signals that we are not prepared to wait for long to achieve that return.¡±
At the conclusion of the most recent meeting of the directors, the board voted unanimously to limit capital spending in 2003 to $8.0 million.
Exhibition 4 (See Attached)
1.???
Distribution Truck Fleet Replacement/Expansion
. Wayne Ramsey proposed to purchase 100 new refrigerated tractor ...
Global Mining Article - Maximising Assets at Peak Gold MinesMark Pinchen
?
New Gold Inc. is an intermediate gold mining company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. It operates four producing mines: New Afton in Canada, Mesquite in the US, Peak Mines in Australia, and Cerro San Pedro in Mexico. Peak Mines in Australia has implemented new processes to optimize production and performance, turning strategy into action through team creativity and passion. The mine produces gold and copper, and is exploring producing lead and zinc to generate new revenue streams from additional ore bodies. Peak Mines has also refined its management culture and communication with help from consultancies to improve performance, employee engagement, and safety.
Aquatic Leisure Technologies (ALT), a WA-based swimming pool manufacturer, experienced rapid growth from 2006-2007 that led it to lose focus on its core values. To address this, ALT undertook a two-year Lean management training program with Think Perform to transform its culture and operations. The training involved all staff and focused on continuous improvement and streamlining processes. ALT saw significant results, including a highly efficient workplace with minimal waste and an ability to relocate to a new facility much faster than expected. The training program positioned ALT for continued success in global markets.
Greencore, a $2.2B food manufacturer, implemented CDC Factory to improve factory efficiencies and support a cost reduction initiative. CDC Factory provided real-time operations data to empower floor workers. This identified issues like product re-work, long changeover times, and downtime causes. Solutions like optimizing line speeds, streamlining changeovers, and adding mixing equipment reduced direct costs by 5% and improved productivity. The system also changed culture by empowering workers and transitioning managers to a ratifying role of shop floor improvements.
The document summarizes the representative accomplishments of managing partners in restructurings and reorganizations. It provides examples of restructuring family offices, ice cream companies, and multinational operations to substantially increase returns. It also details reorganizing agricultural operations, manufacturers, and healthcare facilities to attract investors, relieve debt, and secure financing. Finally, it discusses developing business plans and models for new food companies to successfully launch and attract international investors and expansion.
EcoStim provides well stimulation, coiled tubing, and reservoir management services using proprietary technologies. It has positioned 50,000 HHP of equipment in Argentina ahead of increasing shale drilling activity. EcoStim's growth opportunity is attractive due to supply constraints in Argentina and barriers to entry that limit competitors from rapidly expanding capacity. The company has a strong customer base of major oil and gas producers operating in Argentina and is bidding on several new contracts worth over $50 million as customers finalize 2017 budgets. Argentina's shale development is following a similar path as U.S. plays and is expected to rapidly increase horizontal drilling in coming years, providing significant growth potential for EcoStim.
Ryan Bosse is an adaptable operations professional with over 20 years of experience in plant management, budgeting, safety, quality assurance, and production planning. He has a proven record of leading manufacturing facilities and implementing projects that increase productivity and reduce expenses. His experience includes overseeing multimillion dollar operations and managing teams responsible for annual production in the tens of millions of pounds.
This document summarizes several presentations made at the 2008 PCI Convention on process improvements. It discusses how Rocky Mountain Prestress implemented lean improvements like a 6S system and Kaizen events to organize their facilities and improve production efficiency. It also describes how GPRM Prestress implemented daily stretching exercises to reduce injuries. Additionally, it discusses new wastewater treatment technologies like rotary vacuum filters that can reuse over 90% of water and reclaimers that can recycle waste materials. Finally, it introduces a new piece tracking software that provides real-time status updates to improve coordination of precast production, delivery, and erection.
This document provides information on G&F HRM's construction project layout and facilities. It includes details on the sizes of various buildings being constructed, their production capacities, and the numbers and types of machines being used. The document discusses G&F HRM's vision to be a leading sustainable packaging company and their commitments to environmental protection, social responsibility, and contributing to a more equitable world.
Fonterra Edgecumbe Journey to World Class Maintenance Practices 100529Rob Probst
?
