際際滷

際際滷Share a Scribd company logo
BENCHMARKING
Supervisor
Dr. Anjali Sharma
Associate Professor
Presented by
Education Management Student
Swagata Bharali
Debabrot Phukan
Geetika Das
Department of Education, Tezpur University Assam , India
 A measurement of the quality of an organizations policies,
products, programs and strategies and their comparison
with standard measurements of its peers.
 It is a process for obtaining a measure where
BENCHMARKS are WHAT and BENCHMARKING is
HOW.
 It is the process of improving ourselves by learning from
others.
 It is the process of improving performance by continuously
identifying, understanding and adapting outstanding
processes found inside and outside the organization
奄Continuous process of measuring products,
services and practices against the toughest
competitors or those companies recognized as
industry leaders  CAMP 1989.
奄A process of finding the world class products,
service and operational system and then adjusting
own products, service and system to meet or beat
those standards  GEBER 1990.
奄A method of finding how to improve processes
quickly by learning from others dealing with
similar issues  CORTADA 1995.
Traditional techniques for improvement are not
sufficient in todays competitive market.
Rapidly changing external environment due to
globalization.
Improving product quality and services.
Increasing sales and profit.
To meet the customers needs and expectations.
Continuous process of measuring and
comparing a firms business process against
those of another firm.
Discover the performance gap between
ones processes and those of another firms.
Incorporate leading firms processes into
ones own strategy to fill the gap and
improve performance.
There are four stages in the BENCHMARKING process.
 PLANNING:
 Identify what is to be benchmarked.
 Identify comparative companies.
 Determine data collection method and collect data.
 ANALYSIS:
 Determine current performance gap.
 Project future performance level.
 INTEGRATION:
 Communicate benchmark findings and gain acceptance.
 Establish functional goals.
 ACTION:
 Develop action plans.
 Implement specific action.
 Recalibrate benchmark.
 INTERNAL BENCHMARKING
 Performance comparison of units or departments within
one organization.
 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING
 Product oriented comparisons with processes involved.
 FUNCTIONAL BENCHMARKING
 Comparison of particular business functions at one or
more organization.
 GENERIC BENCHMARKING
 Comparison of all business functions with more of best in
class.
Product and process improvement.
Time and cost can be reduced.
Provides direction for change in business .
Provide new ideas for achieving the goal.
Quality improvement.
Leveraging strength ideas.
What is best for someone may not be the
same for us. It varies from organization to
organization.
If it is poorly defined then it will effect in
measuring the performance gap.
There may be incorrect comparisons which
leads to wastage of time and money.
Reluctant to share information.
It may reduce managerial motivation.
It is basically comparing yourself with
others. It helps us to identify where we are
standing today and lacking behind. To
achieve a goal it is mandatory to set a
benchmark whether it is education or
business. It is a continuous process which
circles itself after meeting a particular
benchmark. To be the best among all we
should follow the best in class.
Benchmarking

More Related Content

Benchmarking

  • 1. BENCHMARKING Supervisor Dr. Anjali Sharma Associate Professor Presented by Education Management Student Swagata Bharali Debabrot Phukan Geetika Das Department of Education, Tezpur University Assam , India
  • 2. A measurement of the quality of an organizations policies, products, programs and strategies and their comparison with standard measurements of its peers. It is a process for obtaining a measure where BENCHMARKS are WHAT and BENCHMARKING is HOW. It is the process of improving ourselves by learning from others. It is the process of improving performance by continuously identifying, understanding and adapting outstanding processes found inside and outside the organization
  • 3. 奄Continuous process of measuring products, services and practices against the toughest competitors or those companies recognized as industry leaders CAMP 1989. 奄A process of finding the world class products, service and operational system and then adjusting own products, service and system to meet or beat those standards GEBER 1990. 奄A method of finding how to improve processes quickly by learning from others dealing with similar issues CORTADA 1995.
  • 4. Traditional techniques for improvement are not sufficient in todays competitive market. Rapidly changing external environment due to globalization. Improving product quality and services. Increasing sales and profit. To meet the customers needs and expectations.
  • 5. Continuous process of measuring and comparing a firms business process against those of another firm. Discover the performance gap between ones processes and those of another firms. Incorporate leading firms processes into ones own strategy to fill the gap and improve performance.
  • 6. There are four stages in the BENCHMARKING process. PLANNING: Identify what is to be benchmarked. Identify comparative companies. Determine data collection method and collect data. ANALYSIS: Determine current performance gap. Project future performance level. INTEGRATION: Communicate benchmark findings and gain acceptance. Establish functional goals. ACTION: Develop action plans. Implement specific action. Recalibrate benchmark.
  • 7. INTERNAL BENCHMARKING Performance comparison of units or departments within one organization. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING Product oriented comparisons with processes involved. FUNCTIONAL BENCHMARKING Comparison of particular business functions at one or more organization. GENERIC BENCHMARKING Comparison of all business functions with more of best in class.
  • 8. Product and process improvement. Time and cost can be reduced. Provides direction for change in business . Provide new ideas for achieving the goal. Quality improvement. Leveraging strength ideas.
  • 9. What is best for someone may not be the same for us. It varies from organization to organization. If it is poorly defined then it will effect in measuring the performance gap. There may be incorrect comparisons which leads to wastage of time and money. Reluctant to share information. It may reduce managerial motivation.
  • 10. It is basically comparing yourself with others. It helps us to identify where we are standing today and lacking behind. To achieve a goal it is mandatory to set a benchmark whether it is education or business. It is a continuous process which circles itself after meeting a particular benchmark. To be the best among all we should follow the best in class.