Text, Topics, and Turkers: A Consensus Measure for Statistical Topics
Download as PPTX, PDF2 likes692 views
This document proposes a new "Topic Consensus" measure to evaluate the interpretability of statistical topics discovered via topic modeling. It uses Amazon Mechanical Turk workers to gauge their understanding of topics by asking them to assign scientific abstracts to topics, and compares this to the topic assignments from LDA. It finds Topic Consensus correlates well with existing automated measures of topic quality and can predict the consensus value. The measure provides a new perspective on evaluating discovered topics compared to existing methods.
![Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 8
Word Intrusion
Show the Turker 6 words in random order
Top 5 words from topic
1 Intruded word
Ask Turker to choose Intruded word
cat dog bird truck horse snake
Topic i:
[Chang et. al 2009]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/hs6xaxwuq4cevvxpu1zy-signature-8628fb53d129234a063127986a342d9b04652a1ad6659b3afaa09d5f4cc404f5-poli-150903093325-lva1-app6891/85/Text-Topics-and-Turkers-A-Consensus-Measure-for-Statistical-Topics-8-320.jpg)
![Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 9
Topic Intrusion
Show the Turker a document
Show the Turker 4 topics
3 most probable topics
1 Intruded topic
Ask Turker to choose Intruded Topic
Documenti
Topic A Topic B Topic C Topic D
[Chang et. al 2009]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/hs6xaxwuq4cevvxpu1zy-signature-8628fb53d129234a063127986a342d9b04652a1ad6659b3afaa09d5f4cc404f5-poli-150903093325-lva1-app6891/85/Text-Topics-and-Turkers-A-Consensus-Measure-for-Statistical-Topics-9-320.jpg)
![Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 13
Dataset
Scientific Abstracts
All available abstracts
since 2007.
Classified into three areas:
Social Sciences & Humanities (SH)
Life Sciences (LS)
Physical Sciences (PE)
Ran LDA on this dataset:
K = [10, 25, 50, 100]
185 topics; 4 topic sets.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/hs6xaxwuq4cevvxpu1zy-signature-8628fb53d129234a063127986a342d9b04652a1ad6659b3afaa09d5f4cc404f5-poli-150903093325-lva1-app6891/85/Text-Topics-and-Turkers-A-Consensus-Measure-for-Statistical-Topics-13-320.jpg)
More Related Content
What's hot (6)
Similar to Text, Topics, and Turkers: A Consensus Measure for Statistical Topics (20)
Recently uploaded (14)
Text, Topics, and Turkers: A Consensus Measure for Statistical Topics
- 1. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 1 Text, Topics, and Turkers: A Consensus Measure for Statistical Topics Fred Morstatter, J端rgen Pfeffer, Katja Mayer*, Huan Liu Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona, USA Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA *University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
- 2. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 2 Text Text is everywhere in research. Text is huge: Too much data to read. How can we understand what is going on in big text data? Source Size Wikipedia 36 million pages World Wide Web 100+ billion static web pages Social Media 500 million new tweets/day
- 3. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 3 Topics Topic Modeling Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Most commonly-used topic modeling algorithm Discovers topics within a corpus Corpus LDA K Topic ID Words Topic 1 cat, dog, horse, ... Topic 2 ball, field, player, ... ... ... Topic K red, green, blue, ... Topic 1 Topic 2 ... Topic K Document1 0.2 0.1 0.01 Document2 0.7 0.02 0.1 ... Documentn 0.1 0.3 0.01
- 4. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 4 Topics LDA K = 10 Topic ID Words Topic 1 river, lake, island, mountain, area, park, antarctic, south, mountains, dam Topic 2 relay, athletics, metres, freestyle, hurdles, ret, divis達o, athletes, bundesliga, medals ... ... Topic 10 courcelles, centimeters, mattythewhite, wine, stamps, oko, perennial, stubs, ovate, greyish Topic 1 Topic 2 ... Topic 10 Document1 0.2 0.1 0.01 Document2 0.7 0.02 0.1 ... Documentn 0.1 0.3 0.01
- 5. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 5 Topics How can we measure the quality of statistical topics? We dont know how well humans can interpret topics. Problem: Does their understanding match what is going on in the corpus?
- 6. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 6 Turkers One Solution: Crowdsourcing Example: Amazons Mechanical Turk Show LDA results to Turkers Gauge their understanding How to effectively measure understanding?
- 7. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 7 Turkers Previous Work: Chang et. al 2009 Word Intrusion Topic Intrusion Corpus LDA K Topic ID Words Topic 1 cat, dog, horse, ... Topic 2 ball, field, player, ... ... ... Topic K red, green, blue, ... Topic 1 Topic 2 ... Topic K Document1 0.2 0.1 0.01 Document2 0.7 0.02 0.1 ... Documentn 0.1 0.3 0.01 Word Intrusion Topic Intrusion
- 8. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 8 Word Intrusion Show the Turker 6 words in random order Top 5 words from topic 1 Intruded word Ask Turker to choose Intruded word cat dog bird truck horse snake Topic i: [Chang et. al 2009]
- 9. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 9 Topic Intrusion Show the Turker a document Show the Turker 4 topics 3 most probable topics 1 Intruded topic Ask Turker to choose Intruded Topic Documenti Topic A Topic B Topic C Topic D [Chang et. al 2009]
- 10. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 10 New Measure: Topic Consensus Corpus LDA K Topic ID Words Topic 1 cat, dog, horse, ... Topic 2 ball, field, player, ... ... ... Topic K red, green, blue, ... Topic 1 Topic 2 ... Topic K Document1 0.2 0.1 0.01 Document2 0.7 0.02 0.1 ... Documentn 0.1 0.3 0.01 Word Intrusion Topic Intrusion Complements existing framework Measures topic quality with corpus. Topic Consensus
- 11. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 11 Topic Consensus: Intuition Measures the agreement between topics and sections they come from. LDA Distribution Turker Distribution
- 12. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 12 Topic Consensus: Calculation We are comparing probability distributions. Jensen-Shannon Divergence. Turker Distribution LDA Distribution
- 13. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 13 Dataset Scientific Abstracts All available abstracts since 2007. Classified into three areas: Social Sciences & Humanities (SH) Life Sciences (LS) Physical Sciences (PE) Ran LDA on this dataset: K = [10, 25, 50, 100] 185 topics; 4 topic sets.
