The document presents the results of the U.S.Brand 2010 rating, which identifies the top 100 most valuable brands in the United States based on an analysis of various factors that influence brand value. Google was ranked as the most valuable brand at $80.5 billion, followed by Walmart at $74.2 billion and Microsoft at $61.34 billion. The rating methodology evaluated brands based on their owners' market position, financial performance, investments, geography, technology, and competition. The report concludes that the rating provides a means for companies and investors to understand the national market and guide effective brand development strategies.
The document summarizes the JpBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable Japanese brands. Toyota was ranked as the most valuable brand at $17.9 billion. The ranking was conducted by MPP Consulting and evaluated brand value based on various financial and market factors, such as a brand's market position, consumer perception, and industry trends. The methodology was developed over several years to create a uniform approach for assessing brand value across different markets. The rating aims to accurately reflect the current real market value of brands.
The document summarizes the KorBrand 2011 rating of the top 50 most valuable Korean brands. Samsung was ranked as the most valuable brand at $31.4 billion, followed by Hyundai at $8.5 billion and LG at $7.3 billion. The rating was conducted by the agency MPP Consulting and evaluated brand value based on financial performance of brand-owning companies and market position, taking into account investment, geographical, technological, and competitive factors. The methodology was developed over several years to accurately assess national brand values across different markets.
2020 Fortune 1000 list factoids and findingsdatabahn
油
This document summarizes key findings from the 2020 Fortune 1000 list. Some highlights include: 37 companies were led by female CEOs; Raytheon Technologies moved up significantly in the rankings after a merger; 40 healthcare companies made the list, led by CVS Health, UnitedHealth Group, and McKesson; Apple dropped to #4 while Amazon leapfrogged to #3; AT&T and Verizon led the telecom sector in the top 20; and 30 companies based in the Atlanta metro area featured on the list.
US-ASEAN Business Council - About Us - Our MembersCat Van Khoi
油
The document lists over 80 member companies of the US-ASEAN Business Council. The members include major US multinational companies from various industries such as energy, technology, consumer goods, healthcare, and finance. The members are divided into two groups - Chairman's Council for larger companies and Corporate Members for other companies.
The document summarizes Deloitte's 2011 Technology Fast 500 ranking of the fastest growing technology companies in North America. It provides details on the selection criteria, requirements for companies to be eligible, and how revenue growth is calculated. It also shares key facts and figures about the rankings, including industry breakdowns and geographic locations of the companies. The top 10 companies are listed with their industry, growth percentage, location, and CEO.
The document summarizes Deloitte's 2014 Technology Fast 500 ranking of the fastest growing technology companies in North America. It provides details on the selection criteria for the ranking, which focuses on companies with high revenue growth rates between 2009-2013. The top industries represented are software, internet, and computers/peripherals. The ranking includes both private and public companies headquartered across North America, with many located in major tech hubs like the San Francisco Bay Area.
The document summarizes Deloitte's 2014 Technology Fast 500 ranking of the fastest growing technology companies in North America. It provides details on the selection criteria for the ranking, which focuses on companies that achieved the highest revenue growth rates between 2009-2013. The ranking includes both private and public companies across various technology sectors. The top company was MobileIron which achieved 123,678% revenue growth during the period. The majority of companies on the list were from the software and internet industries and based in California and other West Coast US states as well as Ontario, Canada.
UK Top 50 fastest growing waste management companiesV Narasimha Reddy
油
The article profiles the 50 fastest growing waste companies in the UK as identified by Catalyst Corporate Finance. The top company had a compound annual growth rate of over 170%, more than doubling the growth of the second place company. Waste management businesses made up 34% of the top 50. Many of the top companies are relatively new, having been established in the last 10-15 years, but have achieved significant growth through both acquisitions and organic growth. The full list of the top 50 companies is provided, broken into sectors and showing each company's primary business, financial year, compound annual growth rate, and turnover.
