1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on truth and how to distinguish truth from opinion. It explains that in phenomenology, truth is based on personal consciousness, while in existentialism it depends on choices and freedom. Postmodernism rejects absolute truth, and logic sees truth as relying on reasoning. The document also provides methods for determining truth, such as through verification using the senses, and discusses how understanding the difference between truths and opinions can lead to wisdom.
Philosophy aims to distinguish truth from opinion. The document discusses various philosophical perspectives on truth and how truth is determined. It also examines the differences between facts, claims, and opinions. Philosophy can guide us in determining what is true by analyzing arguments and identifying logical fallacies and biases. Understanding the distinction between truth and opinion from a philosophical standpoint can help us make wiser decisions.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
This document discusses the nature and formation of beliefs. It defines belief as an assumed truth that people hold mentally and accept as real. Beliefs can form from one's own experiences and reflections or by accepting what others say. Self-generated beliefs come from experiences, experiments, and reflections, while externally-generated beliefs involve trusting experts or generalizing from limited experiences. The document also notes that belief involves both logical thoughts and emotional feelings of truth, and explores how beliefs shape human interactions and the acceptance of ideas.
This document provides an introduction to philosophy and the philosophical concept of determining truth. It begins by outlining the learning objectives and discussing how philosophy aims to acquire real knowledge and truth. It then examines various methods of philosophizing including distinguishing opinion from truth. The document explores several theories for determining truth such as correspondence theory, coherence theory, and pragmatic theory. It also discusses fallacies that can undermine arguments. Overall, the document serves as an introductory overview of philosophical perspectives on knowledge and determining what is considered true.
This document provides an introduction to the Theory of Knowledge course. It discusses key concepts in epistemology such as definitions of knowledge, theories of knowledge like the tripartite theory, sources of knowledge like empiricism and rationalism, and skepticism about knowledge. It also distinguishes between personal, procedural, and propositional knowledge and outlines the goals of the TOK course in developing critical thinking skills and understanding diverse perspectives on knowledge.
This document discusses the concept of truth and how philosophers grapple with its definition. It states that truth lies at the heart of any inquiry and knowledge must be truthful to be valid. It explores how philosophers view truth as a quality or value. It clarifies that knowledge is comprised of clear understandings and beliefs that are known to be true, and must be based on observable reality to qualify as facts. Philosophers emphasize the importance of belief but debate what kind of belief can be considered truthful.
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
This document discusses various sources of knowledge, including both scientific and unscientific sources. It outlines several ways that knowledge can be acquired, such as through authority, intuition, empiricism, rationalism, tradition, and trial and error. Scientific sources of knowledge are highlighted as being empirical, verifiable, objective, and reliable. Divine books like the Quran are also presented as a source of knowledge. The document provides definitions of key concepts like knowledge and different philosophers' perspectives on knowledge. It characterizes different means of acquiring knowledge and their advantages and disadvantages.
The document discusses the topic of doing philosophy. It provides instructions for classroom activities where students will be split into groups and discuss philosophical questions. It also summarizes some of the key questions and methods used in philosophy, such as questions about reality, certainty, ethics, and the tools philosophers use like systematic doubt, argumentation, and thought experiments.
Radius Images/Photolibrary1
Introducing Philosophy
Philosophy has a rich and fascinating history.
Philosophers explore questions ranging from logic and
mathematics to morality and art.
Philosophy helps us to better understand our beliefs and
those of others and to examine, defend, and criticize
those beliefs.
What We Will Discover
mos66103_01_ch01_001-030.indd 1 12/1/10 7:22 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.1 What Is Philosophy?
Philosophy is an unusual discipline, not just because it has an enormously long history, but
because it spends a good bit of time investigating what philosophy itself is. In this chap-
ter, we look at what philosophy is, how philosophers approach their subject, and what the
benefits of philosophical inquiry are. We will also include a brief overview of the rich and
fascinating history of the development of philosophy in the West.
