This study examines how children display and construct competence in classroom learning situations. The researchers observed 71 children aged 6-8 years old in their classrooms over 7 weeks, video recording 44 hours of lessons. They selected 24 case study children, analyzing video clips of moments where children expressed success or joy during tasks like group work. The researchers then interviewed these case study children using stimulated recall, asking questions about their thoughts, feelings, and actions in the video clips. Preliminary findings suggest competence can be displayed differently depending on the setting and classroom, and is constructed through a child's participation and accountability in social contexts like responding to a teacher. The researchers aim to better understand how competence is empirically studied and developed in the classroom.
1) The document outlines an orientation for new students in the Communication and Orientation Studies program, including an introduction to using photo diaries as a reflection method. Students will take one photo per week over six weeks reflecting on themes like home, culture, and studies.
2) It then discusses the concept of culture and gets students to reflect on their impressions of Finnish culture so far. Academic culture is explored, emphasizing independence, integrity, and participation.
3) Finally, the document compares the academic cultures students come from to the culture of studying in Finland and the LET program, noting a focus on independent learning and ability of students to question teachers.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an educational technology course taking place over 6 weeks. It includes details on weekly morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments due each week, collaborative working sessions in small groups during various class times, hands-on ICT workshops for two groups on different days, and the timetable of topics to be covered in the morning meeting that day, including educational technology in Germany, Spain, USA, Kyrgyzstan, Iran, and Moldova. It concludes with the instructions for the fourth portfolio assignment, which involves blogging about a student's own presentation or commenting on two other interesting presentations from the morning meeting.
This document outlines different methods that can be used to measure self-regulated learning. It discusses measuring SRL as both an aptitude and an event, and some of the challenges in measurement. Some key methods mentioned include self-report questionnaires, observations of student behavior, think-aloud protocols, learning diaries, interviews, and analyzing digital traces of student interactions in online learning environments. The document advocates for using mixed methods to address limitations of individual approaches and gain a more comprehensive understanding of students' self-regulated learning.
The document outlines the agenda for a collaborative working session. It instructs participants to first form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and share key insights. They will then return to their home teams to teach what they learned. Finally, home teams will create a presentation, such as a mind map or comic strip, about the theme of four articles and publish it to their blog. The session aims to foster discussion of readings and collaboration between expert and home teams.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an Introduction to Learning and Educational Technology course. It includes details about weekly Monday morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments due each week, collaborative working sessions in small groups on Wednesdays and Fridays, and hands-on ICT workshops for two groups on Thursdays and Tuesdays. This particular Monday's meeting will involve pairing students into teams to prepare a Pecha Kucha presentation on educational technology in their home country, with presentations scheduled over the next few weeks. Students are also assigned a blog post describing the most important things they learned from three assigned video lectures.
This document outlines an introductory course on learning and educational technology. The course objectives are to examine the role of educational technology in different learning contexts, familiarize students with theoretical foundations and concepts in the field, and learn to use and evaluate information and communications technology pedagogically. The course contents include the significance of educational technology, key concepts, research topics, expertise, and central ICT applications. Assessment is based on active participation, portfolio assignments involving reading articles and developing a digital portfolio, and technological implementation of the portfolio. The course involves lectures, workshops, collaborative activities, and developing a digital portfolio blog.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for a learning course meeting. It includes:
1) A presentation by Essi Vuopala on her Pecha Kucha style talk
2) Working in home teams to review initial mind maps on learning and create new mind maps to identify changes
3) A discussion on how participants' understanding of learning has changed during the course
It also provides information on assessment, which is based on active participation, completing portfolio assignments that require reflection on learning, and tasks from ICT workshops. Portfolio Assignment 6 involves reflecting on changes in understanding of learning and the role of collaboration.