The Fonterra Dairy Cooperative manufacturing site located in Edgecumbe, New Zealand has achieved a World Class ranking for its Current Best Practices, (CBP), in Maintenance. The achievement occurred in October 2009 after a 12 year journey. The joint trade-union, management and operations partnership surpassed the IDCON Inc. CBP audit threshold of 75% with a score of 78%. Significant bottom line performance improvements along with an improved lifestyle have been the result. The site has demonstrated that improved reliability drives down costs.
Calysta, the company developing and introducing a new protein source based on single-cell organisms - a bacterium called methylococcus ¨C and destined for inclusion in fishfeeds, has built a ¡®market introduction facility¡¯ in Teesside, England, with production beginning in this last quarter of 2016.
Do Good for Business Case Study: Added ValueThe DoNation
?
A case study of our Do Good for Business programme, run at Added Value UK.
Through the programme, they engaged 71% of their employees in sustainability, making pledges to take simple actions that led to long term behaviour change and carbon savings of over 8 tonnes of carbon.
For more info see https://www.wearedonation.com/
J. Alan Weiler has over 20 years of experience leading lean transformations and operations in manufacturing facilities. As a plant manager, he implemented lean tools that improved safety, quality, customer service and financial metrics. He has a track record of reducing costs through eliminating waste, improving productivity and developing automated systems. Weiler holds a Bachelor's degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology and is a certified Lean Master.
Pathway to Sustainable Development-Kirti sagar Kirti Sagar
?
Sustainable development involves coordinating economic, social, and environmental objectives across all segments of society. A sustainable development pathway can be constructed through an integrated approach involving the three pillars. Shifting from a non-sustainable pathway to a sustainable one is challenging due to legacy investments in old technologies and systems as well as a lack of innovation incentives. However, companies that embrace sustainability gain competitive advantages and see it as a driver of growth. The examples presented show how companies implemented sustainable practices across their operations in areas like energy use, water management, community development, and supply chain management.
Small factory takes big bite of Lays' marketIza Grek
?
The Kettle Fried Company opened a chip manufacturing factory in Benrose, South Africa in April 2013. They had to convert an existing facility previously used for electrical supplies to be suitable for food processing. Production began in October 2013 with four kettle fryers producing Lay's Deli Kettle Cooked potato chips. Demand has grown and the company has added two more fryers and now operates 24 hours a day 6 days a week with 62 employees working 12 hour shifts. The factory produces 4 flavors of lower fat potato chips and packages them to be distributed nationally by Simba snacks. The company plans to further expand production capacity by utilizing additional unused space on the premises.
This document provides an overview of Tassal's salmon farming operations in the Dover region of Tasmania. Some key points:
- Tassal grows 50% of its salmon in the Southern farming zone, which has 8 active leases. They grow fish from smolt stage to harvest size of 5-6kg.
- The Dover processing facility handles 21,000 fish per day and employs 82 people locally. Salmon are transported there directly from harvest for processing.
- Tassal employs 141 people full-time in the Southern zone and invests in the local community through grants, sponsorships, and partnerships.
- Environmental monitoring shows farm operations have not negatively impacted water quality, sediments,
Mainfreight is a global logistics provider that began in 1978 in New Zealand and has since expanded to 21 countries with over 6,400 employees. It provides freight services including warehousing, domestic distribution, and international air and ocean services. The document discusses Mainfreight's resources including management, market, manpower, methods, machinery, minutes, money, and measurements. It focuses on Mainfreight's growth strategy of providing more services to more customers in more locations through geographical and service intensification.
CASE Queensland Food CorpIn early January 2003, the senior-mana.docxjasoninnes20
?
CASE: Queensland Food Corp
In early January 2003, the senior-management committee of Queensland Food Corp was to meet to draw up the firm¡¯s capital budget for the new year. Up for consideration were 11 major projects that totaled over $20.8 million. Unfortunately, the board of directors had imposed a spending limit of only $8.0 million; even so, investment at that rate would represent a major increase in the firm¡¯s asset base of $65.6 million. Thus the challenge for the senior managers of Queensland Food Corp was to allocate funds among a range of compelling projects nominated for consideration.?
The Company
Queensland Food Corp, headquartered in Brisbane, Australia, was a producer of high-quality ice cream, yogurt, bottled water, and fruit juices. Its products were sold throughout two states (Queensland, New South Wales) and two territories (ACT and Northern Territory).? (See Exhibit 1 for map of the company¡¯s marketing region.)