1.1 What Is Philosophy?
Here we will explore what philosophy is, including some of its history. We will focus on Western philosophy, and the most important philosophers of that tradi-tion, but it is good to keep in mind that there are other important traditions in the
history of philosophy. One of the most important things philosophers do is ask questions,
and we will identify some of the questions that have engaged philosophers for thousands
of years.
What Do Philosophers Do?
Plato tells us that philosophy begins in wonder. Human beings wonder about themselves,
about other people, about where they came from, about where they are going, and about
what they should do while they are here. Human beings are naturally curious, and each
question one asks leads to another, then another, and then another. One way of think-
ing about philosophy, then, is that it is the sys-
tematic attempt to answer the general questions
human beings have always asked, and the debate
that naturally follows each proposed answer.
Philosophy combines curiositywonder about
the world and all that is in it, and even beyond
itand criticismobjections to answers, sugges-
tions of new answers, and new objections to those
new answers. As should be clear, philosophical
inquiry has one other important feature: It never
ends. We do, on occasion, seem to discover solu-
tions to specific philosophical questions. But the
pursuit of philosophy will continue as long as
there are things we dont understand, and as long
as we remain curious.
The word philosophy comes from two Greek
words. We see one of them, philein, or to love,
in the name of Philadelphia, city of brotherly
love, and in the word philanthropy, love for
human beings. We are familiar with the other
word, sophos, from such words as sophisticated
and sophomore: It means wisdom. Thus, philos-
ophy is, literally, the love of wisdom and refers
to the unending search for answers to questions.
To be successful, then, in philosophy, one must
Hilary Helton/81a/Photolibrary
As humans, we are naturally curi-
oussomething often q ...
The document discusses the differences between opinions and truths. It states that opinions are subjective judgments without evidence, while truths can be verified with facts and data. The document provides examples of objective, social, and personal domains of truth and examines how to distinguish opinions from truths based on whether statements can be verified or are just assumptions.
Social Justice as a Form of Discourse Impacting Identity for Action.docxwhitneyleman54422
油
Social Justice as a Form of Discourse Impacting Identity for Action
By Philip S. Mirci, Ph.D. (2015)Introduction
Richard Paul (1992) wrote:
Because we do not come to our experience with a blank slate for a mind, because our thinking is already, at any given moment, moving in a direction, because we can form new ideas, beliefs, and patterns of thought only through the scaffolding of our previously formed thought, it is essential that we learn to think critically in environments in which a variety of competing ideas are taken seriously. Knowledge is discovered by thinking, analyzed by thinking, organized by thinking, transformed by thinking There is no way to take the thinking out of knowledge, or the struggle out of thinking, just as there is no way to create a neat and tidy step-by-step path to knowledge that all minds can mindlessly follow But thinking requires counter-thinking, opposition and challenge, as well as support. We need reasons meaningful to us, some persuasive logic, to move our minds from one set of ideas or beliefs to another. In other words, we must argue ourselves out of our present thinking and into thinking that is more or less novel to us if we are to gain genuine knowledge [Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking, p. xi].
The search for truth and knowledge is one of the finest attributes of man though often it is most loudly voiced by those who strive for it the least.
The world we have made as a result of the level of thinking we have done thus far creates problems that cannot be solved at the same level of thinking at which we created them.
Constructivism, as a learning theory, was consistent with neuroscience research: the brain makes sense of experience by accessing its own existing knowledge base in order to interpret that experience. Furthermore, ones identity is connected to this sense-making process. Thus, ones own knowledge about self, others, and the world is limited. Intellectual humility is the discipline of bringing this awareness to different methods of knowing. Stephen Freeman (2000) summarized three different methods of knowing that were first stated by Charles Peirce in 1940:
The first method of knowing, the method of tenacity, states that people hold firm to truths they know are true. In establishing these truths there may be a tendency to omit evidence that does not support our beliefs and to find and include that, which does. This represents the well-known problem of objectivity. Frequent repetition or re-indoctrination of these assumptions or truths enhances their validity. This, simply stated, means one finds what one looks for
The second method of knowing is the method of authority or established belief. This method has the weight of tradition and public sanction behind it. Many of the things we think we know have been handed down by tradition. People have also .