The document provides information about the U.S. Brand 2011 rating which evaluates the top 100 most valuable American brands. It lists the top 20 brands by value ranging from Google at $92 billion to Pampers at $11 billion. The brands span industries such as internet, retail, drinks, software, consumer goods, and others. The rating aims to determine the most expensive U.S. brands and their current market value based on company performance and market position.
The document provides information about the GBBrand 2011 ranking of the top 100 most valuable British brands. It details the methodology used to evaluate and calculate the brand values based on financial performance and market factors. The ranking includes only brands created in or for Great Britain, and provides the brand name, assigned value in millions of US dollars, logo, and industry for brands ranked 1 through 20.
The document summarizes the 2010 rankings of the top 100 corporate brands as measured by CoreBrand, listing each company's ranking from 2010, 2009, and 2007 as well as the industry it operates in. Coca-Cola maintained the number one spot while other brands like McDonald's and Toyota saw improvements and declines in their rankings over the years. CoreBrand measures corporate brands through annual telephone interviews with business leaders to assess perceptions of brands.
This document summarizes CoreBrand's 2010 rankings of corporate brands and analysis of brand equity. Some key findings include:
- Coca-Cola, Hershey, and Campbell Soup topped the brand rankings, while Toyota had the biggest drop since 2007.
- On average, the corporate brand now impacts only 5.3% of market capitalization for companies tracked, the lowest point since tracking began.
- Both brand equity as a percentage of market cap and total dollar value of brand equity declined from 2008-2009 but grew from 2009-2010, reflecting the economic recovery.
- The average brand among the top 100 companies is now worth over $10 billion, while the average brand among 500 tracked companies
The 2015 IndustryWeek 50 Best US ManufacturersThe Industrywe.docxmehek4
油
The 2015 IndustryWeek 50 Best US Manufacturers
The Industryweek 50 Best U.S. Manufacturers is IW's
exclusive annual ranking of America's top-performing
public manufacturers.
Use this free database to view the 2015 IW 50 US Best to sort
the list alphabetically, or by ranking, industry, and financial
performance measures.
To sort the list, click the column heading of the data you'd like to re-order. To sort in reverse,
click the column heading a second time. For complete information about each company, click on
the company name.
Find the most recent articles about current and former IW 50 Best U.S. Manufacturers.
Follow #IWUS50
2016 / 2015
RANK COMPANY NAME INDUSTRY
REVENUE
(MILLIONS)
REVENUE
GROWTH
1 Polaris Industries
Inc.
Railcars, Ships, & Other
Trans. Equip.
$4,480 18.6
2 Apple Inc. Computers & Other
Electronic Products
$182,795 6.95
3 Northern Tier
Energy LP
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$5,556 11.58
4 Monster Beverage
Corp.
Beverages $2,465 9.72
5 Deluxe Corp. Publishing & Printing $1,674 5.63
6 Western Refining
Inc.
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$15,154 50.24
7 Sanderson Farms
Inc.
Food $2,775 3.42
8 Hershey Co. Food $7,422 3.86
9 Sherwin-Williams
Co.
Chemicals $11,130 9.27
10 Toro Co. Machinery $2,173 6.43
The IndustryWeek Lists
The IndustryWeek 1000
The IndustryWeek
U.S. 500
The IndustryWeek 50
Best U.S.
