This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical analysis. It discusses key concepts like knowledge, facts, opinions, arguments, logic, and fallacies. The document encourages applying systematic doubt to statements to analyze them, using examples like claims about one's identity or abilities. Readers are advised to consider whether a statement is factual, an opinion, belief, argument, or explanation in order to distinguish truth from falsehood. Philosophical tools like logic and identifying logical fallacies can guide determining the truthfulness of different types of statements.
This document presents a lesson on methods of philosophizing and determining what is true. It discusses how philosophers use systematic doubt to scrutinize statements and beliefs in order to determine what can be proven as true. Several examples are provided of applying this method to evaluate statements about oneself and one's identity. Students are guided through examining their senses and using facts to justify beliefs. The goal is to understand the nature of knowledge and how philosophy can help arrive at reasonable assessments of what is truthful.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on truth and how to distinguish truth from opinion. It explains that in phenomenology, truth is based on personal consciousness, while in existentialism it depends on choices and freedom. Postmodernism rejects absolute truth, and logic sees truth as relying on reasoning. The document also provides methods for determining truth, such as through verification using the senses, and discusses how understanding the difference between truths and opinions can lead to wisdom.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
The document discusses the differences between opinions and truths. It states that opinions are subjective judgments without evidence, while truths can be verified with facts and data. The document provides examples of objective, social, and personal domains of truth and examines how to distinguish opinions from truths based on whether statements can be verified or are just assumptions.
This document provides an introduction to philosophy and the philosophical concept of determining truth. It begins by outlining the learning objectives and discussing how philosophy aims to acquire real knowledge and truth. It then examines various methods of philosophizing including distinguishing opinion from truth. The document explores several theories for determining truth such as correspondence theory, coherence theory, and pragmatic theory. It also discusses fallacies that can undermine arguments. Overall, the document serves as an introductory overview of philosophical perspectives on knowledge and determining what is considered true.
The document discusses various philosophical concepts related to determining truth, including knowledge, facts, claims, arguments, and biases. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and examines statements to distinguish those that are factual from those that are opinions. The document also discusses logical fallacies and biases that can influence arguments. It emphasizes that understanding the difference between facts and opinions is important for gaining wisdom and forming well-reasoned views. Analyzing different perspectives on issues while being aware of one's own biases can help achieve more objective evaluations.
This document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and determining truth. It discusses the importance of truth and differentiating between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions and arguments. Systematic doubt is presented as a philosophical method for establishing truth by scrutinizing and analyzing statements. Examples are provided to illustrate applying systematic doubt to determine whether a statement is factual or an opinion. Fallacies in reasoning that can undermine arguments are also defined and exemplified. The document aims to teach philosophical thinking and analysis to discern truth from falsehood.
The document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and distinguishing truth from opinion. It discusses how philosophers examine knowledge and its basis in reality or facts. Opinions are judgments or perspectives that may be influenced by bias, while arguments try to convince others of a claim using reasoning that could include fallacies. When analyzing statements, philosophy teaches us to apply systematic doubt and consider various biases that could affect perspectives. Understanding the difference between facts and opinions can guide us to wisdom in forming our own views.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical inquiry. It discusses how ancient Greek philosophers approached truth by examining the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know. It emphasizes employing systematic doubt to scrutinize all statements and determine truth, rather than taking anything as true without sufficient evidence. The document also differentiates between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions, arguments, beliefs, conclusions, explanations, and fallacies. It stresses that arguments may be based on faulty reasoning and fallacies, misleading the reader, so it is important to consider the characteristics and types of fallacies.
Mate, a short story by Kate Grenvile.pptxLiny Jenifer
油
A powerpoint presentation on the short story Mate by Kate Greenville. This presentation provides information on Kate Greenville, a character list, plot summary and critical analysis of the short story.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on truth and how to distinguish truth from opinion. It explains that in phenomenology, truth is based on personal consciousness, while in existentialism it depends on choices and freedom. Postmodernism rejects absolute truth, and logic sees truth as relying on reasoning. The document also provides methods for determining truth, such as through verification using the senses, and discusses how understanding the difference between truths and opinions can lead to wisdom.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
The document discusses the differences between opinions and truths. It states that opinions are subjective judgments without evidence, while truths can be verified with facts and data. The document provides examples of objective, social, and personal domains of truth and examines how to distinguish opinions from truths based on whether statements can be verified or are just assumptions.
This document provides an introduction to philosophy and the philosophical concept of determining truth. It begins by outlining the learning objectives and discussing how philosophy aims to acquire real knowledge and truth. It then examines various methods of philosophizing including distinguishing opinion from truth. The document explores several theories for determining truth such as correspondence theory, coherence theory, and pragmatic theory. It also discusses fallacies that can undermine arguments. Overall, the document serves as an introductory overview of philosophical perspectives on knowledge and determining what is considered true.
