1. Library collections are increasingly moving from primarily print to digital as technology impacts information production and students expect online access.
2. However, not all resources will be or are available digitally due to format restrictions, alternative presses, or cost. Print still has benefits for some students and assignments.
3. Librarians recommend focusing on learning goals and quality content rather than format, and provide databases, ebooks, and other "good destinations" for student research.
This document outlines a study examining whether academic libraries in the United States are reaching their intended audiences via Twitter. The study will identify US academic libraries with Twitter accounts, survey them about their Twitter use and goals, code the followers of responding libraries to categorize them as students/alumni, faculty/staff, affiliated university entities, libraries/librarians, local businesses, unaffiliated, or unknown. Preliminary results from coding 20 libraries show average percentages of followers in each category. Next steps include more coding, statistical analysis, and writing conclusions and recommendations.
Here are a few suggestions for how the MCTC Library can inform faculty about resources:
- Designate library liaisons for each department who can meet regularly with faculty to discuss resources.
- Send regular emails or newsletters highlighting new resources, databases, ebooks, etc. that may be relevant.
- Create research guides for specific courses/subjects that list relevant resources.
- Offer workshops for faculty on how to effectively incorporate library resources into assignments.
- Maintain an updated library website that is easy to navigate and search for resources.
- Provide one-on-one consultations for faculty designing new assignments or courses.
- Attend department meetings periodically to share updates and answer questions.
(Form)ative Assessment: Using Google Forms to Evaluate Active LearningElisa Acosta
油
This document discusses using Google Forms for formative assessment of active learning activities in the classroom. It defines formative and summative assessment, with formative assessment taking place during instruction to allow for continuous improvement, such as discussing responses from Google Forms in class. The document provides examples of how instructors can use forms and rubrics to evaluate student learning through active learning activities and calibrate assessments across different class sections. It also suggests next steps and provides links to additional resources on the topic.
This presentation summarizes the results of an international collaborative project between 100 libraries to benchmark their marketing of electronic resources. The project involved libraries participating in a 16-week timeline to collaboratively plan, execute, and assess a marketing campaign using emails. Survey responses and usage statistics were collected for assessment. Key findings included variation in marketing approaches between different types of institutions and limited conclusions due to low survey response rates. Lessons learned focused on the challenges of large-scale collaboration and suggestions for future research.
Librarians help students with their research in three main ways:
1) By assisting students in getting started with research and locating expert ideas and evidence from scholars to support academic arguments.
2) By helping students efficiently find information through library resources rather than relying on limited internet searches or Wikipedia.
3) By saving students time through library research guides and services that help locate authoritative sources more easily than searching alone.
Taking Active Learning to the Next Level: Increasing Student Engagement by B...Elisa Acosta
油
The document discusses blending face-to-face instruction with digital learning objects to increase student engagement in active learning. It describes using a game called RADAR to evaluate information sources, which led to increased student participation compared to a traditional worksheet. The game incorporated elements of gamification like competition and feedback. Student and instructor surveys found the blended approach improved engagement and learning outcomes.
Trials by Juries: Suggested Practices for Database TrialsAnnis Lee Adams
油
This panel discussion focused on tools and techniques for gathering feedback on database trials from librarians and library users. The panelists from Golden Gate University, University of Nebraska-Kearney, and Clemson University discussed criteria for selecting database trials, scheduling trials, soliciting and recording trial feedback, and closing the loop with participants and vendors after a trial. Key points included using web surveys to gather feedback, timing trials to maximize participation, and maintaining records of past trials and decisions.
The document describes a test fest conducted by librarians at the University of North Carolina to address a backlog of usability issues. It involved running 5 simultaneous usability tests on topics like database access, research videos, the catalog, and discovery tools. 8 participants took part in the first round, with 2 additional participants completing 2 tests later. The tests used methods like task analysis, surveys, and sketching. Affinity diagramming was used to analyze the 44 tests, though not all data could be incorporated. Outcomes so far include reports, catalog changes, and discovery tool decisions. The discussion focuses on managing backlogs and improving the test fest approach.