Manufacturers
2015 IW 50 Best US Manufacturers
2015 IW 50 Best US Manufacturers
List
2015 IW 50: Polaris Unseats Apple
IW US 50 Best: Who Are the Best US
Manufacturers by Revenue Growth,
Profit Margin, ROE -- and More
Creating the IW 50 Best US
Manufacturers
IW Webinars
Transforming Manufacturing:
IndustryWeek/PwC Webinar Series
Blueprint for Breakthrough: A Proven
Roadmap for Designing and Growing
Your Organization
HOME > IW US 50 DATABASE > THE 2015 INDUSTRYWEEK 50 BEST US MANUFACTURERS
Store Webinars White Papers Videos Apps Advertise
Subscribe: Magazine Newsletters
Leadership Global Economy Operations Finance Workforce Innovation Supply Chain Technology Expansion Management
Resources
REGISTER LOG IN
The 2015 IndustryWeek 50 Best US Manufacturers | IndustryWeek http://www.industryweek.com/resources/iw50best/2015
1 of 4 6/22/2016 1:58 PM
11 Microsoft Corp. Computers & Other
Electronic Products
$86,833 11.54
12 NewMarket Corp. Chemicals $2,335 2.41
13 Oasis Petroleum
Inc.
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$1,390 21.74
14 Pilgrim's Pride
Corp.
Food $8,583 2.05
15 Westlake Chemical
Corp.
Chemicals $4,415 17.45
16 Qualcomm Inc. Communications
Equipment
$26,487 6.52
17 Packaging Corp. of
America
Paper $5,853 59.68
18 IDEXX
Laboratories Inc.
Chemicals $1,486 7.9
19 Fossil Group Inc. Apparel $3,510 7.66
20 Thor Industries
Inc.
Motor Vehicles $3,525 8.75
21 Mettler-Toledo
International Inc.
Instruments $2,486 4.5
22 Nike Inc. Apparel $27,799 9.82
23 Alon USA Partners
LP
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$6,779 (3.79)
24 Lear Corp. Motor Vehicle Parts $17,727 9.2
2 ...
The document summarizes the DeBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable German brands. Mercedes-Benz was ranked as the most valuable brand at $25.5 billion. The rating methodology evaluates brand value based on financial performance of brand-owning companies and factors such as investments, geography, technology, and competition. The goal of the rating was to create a universal methodology for accurately assessing the real market value of any national brand.
The document provides a summary of the EsBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable Spanish brands. It describes the methodology used to calculate each brand's value based on financial performance and market position factors. The rating includes well-known national brands from industries such as retail, food, beverages, fashion, and telecommunications. Zara, Movistar and Santander were ranked as the top three most valuable Spanish brands with values of $14.5 billion, $11.4 billion and $7.5 billion, respectively.
The document summarizes the top 80 global brands from the 2007 Best Global Brands ranking. It lists each brand's 2007 and 2006 ranks, country of origin, sector, 2007 brand value in US dollars, and percentage change in brand value from 2006 to 2007. The top brand was Coca-Cola, followed by Microsoft and IBM.
The document provides information about the ItalBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable Italian brands. It discusses how brand value was calculated based on financial performance and market position factors. The top brand was Ferrari valued at $5.52 billion, followed by Gucci at $4.61 billion and Prada at $4.43 billion. The rating only includes brands created in Italy and lists the top 20 most valuable brands based on estimated monetary value.
The document discusses the relationship between media, advertising, marketing and the economy. It explains how advertising supports media companies and how the goal of advertising is to spread, create and transform ideas to promote commercial goals and consumption. It also discusses how branding and logos are important aspects of marketing and how companies focus on creating emotional connections to lifestyles and ideas through their brands.
The document is a report on the top 100 most valuable global brands in 2014. It provides information on each brand's category, brand value in US dollars, percentage change in brand value from 2013 to 2014, and change in ranking. Some of the top brands included Apple, Google, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, IBM, Toyota, and General Electric. The brand values were calculated based on revenues, market share, and forecasted growth using data from BrandZ, Kantar Retail, and Bloomberg.
The document discusses the Global Corporate Reputation Index, which evaluates the reputations of over 6,000 companies based on consumer surveys in 6 countries. It finds that while performance scores are higher than citizenship scores, companies with strong reputations excel at both. Tech companies have the best reputations overall, while oil and gas score lowest. China has the strongest company reputations, while Japan and Brazil are most critical. Long-standing companies tend to have stronger, more durable reputations. The top 25 companies are revealed.