This document discusses the nature and formation of beliefs. It defines belief as an assumed truth that people hold mentally and accept as real. Beliefs can form from one's own experiences and reflections or by accepting what others say. Self-generated beliefs come from experiences, experiments, and reflections, while externally-generated beliefs involve trusting experts or generalizing from limited experiences. The document also notes that belief involves both logical thoughts and emotional feelings of truth, and explores how beliefs shape human interactions and the acceptance of ideas.
This document provides an introduction to philosophy and the philosophical concept of determining truth. It begins by outlining the learning objectives and discussing how philosophy aims to acquire real knowledge and truth. It then examines various methods of philosophizing including distinguishing opinion from truth. The document explores several theories for determining truth such as correspondence theory, coherence theory, and pragmatic theory. It also discusses fallacies that can undermine arguments. Overall, the document serves as an introductory overview of philosophical perspectives on knowledge and determining what is considered true.
This document provides an introduction to the Theory of Knowledge course. It discusses key concepts in epistemology such as definitions of knowledge, theories of knowledge like the tripartite theory, sources of knowledge like empiricism and rationalism, and skepticism about knowledge. It also distinguishes between personal, procedural, and propositional knowledge and outlines the goals of the TOK course in developing critical thinking skills and understanding diverse perspectives on knowledge.
This document discusses the concept of truth and how philosophers grapple with its definition. It states that truth lies at the heart of any inquiry and knowledge must be truthful to be valid. It explores how philosophers view truth as a quality or value. It clarifies that knowledge is comprised of clear understandings and beliefs that are known to be true, and must be based on observable reality to qualify as facts. Philosophers emphasize the importance of belief but debate what kind of belief can be considered truthful.
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
This document discusses various sources of knowledge, including both scientific and unscientific sources. It outlines several ways that knowledge can be acquired, such as through authority, intuition, empiricism, rationalism, tradition, and trial and error. Scientific sources of knowledge are highlighted as being empirical, verifiable, objective, and reliable. Divine books like the Quran are also presented as a source of knowledge. The document provides definitions of key concepts like knowledge and different philosophers' perspectives on knowledge. It characterizes different means of acquiring knowledge and their advantages and disadvantages.
The document discusses the topic of doing philosophy. It provides instructions for classroom activities where students will be split into groups and discuss philosophical questions. It also summarizes some of the key questions and methods used in philosophy, such as questions about reality, certainty, ethics, and the tools philosophers use like systematic doubt, argumentation, and thought experiments.
Radius Images/Photolibrary1
Introducing Philosophy
Philosophy has a rich and fascinating history.
Philosophers explore questions ranging from logic and
mathematics to morality and art.
Philosophy helps us to better understand our beliefs and
those of others and to examine, defend, and criticize
those beliefs.
What We Will Discover
mos66103_01_ch01_001-030.indd 1 12/1/10 7:22 PM
CHAPTER 1Section 1.1 What Is Philosophy?
Philosophy is an unusual discipline, not just because it has an enormously long history, but
because it spends a good bit of time investigating what philosophy itself is. In this chap-
ter, we look at what philosophy is, how philosophers approach their subject, and what the
benefits of philosophical inquiry are. We will also include a brief overview of the rich and
fascinating history of the development of philosophy in the West.
1.1 What Is Philosophy?
Here we will explore what philosophy is, including some of its history. We will focus on Western philosophy, and the most important philosophers of that tradi-tion, but it is good to keep in mind that there are other important traditions in the
history of philosophy. One of the most important things philosophers do is ask questions,
and we will identify some of the questions that have engaged philosophers for thousands
of years.