- 14. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 14 Turkers One task: Turkers have 3 + 1 options. Each task solved 8 times.
- 15. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 15 Results Topic Set ERC-10 ERC-25 ERC-50 ERC-100 new, group, results, plan, class, ... selection, variation, population, genetic, natural, ...
- 16. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 16 Other Topic Sets LDA Topics Use New York Times dataset from one day. 25 topics, 1 topic set Hand-Picked Topics Pure Social Science & Humanities Sampled words that occur only in these documents. 11 topics, 1 topic set Random Topics Randomly choose topics according to word distribution of corpus. 25 topics, 1 topic set
- 17. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 17 Results Topic Set ERC-10 ERC-25 ERC-50 ERC-100 NYT-25 RAND-25 SH-25
- 18. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 18 Overview of the Process Topic Consensus can reveal new information about the topics being studied. Can measure topics from a new perspective. Can help reveal topic confusion. Drawbacks: Expensive Time Consuming Scalability
- 19. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 19 Automated Measures 1. Topic Size: Number of tokens assigned to the topic. 2. Topic Coherence: Probability that the top words co-occur in documents in the corpus. 3. Topic Coherence Significance: Significance of Topic Coherence compared to other topics. 4. Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information: Measures the association between the top words in the topics.
- 20. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 20 Measures Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) Measures concentration of a market. Used to find monopolies. Viewed from two perspectives: Word Probability HHI5. 6. Social Sciences Physical Sciences Life Sciences ERC Section HHI
- 21. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 21 Results - Correlation Automated Measure Correlation Topic Size -0.532 Topic Coherence -0.584 Topic Coherence Significance -0.788 Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information -0.774 HHI (Word Probability) -0.885 HHI (ERC Section) -0.478
- 22. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 22 Results - Prediction Build classifier to predict actual Topic Consensus value. Build linear regression model: Takes automated measures. Predicts Topic Consensus. RMSE: 0.12 賊 0.02.
- 23. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 23 Acknowledgements Members of the DMML lab Office of Naval Research through grant N000141410095 LexisNexis and HPCC Systems
- 24. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 24 Conclusion Introduced a new method for evaluating the interpretability of statistical topics. Demonstrated this measure on a real-world dataset. Automated this measure for scalability.
- 25. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 25 Future Work How sensitive are measures to top words? Word Intrusion uses 5 Topic Intrusion uses 5 Topic Consensus uses 25 How do measures fare on different datasets? Other measures that can reveal quality topics?
- 26. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 26 Auxiliary 際際滷s
- 27. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 27 User Demographics Sex Education Age First Language Country of Origin
- 28. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 28 Results Confusion Matrix
- 29. Text, Topics, and Turkers. Hypertext 2015 29 Dataset Statistics
Editor's Notes
- #4: Topic modeling --- text summarization These algorithms are widely used for
- #6: Why do I need to measure these topics? Finding quality topics Setting value of K in LDA Choosing the best topic model (LDA, ...)
- #7: We need objective measures to evaluate the quality of topics.
- #10: Each document gets a score. Can aggregate to get a sense of the model. This is a measure of the model, by looking at the document.
- #11: The Previous measures are good. Specifically, we are looking at properties of the corpus.
- #12: Sections can be like newspaper Blue is SPORTS Red is BUSINESS In reality, no topic is going to purely sports or business. Topics are mixtures over these sections. We want to know how humans can interpret these mixtures. Sections can be like Twitter Blue is protest Red is This slide just illustrates the process, Ill get into more details later. This is a TC calculation for ONE TOPIC
- #13: Topic Consensus is calculated as... K is Kullback-Leibler divergence; M is the middle of the distribution One side effect of using this measure is that lower scores indicate a better consensus.
- #15: Mention undecidable
- #16: If you want good topics you might choose 100...., If you want a good model you might choose 25.... The worst from TC are often stopwords topics Connection to Word Intrusion Are they really good topics?
- #18: Each bar is a group of topics Bar in the middle is the median SH does the best ... This is good! Random does the worse ... This is also good! NYT does the worst ... Why?
- #19: Is it possible to find a way to address all of these drawbacks? Explain the remainder of this paper here.
- #20: These are methods used throughout the literature to measure topic quality, we repeat them here.
- #21: Similar to Entropy
- #22: Negative correlation makes sense. A high HHI means concentration, and a low Topic Consensus means a good score. Spearmans Rho
- #26: Other measures both in terms of automatic and crowdsourced.
- #29: Can I provide an example? What do I want people to remember?
- #30: LS: 0.36 PE: 0.45 SH: 0.19