This document provides information about an online course on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). The course will be taught over 9 weeks by professors from the Universities of Saarland, Turku, and Oulu. It will cover three topics: scripting, motivation and emotions, and metacognition in CSCL. Students will learn about the theoretical foundations of CSCL and collaborative learning, and how to design, evaluate, and assess collaborative learning environments. The course will include orientation, readings, video lectures, team discussions, and a final exam. Students will be asked to take on discussion roles like contributor, critic, and composer to strengthen argumentation and collaboration skills.
This document outlines the schedule and activities for a course on constructing a learning environment for technology-enhanced learning (TEL). It includes details on problem-based learning sessions, collaborative studying, and instructions for designing a course environment. Students will work in teams to design a course based on pedagogical and technological scripts, and present their designs on the last day of class. The course environment and overall design will be evaluated based on criteria such as clarity, functionality, and adherence to the scripts.
This document provides information about an Introduction to Learning and Educational Technology course beginning on September 7, 2015. It outlines the course content which includes basic concepts of instruction, learning and technology enhanced learning. It also describes the learning outcomes which are to describe key concepts in the field, discuss issues in educational technology, use educational software and hardware, and create a digital portfolio. The course structure is presented, including weekly meetings, assignments, collaborative work, and workshops. Assessment is based on participation, assignments, and workshop exercises.
This document provides the timetable and topics for the second part of a qualitative methodology course taking place in the fall of 2015. It includes the dates and locations for weekly lectures on writing research publications, ethical issues, validity and reliability, and reporting results. It instructs students to discuss in groups what they remember from the first part of the course, what topics interest them, and to write down 3 questions they have that they hope will be addressed. It also directs students to check the course's wiki page for latest materials and information.
This document outlines an introductory session on collaborative learning. It instructs participants to:
1) Form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and the main messages, important concepts, new insights, and unclear areas.
2) Return to their home teams to teach others about their chapter's main message and important concepts. They will create a collaborative concept map titled "how people learn".
3) Members will then each read one of several research articles on collaborative learning and be prepared to discuss with their group.
This document provides an introduction to technology enhanced learning. It discusses how the modern knowledge economy requires lifelong learning. It describes key findings from learning sciences, including the importance of deep conceptual understanding, connected knowledge, and collaborative learning. It also discusses motivational competence, self-regulated learning, and how technology can support deep learning and collaboration through representing knowledge concretely and allowing learners to build knowledge together. Examples are given of learning, collaboration, and technology use in the author's research and teaching.
The document discusses self-regulated learning from a metacognitive perspective. It begins by introducing the presenter as a post-doc researcher studying self-regulated learning and socially shared regulation of learning. It then provides an overview of the key aspects of self-regulated learning, including: (1) task understanding, (2) goal setting and planning, (3) enacting strategies like monitoring and controlling, and (4) evaluating. The document emphasizes that self-regulated learning is an active, cyclical process whereby learners personalize their efforts to optimize cognitive, motivational and behavioral processes in pursuit of learning goals.
This document provides guidance on reporting qualitative research results. It explains that qualitative research aims to interpret and make sense of phenomena in their natural settings by understanding people's meanings and perspectives. The main steps in qualitative research are outlined, including formulating research questions, collecting and interpreting data, and writing findings. When reporting results, the researcher must be consistent, clear, precise, and objective while connecting all aspects of the study. General guidelines recommend highlighting the original context, only reporting results for the research questions, using tables and graphs sparingly with explanation, and indicating which questions the results address. Practical tips include introducing each results section, grouping findings logically by category, and describing the method each set of results came from.
This document summarizes the schedule and activities for the final meeting of an educational technology course. It includes:
- A schedule for the day which involves students presenting their digital stories and wrapping up their teamwork projects.
- An outline of the activities for presenting digital stories and getting feedback from peers.
- Details on an activity where students will evaluate their team projects using "thinking hats" and distribute their team's points to individual grades.
- Instructions for a positive card activity where students write nice things about each other before concluding the course for the summer.
