"Unconference som katalysator for bibliotekutvikling"
Presentasjon holdt i Troms淡 p奪 Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc fredag 6. november 2015
Marit Somby, Troms fylkesbibliotek
From how to why: Critical thinking and academic integrity as key ingredients...Mariann Lokse
油
The document discusses the ikomp-0010 online course aimed at improving critical thinking and academic integrity among students transitioning from high school to university. It outlines course content, student feedback highlighting successes and areas for improvement, and emphasizes the importance of better information literacy. The course aims to assist all students, offering modules on learning strategies, information searching, source evaluation, and academic integrity.
This document describes an online course created by the University Library and Resource Centre for Teaching, Learning, and Technology at the University of Troms淡 in Norway. The course aims to strengthen teacher qualifications around deterring student plagiarism by teaching faculty about plagiarism, why students plagiarize, how to teach academic skills, redesign assignments, detect plagiarism, and handle procedures. The course is organized into six parts covering these topics and includes texts, videos, exercises and additional resources for teachers to use. It will be tested with faculty in spring/summer 2013 and officially launched in August after receiving feedback and endorsements.
The document outlines the reasons for academic integrity violations and offers students guidance on effective library research skills, such as topic selection, keyword identification, and proper citation methods. It emphasizes the importance of understanding plagiarism and offers tools and resources available through the University of Arizona libraries. Additionally, it provides a structured search strategy worksheet to help students formulate their research queries and reminders about seeking assistance.
This document discusses various issues related to academic integrity in online courses. It explores concerns about cheating being more likely in online versus face-to-face environments. Several strategies are proposed for ensuring academic integrity in online assessments, including proctored testing, plagiarism detection software, and pedagogical approaches. The document also notes that cheating challenges educators to improve course design and evaluation methods.
This document introduces linked data, which was proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1998 as a way to connect data on the web through URIs. It discusses how previous data formats focused on documents rather than directly connecting data. Linked data follows four principles: using URIs to name things on the web, making the URIs resolve to web resources that provide information about the thing, and using standards like RDF and HTTP to share and connect information.
The document discusses academic integrity and plagiarism. It defines plagiarism as presenting another person's ideas or words as one's own without giving proper credit to the original source. Plagiarism includes copying, lifting, or stealing others' work through methods such as bootlegging or cheating. The document emphasizes that academic dishonesty, including plagiarism, is not tolerated and that students must always give proper credit whenever using others' words, ideas, graphics, or paraphrases. Teachers have tools like Turnitin.com to detect plagiarism by comparing student work to other sources.
Academic integrity in the american universityMarguerite Lowe
油
The document outlines the University of New Haven's academic integrity policies and the importance of ethical conduct in the academic community, emphasizing honesty and respect for the intellectual work of others. It describes potential consequences for violations, including academic penalties and reputational damage, and provides guidance on how to properly credit sources and avoid violations such as plagiarism and unauthorized collaboration. Resources for tutoring and support offered by the Center for Learning Resources are also detailed, encouraging students to seek help and understand the policies to succeed academically.
Academic integrity is important for students. Some examples of violating academic integrity include quoting without using quotation marks, paraphrasing without citing sources, using images without attribution, submitting group work as one's own, copying another student's work, communicating during an exam, introducing unauthorized information or impersonating someone during an exam. References should be included to give credit to other authors' ideas.
This document discusses academic integrity and plagiarism. It defines plagiarism as submitting someone else's work as your own without citing the source. The document provides examples of plagiarism in different fields and discusses the importance of citing sources to establish authority, validity, traceability, recency and broad research. It also describes a case of plagiarism in a PhD thesis and discusses consequences of plagiarism.
From how to why: Critical thinking and academic integrity as key ingredients...Mariann Lokse
油
The document discusses the ikomp-0010 online course aimed at improving critical thinking and academic integrity among students transitioning from high school to university. It outlines course content, student feedback highlighting successes and areas for improvement, and emphasizes the importance of better information literacy. The course aims to assist all students, offering modules on learning strategies, information searching, source evaluation, and academic integrity.