Presentation at Empirical Librarians 2018 in Knoxville, TN.
At UNC Chapel Hill, the User Experience and Assessment department regularly runs usability tests to inform our decision making and prioritize our users perspectives as we make changes. But there are more things to test than there are hours in the day. Our projects have a variety of stakeholders who are very interested in improving their services, and we found ourselves with a long list of tests we wanted to run.
To catch up, we adapted Harvard Libraries Test Fest model: five tests run simultaneously, with five participants rotating through the set of tests. Over a span of two hours, we completed 25 individual usability tests. In this one event, we caught up on much of our testing backlog.
This session will outline how we planned and executed Test Fest and what we learned from using this approach. Well also discuss how we approached analyzing the large amount of qualitative data that was gathered during testing, via affinity diagrams and lots of post-it notes.
The focus of this session is on our methodologies with an aim to include time for attendees to discuss how they would have approached the backlog, setting up Test Fest, and analyzing the data.
This document summarizes a library instruction session on evaluating online resources. It introduces the instructor, Laksamee Putnam, and provides her contact information. The agenda includes discussing an article on evaluating online information, background reading and searching strategies, developing keywords, and evaluating resources. Tips are provided on developing search strategies using keywords, Boolean operators, truncation and phrase searching. Students are guided through evaluating websites using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority and purpose/point of view. Next steps include completing a worksheet and preparing for discussion by finding additional resources.
This document summarizes a library instruction session on evaluating online information sources. It provides the instructor's contact information and an agenda that includes discussing an article on evaluating online information, background reading and searching strategies, developing keywords, and evaluating resources. It then covers developing effective search strategies using keywords, Boolean operators, truncation and phrase searching. It discusses evaluating websites using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority and purpose/point of view. Students are instructed to analyze example websites and fill out a worksheet to begin their own research.
Measuring electronic resource availability final versionSanjeet Mann
油
Sanjeet Mann conducted a study measuring the availability of electronic resources at the University of Redlands Armacost Library. He tested 400 citations from 10 databases and found an overall availability of 62% with a 38% error rate. The types of errors were categorized, with the most common being proxy errors, source errors, and knowledge base errors. Mann discussed solutions like updating the proxy, customizing the knowledge base, and simplifying interfaces. He noted strengths in collecting both quantitative and qualitative data but weaknesses in not accounting for user issues. Mann proposed expanding the study to test availability through live student searches and evaluations.
This document outlines the agenda and content covered in an EPQ Support Workshop at Copthall School. The workshop covers becoming a critical searcher through evaluating information sources based on relevance, expertise, viewpoint, intended audience, evidence, and date of publication. It teaches searching and recording skills like keeping an annotated bibliography to track research and properly citing sources to avoid plagiarism. The workshop also addresses academic writing skills and accessing library resources for further research support.
The document provides guidelines for designing effective e-learning objects and asynchronous instruction. It discusses best practices from sources like the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and Project Information Literacy. These include establishing learning outcomes, developing content that limits cognitive load, and ensuring accessibility for all students regardless of location. The document then outlines steps for instructional design using the ADDIE model of analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. Examples are provided for each step, with a focus on incorporating principles of multimedia learning and usability testing.
This document discusses opening up educational resources through open educational resources (OER). It defines OER as openly accessible, freely available, shareable, discrete learning materials that can be reused and contextualized. Using OER allows educators to find existing high-quality resources rather than reinventing materials. While OER provide advantages like cost savings and encouraging best practices, they also have disadvantages like variable quality and need for contextualization. The document provides examples of OER types and templates for incorporating OER into course design. It also discusses trends in OER usage and issues to consider regarding OER and the "attention economy".