This document provides information about an online course on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). The course will be taught over 9 weeks by professors from the Universities of Saarland, Turku, and Oulu. It will cover three topics: scripting, motivation and emotions, and metacognition in CSCL. Students will learn about the theoretical foundations of CSCL and collaborative learning, and how to design, evaluate, and assess collaborative learning environments. The course will include orientation, readings, video lectures, team discussions, and a final exam. Students will be asked to take on discussion roles like contributor, critic, and composer to strengthen argumentation and collaboration skills.
This document outlines the schedule and activities for a course on constructing a learning environment for technology-enhanced learning (TEL). It includes details on problem-based learning sessions, collaborative studying, and instructions for designing a course environment. Students will work in teams to design a course based on pedagogical and technological scripts, and present their designs on the last day of class. The course environment and overall design will be evaluated based on criteria such as clarity, functionality, and adherence to the scripts.
This document provides information about an Introduction to Learning and Educational Technology course beginning on September 7, 2015. It outlines the course content which includes basic concepts of instruction, learning and technology enhanced learning. It also describes the learning outcomes which are to describe key concepts in the field, discuss issues in educational technology, use educational software and hardware, and create a digital portfolio. The course structure is presented, including weekly meetings, assignments, collaborative work, and workshops. Assessment is based on participation, assignments, and workshop exercises.
This document provides the timetable and topics for the second part of a qualitative methodology course taking place in the fall of 2015. It includes the dates and locations for weekly lectures on writing research publications, ethical issues, validity and reliability, and reporting results. It instructs students to discuss in groups what they remember from the first part of the course, what topics interest them, and to write down 3 questions they have that they hope will be addressed. It also directs students to check the course's wiki page for latest materials and information.
This document outlines an introductory session on collaborative learning. It instructs participants to:
1) Form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and the main messages, important concepts, new insights, and unclear areas.
2) Return to their home teams to teach others about their chapter's main message and important concepts. They will create a collaborative concept map titled "how people learn".
3) Members will then each read one of several research articles on collaborative learning and be prepared to discuss with their group.
This document provides an introduction to technology enhanced learning. It discusses how the modern knowledge economy requires lifelong learning. It describes key findings from learning sciences, including the importance of deep conceptual understanding, connected knowledge, and collaborative learning. It also discusses motivational competence, self-regulated learning, and how technology can support deep learning and collaboration through representing knowledge concretely and allowing learners to build knowledge together. Examples are given of learning, collaboration, and technology use in the author's research and teaching.
The document discusses self-regulated learning from a metacognitive perspective. It begins by introducing the presenter as a post-doc researcher studying self-regulated learning and socially shared regulation of learning. It then provides an overview of the key aspects of self-regulated learning, including: (1) task understanding, (2) goal setting and planning, (3) enacting strategies like monitoring and controlling, and (4) evaluating. The document emphasizes that self-regulated learning is an active, cyclical process whereby learners personalize their efforts to optimize cognitive, motivational and behavioral processes in pursuit of learning goals.
This document provides guidance on reporting qualitative research results. It explains that qualitative research aims to interpret and make sense of phenomena in their natural settings by understanding people's meanings and perspectives. The main steps in qualitative research are outlined, including formulating research questions, collecting and interpreting data, and writing findings. When reporting results, the researcher must be consistent, clear, precise, and objective while connecting all aspects of the study. General guidelines recommend highlighting the original context, only reporting results for the research questions, using tables and graphs sparingly with explanation, and indicating which questions the results address. Practical tips include introducing each results section, grouping findings logically by category, and describing the method each set of results came from.
This document summarizes the schedule and activities for the final meeting of an educational technology course. It includes:
- A schedule for the day which involves students presenting their digital stories and wrapping up their teamwork projects.
- An outline of the activities for presenting digital stories and getting feedback from peers.
- Details on an activity where students will evaluate their team projects using "thinking hats" and distribute their team's points to individual grades.
- Instructions for a positive card activity where students write nice things about each other before concluding the course for the summer.
