09 COT-RPMS in Portfolio Organization and Assessmentedmond84
油
Teacher Sam's portfolio contains COT rating sheets from four observations for Indicator 1. Her average rating is 3.75, which corresponds to a final rating of 4 (Very Satisfactory). To support the COT ratings, Teacher Sam includes inter-observer agreement forms and instructional materials/performance tasks from each observation in her portfolio. The document provides guidance on calculating COT ratings, required documentation for the portfolio, and acceptable means of verification to support COT ratings for each indicator.
09-COT-RPMS in Portfolio Organization and Assessment.pptxAnalynAusa2
油
Teacher Sam's portfolio contains COT rating sheets from four observations for Indicator 1. Her average rating is 3.75, which corresponds to a final rating of 4 (Very Satisfactory) on the RPMS 5-point scale. The document provides guidance on calculating COT ratings, required documentation for the portfolio, acceptable means of verification to support COT ratings, and sample portfolio formats for teachers.
This document discusses the RPMS-PPST (Results-based Performance Management System - Performance and Planning Self-Assessment Tool) for the 2019-2020 school year in the Philippines. It includes a self-assessment tool for teachers to evaluate their own strengths and needs, as well as classroom observation tools used by raters like principals and department heads to evaluate teacher performance. The self-assessment tool includes sections for demographic information, objectives, and development plans where teachers identify their strengths, needs for improvement, and action plans. The classroom observation tool provides a rubric to rate teachers on indicators of teaching practice with increasing levels of proficiency.
The document provides information on classroom observation tools used in the RPMS (Results-Based Performance Management System) cycle in the Philippines. It discusses the objectives of classroom observations, which are to gain knowledge of the COT (Classroom Observation Tool), enhance observation skills, and appreciate the COT as an RPMS tool. It also outlines the COT, its development based on teaching standards, and how it assesses teacher performance levels in relation to those standards. The COT is used to map classroom observations to RPMS objectives and provide performance feedback to help teachers improve.
The document discusses the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) used in the Philippines' Department of Education. RPMS uses tools like self-assessment questionnaires (SAT-RPMS) and classroom observations (COT-RPMS) to evaluate teachers' performance and facilitate professional development. SAT-RPMS involves teachers rating their own capabilities and priorities for growth. COT-RPMS involves trained observers evaluating teachers' classroom performance based on a rubric. RPMS aims to help teachers understand expectations, assess their own teaching, and improve student learning outcomes through strategic development planning.
The document discusses self-assessment tools in the RPMS (Results-based Performance Management System) cycle for teachers. It explains that the Self-Assessment Tool (SAT-RPMS) is used by teachers to reflect on their performance based on indicators and guide discussions on goal-setting and professional development. There are different SAT-RPMS forms for teachers at various experience levels. The process involves teachers rating their capabilities and priorities for development, then discussing results with principals to identify strengths, needs, and plan interventions. The output is an Individual Development Plan to address needs through activities, timeline, and resources.
The document outlines the steps for conducting classroom observations using the COT-RPMS (Classroom Observation Tool - Results-Based Performance Management System).
The key steps are:
1. Review the COT-RPMS rubric and indicators to be observed before the classroom observation.
2. Observe the entire class period without discussing observations with other observers.
3. Individually rate the teacher's performance on each indicator using the observation notes and COT-RPMS rubric.
The document provides details on preparing and completing observation forms, rating teacher performance, and procedures for single or multiple observers.
The document outlines the steps in conducting classroom observations using the COT-RPMS (Classroom Observation Tool - Results-Based Performance Management System) protocol in the Philippines. The key steps are:
1. The observer reviews the COT-RPMS rubric and identifies which indicators will be observed.
2. The actual classroom observation is conducted without discussion between observers.
3. After observing, each observer independently rates the teacher's performance on the identified indicators using the COT-RPMS rubric. If multiple observers, they then discuss ratings to agree on final ratings.
This document discusses various models and approaches for evaluating curriculum. It begins by defining curriculum evaluation and its purposes. Several evaluation models are then described in detail, including the Bradley Model, Tyler's Objectives Model, Stufflebeam's CIPP Model, Stake's Responsive Model, and Scriven's Consumer Oriented Approach. Common steps in the evaluation process are also outlined, such as identifying stakeholders, issues to examine, appropriate data sources and collection techniques. The overall goal of curriculum evaluation is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum to inform necessary improvements or changes.