Usability Evaluation of a Research Repository and Collaboration Website For H...Tao Zhang
油
This usability study evaluated a research repository and collaboration website called HABRI Central for human-animal bond researchers. 7 graduate student participants completed tasks like finding and submitting articles and citations. The study found issues like difficulty selecting a resource type when submitting and adding authors. Suggested improvements included streamlining the submission workflows and improving search functionality. Overall, the study aimed to enhance the user experience of HABRI Central through a user-centered design process.
This document summarizes the process an academic library went through to implement and improve their discovery layer, Primo. They initially took a conservative approach that tried to integrate the old system too much. User studies later revealed the interface had too many options and confusing terminology. The library simplified the interface based on this feedback, focusing on a single search box and improving login visibility. They also improved journal article searching and made other refinements to provide a simpler search experience for users.
This document provides an overview of research basics and evaluating online resources. It discusses developing keywords for research topics, using Boolean operators and truncation to improve searches, and evaluating websites based on currency, reliability, authority, and purpose. Students are instructed to come up with keywords for their own research topics and search for initial information online using those keywords.
This document discusses assessment, evaluation, and review of information literacy programs. It describes the importance of assessing whether students learned the intended objectives, if teaching methods were effective, and if program goals were met. Several assessment methods are outlined, including surveys, tests, interviews, and analyzing student work. Case studies are presented of assessments conducted at different universities to evaluate information literacy instruction sessions and measure changes in student confidence in research skills. The conclusion states that ongoing assessment and revision is important to identify strengths and weaknesses in instructional programs.
This document provides an overview of research basics and library resources from a presentation by Laksamee Putnam, a research librarian. It discusses developing keywords for search topics, evaluating online information sources, searching the library catalog and databases for books and articles, and asking librarians for research help. Evaluation criteria like currency, reliability, authority and purpose are presented for assessing information quality. Boolean operators and truncation are also covered for effective searching.
Treasure or Trash? Helping students distinguish online gold from online guffChris Willmott
油
These are the slides for a short talk to be given at the Higher Education Academy STEM conference in Birmingham (UK) on 18th April 2013. They describe a blended-learning activity in which students evaluate a series of online sources prior to a group tutorial. Reflections on the merit of the task are given, including data derived during three years of usage.
The document summarizes UConn's use of virtual focus groups across its six campus library system. It discusses how virtual focus groups were conducted using WordPress blogs to get feedback from students on specific questions about library services. Common themes that emerged from the focus groups are summarized for each question, along with recommendations for addressing issues. The experiment found that virtual focus groups provided detailed comments and engagement from students without incentives. Overall, the virtual focus groups proved to be an effective assessment tool for the regional campus libraries.
Capture All the URLS: First Steps in Web ArchivingKristen Yarmey
油
Presentation with Judy Silva (Fine & Performing Arts Librarian and Archivist at Slippery Rock University) and Alexis Antracoli (Records Management archivist at Drexel University) at the Pennsylvania Library Association's 2013 annual conference in Seven Springs, Pennsylvania.
Abstract: As higher education embraces new technologies, teaching, learning, research, and record-keeping is increasingly taking place on university websites, on university-related social media pages, and elsewhere on the open web. This dynamic digital content, however, is highly vulnerable to degradation and loss. This session will introduce the concept of web archiving and articulate why its important for colleges and universities. Speakers will demonstrate web archiving service Archive-It and then share lessons learned from their institutions web archiving initiatives, from unexpected stumbling blocks to strategies for raising funds and support from campus stakeholders.
This document discusses sharing information literacy resources through communities of practice. It summarizes the results of a survey of over 300 librarians which found that the top barriers to using open educational resources were not knowing where to find them, concerns about quality, and resources not being relevant to the subject area. The top motivations for selecting particular resources were reputation of the creator or institution, relevance, and open licensing. Creating an online community and events were proposed to help librarians overcome barriers and advocate for open sharing of resources.