Self-regulated learning involves students actively monitoring and controlling their cognition, motivation, behavior, and environment in pursuit of goals. It is influenced by personal characteristics as well as social and environmental factors. Effective self-regulated learners are aware of their own strengths and weaknesses, can employ various learning strategies, and are motivated to learn. Regulation may occur individually through self-reflection, or socially through collaboration with others. Developing strong self-regulated learning skills is important for students' well-being, academic success, and ability to adapt to changing demands.
This document outlines the course objectives, content, assessment, and timeline for a course on self-regulated learning. The course aims to help students understand key concepts and theories of self-regulated learning and how to apply them in different contexts. Students will complete individual reflection assignments and participate in collaborative group work, which involves solving cases and preparing teaching sessions. The course will be assessed based on individual and group work and participation.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an educational technology course taking place over 6 weeks. It details the weekly schedule which includes Monday morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments, collaborative working sessions in small groups, and hands-on ICT workshops. The timetable for the current Monday morning meeting is provided, covering educational technology in countries such as Palestine, Ghana, Thailand, Vietnam, Italy, and Indonesia. Students are assigned to write blog posts about their presentations and comment on others' posts as part of portfolio assignment 5.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for a collaborative working session. It instructs participants to first form expert teams based on book chapters they read, to discuss the main messages, important concepts, new information, and any unclear parts. They will then return to their home teams to teach one another what they learned. As a home team, they will create a mind map summarizing the key points. Finally, the document asks how important concepts from all articles can be connected and presented coherently, and provides reading materials for the next session.
This document outlines the agenda and activities for a collaborative working session on personal learning environments (PLEs). It instructs participants to:
1. Form expert teams to discuss chapters they read and the main messages, important concepts, new insights, and unclear areas.
2. Return to their home teams to teach one another about their chapter's main message, important concepts using a mind map.
3. As a large group, discuss the important concepts found across all articles, how they are the same or different, how concepts are connected, and how to coherently present the main points.
4. Have each member read one of four research articles on PLEs to further their individual understanding.
This document outlines the course structure and schedule for an educational technology course taking place over 6 weeks. It details the various course activities including Monday morning meetings for presentations and information sharing, individual portfolio assignments, collaborative working sessions in small groups, and hands-on ICT workshops. The timetable provides the specific dates and times for each course element. It also lists the topics that will be covered in the student Pecha Kucha presentations during that morning's meeting, and gives instructions for portfolio assignment 3 regarding blogging about the presentations.
The document outlines the schedule and topics for a communication and orientation studies course. It discusses creating a personal study plan (PSP) to guide students through their degree requirements, goals and timeline. Students will continue working on their PSPs in an upcoming computer class and must present original certificates of completed studies. The PSP process involves ongoing review and revision over three years to facilitate on-time graduation.
This document outlines an introductory course collaboration project using mind mapping, concept mapping, and the jigsaw method of learning. It discusses:
1) Students will be divided into teams to create a mind map on the concept of "Learning" and learn about the jigsaw method.
2) The jigsaw method involves students dividing into expert groups to learn about assigned readings and then returning to their original teams to share their new knowledge.
3) The document provides the course schedule and plan for collaborative working sessions, ICT workshops, and assigned readings to be divided among student teams using the jigsaw method.
This document provides an orientation for students in the Master's Degree Programme in Learning, Education and Technology (LET) at the University of Oulu. It outlines the support services available to students, including personal study advisors, student tutors, and central administration. It also describes some of the academic components of the program, such as lectures on academic communication and writing, use of databases and libraries, and developing a personal study plan. Finally, it provides some practical information for students on requirements, computer accounts, and presenting original certificates.
This document provides information about the Educational Technology minor studies program at the University of Oulu in Finland. The 25 ECTS minor involves four courses that introduce students to learning sciences, educational technology, learning theory, designing technology-enhanced learning, and completing an educational project. Students learn to identify core concepts in learning and ed tech, use technology to support learning, design tech-enhanced learning, and plan, implement and evaluate educational projects. They also learn to work efficiently in teams and reflect on their expertise in a digital portfolio. Studying involves diverse teaching methods, collaborative group work, international collaboration, and cooperation with local employers.