[Appendix 2] RPMS Tool for MT I-IV SY 2020-2021 in the time of COVID-19.docxMerryDollEsolana1
油
The document is a position and competency profile for Master Teacher positions I-IV in the Department of Education. It outlines the required qualifications, duties and responsibilities, and performance standards for the positions. Specifically, it details the required education and experience, preferred qualifications, key result areas including content knowledge and pedagogy and diversity of learners and assessment. It also provides means of verification and performance indicators to evaluate teachers' competency in each key result area using a 5-point quality evaluation tool rating scale.
Philippine Copyright 2014
All Rights Reserved. Portions of this manuscript may be reproduced with proper referencing and due acknowledgement of the authors.
ask permission before copying the contents :)
The document outlines the steps in conducting classroom observations using the COT-RPMS (Classroom Observation Tool - Results-Based Performance Management System). The key steps include:
1. The observer prepares by reviewing the observation rubric and identifying which indicators will be observed.
2. The observer conducts the actual observation, taking notes without discussing with other observers.
3. After observing, the observer rates the teacher's performance on each indicator individually. For multiple observers, they discuss ratings and agree on final ratings.
The document defines rubrics and portfolios, and discusses their uses in assessment. It provides details on developing rubrics, including the advantages of analytic vs holistic rubrics. Portfolio types and guidelines for effective portfolio assessment are also outlined. Performance based assessment is defined as the direct observation of student performance based on predetermined criteria.
The document defines rubrics and their types, outlines steps for developing rubrics, compares portfolios to traditional assessments, lists portfolio types and guidelines, and defines performance-based assessment. Rubrics are scoring scales that assess student work against specific criteria. Developing effective rubrics involves determining learning outcomes, keeping rubrics concise, focusing on measureable skills, and reevaluating rubrics. Portfolios collect student work over time to measure growth, while performance-based assessment directly observes students applying skills through meaningful tasks.
Monitoring and Supervising Curriculum & Curriculum Revision and EvaluationShaharyar Shoukat
油
This document provides an overview of curriculum monitoring and supervision. It discusses:
- Definitions of curriculum and its key elements/components like goals, content, learning experiences, and evaluation approaches.
- The importance of curriculum monitoring in determining if a curriculum is still relevant/effective and making improvements.
- The role of curriculum supervision in planning, directing, supporting the development, implementation and evaluation of curriculum.
- The process of curriculum revision to update and improve curriculum according to changes in needs, knowledge, and practices. It outlines the steps involved in revising curriculum according to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.
This document discusses classroom-based assessment tools. It defines classroom assessment as a process of identifying, gathering, organizing and interpreting information about what learners know and can do. The document lists different types of assessment tools used in the classroom, including quizzes, tests, essays, demonstrations, presentations, and performance-based assessments. It distinguishes between formative and summative assessment, noting that formative assessment is used to help students improve their learning, while summative assessment occurs at the end of a learning period to measure student achievement. The key goal of assessment is to use the information gathered to provide remediation, enrichment, or reinforcement activities to help students perform better.
The document outlines courses for teachers that cover topics like becoming a DepEd teacher, understanding the K-12 curriculum, the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST), and engaging communities. Each course has 3-4 modules that include sessions on key topics. Sessions provide activities, scenarios and outputs to help teachers achieve intended learning outcomes. The PPST framework and Results-based Performance Management System (RPMS) are aligned to guide teachers' professional development and performance evaluation.
This document is a mid-year review form for teacher Mary Grace R. Ope単a. It evaluates her performance on key result areas like content knowledge, teaching strategies, learning environment management, curriculum planning and assessment. Metrics for evaluation include classroom observations, lesson plans, test results and participation in professional development. For each KRA, the teacher's self-rating and principal's rating are included along with remarks. The principal found the teacher met performance targets for all KRAs at the mid-year point.
Assessment of Learning 2 (assessment).pptxLizzieBho
油
The document discusses summative assessment, which evaluates student learning at the end of a learning period. It describes summative assessment tools like rubrics, tests, projects and portfolios. Effective summative assessment ensures alignment to learning outcomes, uses tools like rubrics and table specifications, and provides meaningful feedback and grading according to Department of Education policies. Scores are recorded and reported regularly to monitor student progress towards standards.