Post-it Up: Qualitative Data Analysis of a Test FestSarah Joy Arnold
油
Presentation at Southeastern Library Assessment Conference 2017 in Atlanta, GA.
This session will outline how we planned and executed five simultaneous usability tests and what we learned from using this method. We'll also discuss how we approached analyzing the large amount of qualitative data that was gathered during testing via affinity diagrams and lots of post-it notes. The focus of this session is on our methodologies, though we'll briefly look at the results of each test.
Assessing the Diversity of the E-collection of the William H. Hannon LibraryMarie Kennedy
油
The American Library Associations 1982 statement on Diversity in Collection Development reminds librarians of the professional responsibility to select and support the access to materials on all subjects that meet, as closely as possible, the needs, interests, and abilities of all persons in the community the library serves. This includes materials that reflect political, economic, religious, social, minority, and sexual issues. In an effort to ensure that the collection of the William H. Hannon Library (of Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California, USA {LMU}) aligns with its institutional vision (including bridging disciplines and representing diverse topics and perspectives) and meets the research needs of a diverse campus population, a team of library staff has designed a project to assess the librarys electronic collection through the lens of diversity. While some similar studies have been done at larger research institutions (notably that of Ciszek and Young (2010)), this project further interrogates inclusivity in database collections and integrates LMU student learning into the research process. The results of the evaluation will inform the library collection strategy and ensure that collections are built that deliberately and positively contribute to an inclusive campus climate.
The evolution of the personal networks of novice librarian researchersMarie Kennedy
油
Presented at the 2016 Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Libraries conference (London, UK).
This presentation reports the findings of an analysis of personal network data gathered from the novice librarian researcher participants of the first year of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship (IRDL), an institute designed to provide instruction in how to conduct a research project and establish a peer-network of like-minded librarians to support each other throughout the research process. Analysis of the first year of data (four waves) will be discussed in this presentation. The data gathered is about the people and the strength of the relationship in the personal research networks of each of the IRDL participants. During the presentation we will report on the observations of the networks over a years time and show you visually how they evolved. The results have implications for how librarians develop themselves, and may influence the future of libraries generally.
A highlight of this presentation is to focus on our methodological decision to gather the four waves of data in survey format. We will describe the mechanism used to gather that data, the freely available, open source, web-based software used to gather personal network data, EgoWeb 2.0. We will describe the process of customizing the survey software to ask questions about the people in the librarians research networks. We will demonstrate the computations that the software provides, as well as the attractive visualizations of the personal networks.
More Related Content
Similar to Trials workflow using Innovative ERM (20)
Trials by Juries: Suggested Practices for Database TrialsAnnis Lee Adams
油
This panel discussion focused on tools and techniques for gathering feedback on database trials from librarians and library users. The panelists from Golden Gate University, University of Nebraska-Kearney, and Clemson University discussed criteria for selecting database trials, scheduling trials, soliciting and recording trial feedback, and closing the loop with participants and vendors after a trial. Key points included using web surveys to gather feedback, timing trials to maximize participation, and maintaining records of past trials and decisions.
The document describes a test fest conducted by librarians at the University of North Carolina to address a backlog of usability issues. It involved running 5 simultaneous usability tests on topics like database access, research videos, the catalog, and discovery tools. 8 participants took part in the first round, with 2 additional participants completing 2 tests later. The tests used methods like task analysis, surveys, and sketching. Affinity diagramming was used to analyze the 44 tests, though not all data could be incorporated. Outcomes so far include reports, catalog changes, and discovery tool decisions. The discussion focuses on managing backlogs and improving the test fest approach.
Presentation at Empirical Librarians 2018 in Knoxville, TN.
At UNC Chapel Hill, the User Experience and Assessment department regularly runs usability tests to inform our decision making and prioritize our users perspectives as we make changes. But there are more things to test than there are hours in the day. Our projects have a variety of stakeholders who are very interested in improving their services, and we found ourselves with a long list of tests we wanted to run.