The document discusses various philosophical concepts related to determining truth, including knowledge, facts, claims, arguments, and biases. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and examines statements to distinguish those that are factual from those that are opinions. The document also discusses logical fallacies and biases that can influence arguments. It emphasizes that understanding the difference between facts and opinions is important for gaining wisdom and forming well-reasoned views. Analyzing different perspectives on issues while being aware of one's own biases can help achieve more objective evaluations.
This document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and determining truth. It discusses the importance of truth and differentiating between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions and arguments. Systematic doubt is presented as a philosophical method for establishing truth by scrutinizing and analyzing statements. Examples are provided to illustrate applying systematic doubt to determine whether a statement is factual or an opinion. Fallacies in reasoning that can undermine arguments are also defined and exemplified. The document aims to teach philosophical thinking and analysis to discern truth from falsehood.
The document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and distinguishing truth from opinion. It discusses how philosophers examine knowledge and its basis in reality or facts. Opinions are judgments or perspectives that may be influenced by bias, while arguments try to convince others of a claim using reasoning that could include fallacies. When analyzing statements, philosophy teaches us to apply systematic doubt and consider various biases that could affect perspectives. Understanding the difference between facts and opinions can guide us to wisdom in forming our own views.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical inquiry. It discusses how ancient Greek philosophers approached truth by examining the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know. It emphasizes employing systematic doubt to scrutinize all statements and determine truth, rather than taking anything as true without sufficient evidence. The document also differentiates between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions, arguments, beliefs, conclusions, explanations, and fallacies. It stresses that arguments may be based on faulty reasoning and fallacies, misleading the reader, so it is important to consider the characteristics and types of fallacies.
Mate, a short story by Kate Grenvile.pptxLiny Jenifer
油
A powerpoint presentation on the short story Mate by Kate Greenville. This presentation provides information on Kate Greenville, a character list, plot summary and critical analysis of the short story.
Prelims of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Research & Research Methods: Basic Concepts and Types.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt has been made for the students pursuing PG in social science and humanities like M.Ed., M.A. (Education), Ph.D. Scholars. It will be also beneficial for the teachers and other faculty members interested in research and teaching research concepts.
The Constitution, Government and Law making bodies .saanidhyapatel09
油
This PowerPoint presentation provides an insightful overview of the Constitution, covering its key principles, features, and significance. It explains the fundamental rights, duties, structure of government, and the importance of constitutional law in governance. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the foundation of a nations legal framework.
QuickBooks Desktop to QuickBooks Online How to Make the MoveTechSoup
油
If you use QuickBooks Desktop and are stressing about moving to QuickBooks Online, in this webinar, get your questions answered and learn tips and tricks to make the process easier for you.
Key Questions:
* When is the best time to make the shift to QuickBooks Online?
* Will my current version of QuickBooks Desktop stop working?
* I have a really old version of QuickBooks. What should I do?
* I run my payroll in QuickBooks Desktop now. How is that affected?
*Does it bring over all my historical data? Are there things that don't come over?
* What are the main differences between QuickBooks Desktop and QuickBooks Online?
* And more
Prelims of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Information Technology for class X CBSE skill SubjectVEENAKSHI PATHAK
油
These questions are based on cbse booklet for 10th class information technology subject code 402. these questions are sufficient for exam for first lesion. This subject give benefit to students and good marks. if any student weak in one main subject it can replace with these marks.
Computer Application in Business (commerce)Sudar Sudar
油
The main objectives
1. To introduce the concept of computer and its various parts. 2. To explain the concept of data base management system and Management information system.
3. To provide insight about networking and basics of internet
Recall various terms of computer and its part
Understand the meaning of software, operating system, programming language and its features
Comparing Data Vs Information and its management system Understanding about various concepts of management information system
Explain about networking and elements based on internet
1. Recall the various concepts relating to computer and its various parts
2 Understand the meaning of softwares, operating system etc
3 Understanding the meaning and utility of database management system
4 Evaluate the various aspects of management information system
5 Generating more ideas regarding the use of internet for business purpose
APM event hosted by the South Wales and West of England Network (SWWE Network)
Speaker: Aalok Sonawala
The SWWE Regional Network were very pleased to welcome Aalok Sonawala, Head of PMO, National Programmes, Rider Levett Bucknall on 26 February, to BAWA for our first face to face event of 2025. Aalok is a member of APMs Thames Valley Regional Network and also speaks to members of APMs PMO Interest Network, which aims to facilitate collaboration and learning, offer unbiased advice and guidance.
Tonight, Aalok planned to discuss the importance of a PMO within project-based organisations, the different types of PMO and their key elements, PMO governance and centres of excellence.