Interim update of Type 2 Consulting's annual comparison of the brand values shown in the league tables published by Brand Finance, Forbes, BrandZ/Millard Brown, and Interbrand. These slides use the recently released 2021 data from Brand Finance and the 2020 data from the other three providers.
This document lists the top 100 most valuable global brands in 2015 according to brand value as measured by Millward Brown. Technology brands dominated the top of the list, with the #1 brand having a value of $246.9 billion. The brand values and rankings saw significant changes from 2014, with brand value changes ranging from -17% to 99% and ranking changes from -16 positions to 30 positions higher. The brands span various industries including technology, payments, telecom providers, soft drinks, fast food, and others.
Command辿 par le groupe de communication et de publicit辿 WPP et r辿alis辿 par le cabinet de conseil Millward Brown, le classement BrandZ Top 100 permet dappr辿hender la valeur des marques les plus puissantes au monde. Cest le seul classement qui int竪gre la perception des marques par les consommateurs une analyse rigoureuse des donn辿es financi竪res, des 辿volutions de march辿s et des rapports danalystes financiers pour calculer la valeur de la marque.
This document discusses the Coca-Cola Company's marketing strategies and outlook. It makes the following key points:
1. Coca-Cola is focusing on precision marketing, reaching people based on their values rather than demographics.
2. The company is building its brands differently by being flexible and customized rather than "one size fits all".
3. Coca-Cola remains the most valuable brand in the world due to its timeless relevance and ability to refresh people.
4. The company believes Coca-Cola's growth potential is just beginning to be unlocked and its epicenter will continue expanding to 2020 and beyond.
The document provides information about the U.S. Brand 2011 rating which evaluates the top 100 most valuable American brands. It lists the top 20 brands by value ranging from Google at $92 billion to Pampers at $11 billion. The brands span industries such as internet, retail, drinks, software, consumer goods, and others. The rating aims to determine the most expensive U.S. brands and their current market value based on company performance and market position.
The document provides information about the GBBrand 2011 ranking of the top 100 most valuable British brands. It details the methodology used to evaluate and calculate the brand values based on financial performance and market factors. The ranking includes only brands created in or for Great Britain, and provides the brand name, assigned value in millions of US dollars, logo, and industry for brands ranked 1 through 20.
The document summarizes the 2010 rankings of the top 100 corporate brands as measured by CoreBrand, listing each company's ranking from 2010, 2009, and 2007 as well as the industry it operates in. Coca-Cola maintained the number one spot while other brands like McDonald's and Toyota saw improvements and declines in their rankings over the years. CoreBrand measures corporate brands through annual telephone interviews with business leaders to assess perceptions of brands.
This document summarizes CoreBrand's 2010 rankings of corporate brands and analysis of brand equity. Some key findings include:
- Coca-Cola, Hershey, and Campbell Soup topped the brand rankings, while Toyota had the biggest drop since 2007.
- On average, the corporate brand now impacts only 5.3% of market capitalization for companies tracked, the lowest point since tracking began.
- Both brand equity as a percentage of market cap and total dollar value of brand equity declined from 2008-2009 but grew from 2009-2010, reflecting the economic recovery.
- The average brand among the top 100 companies is now worth over $10 billion, while the average brand among 500 tracked companies
The 2015 IndustryWeek 50 Best US ManufacturersThe Industrywe.docxmehek4
油
The 2015 IndustryWeek 50 Best US Manufacturers
The Industryweek 50 Best U.S. Manufacturers is IW's
exclusive annual ranking of America's top-performing
public manufacturers.
Use this free database to view the 2015 IW 50 US Best to sort
the list alphabetically, or by ranking, industry, and financial
performance measures.
To sort the list, click the column heading of the data you'd like to re-order. To sort in reverse,
click the column heading a second time. For complete information about each company, click on
the company name.
Find the most recent articles about current and former IW 50 Best U.S. Manufacturers.