Exhibit 1 ¨C Queensland Food Corp, located in Australia
Queensland Food Corp sales had been static since 2000 (see Exhibit 2), which management attributed to low population growth in Northern Territory and market saturation in some areas. Outside observers, however, faulted recent failures in new-product introductions.
Exhibit 2 - Summary of Financial Results (millions AUD except per share amounts)
End of Fiscal Year
2000
2001
2002
Gross Sales
$100.8
$100.7
$100.8
Net Income
5.1
4.9
3.7
Dividends
2.0
2.0
2.0
Earnings Per Share
0.85
0.82
0.66
Shareholders¡¯ Equity (Book Value)
18.2
20.6
23.5
Shareholders¡¯ Equity (Market value)
45.3
39.0
22.9
Total Assets
47.7
58.0
65.6
Most members of management wanted to expand the company¡¯s market presence and introduce more new products to boost sales.
Resource Allocation
The capital budget at Queensland Food Corp was prepared annually by a committee of senior managers who then presented it for approval by the board of directors. The committee consisted of five managing directors, the president Chief Executive (CEO), and the chief finance officer (CFO). Typically, the CEO solicited investment proposals from the managing directors. The proposals included a brief project description, a financial analysis, and a discussion of strategic or other qualitative consideration.
As a matter of company policy, investment proposals at Queensland Food Corp were subjected to two financial tests, payback and internal rate of return (IRR). Financial tests were considered hurdles and had been established in 2001 by the management committee and varied according to the type of project:
Exhibit 3 -Company Policy for Project Approval
Project Type
Minimum Acceptable IRR
Maximum Acceptable Payback (Years)
1. Market/Product Extension
12%
6
2. New Product/Markets
10%
5
3. Efficiency Improvements
8%
4
4. Environmental/Safety
Not required
Not Applicable
In January 2003, the estimated weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Queensland Food Corp was 10.5 percent. In describing the capital-budgeting proce ...
CASE Queensland Food CorpIn early January 2003, the senior-.docxcowinhelen
?
CASE: Queensland Food Corp
In early January 2003, the senior-management committee of Queensland Food Corp was to meet to draw up the firm¡¯s capital budget for the new year. Up for consideration were 11 major projects that totaled over $20.8 million. Unfortunately, the board of directors had imposed a spending limit of only $8.0 million; even so, investment at that rate would represent a major increase in the firm¡¯s asset base of $65.6 million. Thus the challenge for the senior managers of Queensland Food Corp was to allocate funds among a range of compelling projects nominated for consideration.?
The Company
Queensland Food Corp, headquartered in Brisbane, Australia, was a producer of high-quality ice cream, yogurt, bottled water, and fruit juices. Its products were sold throughout two states (Queensland, New South Wales) and two territories (ACT and Northern Territory). ?(See Exhibit 1 for map of the company¡¯s marketing region.)
Exhibit 1 ¨C Queensland Food Corp, located in Australia
Queensland Food Corp sales had been static since 2000 (see Exhibit 2), which management attributed to low population growth in Northern Territory and market saturation in some areas. Outside observers, however, faulted recent failures in new-product introductions.
Exhibit 2 - Summary of Financial Results (millions AUD except per share amounts)
End ??of Fiscal Year
2000
2001
2002
Gross ??Sales
$100.8
$100.7
$100.8
Net ??Income
5.1
4.9
3.7
Dividends
2.0
2.0
2.0
Earnings ??Per Share
0.85
0.82
0.66
Shareholders¡¯ ??Equity (Book Value)
18.2
20.6
23.5
Shareholders¡¯ ??Equity (Market value)
45.3
39.0
22.9
Total ??Assets
47.7
58.0
65.6
Most members of management wanted to expand the company¡¯s market presence and introduce more new products to boost sales.
Resource Allocation
The capital budget at Queensland Food Corp was prepared annually by a committee of senior managers who then presented it for approval by the board of directors. The committee consisted of five managing directors, the president Chief Executive (CEO), and the chief finance officer (CFO). Typically, the CEO solicited investment proposals from the managing directors. The proposals included a brief project description, a financial analysis, and a discussion of strategic or other qualitative consideration.