To catch up, we adapted Harvard Libraries Test Fest model: five tests run simultaneously, with five participants rotating through the set of tests. Over a span of two hours, we completed 25 individual usability tests. In this one event, we caught up on much of our testing backlog.
This session will outline how we planned and executed Test Fest and what we learned from using this approach. Well also discuss how we approached analyzing the large amount of qualitative data that was gathered during testing, via affinity diagrams and lots of post-it notes.
The focus of this session is on our methodologies with an aim to include time for attendees to discuss how they would have approached the backlog, setting up Test Fest, and analyzing the data.
This document summarizes a library instruction session on evaluating online resources. It introduces the instructor, Laksamee Putnam, and provides her contact information. The agenda includes discussing an article on evaluating online information, background reading and searching strategies, developing keywords, and evaluating resources. Tips are provided on developing search strategies using keywords, Boolean operators, truncation and phrase searching. Students are guided through evaluating websites using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority and purpose/point of view. Next steps include completing a worksheet and preparing for discussion by finding additional resources.
This document summarizes a library instruction session on evaluating online information sources. It provides the instructor's contact information and an agenda that includes discussing an article on evaluating online information, background reading and searching strategies, developing keywords, and evaluating resources. It then covers developing effective search strategies using keywords, Boolean operators, truncation and phrase searching. It discusses evaluating websites using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority and purpose/point of view. Students are instructed to analyze example websites and fill out a worksheet to begin their own research.
Measuring electronic resource availability final versionSanjeet Mann
油
Sanjeet Mann conducted a study measuring the availability of electronic resources at the University of Redlands Armacost Library. He tested 400 citations from 10 databases and found an overall availability of 62% with a 38% error rate. The types of errors were categorized, with the most common being proxy errors, source errors, and knowledge base errors. Mann discussed solutions like updating the proxy, customizing the knowledge base, and simplifying interfaces. He noted strengths in collecting both quantitative and qualitative data but weaknesses in not accounting for user issues. Mann proposed expanding the study to test availability through live student searches and evaluations.
This document outlines the agenda and content covered in an EPQ Support Workshop at Copthall School. The workshop covers becoming a critical searcher through evaluating information sources based on relevance, expertise, viewpoint, intended audience, evidence, and date of publication. It teaches searching and recording skills like keeping an annotated bibliography to track research and properly citing sources to avoid plagiarism. The workshop also addresses academic writing skills and accessing library resources for further research support.
The document provides guidelines for designing effective e-learning objects and asynchronous instruction. It discusses best practices from sources like the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and Project Information Literacy. These include establishing learning outcomes, developing content that limits cognitive load, and ensuring accessibility for all students regardless of location. The document then outlines steps for instructional design using the ADDIE model of analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. Examples are provided for each step, with a focus on incorporating principles of multimedia learning and usability testing.
This document discusses opening up educational resources through open educational resources (OER). It defines OER as openly accessible, freely available, shareable, discrete learning materials that can be reused and contextualized. Using OER allows educators to find existing high-quality resources rather than reinventing materials. While OER provide advantages like cost savings and encouraging best practices, they also have disadvantages like variable quality and need for contextualization. The document provides examples of OER types and templates for incorporating OER into course design. It also discusses trends in OER usage and issues to consider regarding OER and the "attention economy".
Usability Evaluation of a Research Repository and Collaboration Website For H...Tao Zhang
油
This usability study evaluated a research repository and collaboration website called HABRI Central for human-animal bond researchers. 7 graduate student participants completed tasks like finding and submitting articles and citations. The study found issues like difficulty selecting a resource type when submitting and adding authors. Suggested improvements included streamlining the submission workflows and improving search functionality. Overall, the study aimed to enhance the user experience of HABRI Central through a user-centered design process.