Follow #IWUS50
2016 / 2015
RANK COMPANY NAME INDUSTRY
REVENUE
(MILLIONS)
REVENUE
GROWTH
1 Polaris Industries
Inc.
Railcars, Ships, & Other
Trans. Equip.
$4,480 18.6
2 Apple Inc. Computers & Other
Electronic Products
$182,795 6.95
3 Northern Tier
Energy LP
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$5,556 11.58
4 Monster Beverage
Corp.
Beverages $2,465 9.72
5 Deluxe Corp. Publishing & Printing $1,674 5.63
6 Western Refining
Inc.
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$15,154 50.24
7 Sanderson Farms
Inc.
Food $2,775 3.42
8 Hershey Co. Food $7,422 3.86
9 Sherwin-Williams
Co.
Chemicals $11,130 9.27
10 Toro Co. Machinery $2,173 6.43
The IndustryWeek Lists
The IndustryWeek 1000
The IndustryWeek
U.S. 500
The IndustryWeek 50
Best U.S.
Manufacturers
2015 IW 50 Best US Manufacturers
2015 IW 50 Best US Manufacturers
List
2015 IW 50: Polaris Unseats Apple
IW US 50 Best: Who Are the Best US
Manufacturers by Revenue Growth,
Profit Margin, ROE -- and More
Creating the IW 50 Best US
Manufacturers
IW Webinars
Transforming Manufacturing:
IndustryWeek/PwC Webinar Series
Blueprint for Breakthrough: A Proven
Roadmap for Designing and Growing
Your Organization
HOME > IW US 50 DATABASE > THE 2015 INDUSTRYWEEK 50 BEST US MANUFACTURERS
Store Webinars White Papers Videos Apps Advertise
Subscribe: Magazine Newsletters
Leadership Global Economy Operations Finance Workforce Innovation Supply Chain Technology Expansion Management
Resources
REGISTER LOG IN
The 2015 IndustryWeek 50 Best US Manufacturers | IndustryWeek http://www.industryweek.com/resources/iw50best/2015
1 of 4 6/22/2016 1:58 PM
11 Microsoft Corp. Computers & Other
Electronic Products
$86,833 11.54
12 NewMarket Corp. Chemicals $2,335 2.41
13 Oasis Petroleum
Inc.
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$1,390 21.74
14 Pilgrim's Pride
Corp.
Food $8,583 2.05
15 Westlake Chemical
Corp.
Chemicals $4,415 17.45
16 Qualcomm Inc. Communications
Equipment
$26,487 6.52
17 Packaging Corp. of
America
Paper $5,853 59.68
18 IDEXX
Laboratories Inc.
Chemicals $1,486 7.9
19 Fossil Group Inc. Apparel $3,510 7.66
20 Thor Industries
Inc.
Motor Vehicles $3,525 8.75
21 Mettler-Toledo
International Inc.
Instruments $2,486 4.5
22 Nike Inc. Apparel $27,799 9.82
23 Alon USA Partners
LP
Petroleum & Coal
Products
$6,779 (3.79)
24 Lear Corp. Motor Vehicle Parts $17,727 9.2
2 ...
The document summarizes the DeBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable German brands. Mercedes-Benz was ranked as the most valuable brand at $25.5 billion. The rating methodology evaluates brand value based on financial performance of brand-owning companies and factors such as investments, geography, technology, and competition. The goal of the rating was to create a universal methodology for accurately assessing the real market value of any national brand.
The document provides a summary of the EsBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable Spanish brands. It describes the methodology used to calculate each brand's value based on financial performance and market position factors. The rating includes well-known national brands from industries such as retail, food, beverages, fashion, and telecommunications. Zara, Movistar and Santander were ranked as the top three most valuable Spanish brands with values of $14.5 billion, $11.4 billion and $7.5 billion, respectively.