This document contains the schedule and introductory information for students beginning the Master's Degree Programme in Learning, Education and Technology (LET) at the University of Oulu. It includes the timetable for course sessions during the first two weeks of the autumn 2015 semester. It also assigns students to one of two workshop groups and provides contact information for the Educational Coordinator, Karoliina Hautala, to help with any questions about practicalities of the program such as semesters, course registration, attendance, and communication policies. Students are encouraged to meet their assigned partner over coffee to get to know each other and discuss where they are from and their experiences so far in the program.
This document provides instructions for preparing for an exam by formulating questions. It outlines criteria for good exam questions, including that they should be based on course material, ask for the learner's own thinking, and demand argumentation. It also provides details on the implementation of the exam, including dates and times for different groups. Evaluation criteria are outlined for the exam, science books, and participation. The final grade will be based on the exam, science book, and participation grade.
This document provides background information on expertise and expert performance. It begins by explaining why expertise is important to learn in higher education and outlines different levels of expertise, distinguishing between routine experts and adaptive experts. It then discusses definitions of expertise over time. The document covers domain-specific expertise in various fields and describes the progression from novice to expert in five levels. It also addresses stereotypes related to expertise and how experts can excel as well as occasionally fall short. Finally, the document discusses expertise in the context of work life, how experts define expertise, and expertise as an increasingly social and collaborative phenomenon.
The document discusses social interaction and group dynamics in collaborative learning. It begins by defining collaborative learning and noting that it involves joint tasks where group members work together to build shared understanding through social interaction. It then examines the educational and social psychological dimensions of collaborative learning. Some key points made include:
- Social interaction is crucial for collaborative learning and involves things like negotiations, presenting new knowledge, and joint decision making.
- Both asynchronous and synchronous interactions in online collaborative learning have benefits and disadvantages when it comes to aspects like feedback, reflection time, and control of discussions.
- Group dynamics in collaborative learning involve factors like group formation processes, roles and statuses of individuals, and challenges like social loafing. Maintaining positive group processes is
Collaborative learning refers to learning in a group where members construct a shared understanding through social interaction. Effective collaborative learning requires structuring group interactions and can be supported by technology. Research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) aims to understand how technology can promote knowledge sharing and expertise among learners through both virtual and in-person interactions. Current areas of focus include identifying productive interactions, using collaboration scripts, studying affordances, and orchestrating supportive interventions across multiple social levels.
The document discusses a 3x3x3 matrix for good instruction. It includes 3 affordances, 3 aspects, and 3 goals. The affordances are educational, technological, and social. The aspects are tools, techniques, and ingredients. The goals are effectiveness, efficiency, and enjoyability.