This document summarizes the process an academic library went through to implement and improve their discovery layer, Primo. They initially took a conservative approach that tried to integrate the old system too much. User studies later revealed the interface had too many options and confusing terminology. The library simplified the interface based on this feedback, focusing on a single search box and improving login visibility. They also improved journal article searching and made other refinements to provide a simpler search experience for users.
This document provides an overview of research basics and evaluating online resources. It discusses developing keywords for research topics, using Boolean operators and truncation to improve searches, and evaluating websites based on currency, reliability, authority, and purpose. Students are instructed to come up with keywords for their own research topics and search for initial information online using those keywords.
This document discusses assessment, evaluation, and review of information literacy programs. It describes the importance of assessing whether students learned the intended objectives, if teaching methods were effective, and if program goals were met. Several assessment methods are outlined, including surveys, tests, interviews, and analyzing student work. Case studies are presented of assessments conducted at different universities to evaluate information literacy instruction sessions and measure changes in student confidence in research skills. The conclusion states that ongoing assessment and revision is important to identify strengths and weaknesses in instructional programs.
This document provides an overview of research basics and library resources from a presentation by Laksamee Putnam, a research librarian. It discusses developing keywords for search topics, evaluating online information sources, searching the library catalog and databases for books and articles, and asking librarians for research help. Evaluation criteria like currency, reliability, authority and purpose are presented for assessing information quality. Boolean operators and truncation are also covered for effective searching.
Treasure or Trash? Helping students distinguish online gold from online guffChris Willmott
油
These are the slides for a short talk to be given at the Higher Education Academy STEM conference in Birmingham (UK) on 18th April 2013. They describe a blended-learning activity in which students evaluate a series of online sources prior to a group tutorial. Reflections on the merit of the task are given, including data derived during three years of usage.
The document summarizes UConn's use of virtual focus groups across its six campus library system. It discusses how virtual focus groups were conducted using WordPress blogs to get feedback from students on specific questions about library services. Common themes that emerged from the focus groups are summarized for each question, along with recommendations for addressing issues. The experiment found that virtual focus groups provided detailed comments and engagement from students without incentives. Overall, the virtual focus groups proved to be an effective assessment tool for the regional campus libraries.
Capture All the URLS: First Steps in Web ArchivingKristen Yarmey
油
Presentation with Judy Silva (Fine & Performing Arts Librarian and Archivist at Slippery Rock University) and Alexis Antracoli (Records Management archivist at Drexel University) at the Pennsylvania Library Association's 2013 annual conference in Seven Springs, Pennsylvania.
Abstract: As higher education embraces new technologies, teaching, learning, research, and record-keeping is increasingly taking place on university websites, on university-related social media pages, and elsewhere on the open web. This dynamic digital content, however, is highly vulnerable to degradation and loss. This session will introduce the concept of web archiving and articulate why its important for colleges and universities. Speakers will demonstrate web archiving service Archive-It and then share lessons learned from their institutions web archiving initiatives, from unexpected stumbling blocks to strategies for raising funds and support from campus stakeholders.
This document discusses sharing information literacy resources through communities of practice. It summarizes the results of a survey of over 300 librarians which found that the top barriers to using open educational resources were not knowing where to find them, concerns about quality, and resources not being relevant to the subject area. The top motivations for selecting particular resources were reputation of the creator or institution, relevance, and open licensing. Creating an online community and events were proposed to help librarians overcome barriers and advocate for open sharing of resources.
Post-it Up: Qualitative Data Analysis of a Test FestSarah Joy Arnold
油
Presentation at Southeastern Library Assessment Conference 2017 in Atlanta, GA.
This session will outline how we planned and executed five simultaneous usability tests and what we learned from using this method. We'll also discuss how we approached analyzing the large amount of qualitative data that was gathered during testing via affinity diagrams and lots of post-it notes. The focus of this session is on our methodologies, though we'll briefly look at the results of each test.
