This document is a curriculum vitae for Dr. Ibrahim Suliman Ahmed Mukhtar that provides details about his educational and professional background. It includes information about his degrees including a Ph.D in Education from El-Neelian University in Sudan, as well as his teaching experience as an assistant professor at Bahrain Teachers College and International Islamic University Malaysia. It also lists the courses he has taught and his administrative roles including coordinating programs and committees.
This document is a curriculum vitae for Dr. Ibrahim Suliman Ahmed Mukhtar that provides details about his educational and professional background. It includes information about his degrees including a Ph.D in Education from El-Neelian University in Sudan, as well as his teaching experience as an assistant professor at Bahrain Teachers College and International Islamic University Malaysia. It also lists the courses he has taught and his administrative roles including coordinating programs and committees.
Gr4009 application of quality standards and instruments v.1.1Ibrahim Suliman
油
This course introduces participants to quality standards and instruments applied in schools globally and in Bahrain. It covers the emergence of quality systems in education and frameworks that schools must operate within. The course examines key aspects of schools that will be evaluated, including teaching, curriculum, student achievement and development, leadership, and management. It provides guidance on preparing for school reviews conducted by Bahrain's School Review Unit. The course aims to help participants understand quality standards and prepare their schools for review through assignments such as a self-evaluation form and group presentation analyzing quality standards.
The document outlines the review timetable and process for preparing for a quality audit of a school. It includes:
1. An 8 week timeline prior to the review for training staff on self-evaluations, distributing evaluation forms to parents and staff, and collecting responses.
2. Instructions for managing the review with staff, governors, students, parents and the review team to ensure all stakeholders are informed and prepared to participate.
3. Details on logistics like accommodating the review team, supplying requested documents, and arranging interviews and meetings between the review team and school representatives.
The document evaluates the arrangements for student welfare at a school. It examines records of student progress, guidance provided to students, communication with parents, and health and safety measures. Review questions address how well students are inducted and supported, academic and personal monitoring, support for special needs, advice available to students, and parent communication. The discussion section covers the differences between leadership and management, characteristics of each, and the relationship between the two roles. It also addresses school development planning, including self-evaluation, vision, action planning, and monitoring progress.
The document discusses various aspects of curriculum, including the recommended, written, supported, taught, tested, and learned curriculum. It also discusses the hidden curriculum and three levels of planning curriculum objectives. It emphasizes the need for continuous monitoring and review of the curriculum. Finally, it provides framework questions to evaluate if a school's curriculum adequately addresses a broad range of experiences for students and prepares them for their next stage of education.
Session 5 evaluation of teaching and learning v1.0Ibrahim Suliman
油
This document discusses evaluation of teaching and learning. It provides an overview of what constitutes good teaching, including learner-centric pedagogy and expectations. It also discusses reviewing video clips from teaching programs and analyzing different forms used by reviewers to write evaluative comments. Key questions from the SRU evaluation framework are presented which focus on teachers' knowledge, skills development in students, classroom management, engagement and challenging students of varying abilities. The document concludes with suggestions for helping colleagues prepare for reviews, such as workshops on the evaluation framework and joint lesson observations.
Session 3 evaluation of students achievement v.1.0Ibrahim Suliman
油
The document discusses various methods of assessing student achievement, including test results from the Ministry of Education and National Examination Unit, as well as trends in student academic performance over time. It notes that data from assessments need to be interpreted carefully, as reviews also consider lesson observations, student work samples, and oral questioning to evaluate student achievement. Encouraging teachers to prepare a portfolio of evidence can help provide reviewers the most well-rounded picture of student performance.