3. Kurssisuoritus -Aktiivinen osallistuminen kaikkiin kurssin osa-alueisiin (Ei tentti辰!) f2f x4 solo x3 collab x3 Kasvokkain ty旦skentely Luennot harjoitukset Ryhm辰ty旦skentelyn organisointi nStudy ty旦skentely yksin Lukemisto (noin 3-4 artikkelia) K辰site m辰辰ritelm辰t IDEA -muistiinpanot - Tietoisuus - & arviointi ty旦kalut nStudy ty旦skentely ryhm辰ss辰 Aktiivinen osallistuminen (Case esimerkki analyysi) Tiedon jakaminen (IDEAmuistiinpanot) ja yhteinen tuottaminen Tietoisuus - & arviointi ty旦kalut
4. OSA-ALUEET LHIPIVIIN OSALLISTUMINEN - L辰sn辰olot - Luennot -Harjoitukset 2. SOLO TYSKENTELY a) NSTUDY: SOLO TYSKENTELYN SUUNNITTELU (Ennen ty旦skentely辰 ja ty旦skentelyn j辰lkeen b) NSTUDY: 4 k辰sitteen m辰辰rittely, 8 Idea muistiinpanoa (Artikkelit/Luennot) *ITSESTISEN OPPIMISEN ARVIOINTI 油 d) OMAN RYHMTYSKENTELYN SUUNNITTELU 油
6. 3. COLLAB TYSKENTELY 油 a) NSTUDY: IDEA muistiinpanojen jakaminen (Kommentointi, keskustelu, t辰ydent辰minen, oppiminen muilta) b) NSTUDY: COLLAB TYSKENTELYN SUUNNITTELU (Ennen ty旦skentely辰 ja ty旦skentelyn j辰lkeen) Chat-keskustelu niiden teemojen pohjalta, mit辰 ryhm辰ty旦nsuunnittelu sis辰lt辰辰 - YHTEINEN YMMRRYS ) c) YHTEISEN CASEN SUUNNITTELU JA TYSTMINEN * RYHMTYSKENTELYN ARVIOINTI (Chatissa keskustelu niiden teemojen pohjalta, mit辰 ryhm辰ty旦nsuunnittelu sis辰lt辰辰, sek辰 lomakkeen t辰ytt辰minen YHTEINEN YMMRRYS 油 d) OMAN RYHMTYSKENTELYN REFLEKTOINTI OSA-ALUEET
7. KURSSI ARVIOINTI - Aktiivinen osallistuminen 50% 50% F2f SOLOTASK COLLABTASK YHTEENS L辰sn辰olo k辰sitteet/IDEA muistiinpanot Jakaminen/ty旦skentely 油 4krt (3*4) + (3*8) 3*8 100% Reflections SOLO COLLAB EMa ? ? Planning and Reflection 3 3 100% RLQ&AIRE 3 3 100% Planning and Reflection Ind. Groupwork 3 3 3 100%
8. RLQ Palaute SOLO ty旦skentelyst辰 A score > 4 indicates aspects of studying and self-regulation that you attend to in your studying. * These may be areas that require more attention or they may be areas that were just not as important for you in that particular domain or task. Where were you most active in using studying processes and strategies? Before studying 6,25 During studying 2,95* After studying and monitoring or regulating 3,11* 油 油 Before studying, what aspects where did your efforts? 油 Understanding the task 6,50 Setting goals 6,33 Planning 5,40 Activate prior knowledge 7,00 油 油 During studying, what processing strategies were most prominent in your studying episode? 油 search and select strategies 1,00* assemble or make connections 1,00* Translation strategies 4,71 re-structuring strategies (involving both assembling and translating) 2,89* 油 油 Self-regulation depends upon monitoring, evaluating, and evaluating studying during and after studying activities. What metacognitive and regulatory strategies were most prominent in your studying episode? 油 Monitoring progress and products 4,40 Evaluating my progress and my work 2,33* Reviewing work 5,50 Regulating or adapting my strategies and processes. 2,11*
9. IPPIKURSSILLA KEHITMME YMMRTV OPPIMISTA Tutkimus on peili, jonka avulla voit itse seurata omaa kehittymist辰si oppijana.