Assessing the Diversity of the E-collection of the William H. Hannon LibraryMarie Kennedy
油
The American Library Associations 1982 statement on Diversity in Collection Development reminds librarians of the professional responsibility to select and support the access to materials on all subjects that meet, as closely as possible, the needs, interests, and abilities of all persons in the community the library serves. This includes materials that reflect political, economic, religious, social, minority, and sexual issues. In an effort to ensure that the collection of the William H. Hannon Library (of Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California, USA {LMU}) aligns with its institutional vision (including bridging disciplines and representing diverse topics and perspectives) and meets the research needs of a diverse campus population, a team of library staff has designed a project to assess the librarys electronic collection through the lens of diversity. While some similar studies have been done at larger research institutions (notably that of Ciszek and Young (2010)), this project further interrogates inclusivity in database collections and integrates LMU student learning into the research process. The results of the evaluation will inform the library collection strategy and ensure that collections are built that deliberately and positively contribute to an inclusive campus climate.
The evolution of the personal networks of novice librarian researchersMarie Kennedy
油
Presented at the 2016 Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Libraries conference (London, UK).
This presentation reports the findings of an analysis of personal network data gathered from the novice librarian researcher participants of the first year of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship (IRDL), an institute designed to provide instruction in how to conduct a research project and establish a peer-network of like-minded librarians to support each other throughout the research process. Analysis of the first year of data (four waves) will be discussed in this presentation. The data gathered is about the people and the strength of the relationship in the personal research networks of each of the IRDL participants. During the presentation we will report on the observations of the networks over a years time and show you visually how they evolved. The results have implications for how librarians develop themselves, and may influence the future of libraries generally.
A highlight of this presentation is to focus on our methodological decision to gather the four waves of data in survey format. We will describe the mechanism used to gather that data, the freely available, open source, web-based software used to gather personal network data, EgoWeb 2.0. We will describe the process of customizing the survey software to ask questions about the people in the librarians research networks. We will demonstrate the computations that the software provides, as well as the attractive visualizations of the personal networks.
An Intentional Conversation: Electronic Resources and Your Library PatronsMarie Kennedy
油
In order to provide the most appropriate library resources to our patrons we need to actively connect with them as people first to learn what their information needs and barriers may be. Developing a systematic approach to seeking out and responding to feedback can provide us with the information we need to acquire eventually well-used resources. A library in which this kind of intentional communication style is prevalent can be called a marketing-aware organization. In this presentation we will discuss all the components of a marketing cycle for electronic resources, with a special focus on the patron. Well discuss how to build a marketing team, ways of knowing your patrons, and hear real-world examples of recent projects that were designed to learn about a user group.
Oh past self, come here and let me kick you in the shinsMarie Kennedy
油
Notes. We put them everywhere, in order records, item records, database records, etc. They tell us how to process something, mark historical decisions, and guide us in our next steps. We would be lost without them, and yet theyre typically unformatted, by-the-seat-of-your-pants kind of information.
This session explores the theme of notes from several perspectives as librarians who use different e-resource management systems talk about what kinds of notes they make, where they put them, and what their uses are.
Marketing Your Library's Electronic Resources (MSU LEETS presentation)Marie Kennedy
油
As libraries continue to move more of their resources from print to the electronic format, the difficulty of promoting the use of that content has become apparent. The traditional promotional techniques for print resources, such as putting the new items on a new book shelf near the front door or keeping heavily used items at the reference desk, do not work for resources in an electronic format because there are no physical volumes to view. How, then, do libraries best connect their patrons to appropriate electronic resources? Well be talking about how you can get started right away with developing a marketing plan for electronic resources at your library.
Presented at the 2013 Mississippi State University Libraries eResource & Emerging Technologies Summit (http://blogs.library.msstate.edu/msuleets/)
The use of an electronic resource from a social network analysis perspectiveMarie Kennedy
油
This document discusses using social network analysis to understand how electronic resources are used in an academic setting. It analyzes usage data from the Gimlet system at Loyola Marymount University, which records over 11,000 reference transactions over one year. Social network analysis identified relationships between specific resources mentioned and which ones were not. This approach provides additional context beyond traditional usage metrics like COUNTER, and suggests social network analysis can offer a more complete picture of how resources are used.