The document summarizes the top 80 global brands from the 2007 Best Global Brands ranking. It lists each brand's 2007 and 2006 ranks, country of origin, sector, 2007 brand value in US dollars, and percentage change in brand value from 2006 to 2007. The top brand was Coca-Cola, followed by Microsoft and IBM.
The document provides information about the ItalBrand 2011 rating of the top 100 most valuable Italian brands. It discusses how brand value was calculated based on financial performance and market position factors. The top brand was Ferrari valued at $5.52 billion, followed by Gucci at $4.61 billion and Prada at $4.43 billion. The rating only includes brands created in Italy and lists the top 20 most valuable brands based on estimated monetary value.
The document discusses the relationship between media, advertising, marketing and the economy. It explains how advertising supports media companies and how the goal of advertising is to spread, create and transform ideas to promote commercial goals and consumption. It also discusses how branding and logos are important aspects of marketing and how companies focus on creating emotional connections to lifestyles and ideas through their brands.
The document is a report on the top 100 most valuable global brands in 2014. It provides information on each brand's category, brand value in US dollars, percentage change in brand value from 2013 to 2014, and change in ranking. Some of the top brands included Apple, Google, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, IBM, Toyota, and General Electric. The brand values were calculated based on revenues, market share, and forecasted growth using data from BrandZ, Kantar Retail, and Bloomberg.
The document discusses the Global Corporate Reputation Index, which evaluates the reputations of over 6,000 companies based on consumer surveys in 6 countries. It finds that while performance scores are higher than citizenship scores, companies with strong reputations excel at both. Tech companies have the best reputations overall, while oil and gas score lowest. China has the strongest company reputations, while Japan and Brazil are most critical. Long-standing companies tend to have stronger, more durable reputations. The top 25 companies are revealed.
Interim update of Type 2 Consulting's annual comparison of the brand values shown in the league tables published by Brand Finance, Forbes, BrandZ/Millard Brown, and Interbrand. These slides use the recently released 2021 data from Brand Finance and the 2020 data from the other three providers.
This document lists the top 100 most valuable global brands in 2015 according to brand value as measured by Millward Brown. Technology brands dominated the top of the list, with the #1 brand having a value of $246.9 billion. The brand values and rankings saw significant changes from 2014, with brand value changes ranging from -17% to 99% and ranking changes from -16 positions to 30 positions higher. The brands span various industries including technology, payments, telecom providers, soft drinks, fast food, and others.
Command辿 par le groupe de communication et de publicit辿 WPP et r辿alis辿 par le cabinet de conseil Millward Brown, le classement BrandZ Top 100 permet dappr辿hender la valeur des marques les plus puissantes au monde. Cest le seul classement qui int竪gre la perception des marques par les consommateurs une analyse rigoureuse des donn辿es financi竪res, des 辿volutions de march辿s et des rapports danalystes financiers pour calculer la valeur de la marque.
This document discusses the Coca-Cola Company's marketing strategies and outlook. It makes the following key points:
1. Coca-Cola is focusing on precision marketing, reaching people based on their values rather than demographics.
2. The company is building its brands differently by being flexible and customized rather than "one size fits all".
3. Coca-Cola remains the most valuable brand in the world due to its timeless relevance and ability to refresh people.
4. The company believes Coca-Cola's growth potential is just beginning to be unlocked and its epicenter will continue expanding to 2020 and beyond.
2. About
MPP Consulting agency presents the first rating of Brands of United States.
The main objective of the U.S.Brand 2010 rating was to determine the TOP 100 most
expensive Brands of United States, as well as their current market value, based on the
performance of companies brand-owners, their market position and opportunities of
companies and their brands.
Under existing conditions of the world economy, rather important aspect of business for each
company is the presence of a strong brand, which allows to retain a substantial market share,
as well as enable the company to actively develop and distribute their products in new
markets.
As a rule, for a large global company's brand is one of the most expensive of its assets in the
total value of the company compared with manufacturing facilities or other tangible or
intangible assets. And this trend continues to grow every year.
