The document discusses using Microsoft PowerPoint to support emergent literacy skill development in young at-risk children. It contains sections on pedagogical aspects, document layout and formatting requirements, document image requirements, motivation and reinforcement, presentation, feedback, and navigation. An observer would use this checklist to evaluate how well a PowerPoint presentation meets standards for education goals, design, interactivity, and support for early literacy skills.
1 of 2
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Chicklist1
1. Use of Microsoft® PowerPoint to support emergent
literacy skill development among young at risk children
1. Teacher Name: ______________________ 2. Date: _____________________________
3. School: ____________________________ 5. Grade: _____________________________
6. Subject: ___________________________
7. Topic: _____________________________
8. Observer Name: ____________________
ID Pedagogical aspect Done Not Done N/A
A There clear educational goals
B Instruction matches stated objectives
C Practice activities and exercises are appropiate for lesson objectives.
ID 1.0 Document Layout and Formatting Requirement Done Not Done N/A
A Do all of the slides avoid using flickering/flashing text and/or
animated text?
B Do all slides that contain hyperlinks have active links?
C Do all of the slides avoid using text boxes or graphics with text
within them?
E
D Have comments been removed and formatting marks been turned
off?
ID 2.0 Document Image Requirement Done Not Done N/A
A Do all slide graphics (images, grouped images and non-text
elements) that convey information have Alternative Text (Alt Text)
associated with them?
B Have all slides that contain multiple associated images on the same
page (e.g., boxes in an organizational chart) been grouped as one
object?
C Do complex images have teacher descriptive immediately after the
image?
2. ID motivation and reinforcement Done Not Done N/A
A The program is attractive and interesting for risk kids?
B It motivates users to continue using the program, does it encourage
the learner?
ID Presentation Done Not Done N/A
A The material easy to read ?
B The graphics useful?
c The layout well-designed?
ID Feed Back Done Not Done N/A
A Feedback is used appropriately ?
B the learner offered useful feedback if s/he gets something wrong?
c the learner gets something right purely by chance, can s/he seek an
explanation in order to find out why the answer is right?
ID Navigation Done Not Done N/A
A The program designed for easy navigation and control?
B The interface understanding?
C Can go back to earlier steps easily?
D Can control the order of presentation?
E Can control how long to spend at each step?
F Easy to exit from program?