As a matter of company policy, investment proposals at Queensland Food Corp were subjected to two financial tests, payback and internal rate of return (IRR). Financial tests were considered hurdles and had been established in 2001 by the management committee and varied according to the type of project:
Exhibit 3 -Company Policy for Project Approval
Project ??Type
Minimum ??Acceptable IRR
Maximum ??Acceptable Payback (Years)
1. ??Market/Product Extension
12%
6
2. ??New Product/Markets
10%
5
3. ??Efficiency Improvements
8%
4
4. ??Environmental/Safety
Not ??required
Not ??Applicable
In Janu.
Wayne Johnson is seeking a challenging position fully utilizing his managerial, analytical, engineering, and financial skills. He has 20+ years of experience in facilities management, maintenance, and engineering roles in the food processing industry. His experience includes overseeing maintenance programs, energy management, process improvements, budgeting, and project management. He holds an MSc in Engineering Management and has extensive training in areas like project management, maintenance, and food safety.
Unit 2 Group AssignmentGroup Assignment (suggested level of effo.docxadkinspaige22
?
Unit 2 Group Assignment
Group Assignment (suggested level of effort by each group member: 4 hours)
Now that your team is assembled, a mini-case is presented below with several questions.? Read the case and prepare responses to the questions.
CASE: Queensland Food Corp
In early January 2003, the senior-management committee of Queensland Food Corp was to meet to draw up the firm¡¯s capital budget for the new year. Up for consideration were 11 major projects that totaled over $20.8 million. Unfortunately, the board of directors had imposed a spending limit of only $8.0 million; even so, investment at that rate would represent a major increase in the firm¡¯s asset base of $65.6 million. Thus the challenge for the senior managers of Queensland Food Corp was to allocate funds among a range of compelling projects nominated for consideration.?
The Company
Queensland Food Corp, headquartered in Brisbane, Australia, was a producer of high-quality ice cream, yogurt, bottled water, and fruit juices. Its products were sold throughout two states (Queensland, New South Wales) and two territories (ACT and Northern Territory).? (See Exhibit 1 for map of the company¡¯s marketing region.)
Exhibition 1 (See Attached)
Exhibition 2 (See Attached)
Most members of management wanted to expand the company¡¯s market presence and introduce more new products to boost sales.
Resource Allocation
The capital budget at Queensland Food Corp was prepared annually by a committee of senior managers who then presented it for approval by the board of directors. The committee consisted of five managing directors, the president Chief Executive (CEO), and the chief finance officer (CFO). Typically, the CEO solicited investment proposals from the managing directors. The proposals included a brief project description, a financial analysis, and a discussion of strategic or other qualitative consideration.
As a matter of company policy, investment proposals at Queensland Food Corp were subjected to two financial tests, payback and internal rate of return (IRR). Financial tests were considered hurdles and had been established in 2001 by the management committee and varied according to the type of project:
Exhibition 3 (See Attached)
In January 2003, the estimated weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Queensland Food Corp was 10.5 percent. In describing the capital-budgeting process, the CFO, Tony Austin, said, ¡°We use the sliding scale of IRR tests as a way of recognizing differences in risk among the various types of projects. Where the company takes more risk, we should earn more return. The payback test signals that we are not prepared to wait for long to achieve that return.¡±
At the conclusion of the most recent meeting of the directors, the board voted unanimously to limit capital spending in 2003 to $8.0 million.
Exhibition 4 (See Attached)
1.???
Distribution Truck Fleet Replacement/Expansion
. Wayne Ramsey proposed to purchase 100 new refrigerated tractor ...
Global Mining Article - Maximising Assets at Peak Gold MinesMark Pinchen
?
New Gold Inc. is an intermediate gold mining company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. It operates four producing mines: New Afton in Canada, Mesquite in the US, Peak Mines in Australia, and Cerro San Pedro in Mexico. Peak Mines in Australia has implemented new processes to optimize production and performance, turning strategy into action through team creativity and passion. The mine produces gold and copper, and is exploring producing lead and zinc to generate new revenue streams from additional ore bodies. Peak Mines has also refined its management culture and communication with help from consultancies to improve performance, employee engagement, and safety.
Aquatic Leisure Technologies (ALT), a WA-based swimming pool manufacturer, experienced rapid growth from 2006-2007 that led it to lose focus on its core values. To address this, ALT undertook a two-year Lean management training program with Think Perform to transform its culture and operations. The training involved all staff and focused on continuous improvement and streamlining processes. ALT saw significant results, including a highly efficient workplace with minimal waste and an ability to relocate to a new facility much faster than expected. The training program positioned ALT for continued success in global markets.