Companion Materials Looking Through the Lens of Rubricsanniesyso
油
The document discusses using rubrics to improve student achievement by constructing valid and reliable rubrics to assess student learning, inform instruction, and support student self-assessment; it provides examples of how rubrics align with the Danielson teaching framework and describes a protocol for collaborative rubric creation to guide professional learning communities.
This document outlines strategies for using rubrics and checklists to facilitate student self-assessment and self-reflection. It discusses 4 strategies: 1) justifying quality levels with highlighting evidence in student work, 2) matching features of work to rubric phrases, 3) co-creating rubrics with students, and 4) using rating scales for self-assessment and setting goals. The purpose is to engage students in assessing their own learning and progress toward standards to increase ownership over the learning process.
The document discusses evaluation of instructional programs, outlining Kirkpatrick's four-level model of evaluation that assesses reaction, learning, behavior, and results. It provides details on each level, including example evaluation questions and methods to measure outcomes. The goal is to help instructors systematically evaluate their programs to improve learning and impact through assessment at each stage of the model.
DepEd MEMORANDUM No. 008 , S. 2023
MULTI-YEAR GUIDELINES ON THE RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-PHILIPPINE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS
The document outlines the steps for conducting classroom observations using the COT-RPMS (Classroom Observation Tool - Results-Based Performance Management System).
The key steps are:
1. Review the COT-RPMS rubric and indicators to be observed before the classroom observation.
2. Observe the entire class period without discussing observations with other observers.
3. Individually rate the teacher's performance on each indicator using the observation notes and COT-RPMS rubric.
The document provides details on preparing and completing observation forms, rating teacher performance, and procedures for single or multiple observers.
The document outlines the steps in conducting classroom observations using the COT-RPMS (Classroom Observation Tool - Results-Based Performance Management System) protocol in the Philippines. The key steps are:
1. The observer reviews the COT-RPMS rubric and identifies which indicators will be observed.
2. The actual classroom observation is conducted without discussion between observers.
3. After observing, each observer independently rates the teacher's performance on the identified indicators using the COT-RPMS rubric. If multiple observers, they then discuss ratings to agree on final ratings.
This document discusses various models and approaches for evaluating curriculum. It begins by defining curriculum evaluation and its purposes. Several evaluation models are then described in detail, including the Bradley Model, Tyler's Objectives Model, Stufflebeam's CIPP Model, Stake's Responsive Model, and Scriven's Consumer Oriented Approach. Common steps in the evaluation process are also outlined, such as identifying stakeholders, issues to examine, appropriate data sources and collection techniques. The overall goal of curriculum evaluation is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum to inform necessary improvements or changes.
[Appendix 2] RPMS Tool for MT I-IV SY 2020-2021 in the time of COVID-19.docxMerryDollEsolana1
油
The document is a position and competency profile for Master Teacher positions I-IV in the Department of Education. It outlines the required qualifications, duties and responsibilities, and performance standards for the positions. Specifically, it details the required education and experience, preferred qualifications, key result areas including content knowledge and pedagogy and diversity of learners and assessment. It also provides means of verification and performance indicators to evaluate teachers' competency in each key result area using a 5-point quality evaluation tool rating scale.
Philippine Copyright 2014
All Rights Reserved. Portions of this manuscript may be reproduced with proper referencing and due acknowledgement of the authors.
ask permission before copying the contents :)
The document outlines the steps in conducting classroom observations using the COT-RPMS (Classroom Observation Tool - Results-Based Performance Management System). The key steps include:
1. The observer prepares by reviewing the observation rubric and identifying which indicators will be observed.
2. The observer conducts the actual observation, taking notes without discussing with other observers.
3. After observing, the observer rates the teacher's performance on each indicator individually. For multiple observers, they discuss ratings and agree on final ratings.
The document defines rubrics and portfolios, and discusses their uses in assessment. It provides details on developing rubrics, including the advantages of analytic vs holistic rubrics. Portfolio types and guidelines for effective portfolio assessment are also outlined. Performance based assessment is defined as the direct observation of student performance based on predetermined criteria.
The document defines rubrics and their types, outlines steps for developing rubrics, compares portfolios to traditional assessments, lists portfolio types and guidelines, and defines performance-based assessment. Rubrics are scoring scales that assess student work against specific criteria. Developing effective rubrics involves determining learning outcomes, keeping rubrics concise, focusing on measureable skills, and reevaluating rubrics. Portfolios collect student work over time to measure growth, while performance-based assessment directly observes students applying skills through meaningful tasks.