The rating U.S.Brand 2010 includes only brands created in United States or for American
goods or services. Geographical origin of brands to the United States was the main criterion
for brand selection to be evaluated in this rating.
* All rights to brands and trademarks mentioned or referred to in the rankings belong to their respective owners.
U.S.Brand 2010 |2|
3. Methodology
The methodology of the brand evaluation based on the evaluation of activity of companies
brand-owners, and also takes into account several factors, that show the market conditions
that influence the brands, possible threats and perspectives of every industries development.
This methodology is based on analysis of factors influencing the market value of the brand:
the company's position in the market, consumer value of the brand, as well as factors that
show the trends of the company and its brand.
Brand value calculation formula:
Vb = Pt*Fc*(Qi*Qc*Qf*Qm)*Uid
Vb brand value
Pt static coefficient
Fc composite financial index
Qi investments coefficient
Qc geographical coefficient
Qf technique coefficient
Qm - competitive coefficient
Uid unique ID
It is worth noting that the brand value includes only the cost of the brand (name), excluding
production facilities, infrastructure, patents, inventions and other tangible or intellectual
property.
* Value of Brands in rating indicated in millions $
U.S.Brand 2010 |3|
4. TOP 100 Rank 1 - 20
Brand Value, mln.$ Logo Industry
1 Google 80 500 Internet
2 Walmart 74 200 Retail
3 Microsoft 61 340 Computer software
4 Coca-Cola 58 200 Drinks
5 McDonald's 45 088 HoReCa
6 Nike 33 000 Clothing & Fashion
7 Apple 23 390 Electronics
8 Windows 22 250 Computer software
9 IBM 21 325 Electronics
10 Gillette 19 550 Cosmetics
11 Budweiser 18 500 Beer
12 Disney 18 230 Media
13 Facebook 17 550 Internet
14 Procter & Gamble 17 300 Household chemistry
15 AT&T 16 900 Telecoms
16 Amazon.com 16 572 Internet
17 GAP 15 800 Clothing & Fashion
18 Motorola 14 880 Electronics
19 Pepsi 13 188 Drinks
20 iPhone 12 200 Electronics
U.S.Brand 2010 |4|
8. TOP 100 Rank 81 - 100
Brand Value, mln.$ Logo Industry
81 Duracell 2 440 Equipment
82 Polo Ralph Lauren 2 352 Clothing & Fashion
83 Avon 2 300 Cosmetics
84 Chevrolet 2 280 Automotive
85 Honeywell 2 132 Engineering
86 Hilton 2 000 HoReCa
87 Adobe 1 949 Computer software
88 Head & Shoulders 1 913 Household chemistry
89 Calvin Klein 1 860 Clothing & Fashion
90 Continental Airlines 1 680 Transport
91 Chrysler 1 620 Automotive
92 Hyatt 1 550 HoReCa
93 Forbes 1 330 Media
94 Twitter 1 220 Internet
95 3M 1 212 Chemistry
96 Levi's 1 201 Clothing & Fashion
97 Southwest Airlines 1 185 Transport
98 Est辿e Lauder 1 150 Clothing & Fashion
99 Hertz 1 108 Transport
100 John Deere 1 047 Engineering
U.S.Brand 2010 |8|
9. Conclusions
The rating U.S.Brand 2010 is the 8th rating of the project TOP National Brands, launched in
2010, and is the first rating of Brands of United States.
Methodology of brands evaluation, created by our agency and applied in TOP National
Brands project, allow to consider all the parameters that define the real market value of each
brand, and provides an opportunity to identify and create a list of the most expensive national
brands in each country.
We hope that this rating will allow companies and investors to be guided in the national
market and also in the global and strongly competitive markets, and to determine for
themselves the ways of further effective development of their brands and business.
MPP Consulting
Ukraine, Kyiv
tel: +380-44-361-46-47
www.mppconsulting.com.ua
office@mppconsulting.com.ua
U.S.Brand 2010 |9|