Greencore, a $2.2B food manufacturer, implemented CDC Factory to improve factory efficiencies and support a cost reduction initiative. CDC Factory provided real-time operations data to empower floor workers. This identified issues like product re-work, long changeover times, and downtime causes. Solutions like optimizing line speeds, streamlining changeovers, and adding mixing equipment reduced direct costs by 5% and improved productivity. The system also changed culture by empowering workers and transitioning managers to a ratifying role of shop floor improvements.
The document summarizes the representative accomplishments of managing partners in restructurings and reorganizations. It provides examples of restructuring family offices, ice cream companies, and multinational operations to substantially increase returns. It also details reorganizing agricultural operations, manufacturers, and healthcare facilities to attract investors, relieve debt, and secure financing. Finally, it discusses developing business plans and models for new food companies to successfully launch and attract international investors and expansion.
EcoStim provides well stimulation, coiled tubing, and reservoir management services using proprietary technologies. It has positioned 50,000 HHP of equipment in Argentina ahead of increasing shale drilling activity. EcoStim's growth opportunity is attractive due to supply constraints in Argentina and barriers to entry that limit competitors from rapidly expanding capacity. The company has a strong customer base of major oil and gas producers operating in Argentina and is bidding on several new contracts worth over $50 million as customers finalize 2017 budgets. Argentina's shale development is following a similar path as U.S. plays and is expected to rapidly increase horizontal drilling in coming years, providing significant growth potential for EcoStim.
Ryan Bosse is an adaptable operations professional with over 20 years of experience in plant management, budgeting, safety, quality assurance, and production planning. He has a proven record of leading manufacturing facilities and implementing projects that increase productivity and reduce expenses. His experience includes overseeing multimillion dollar operations and managing teams responsible for annual production in the tens of millions of pounds.
This document summarizes several presentations made at the 2008 PCI Convention on process improvements. It discusses how Rocky Mountain Prestress implemented lean improvements like a 6S system and Kaizen events to organize their facilities and improve production efficiency. It also describes how GPRM Prestress implemented daily stretching exercises to reduce injuries. Additionally, it discusses new wastewater treatment technologies like rotary vacuum filters that can reuse over 90% of water and reclaimers that can recycle waste materials. Finally, it introduces a new piece tracking software that provides real-time status updates to improve coordination of precast production, delivery, and erection.
This document provides information on G&F HRM's construction project layout and facilities. It includes details on the sizes of various buildings being constructed, their production capacities, and the numbers and types of machines being used. The document discusses G&F HRM's vision to be a leading sustainable packaging company and their commitments to environmental protection, social responsibility, and contributing to a more equitable world.
Fonterra Edgecumbe Journey to World Class Maintenance Practices 100529Rob Probst
?
The Fonterra Dairy Cooperative manufacturing site located in Edgecumbe, New Zealand has achieved a World Class ranking for its Current Best Practices, (CBP), in Maintenance. The achievement occurred in October 2009 after a 12 year journey. The joint trade-union, management and operations partnership surpassed the IDCON Inc. CBP audit threshold of 75% with a score of 78%. Significant bottom line performance improvements along with an improved lifestyle have been the result. The site has demonstrated that improved reliability drives down costs.
Calysta, the company developing and introducing a new protein source based on single-cell organisms - a bacterium called methylococcus ¨C and destined for inclusion in fishfeeds, has built a ¡®market introduction facility¡¯ in Teesside, England, with production beginning in this last quarter of 2016.
Do Good for Business Case Study: Added ValueThe DoNation
?
A case study of our Do Good for Business programme, run at Added Value UK.
Through the programme, they engaged 71% of their employees in sustainability, making pledges to take simple actions that led to long term behaviour change and carbon savings of over 8 tonnes of carbon.
For more info see https://www.wearedonation.com/
J. Alan Weiler has over 20 years of experience leading lean transformations and operations in manufacturing facilities. As a plant manager, he implemented lean tools that improved safety, quality, customer service and financial metrics. He has a track record of reducing costs through eliminating waste, improving productivity and developing automated systems. Weiler holds a Bachelor's degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology and is a certified Lean Master.
Pathway to Sustainable Development-Kirti sagar Kirti Sagar
?