Monitoring and Supervising Curriculum & Curriculum Revision and EvaluationShaharyar Shoukat
油
This document provides an overview of curriculum monitoring and supervision. It discusses:
- Definitions of curriculum and its key elements/components like goals, content, learning experiences, and evaluation approaches.
- The importance of curriculum monitoring in determining if a curriculum is still relevant/effective and making improvements.
- The role of curriculum supervision in planning, directing, supporting the development, implementation and evaluation of curriculum.
- The process of curriculum revision to update and improve curriculum according to changes in needs, knowledge, and practices. It outlines the steps involved in revising curriculum according to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.
This document discusses classroom-based assessment tools. It defines classroom assessment as a process of identifying, gathering, organizing and interpreting information about what learners know and can do. The document lists different types of assessment tools used in the classroom, including quizzes, tests, essays, demonstrations, presentations, and performance-based assessments. It distinguishes between formative and summative assessment, noting that formative assessment is used to help students improve their learning, while summative assessment occurs at the end of a learning period to measure student achievement. The key goal of assessment is to use the information gathered to provide remediation, enrichment, or reinforcement activities to help students perform better.
The document outlines courses for teachers that cover topics like becoming a DepEd teacher, understanding the K-12 curriculum, the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST), and engaging communities. Each course has 3-4 modules that include sessions on key topics. Sessions provide activities, scenarios and outputs to help teachers achieve intended learning outcomes. The PPST framework and Results-based Performance Management System (RPMS) are aligned to guide teachers' professional development and performance evaluation.
This document is a mid-year review form for teacher Mary Grace R. Ope単a. It evaluates her performance on key result areas like content knowledge, teaching strategies, learning environment management, curriculum planning and assessment. Metrics for evaluation include classroom observations, lesson plans, test results and participation in professional development. For each KRA, the teacher's self-rating and principal's rating are included along with remarks. The principal found the teacher met performance targets for all KRAs at the mid-year point.
Assessment of Learning 2 (assessment).pptxLizzieBho
油
The document discusses summative assessment, which evaluates student learning at the end of a learning period. It describes summative assessment tools like rubrics, tests, projects and portfolios. Effective summative assessment ensures alignment to learning outcomes, uses tools like rubrics and table specifications, and provides meaningful feedback and grading according to Department of Education policies. Scores are recorded and reported regularly to monitor student progress towards standards.
Companion Materials Looking Through the Lens of Rubricsanniesyso
油
The document discusses using rubrics to improve student achievement by constructing valid and reliable rubrics to assess student learning, inform instruction, and support student self-assessment; it provides examples of how rubrics align with the Danielson teaching framework and describes a protocol for collaborative rubric creation to guide professional learning communities.
This document outlines strategies for using rubrics and checklists to facilitate student self-assessment and self-reflection. It discusses 4 strategies: 1) justifying quality levels with highlighting evidence in student work, 2) matching features of work to rubric phrases, 3) co-creating rubrics with students, and 4) using rating scales for self-assessment and setting goals. The purpose is to engage students in assessing their own learning and progress toward standards to increase ownership over the learning process.
The document discusses evaluation of instructional programs, outlining Kirkpatrick's four-level model of evaluation that assesses reaction, learning, behavior, and results. It provides details on each level, including example evaluation questions and methods to measure outcomes. The goal is to help instructors systematically evaluate their programs to improve learning and impact through assessment at each stage of the model.
DepEd MEMORANDUM No. 008 , S. 2023
MULTI-YEAR GUIDELINES ON THE RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-PHILIPPINE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS
This document contains 4 short passages that describe different body parts and ask readers to guess what each one is. It discusses teeth, which are white and part of the digestive system; lungs, which are located in the chest and help with breathing; the brain, which is in the head and sends and receives messages to control the body; and the stomach, which is pinkish, sack-like and located in the tummy to digest food.
Computer Application in Business (commerce)Sudar Sudar
油
The main objectives
1. To introduce the concept of computer and its various parts. 2. To explain the concept of data base management system and Management information system.