What Do Philosophers Do?
Plato tells us that philosophy begins in wonder. Human beings wonder about themselves,
about other people, about where they came from, about where they are going, and about
what they should do while they are here. Human beings are naturally curious, and each
question one asks leads to another, then another, and then another. One way of think-
ing about philosophy, then, is that it is the sys-
tematic attempt to answer the general questions
human beings have always asked, and the debate
that naturally follows each proposed answer.
Philosophy combines curiositywonder about
the world and all that is in it, and even beyond
itand criticismobjections to answers, sugges-
tions of new answers, and new objections to those
new answers. As should be clear, philosophical
inquiry has one other important feature: It never
ends. We do, on occasion, seem to discover solu-
tions to specific philosophical questions. But the
pursuit of philosophy will continue as long as
there are things we dont understand, and as long
as we remain curious.
The word philosophy comes from two Greek
words. We see one of them, philein, or to love,
in the name of Philadelphia, city of brotherly
love, and in the word philanthropy, love for
human beings. We are familiar with the other
word, sophos, from such words as sophisticated
and sophomore: It means wisdom. Thus, philos-
ophy is, literally, the love of wisdom and refers
to the unending search for answers to questions.
To be successful, then, in philosophy, one must
Hilary Helton/81a/Photolibrary
As humans, we are naturally curi-
oussomething often q ...
The document discusses the differences between opinions and truths. It states that opinions are subjective judgments without evidence, while truths can be verified with facts and data. The document provides examples of objective, social, and personal domains of truth and examines how to distinguish opinions from truths based on whether statements can be verified or are just assumptions.
Social Justice as a Form of Discourse Impacting Identity for Action.docxwhitneyleman54422
油
Social Justice as a Form of Discourse Impacting Identity for Action
By Philip S. Mirci, Ph.D. (2015)Introduction
Richard Paul (1992) wrote:
Because we do not come to our experience with a blank slate for a mind, because our thinking is already, at any given moment, moving in a direction, because we can form new ideas, beliefs, and patterns of thought only through the scaffolding of our previously formed thought, it is essential that we learn to think critically in environments in which a variety of competing ideas are taken seriously. Knowledge is discovered by thinking, analyzed by thinking, organized by thinking, transformed by thinking There is no way to take the thinking out of knowledge, or the struggle out of thinking, just as there is no way to create a neat and tidy step-by-step path to knowledge that all minds can mindlessly follow But thinking requires counter-thinking, opposition and challenge, as well as support. We need reasons meaningful to us, some persuasive logic, to move our minds from one set of ideas or beliefs to another. In other words, we must argue ourselves out of our present thinking and into thinking that is more or less novel to us if we are to gain genuine knowledge [Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking, p. xi].
The search for truth and knowledge is one of the finest attributes of man though often it is most loudly voiced by those who strive for it the least.
The world we have made as a result of the level of thinking we have done thus far creates problems that cannot be solved at the same level of thinking at which we created them.
Constructivism, as a learning theory, was consistent with neuroscience research: the brain makes sense of experience by accessing its own existing knowledge base in order to interpret that experience. Furthermore, ones identity is connected to this sense-making process. Thus, ones own knowledge about self, others, and the world is limited. Intellectual humility is the discipline of bringing this awareness to different methods of knowing. Stephen Freeman (2000) summarized three different methods of knowing that were first stated by Charles Peirce in 1940:
The first method of knowing, the method of tenacity, states that people hold firm to truths they know are true. In establishing these truths there may be a tendency to omit evidence that does not support our beliefs and to find and include that, which does. This represents the well-known problem of objectivity. Frequent repetition or re-indoctrination of these assumptions or truths enhances their validity. This, simply stated, means one finds what one looks for
The second method of knowing is the method of authority or established belief. This method has the weight of tradition and public sanction behind it. Many of the things we think we know have been handed down by tradition. People have also .