Sustainable development involves coordinating economic, social, and environmental objectives across all segments of society. A sustainable development pathway can be constructed through an integrated approach involving the three pillars. Shifting from a non-sustainable pathway to a sustainable one is challenging due to legacy investments in old technologies and systems as well as a lack of innovation incentives. However, companies that embrace sustainability gain competitive advantages and see it as a driver of growth. The examples presented show how companies implemented sustainable practices across their operations in areas like energy use, water management, community development, and supply chain management.
Small factory takes big bite of Lays' marketIza Grek
?
The Kettle Fried Company opened a chip manufacturing factory in Benrose, South Africa in April 2013. They had to convert an existing facility previously used for electrical supplies to be suitable for food processing. Production began in October 2013 with four kettle fryers producing Lay's Deli Kettle Cooked potato chips. Demand has grown and the company has added two more fryers and now operates 24 hours a day 6 days a week with 62 employees working 12 hour shifts. The factory produces 4 flavors of lower fat potato chips and packages them to be distributed nationally by Simba snacks. The company plans to further expand production capacity by utilizing additional unused space on the premises.
This document provides an overview of Tassal's salmon farming operations in the Dover region of Tasmania. Some key points:
- Tassal grows 50% of its salmon in the Southern farming zone, which has 8 active leases. They grow fish from smolt stage to harvest size of 5-6kg.
- The Dover processing facility handles 21,000 fish per day and employs 82 people locally. Salmon are transported there directly from harvest for processing.
- Tassal employs 141 people full-time in the Southern zone and invests in the local community through grants, sponsorships, and partnerships.
- Environmental monitoring shows farm operations have not negatively impacted water quality, sediments,
Mainfreight is a global logistics provider that began in 1978 in New Zealand and has since expanded to 21 countries with over 6,400 employees. It provides freight services including warehousing, domestic distribution, and international air and ocean services. The document discusses Mainfreight's resources including management, market, manpower, methods, machinery, minutes, money, and measurements. It focuses on Mainfreight's growth strategy of providing more services to more customers in more locations through geographical and service intensification.
1. ¡°FISHING FOR THE FUTURE¡±:
NEW PRODUCTIVITY AT ROYAL STAR FOODS
By Barry Jagoda and Paul Kowdrysh
Royal Star Foods is one of Eastern Canada¡¯s largest and most modern seafood
processing plants. It is part of the Tignish Fisheries Co-operative which has been
around since 1922. Currently, the plant is undergoing a total ¡°profitability and
productivity enhancement program¡± to improve management and employee skills,
and to improve efficiency and increase revenues.
The Tignish co-op has nearly 200 members and the processing plant employs
400. The crucial need for a new look at operations came as a result of a tripling of
revenue in the past several years. With the huge increase in workload, and with a
new management coming aboard, especially a new CEO named Peter Kean, it was
clearly time to improve worker and management capabilities, to install the most
modern production techniques and to examine the business from top-to-bottom.
For decades Royal Star has successfully managed its local processing business,
taking in lobster, crab, mackerel, herring, bottom feeders and other fish product
through Tignish Co-op efforts from the great Atlantic waters off Prince Edward
Island, Canada. But it seemed to make sense to bring in an outside firm that would
analyze opportunities freshly, and then would present possibilities for change. Help
came in the form of ICS, the world¡¯s leading Productivity Company. ¡°When I came
to this job in November, 1999,¡± said CEO Kean, ¡°I had goals I wanted to accomplish,
but after ICS spent three weeks here analyzing our operation, I realized they could
help me attain these goals much faster than if I had attempted them on my own.¡±
ICS, with several hundred clients annually in many fields, has had much experience
with food processing and fisheries, maintains Canadian offices in both Toronto and
Montreal and operates in 60 other countries around the globe.
Of course, for serious improvement to be implemented, it is critical to make
sure that management and the workforce supports the changes. This is a constant
2. across any program of productivity improvement. Though this education and
demonstration process is extremely time-consuming, it is well-worth the energy and
the effort expended. Until people see the benefit of change, of course, it is much
easier to continue along older patterns. According to Paul Kowdrysh, CEO of ICS
Canada, ¡°If we want improvements which perpetuate, we must ensure that all are
involved. If not, the result would be rebellion or anarchy. We must show how
change will benefit the individual employee, as well as the overall organization.¡±
Most important, the productivity program has shown significant results in just
a few months. As expressed by one Royal Star front line supervisor, ¡°The people on
the floor are really noticing the changes. They are having a better understanding of
what I¡¯m looking for and they are doing it even before I ask. There is a change in
attitude and mindset happening here.¡±
The basic approach involves starting at the very bottom of the organizational
structure to map out exactly what functions take place on the processing floor.