10. Opetus jota j辰rjestet辰辰n pohjautuu tutkimukseen. Opetuksen kehitt辰minen tutkimustiedon t辰smentyminen toimivat k辰yt辰nteet. ADDRESS tutkimuksessa l辰hestyt辰辰n motivaation s辰辰tely辰 adaptiivisena, yksil旦llisen辰 ja sosiaalisesti jaettuna ilmi旦n辰 eri oppimisen tilanteissa. Tavoitteena on (1) tunnistaa ja tutkia kuinka motivaation s辰辰telyn eri muodot ilmentyv辰t yksil旦llisiss辰 ja sosiaalisissa oppimistilanteissa, (2) analysoida motivaation s辰辰tely辰 sosiaalisesti jaettuna ilmi旦n辰, ja (3) tutkia kuinka motivaation s辰辰telyn eri muotoja voidaan tukea nStudy teknologian avulla. Tutkimukseen osallistuminen on vapaaehtoista
11. IPPI Solo ty旦skentelyjakso Aloita nStudy ty旦skentely aina aktivoimalla ajatuksesi KLIKKAA Klikkaa kuvasta kun olet kirjautunut nStudy oppimisymp辰rist旦旦n omilla tunnuksillasi Mit辰 ty旦vaiheita minulle tulee eteen Solo jakson aikana? (15.10-21.10)
12. Kuva toimii linkkin辰 ja ohjaa seuraamaan eri ty旦vaiheita SRL mallin mukaisesti 1. Soloteht辰v辰n kuvaus (Klikkaa) 2. Solo ty旦skentely jakson suunnittelu nStudyssa (Klikkaa) 3. nStudy ty旦skentely辰 (Klikkaa) 4. Oman ty旦skentelyn arviointia (Klikkaa) 4.1. Reflektointia nStudyssa sek辰 4.2. OMAN COLLAB ty旦skentelyn suunnittelua nStudyssa
14. Miten voin suunnitella ty旦skentely辰ni Solo jakson alussa? Aloita Solo jakso suunnittelemalla t辰m辰n jakson ty旦skentely辰. JAKSO 1. Solo ty旦skentely -> ty旦skentelyn suunnittelu, Kaksoisklikkaa objektia hiirell辰, niin se avautuu.
15. Mit辰 tarkoittaa Solo ty旦skentely nStudyssa? Voit tehd辰 merkint旦j辰 nStudy ty旦kalujen avulla esimerkiksi lukemistoon. Luentokalvoihin ei voi tehd辰 merkint旦j辰, mutta sen sijaan kalvojen alapuolella olevaa teksti辰 on mahdollista kommentoida.
16. Miten voin arvioida solo ty旦skentely辰ni Solo jakson viimeisen辰 p辰iv辰n辰? 1. 2. Klikkaa hiirell辰 kuvasta Klikkaa hiirell辰 kuvasta Ja nStudyn library n辰kym辰ss辰. Kaksoisklikkaa Solo ty旦skentelyn arviointi bookmarkkia. Sen lis辰ksi t辰yt辰 SOLO ty旦skentelyn reflektointi ja OMAN COLLAB ty旦skentelyn reflektointi
17. IPPI Collab ty旦skentelyjakso Mit辰 ty旦vaiheita minulle tulee eteen Collab jakson aikana? (22.10-3.11) Collab jakson teht辰v辰n kuvauksen, ohjeet teht辰v辰n suunnittelua ja teht辰v辰n toteuttamista varten sek辰 arviointilomakkeeseen p辰辰syn l旦yd辰t klikkaamalla COLLAB -painiketta
18. Mit辰 tarkoittaa Collab ty旦skentely nStudyssa? Omassa ty旦tilassa OMAN COLLAB ty旦skentelyn suunnittelu IDEA muistiinpanojen ja k辰sitteiden jakaminen ryhm辰n yhteiseen ty旦tilaan chat RYHMN yhteisen COLLAB suunnitelman t辰ytt辰minen chat Case-kuvaus ja Analyysi chat 5) RYHMN yhteisen COLLAB reflektion t辰ytt辰minen 6) Omassa ty旦tilassa OMAN COLLAB ty旦skentelyn reflektio 7. RYHMTYSKENTELYN ARVIOINTI
19. Miten k辰yt辰n chattia Collab ty旦skentelyjakson aikana? Klikkaa itsesi ensin Library n辰kym辰辰n Jotta chattaaminen olisi mahdollista klikkaa chat -painiketta nStudy oppimisymp辰rist旦n yl辰palkista.