Literary Adaptations with ICT skills empowerment.pptxNioAbaoCasyao
油
The document discusses using information and communication technology (ICT) skills to create literary adaptations through multimedia presentations. It defines ICT as referring to all technologies used for telecommunications, media, building systems, audiovisual processing, and network-based control. ICT skills include proficiency with software like word processing, spreadsheets, databases, and presentations. The document provides examples of ICT skills like using Microsoft Office programs, copying/pasting content, citing sources, and managing files and browsing. It identifies the main components of ICT as the combined technologies that allow digital interaction.
Writing Informative Texts Education Presentation in Blue and Orange Grid Line...NioAbaoCasyao
油
This document discusses strategies for effective writing. It begins by explaining how strong writing skills are important for success and outlines key areas like selecting ideas, developing topics, and using precise language. It then delves into various aspects of successful writing like planning, understanding the audience, sentence structure, and revision. The document emphasizes developing a "writer's eye" through techniques like shifting perspectives, focusing on conciseness, and sharpening descriptions. It concludes by recommending resources for improving editing abilities and notes that the editing process is iterative.
21st century literature from the Philippines and the world literary multimedi...NioAbaoCasyao
油
This document discusses the use of multimedia to creatively adapt literary works. It defines multimedia as the combination of different media like text, graphics, audio, video and animation to engage and educate learners. Examples of multimedia include audiobooks, music videos, podcasts, lectures and digital stories. The document advocates that multimedia adaptations of literature make learning more interesting and help students better understand lessons by presenting ideas in an artistic way. It maintains that digital storytelling and self-directed learning using multimedia can improve students' skills and overall academic performance.
This document discusses different models of communication and the importance of feedback. It describes three models: the linear model which is one-way without feedback, the interactive model which is two-way but with slow indirect feedback, and the transactional model which features immediate two-way feedback. The document emphasizes that feedback is essential for effective communication to check understanding and modify the message as needed. It also discusses how active listening builds strong relationships by understanding others' perspectives and providing clear, specific feedback to support improvement.
The document discusses formulating assertions about texts read. An assertion is a statement expressing strong belief without evidence. Assertions can be made after reading stories, poems, or watching plays. They are meant to convey the writer's ideas/feelings and convince readers. Before writing an assertion, the author must read the work comprehensively. Different types of assertions include basic, emphatic using I-language. Strong assertions include facts/evidence supporting the statement.
1. The document discusses key concepts of democracy including government intervention, democratic participation, and the six fundamental elements of modern democracy such as rule of law, separation of powers, and basic rights and freedoms.
2. It also outlines the four dimensions of democracy: the people, equality, common good, and representation. For each dimension, it provides details on what they entail such as the people referring to citizens of a democratic nation regarded as equals.
3. The types of democracy discussed are direct democracy, practiced in parts of Switzerland, and indirect representative democracy where citizens elect representatives to act on their behalf in government.
Context refers to the social, cultural, political, and historical background that surrounds a text. It includes factors like the author, time period, circumstances of creation, and issues addressed. Intertext is how a text references or alludes to other texts to add meaning, showing connections among works through language, themes, or topics. Hypertext provides links to additional non-linear information beyond the core text, such as related topics, graphics, or media, allowing readers easy access to more details about the subject matter.
This document discusses various forms and documents used for application processes:
A personal data sheet collects important information for employers. A health declaration form declares a person's health status. A barangay clearance is required by municipalities and obtained from the applicant's local barangay hall to verify residence. An application letter, also called a cover letter, expresses the applicant's interest in an open position and relevant qualifications. A resume highlights a person's background, skills, and accomplishments to secure new employment. A reflection paper allows personal analysis of thoughts and reactions to a specific experience. A parent's consent form gives approval for a minor to participate in an activity.