3. To provide insight about networking and basics of internet
Recall various terms of computer and its part
Understand the meaning of software, operating system, programming language and its features
Comparing Data Vs Information and its management system Understanding about various concepts of management information system
Explain about networking and elements based on internet
1. Recall the various concepts relating to computer and its various parts
2 Understand the meaning of softwares, operating system etc
3 Understanding the meaning and utility of database management system
4 Evaluate the various aspects of management information system
5 Generating more ideas regarding the use of internet for business purpose
How to Configure Flexible Working Schedule in Odoo 18 EmployeeCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to configure flexible working schedule in Odoo 18 Employee module. In Odoo 18, the Employee module offers powerful tools to configure and manage flexible working schedules tailored to your organization's needs.
QuickBooks Desktop to QuickBooks Online How to Make the MoveTechSoup
油
If you use QuickBooks Desktop and are stressing about moving to QuickBooks Online, in this webinar, get your questions answered and learn tips and tricks to make the process easier for you.
Key Questions:
* When is the best time to make the shift to QuickBooks Online?
* Will my current version of QuickBooks Desktop stop working?
* I have a really old version of QuickBooks. What should I do?
* I run my payroll in QuickBooks Desktop now. How is that affected?
*Does it bring over all my historical data? Are there things that don't come over?
* What are the main differences between QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online?
* And more
Prelims of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
- Autonomy, Teams and Tension
- Oliver Randall & David Bovis
- Own Your Autonomy
Oliver Randall
Consultant, Tribe365
Oliver is a career project professional since 2011 and started volunteering with APM in 2016 and has since chaired the People Interest Network and the North East Regional Network. Oliver has been consulting in culture, leadership and behaviours since 2019 and co-developed HPTM速an off the shelf high performance framework for teams and organisations and is currently working with SAS (Stellenbosch Academy for Sport) developing the culture, leadership and behaviours framework for future elite sportspeople whilst also holding down work as a project manager in the NHS at North Tees and Hartlepool Foundation Trust.
David Bovis
Consultant, Duxinaroe
A Leadership and Culture Change expert, David is the originator of BTFA and The Dux Model.
With a Masters in Applied Neuroscience from the Institute of Organisational Neuroscience, he is widely regarded as the Go-To expert in the field, recognised as an inspiring keynote speaker and change strategist.
He has an industrial engineering background, majoring in TPS / Lean. David worked his way up from his apprenticeship to earn his seat at the C-suite table. His career spans several industries, including Automotive, Aerospace, Defence, Space, Heavy Industries and Elec-Mech / polymer contract manufacture.
Published in Londons Evening Standard quarterly business supplement, James Caans Your business Magazine, Quality World, the Lean Management Journal and Cambridge Universities PMA, he works as comfortably with leaders from FTSE and Fortune 100 companies as he does owner-managers in SMEs. He is passionate about helping leaders understand the neurological root cause of a high-performance culture and sustainable change, in business.
Session | Own Your Autonomy The Importance of Autonomy in Project Management
#OwnYourAutonomy is aiming to be a global APM initiative to position everyone to take a more conscious role in their decision making process leading to increased outcomes for everyone and contribute to a world in which all projects succeed.
We want everyone to join the journey.
#OwnYourAutonomy is the culmination of 3 years of collaborative exploration within the Leadership Focus Group which is part of the APM People Interest Network. The work has been pulled together using the 5 HPTM速 Systems and the BTFA neuroscience leadership programme.
https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/apm-people-network/about/
Research & Research Methods: Basic Concepts and Types.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt has been made for the students pursuing PG in social science and humanities like M.Ed., M.A. (Education), Ph.D. Scholars. It will be also beneficial for the teachers and other faculty members interested in research and teaching research concepts.
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
Finals of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
How to attach file using upload button Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to attach file using upload button Odoo 18. Odoo features a dedicated model, 'ir.attachments,' designed for storing attachments submitted by end users. We can see the process of utilizing the 'ir.attachments' model to enable file uploads through web forms in this slide.
How to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18. In Odoo, Init Hooks are essential functions specified as strings in the __init__ file of a module.
2. Classroom Observation Tools in the RPMS Cycle
Classroom observation is a process of providing
feedback to a teachers classroom practice.
Feedback given provides quality input for the continuous
improvement of teacher practice and provides opportunities
to share ideas and expertise, as well as promote mentoring
and coaching among colleagues.
It also encourages teachers to reflect and develop awareness
about their own practice as it provides evidence of actual
teacher performance, their strengths and areas for development
and the impact of their practice.
