101 01-f07 assessment checklist - rev 1 - soaf
Download as DOC, PDF0 likes483 views
This document contains an assessment checklist used to evaluate assignments at several educational institutions in Malaysia. The checklist contains 13 criteria used to assess assignments, including whether learning outcomes, assessment criteria, and program outcomes are clear to students. Assignments are also evaluated based on appropriate task complexity, relevance to the program, realistic deadlines, and freedom from bias. The checklist is signed by an assessor and internal verifier upon review, and includes space for comments on specific assignment questions or tasks. A second section of the checklist is used specifically for English language assignments and focuses on grammatical accuracy.
101 01-f07 assessment checklist - rev 1 - soaf
- 1. FORM : 101/01-F07 REV : 1 SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Kolej Universiti Linton Institut Jati Institut Teknologi Pertama Kolej Legenda Institute Of Medical Sciences Mantin Programme Name Module Name Module Code Name of Module Leader Assessment Type / Reference No. Name of Internal Verifier Lead Officer (Assessment Committee) ( A ) While some of the features below are essential, others will apply only in particular situations. No Assignment features or X or N/A Comments 1. Are the relevant learning outcome(s), programme outcome and associated assessment criteria clearly specified and known to students? 2. Is background information relevant and adequate for the students? 3. Opportunity for the students to make decisions 4. Are the tasks at appropriate level for students e.g complexity of tasks, overall standard 5. Type of activity e.g group and individual work 6. Is this assessment relevant to the programme? 7. Are the tasks/questions developed clear? 8. Is assignment practicable and relate to the industry?
- 2. FORM : 101/01-F07 REV : 1 No Assignment features or X or N/A Comments 9. Are assessment criteria/ expected evidence clear and known to students? 10. Are marking/grading descriptors shown and contextualised? 11. Is the deadline realistic for this assessment? 12. Is assignment free from bias? 13. Any specific comments on questions/tasks. Note: assessment has this feature X assessment does not have this feature (comment/ suggestion to overcome this, to be included by internal verifier) N/A not applicable Assessors Name and Signature Date Name and Signature Date of Verification Internal Verifier Name and Signature Date of Verification Lead Officer, Assessment Committee ( B ) Use by English Language Centre. No Assignment features or X or N/A Comments 1. No grammatical, punctuation errors and etc. Name and Signature Date of Verification English Language Centre