Guidance on how to operate the plant comes from the ¡°point-of-execution¡±, the place
of work, and goes up the line to supervisors, to area managers and on to the executive
management. Working with the supervisors and the line workers, ICS develops the
best agreed upon procedures and gets agreement for change away from less
productive approaches. After the initial process mapping in each part of the plant,
one-on-one follow-up takes place with each worker and each supervisor. The goal is
to identify the best way of doing a particular task and to highlight outstanding
performances. If these approaches can be duplicated, increased results follow.
The overall change program is clearly working at Royal Star Foods. In just a
few months product yield has increased more than 4%, which is an exceptional
accomplishment in this type of industry. Overall productivity has jumped nearly
16% and the projected yearly savings to the company in costs and expected income is
a huge 89%.
3. Results are derived from instilling new attitudes toward the work among employees
at all levels. At the same time, very specific process improvements are put into place.
Here are some examples:
? Quality had been sacrificed on the lobster line: After meat was removed from
the body, it was washed to remove bacteria and shells. Then, for decades, this
valuable lobster meat had been squeezed to remove excess liquid.
Unfortunately this has given the meat a more bland taste. No explanation had
been offered for the value of the squeezing, so this step was terminated. The
result has been a much more tasty product now being well-received by
wholesale customers and sustaining a larger market share.
? The ¡°flapper fin¡± of the lobster had been historically discarded because of the
labor intensive extraction process. Working with the client, ICS engineers
redesigned (at a cost of $CN30) the automatic extraction rollers to handle this
part of the lobster. The result was an immediate $CN4500 weekly increase in
revenue, which would be derived in perpetuity and increase as the harvest got
larger.
? On the snow crab processing the line called for 28 employees. There were
tremendous bottlenecks. In the past more people had been added to try to fix
the slowdowns. The ICS analysis showed that fewer employees would actually
be more efficient. Under the old system the 28 workers produced 2,700 pounds
of cleaned snow crabs per hour. With behavior changes and revised processing
line assignments the new system, with 23 employees, produces 3,600 pounds of
crab per hour. This was a decrease in labor of 18% and an increase in output
of 25%. Through re-training, other jobs would be found for the surplus
processors.
? On the herring line it was agreed that payment based on production, or piece
work, could be effective. The ICS engineer spent a good deal of time observing
the process and came up with a payment plan that seemed fair to the employees
and to management. ¡°This is the best year we¡¯ve ever had,¡± said the herring
production manager. ¡°The new approach to pay has worked,¡± he added.
4. A proprietary employee improvement plan was immediately put into place at
Royal Star Foods. Results from the first few months were significant, with 46 ideas
submitted. A committee of employees, management and ICS evaluated the
suggestions and three have now been implemented.
? Keeping the fish chilled is imperative. Getting ice to the assembly line is an
everyday necessity. Four men had been involved in a fork-lift/shoveling operation.
The re-fitting of the forklift, with a front-end shovel, has saved more than $CN80,000
annually.
? Several employees suggested revised the forms filled out to transfer fish
between the co-op and the processing company. New forms have saved more than
$CN10,000 per year.
Even though all are delighted to point to these specific changes, the largest source of
savings and productivity improvement is derived from the company-wide new sense
of teamwork and to agreement on a much clearer company direction. The entire
workforce has gone through seminars and individual consultation on such subjects
as:
? The cause and effects of lost time
? The cause and effect of inappropriate resource loading and crewing
? Ways of maintaining accountability to lessen finger pointing and a culture of
blame
? Ways of using conflict to achieve effective problem-solving
All of this has boosted company morale enormously. The sum has been much a
much greater output at significantly reduced cost.
The whole purpose of Tignish Fish Cooperative, back in the 1920¡¯s, was to
create an organization to improve the lives of local fishermen, to make things better
for their families and their community. That is still the goal of Royal Star Foods, but
now the form is that of a very big business. The good news is that, in the year 2000,
they are still banding together in Tignish, now to further build management and
worker skills, to develop the right attitudes for continued growth and to work
smarter, better and more efficiently.