Classroom observation aims to visualize classroom practices.
4. In the RPMS Cycle, teachers classroom
performance is assessed against the indicators of
the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
(PPST). The results of classroom observation are
considered non-negotiable means of verification
(MOV) of teacher performance that can prove
teachers attainment of classroom observable
objectives in the RPMS Tools.
6. Mapped RPMS Objectives and COT Indicators
Not all objectives in the RPMS tools are
classroom observable. The tables below show
the congruence between the RPMS objectives
and COT indicators.
8. Indicator List
COT
Indicator
No.
THE TEACHER:
Observation Period
1 2 3 4
1
Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum
teaching areas / / / /
2
Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner
achievement in literacy and numeracy skills / / / /
3
Applies a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills / / / /
4
Manages classroom structure to engage learners, individually
or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-
on activities within a range of physical learning environments / / / /
5
Manages learner behavior constructively by applying positive
and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused
environments
/ / / /
6
Uses differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning
experiences to address learners gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
/ x / x
7
Plans, manages and implements developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching contexts
/ / / /
8
Selects, develops, organizes, and uses appropriate teaching
and learning resources, including ICT, to address learning
goals
x / / /
9
Designs, selects, organizes, and uses diagnostic, formative
and summative assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements
x x x /
Classroom observation in
the RPMS cycle is
distributed within the
academic year.
The check mark signifies in the
table that the indicator has to
be shown in the observation
period
9. Indicator List
What are the COT-RPMS Forms?
The COT-RPMS are composed of four forms:
Rubric
Observation Notes Form
Rating Sheet
Inter-Observer Agreement Form
Each form is used at a specific stage in the
observation process.
10. Indicator List
Rubric
The rubric contains a performance continuum
for each career stage. For Teacher I-III (with Levels
3-7), the expected attained level is at least Level
6, Consolidating. For Master Teacher I-IV (with
Levels 4-8), the expected attained level is at least
Level 7, Integrating.
11. Indicator List
1. Rubric Level Summary
This refers to both the name and description of each level, described
according to performance of teachers in the classroom.
Figure 6.20. Rubric Level Summaryfor Teacher I-III
13. Indicator List
3. Level Description
As teachers progress in their
careers, different levels of performance
are expected of them. The development
in levels refers to the expectations of
teachers in different career stages: Levels
3-7 for Teacher I-III while Levels 4-8 for
Master Teacher I-IV.
This refers to the description of
practice for each level. The description
explains the practice expected of
teachers in the classroom.
14. Indicator List
4. Clarifications
This refers to definitions or elaborations of some terms included in the
level descriptions.
5. Features of Practice
This refers to specific classroom practices, which help describe a
particular level.
18. Indicator List
A. Reviewing Previous
Lesson or Presenting
the New Lesson
Review the previous lesson through giving them
engaging activity. Let them play the Amazing
Maze
Tourism Promotion Services NC II
LO 1. Display professional valet standards
Objective: To identify the possible sources of guest
information
(TLE_HEHK9-12VS-IIIa-j-1)
20. Indicator List CRITERIA RATING
Enumeration of
Valets Duties and
Responsibilities
10%
Demonstration of
knowledge on
performing valets
duties and
responsibilities
25%
Utilization of
devices/tools
needed upon on
guests request
correctly
25%
Following the
guests directions,
cheerfully, quickly,
confidently and with
understanding
25%
Clarity of the script 10%
Focus 5%
TOTAL 100%
22. Indicator List
A. Presenting
Examples/Instances
of the Lesson
Guide Questions:
1. What is packing and unpacking of luggage?
2. What do you think comes first? Packing or
unpacking luggages? Explain your answer.
3. Do you think, a valet needs to be skillful when it
comes to packing and unpacking luggages?
27. Indicator List
I.Evaluating
Learning
Activities to be done:
Using the given script, perform Unpacking, storing,
preparing, and packing of luggage.
- 2 learners at a time, (1 as a guest and 1 as a valet)
Other activities while waiting for their turn to perform:
One learner will take a video of the said performance.
The remaining learners will observe the performance to
be done.
Write expected outputs while observing your classmates
performing the USPP of luggage.
Written observation about the performance on
unpacking, packing, preparing and packing of luggage.
Draw the clothes preferred to be folded or hanged.