This document describes an online course created by the University Library and Resource Centre for Teaching, Learning, and Technology at the University of Troms淡 in Norway. The course aims to strengthen teacher qualifications around deterring student plagiarism by teaching faculty about plagiarism, why students plagiarize, how to teach academic skills, redesign assignments, detect plagiarism, and handle procedures. The course is organized into six parts covering these topics and includes texts, videos, exercises and additional resources for teachers to use. It will be tested with faculty in spring/summer 2013 and officially launched in August after receiving feedback and endorsements.
The document outlines the reasons for academic integrity violations and offers students guidance on effective library research skills, such as topic selection, keyword identification, and proper citation methods. It emphasizes the importance of understanding plagiarism and offers tools and resources available through the University of Arizona libraries. Additionally, it provides a structured search strategy worksheet to help students formulate their research queries and reminders about seeking assistance.
This document discusses various issues related to academic integrity in online courses. It explores concerns about cheating being more likely in online versus face-to-face environments. Several strategies are proposed for ensuring academic integrity in online assessments, including proctored testing, plagiarism detection software, and pedagogical approaches. The document also notes that cheating challenges educators to improve course design and evaluation methods.
This document introduces linked data, which was proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1998 as a way to connect data on the web through URIs. It discusses how previous data formats focused on documents rather than directly connecting data. Linked data follows four principles: using URIs to name things on the web, making the URIs resolve to web resources that provide information about the thing, and using standards like RDF and HTTP to share and connect information.
The document discusses academic integrity and plagiarism. It defines plagiarism as presenting another person's ideas or words as one's own without giving proper credit to the original source. Plagiarism includes copying, lifting, or stealing others' work through methods such as bootlegging or cheating. The document emphasizes that academic dishonesty, including plagiarism, is not tolerated and that students must always give proper credit whenever using others' words, ideas, graphics, or paraphrases. Teachers have tools like Turnitin.com to detect plagiarism by comparing student work to other sources.
Academic integrity in the american universityMarguerite Lowe
油
The document outlines the University of New Haven's academic integrity policies and the importance of ethical conduct in the academic community, emphasizing honesty and respect for the intellectual work of others. It describes potential consequences for violations, including academic penalties and reputational damage, and provides guidance on how to properly credit sources and avoid violations such as plagiarism and unauthorized collaboration. Resources for tutoring and support offered by the Center for Learning Resources are also detailed, encouraging students to seek help and understand the policies to succeed academically.
Academic integrity is important for students. Some examples of violating academic integrity include quoting without using quotation marks, paraphrasing without citing sources, using images without attribution, submitting group work as one's own, copying another student's work, communicating during an exam, introducing unauthorized information or impersonating someone during an exam. References should be included to give credit to other authors' ideas.
This document discusses academic integrity and plagiarism. It defines plagiarism as submitting someone else's work as your own without citing the source. The document provides examples of plagiarism in different fields and discusses the importance of citing sources to establish authority, validity, traceability, recency and broad research. It also describes a case of plagiarism in a PhD thesis and discusses consequences of plagiarism.