20. Miten k辰yt辰n chattia Collab ty旦skentelyjakson aikana? Tarkista chat ikkunan alareunasta, ett辰 tilanasi on online. N辰in muut ryhm辰nj辰senet n辰kev辰t sinun olevan kirjautuneena chattiin ja voivat kutsua sinut keskustelemaan kanssaan. Voit lis辰t辰 kavereita chattiin add buddies -painikkeen avulla. Klikkaa add buddy painiketta ja kirjoita kaverisi k辰ytt辰j辰tunnus tekstikentt辰辰n ja paina ok.
21. Keskusteleminen chatissa Voit kutsua online -tilassa olevan kaverin keskusteluun klikkaamalla h辰nen nime辰辰n, jolloin keskusteluruutu avautuu automaattisesti. Muistakaa nimet辰 keskustelunne! Online tilassa olevan kaverin tunnistat tummennetusta puhekuplasta. Ryhm辰keskustelun voi toteuttaa multiuser painikkeen kautta. Klikkaa multiuser painiketta ja valitse keskusteluun mukaan haluamasi j辰senet
22. ESIMERKKI CASE Lyhyt Case kuvaus Vanhempi aikuisopiskelija rouva aloittaa pitk辰n ty旦uran j辰lkeen uuden tutkintoon t辰ht辰辰v辰n opiskelun. Opiskelut alkavat hyvin, mutta sitten alkaa verkkokurssi ja motivaatio loppuu siihen teknisen taitamattomuuden vuoksi. Opiskelu on p辰辰asiassa l辰hiopetusta eik辰 opintojen alussa ollut tietoa siit辰, ett辰 joku jakso suoritettaisiin verkkokurssina. Jos rouva olisi tiennyt t辰m辰n, ei h辰n olisi l辰htenyt opintoihin mukaan ollenkaan. Rouva ei kehtaa tunnustaa osaamattomuuttaan. H辰n ei kysy neuvoa tai ohjeita vaan antaa ymm辰rt辰辰, ett辰 h辰n tiet辰辰 mit辰 pit辰辰 tehd辰. H辰n ei ole koskaan ollut mukana verkkokursseilla eik辰 internetin k辰ytt旦k辰辰n ole h辰nelle tuttua. Kotona on kyll辰 tietokone mutta sit辰 k辰ytt辰v辰t lapset ja mies. mies hoitaa laskut ja muut perheen raha-asiat verkkopankissa. rouvalla ei ole sinne omia tunnuksia. S辰hk旦postia h辰n haluaisi opetella k辰ytt辰m辰辰n mutta h辰n ei usko, ett辰 oppisi. Verkkokurssin j辰lkeen tuutor opettaja kysyy rouvalta, ett辰 miksi h辰n ei ole kirjautunut oppimisymp辰rist旦旦n kertaakaan. Rouva tunnustaa, ett辰 h辰n ei osaa k辰ytt辰辰 tietokonetta.
23. ESIMERKKI ANALYYSI Johdanto Lambert & Balderstonen (2003) mukaan油 opetus-opiskelu- ja oppimisj辰rjestelyt vaikuttavat siihen, miten oppijat kiinnostuvat ja menestyv辰t opinnoissaan. Case kuvauksen tilanteessa oppija koki, ett辰 j辰rjestelyt eiv辰t mahdollistaneet . Motivaatio ja emootiot Motivaatioon vaikuttaa mm. oppijan k辰sitys itsest辰辰n oppijana sek辰 itse oppimistilanne. Tavoitesuuntautunut tyy旦skentely ei ole aina helppoa, vaan siihen liittyy my旦s vaikeita ja turhautumista aiheuttavia tilanteita. Oppija joutuu siet辰m辰辰n erilaisia tunteita sek辰 kontrolloimaan mm. pettymyksi辰. Taitava oppija on itses辰辰t旦inen ja pyrkii s辰辰telem辰辰n kognitiivisia.. SIDO NAPAKASTI OPISKELEMIISI SISLTIHIN 2. SIDO LYHYESTI ESIMERKKI CASEEN
Editor's Notes
#4: Tarkemmin ensimm辰inen vaihe -Jokaisessa jaksossa on luettavia artikkeleja!!!!