Cycling Through: Paths Libraries Take to Marketing Electronic ResourcesMarie Kennedy
油
This document summarizes a study of 23 library marketing campaigns for electronic resources from 1994-2009. The study found that few libraries consistently used all components of a marketing plan such as goals, strategies and assessment. While most libraries identified targets and strategies, few conducted SWOT analyses, set budgets or timelines. Only 3 libraries fully matched their goals, strategies, measurements and assessments. The study concludes libraries do not adequately plan or assess their marketing of electronic resources.
How to Unblock Payment in Odoo 18 AccountingCeline George
油
In this slide, we will explore the process of unblocking payments in the Odoo 18 Accounting module. Payment blocks may occur due to various reasons, such as exceeding credit limits or pending approvals. We'll walk through the steps to remove these blocks and ensure smooth payment processing.
How to Configure Flexible Working Schedule in Odoo 18 EmployeeCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to configure flexible working schedule in Odoo 18 Employee module. In Odoo 18, the Employee module offers powerful tools to configure and manage flexible working schedules tailored to your organization's needs.
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
ITI Turner Question Paper MCQ E-Book Free DownloadSONU HEETSON
油
ITI Turner Question Paper MCQ Book PDF Free Download. All Questions collected from NIMI Mock Test, CTS Bharat Skills Question Bank, Previous Exam papers. Helpful for CTS Trade Theory 1st & 2nd Year CBT Exam,油Apprentice test, AITT, ISRO, DRDO, NAVY, ARMY, Naval Dockyard, Tradesman, Training Officer, Instructor, RRB ALP CBT 2,油Railway Technician, CEPTAM, BRO, PWD, PHED, Air India, BHEL, BARC, IPSC, CISF, CTI, HSFC, GSRTC, GAIL, PSC, Viva, Tests, Quiz油& all other technical competitive exams.
Research & Research Methods: Basic Concepts and Types.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt has been made for the students pursuing PG in social science and humanities like M.Ed., M.A. (Education), Ph.D. Scholars. It will be also beneficial for the teachers and other faculty members interested in research and teaching research concepts.
Managing expiration dates of products in odooCeline George
油
Odoo allows users to set expiration dates at both the product and batch levels, providing flexibility and accuracy. By using Odoo's expiration date management, companies can minimize waste, optimize stock rotation, and maintain high standards of product quality. The system allows users to set expiration dates at both the product and batch levels, providing flexibility and accuracy.
How to create security group category in Odoo 17Celine George
油
This slide will represent the creation of security group category in odoo 17. Security groups are essential for managing user access and permissions across different modules. Creating a security group category helps to organize related user groups and streamline permission settings within a specific module or functionality.
23. Feedback form questions
(using a Google form to gather the feedback)
1. How relevant is this database's content to your research and/or instruction
needs? (Likert 1-5, highly relevant/not at all relevant)
2. In which courses or areas of research would this database help you? (text entry)
3. How easy was it to navigate this database and access results on your search
topic? (Likert 1-5, very easy/very difficult)
4. Did you find the information that you expected in this database? (Yes/No/Not
sure)
5. Does this database provide unique content that you were unable to find in
another LMU resource? (Yes/No/Not sure)
6. Would you suggest that the library acquire this database? (Yes/No/Not sure)
7. Do you have any additional comments? (text entry)
8. What is your status at LMU? (Undergraduate student/graduate
student/faculty/staff/administration/librarian)
9. If you would like to be notified of the library's decision regarding this trial,
please enter your email address below. (text entry)
27. If Swifted:
Change Resource Status to 'r REJECTED
Add feedback to 'u Trial Information' field
Delete 'z Tickler' (Remove New Resources
from Subject field)