There are two aspects of dissonance perception: learned/top-down and innate/bottom-up. Sensory dissonance can be modeled using either auditory models based on the auditory periphery or curve-mapping models based on empirical data. Computer programs that simulate sensory dissonance processing can estimate the degree of dissonance for a given sound. The models were tested on piano music, drone music, and synthesized chords by comparing their predictions of dissonance to participant ratings. The curve-mapping models predicted ratings reasonably well for isolated chords and drone music but not piano music, possibly due to non-sensory influences on ratings for more complex music.
2. Sensory Dissonance
Models
There are two aspects of dissonance
perception
1. learned or top-down or contextual
2. innate or bottom-up or sensory
3. Sensory Dissonance
Models
Sensory dissonance is explained in terms of
Physical properties of sound
Physiological properties of the auditory
system
4. Sensory Dissonance
Models
Computer programs that
simulate the sensory process of
dissonance perception.
give an estimate of the degree of
perceived dissonance of a given sound.
6. Sensory Dissonance
Models
Auditory models
Based on models of the auditory periphery
e.g. Leman (2000)
7. Sensory Dissonance
Models
Curve-mapping models
Based on empirical data from Plomp and
Levelt (1965)
e.g. Sethares (1999), Vassilakis (2001)
8. Curve-mapping Models
From Plomp & Levelt 1965
Sensory dissonance of a sine
tone pair as a function of
frequency difference on a critical
bandwidth scale
9. Sensory Dissonance
Models
Why try to model sensory dissonance
perception?
To gain better understanding about its
contribution to the organisation of music.
May be useful for MIR tasks.
May be useful for studies of higher-level
processing of music, e.g. music-induced
emotions.
10. Research Question
Can the models of sensory dissonance predict
the perceived degree of dissonance of music?
11. Method
! Listening experiment to gather behavioural
data on dissonance perception.
! Simulating sensory dissonance processing using
various models.
! Statistical analysis of the relation between the
models' predictions and the behavioural data.
13. Stimuli
A. Piano music (Keith Jarrett)
50 x 5 seconds
B. Drone music (Jim ORourke, Phill Niblock)
50 x 5 seconds
C. Synthesized chords
20 x 3 seconds
14. Procedure
Each stimulus is rated on a scale from
1 (consonant) to 7 (dissonant).
Group 1
First stimuli A, then stimuli B or vice versa
Group 2
Stimuli A and B mixed, then stimuli C
15. Calculating Sensory
Dissonance
Models implemented in Matlab
Sethares' (1999) and Vassilakis' (2001)
curve-mapping models in the MIRtoolbox
at the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Music
Research, University of Jyv辰skyl辰
Leman's (2000) auditory model in the
IPEMtoolbox
at the Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music research
center of the Department of Musicology at the Ghent University
25. Some Conclusions
Curve-mapping models can predict the
perceived dissonance reasonably well for
! isolated chords.
! drone music.
Dif鍖culties with piano music. Why?
Non-sensory aspects affect the ratings?
Sharp attacks cause the models to detect
erratic dissonance peaks?
26. References
Leman, M. 2000. Visualization and Calculation of the Roughness of
Acoustical Musical Signals Using the Synchronization Index Model
(SIM). Proceedings of the COST G-6 Conference on Digital Audio
Effects. Retrieved from: http://profs.sci.univr.it/~dafx/Final-Papers/
pdf/Leman_DAFXFinalPaper.pdf
Plomp, R. & Levelt, W. J. M. 1965. Tonal Consonance and Critical
Bandwidth. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 548-560.
Sethares, W. 1999. Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale. Berlin,
Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Vassilakis, P. N. 2001. Perceptual and Physical Properties of Amplitude
Fluctuation and their Musical Signi鍖cance. Los Angeles: University of
California. Doctoral dissertation.