How to Modify Existing Web Pages in Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to modify existing web pages in Odoo 18. Web pages in Odoo 18 can also gather user data through user-friendly forms, encourage interaction through engaging features.
The Constitution, Government and Law making bodies .saanidhyapatel09
油
This PowerPoint presentation provides an insightful overview of the Constitution, covering its key principles, features, and significance. It explains the fundamental rights, duties, structure of government, and the importance of constitutional law in governance. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the foundation of a nations legal framework.
Research & Research Methods: Basic Concepts and Types.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt has been made for the students pursuing PG in social science and humanities like M.Ed., M.A. (Education), Ph.D. Scholars. It will be also beneficial for the teachers and other faculty members interested in research and teaching research concepts.
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
-Autonomy, Teams and Tension: Projects under stress
-Tim Lyons
-The neurological levels of
team-working: Harmony and tensions
With a background in projects spanning more than 40 years, Tim Lyons specialised in the delivery of large, complex, multi-disciplinary programmes for clients including Crossrail, Network Rail, ExxonMobil, Siemens and in patent development. His first career was in broadcasting, where he designed and built commercial radio station studios in Manchester, Cardiff and Bristol, also working as a presenter and programme producer. Tim now writes and presents extensively on matters relating to the human and neurological aspects of projects, including communication, ethics and coaching. He holds a Masters degree in NLP, is an NLP Master Practitioner and International Coach. He is the Deputy Lead for APMs People Interest Network.
Session | The Neurological Levels of Team-working: Harmony and Tensions
Understanding how teams really work at conscious and unconscious levels is critical to a harmonious workplace. This session uncovers what those levels are, how to use them to detect and avoid tensions and how to smooth the management of change by checking you have considered all of them.
Prelims of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Information Technology for class X CBSE skill SubjectVEENAKSHI PATHAK
油
These questions are based on cbse booklet for 10th class information technology subject code 402. these questions are sufficient for exam for first lesion. This subject give benefit to students and good marks. if any student weak in one main subject it can replace with these marks.
Finals of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Finals of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
2. Truth and Knowledge
Truth lies at the heart of any inquiry.
It is a fact that has been verified.
Knowledge is simple data that
comes from the outside that pass to
our senses. It must be truthful to gain
validity and acceptance.
3. Propositions
Philosophers consider truth as a kind of
quality or value.
Propositions are statements about the
world or reality which may or may not
carry truth.
is a central concept in the philosophy of
language, semantics, logic, and related fields,
often characterized as the primary bearer
of truth or falsity. Propositions are also
often characterized as being the kind of
thing that declarative sentences denote.
4. What is truth and why is it important?
Knowledge is the clear awareness and
understanding of something. It is the
product of questions that allow for clear
answers provided by facts.
What we know is what is observable or
evident in the real world.
Propositions which are observed to be real
or truthful are considered FACTS.
5. There are statements, however, that are not
evidently or immediately known to be true
and they are called CLAIMS.They require
further examination to establish whether it
is true or false.
6. How do we know if something is true?
Philosophers emphasize the importance of
belief as a basis for determining truth.
We assume that everything we know about
this world is true but philosophers who
pondered upon the origins of knowledge
doubted everything that there is to know
about themselves and the world. In doing so,
they were able to better understand the
means by which humans gain knowledge and
determine the truth about everything.
7. It is said that there are instances when we have to
unlearn something so that we may learn anew.
Philosophers questioned what they knew and even
analyzed their methods of knowing in order to
understand themselves and the world much better.
Doubt has a very important purpose in
philosophy as it drives our desire to discover truth.
Nothing is taken as true unless there is sufficient
reason and evidence to prove that it is indeed true.
I am alive. Am I alive? I am alive.
I have a body.
Do I have a
body?
I have a body.
I can breathe. Can I breathe? I can breathe.
8. 1. It can be justified or proven through
the use of ones senses.
2. It is based on facts.
3. It is a product of agreement or
consensus.