1. men jeg ble positivt overrasket Undervisning i informasjonskompetanse: Hva gj淡r vi og hva synes studentene? Mariann L淡kse Universitetsbiblioteket i Troms淡 [email_address]
4. INF#造MASJ&%@KOMPETA贈造E What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 45-46) 01.06.10
5. Et kurs i akademisk overlevelsesteknikk For hvem? Alle nye studenter p奪 HSL-fakultet Av hvem? Fagreferenter Omfang? 3 x 2 timer 01.06.10
6. Kursinnhold: Informasjonss淡king Informasjon om bibliotekets tjenester Bibsys + Ofelas (bibliotekportalen) VPN 皆淡一eprosessen Studieteknikk & l脱ring p奪 universitetet Spr奪kbruk Henvisning til VIKO og 皆淡一 & skriv 01.06.10
7. Eksempel: Born digital = born information literate?油 油 students may be adept at using new technologies, but they do not necessarily have the abilities to use research content in effective ways (p.9) 油 油 Hampton-Reeves, S, et al. Students use of research content in teaching and learning.油 A report for the Joint Information Systems Couoncil (JISC) 2009. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/aboutus/workinggroups/studentsuseresearchcontent.pdf [Accessed 04.08.2009] 01.06.10
9. Kursinnhold: Kildebruk Kritikk Digital d淡mmekraft Sitatrett og sitatbruk Opphavsrett Akademisk redelighet & plagiat Eksamensforskrifter Referanseteknikker 01.06.10
10. Eksempel: Kildekritikk Ting er ikke alltid det de gir seg ut for 奪 v脱re. 01.06.10 Begge bilder er hentet fra Worth1000.com: http://fx.worth1000.com/contests/6089/hybrid-produce-3/
15. Hvorfor evaluering Hjelper oss 奪 holde riktig fokus St淡tte der det er n淡dvendig, ikke der vi tror de trenger hjelp En kort rapport utarbeides p奪 grunnlag av evalueringene hvert 奪r og sendes til fakultetet Inkluderer Evalueringen i tabellform Kommentarene fra studentene Antall oppm淡tte Forelesers vurdering av kurset 01.06.10
19. Hva liker studentene? 01.06.10 Jeg trodde at det ville bli en t淡rr forelesning, men jeg ble positivt overrasket. Er mer komfortabel p奪 universitetet n奪. Betryggende. Inspirerende og positiv 奪nd.
20. Hva liker studentene? 01.06.10 Hyggelig med pausemusikk. Stoffet framstilt p奪 en langt mer relevant m奪te enn mange andre forelesninger i ex.fac., s奪 her er det noe 奪 l脱re! En av de f奪 forelesninger (hittil) som ikke gir en f淡lelse av 奪 sitte i en roman av Kafka.
21. Og hva liker de ikke? 01.06.10 Kunne med fordel brukt litt mindre tid p奪 informasjon om biblioteket. Jeg er ganske lei av PowerPoint-presentasjoner! Klarer ikke 奪 henge med i alt, er ikke kjent med bibliotekterminologi. Stusser for eksempel over tidsskrift og database, helt enkle ord jeg ikke klarer helt 奪 plassere.
22. Og hva liker de ikke? 01.06.10 Bibsys-oppgavene kunne v脱rt mer utfordrende. Hva er dette? Trodde det skulle v脱re sok-001-forelesning her. D奪rlig pausemusikk!
23. Hva 淡nsker de? 01.06.10 F奪 pr淡ve mer selv. Flere eksempler. nsker gjerne flere anbefalinger om gode nettsider i forbindelse med skolearbeid. Litt om Fronter. (Vise framgangm奪te)
24. Hva 淡nsker de? 01.06.10 Tipse om at man kan ta noen enkle notater under foredraget Kunne 淡vd oss i fellesskap p奪 奪 skrive referanser fra de nettsted vi bes淡kte. Ikke sl奪 av musikken i pausen.
26. Erfaringer N淡dvendig 奪 v脱re med p奪 planleggingen V脱r tidlig ute! Timeplanene for h淡sten fastsettes ofte i mars.油 Biblioteket b淡r v脱re representert i arbeidsgrupper/emnestyrer etc. som planlegger tilbudet. Fagmilj淡et har stor betydning for oppm淡teprosenten p奪 kursene v奪re Informasjonsflyten mellom bibliotek - studenter - fagmilj淡 m奪 v脱re god 01.06.10
27. Utfordringer Hvordan kan vi: Forbedre samarbeidet med fagmilj淡/integrering av kursene i 淡vrig studietilbud? Forbedre oppm淡teprosenten? Forbedre informasjonsflyten fra biblioteket til studenter/fagmilj淡? Holde et h淡yt faglig og pedagogisk niv奪 p奪 undervisningen? Forbedre samkj淡ring/utveksling av informasjon, b奪de internt p奪 biblioteket og med andre bibliotek? 油 油油油 01.06.10