4. It can be applied in real life (tested and
verified)
Something is true if
9. 1. It takes me 30 minutes to walk from my home to
school.
2. Living near the school is better because we dont
have to spend much for transportation.
3. My sister ate the last piece of pizza.
4. My sister is a selfish person because she ate the
last piece and didnt share it with me.
5. The police firmly pushed the suspect to his kneed
and placed him in handcuffs.
6. The aggressive manner by which the police
arrested the suspect is an example of brutality that
characterizes our police force.
Let us Analyze
10. Opinions are comprised of statements
which not only give facts but also provide
conclusions or perspectives regarding
certain situations.They may advance a belief
about certain things or provide
explanations.
Opinions are also the bases for making
arguments and convincing people that a
certain claim is a fact.They are often
influenced by bias.
How can philosophy guide us in
distinguishing truth from opinion?
11. Beliefs are statements that express
convictions that are not easily and
clearly explained by facts.To judge the
truthfulness of a belief, we must also
consider things such as the persons
experiences and views.
Explanations are statements that
assume the claim to be true and
provide reasons why the statement is
true.
12. Arguments are a series of statements that
provide reasons to convince the reader or
listener that a claim or opinion is truthful.
They often take the form of statements that
are either claims of facts and are phrased in
such a way that they seem reasonable.
Fallacies are arguments based on faulty
reasoning. Some of them are intentional, as
the person making the claim is desperate to
convince you to accept his or her
argument.
13. FALLACY
Ad hominem
Ad baculum
(appeal to force)
Ad misericordiam (appeal to pity)
Ad populum
(appeal to majority or bandwagon)
Ad antiquitatem (appeal to tradition)
Ad verecundiam
14. FALLACY
Dicto Simpliciter
Fallacy of Composition
Fallacy of Division
Hasty Generalization
Petitio Principii
(begging the question)
Post Hoc
(false cause)
16. Argumentum ad baculum
Argumentum ad
baculum is the fallacy
committed when one
makes an appeal to
force to bring about the
acceptance of a
conclusion.
17. Argumentum ad Misericordiam
(argument from pity or
misery): the fallacy
committed when pity
or a related emotion
such as sympathy,
mercy, or compassion
is illicitly appealed to
for the sake of getting
a conclusion accepted.
18. Ad populum
is a fallacy based on the
assumption that the
opinion of the majority is
always valid: that is,
everyone believes it, so
you should too. It is also
called an appeal to
popularity, the authority
of the many, and
argumentum ad populum.
29. Biases are the personal views of the person
presenting it.They are not necessarily errors
in reasoning, but refer to tendencies or
influences which affect the views of people.
BIAS CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Correspondence bias
(Fundamental
attribution error)
Tendency to judge a persons
personality by his/her actions
without regard for external
factors or situations
The soldiers who fought in the
war are all bloodthirsty
murderers.
Confirmation bias the tendency to look for and
accept information in a way
that confirms one's own
beliefs and reject ideas that
go against it
How can I accept his view that
there is no God? I am a
Christian!
30. BIAS CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Conflict of interest A person or group is
connected to or has a vested
interest in the issue
As the daughter of the accused, I
believe that I have the right to
express my opinion on the issue
of his alleged corrupt practices.
Cultural bias Analyzing an event or issue
based on ones cultural
standards
I do not agree with this Western
practice of placing the elderly in
retirement homes.We Filipinos
take care of our family members.
Framing Focusing on a certain aspect
of a problem while ignoring
other aspects
Preliminary evidence has still not
pointed out the actual cause of
the plane crash, but investigators
are currently focusing on the
possibility of pilot error.
Hindsight
(knew-it-all-along
phenomenon)
Is when, after an event
occurs, we feel we already
knew what was going to
happen
When you put a glass on the edge
of a table and you start cleaning
and bumped the glass and it fell to
the ground and shattered into
pieces.You exclaim, I knew it
was gonna break!