PMOs within an organisation can be centralised, hub and spoke with a central PMO with satellite PMOs globally, or embedded within projects. The appropriate structure will be determined by the specific business needs of the organisation. The PMO sits above PM delivery and the supply chain delivery teams.
For further information about the event please click here.
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
Chapter 3. Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management.pptxRommel Regala
油
This course provides students with a comprehensive understanding of strategic management principles, frameworks, and applications in business. It explores strategic planning, environmental analysis, corporate governance, business ethics, and sustainability. The course integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to enhance global and ethical perspectives in decision-making.
Finals of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
2. Which of the following statements are
True?
1. The sun is the center of the solar system.
2. Asia is the largest continent in the world.
3. God made the world in seven days.
4. Man has the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
5. A persons must always consider the interest of his/her family
before his/her own happiness.
6. Citizens have the right to take up arms and overthrow an
oppressive government.
3. TRUTH
Truth lies at the heart of any inquiry. Knowledge must be truthful to gain
validity and acceptance.
Philosophers considered truth as a kind of quality or value.
When we answer a True or False test, we judge if the statements we read
are true or false. This means statement may have truth or may not have truth.
Statements about the world or reality are called propositions and these
propositions may or may not carry truth. Propositions are usually stated as
short statements or sentences.
4. Knowledge
We need to clarify knowledge since it is through knowing that we are able to determine what
is true.
Knowledge is the clear awareness and understanding of something. It is the product of
questions that allow for clear answers provided by facts. Our knowledge is comprised of
ideas and beliefs that we know to be true.
Lets explore your knowledge by completing the following statements:
1. I know that.
2. I know why.
3. I know how
6. Facts are propositions or statements which are observed to be real or truthful. This
simply means that what we know is what is observable or evident in the real world.
Ex. We can say that I know fish live in water because fish do live in water.
Claim on the other hand are statements or propositions that are not evidently or
immediately known to be true. We can say that I know that my school is the best
school in town., however it cannot be taken as true since it is simply not evident
and further examination is required to establish whether it is true or false. It can be
contested by other people.
Truthful statements, therefore, can be considered facts. Science considers truth as
something observable and empirical. This means that any claim can be proven by
verification and experimentation. Philosophy has various views which can help us
tackle the concepts of knowing the truth, and arrive at a reasonable assessment if a
statement, idea or event is believable.
7. How do we know if something is true?
There are several views regarding truth. Philosophers emphasize the
importance of belief for determining truth. But what kind of belief is
truthful? How do we know what we believe is true?
Ancient Greeks approach the problem by looking at the nature of knowledge
of how do we know what we know. We assume everything to be true. But
philosophers pondered upon the origins of knowledge doubted everything. In
doing so they were able to better understand how human gain knowledge and
determine the truth about everything.
8. Step 1. Lets embark on the ff: propositions. I am alive, I have a body, I can breathe.
Do you believe these statements apply to you? Of course! But as a philosopher we do
not need to assume that every statement is true. Doubt has a very important purpose in
philosophy, systematic doubt is employed to determine truth. Nothing is taken as true
unless there is sufficient reason and evidence to prove that it is indeed true.
Step 2. Using doubt, let us revise the proposition by asking: Am I alive? Do I have a
body? Can I breathe? Now how will you figure out the answers to these questions?
Obviously, you need to examine yourself. Do you have a pulse? Do you have your
head, arms and legs? Try to take a deep breath and exhale.
Step 3. If you answered yes to these questions, then you can conclude with certainty
that the previous statements are true. You can now say: I am alive! I have a body! I can
breathe!
9. Something is True if.
1. If it can be justified or proven using ones senses. Using your five senses
or the sensation you feel in your body to verify the validity of the claim.
2. If it is based on facts. Using existing documents, articles, arguments and
proven and valid known facts to determine the truthfulness of the claim.
3. Getting a consensus or having people agree on a common belief. A lot
of people are in an agreement with the validity of the claim.
4. It is applicable in real life or action (proven and verified). Using actions
or real life situations to prove the truthfulness of the claim.
11. Now that you have an idea on how philosophizing
recognizes truth, let us try and apply it in various situations
in your life. The ideas that we encounter in everyday life
can be considered as truth or opinion. But what
distinguishes one from the other? Let us look at the ff:
statements and determine which one states fact or opinion.
12. Facts? Or Opinion?
1. It takes me 30 minutes to walk from my home to school.
2. Living near the school is better because we dont have to spend
much for transportation.
3. My sister ate the last piece of pizza pie.
4. My sister is selfish person because she ate the last piece of pizza
pie and did not share it with me.
5. The policeman firmly pushed the suspect to his knees and placed
him in handcuffs.
6. The aggressive manner by which the policeman arrested the suspect
is an example of the brutality that characterizes our police.
13. Which one is factual? Which one is
opinion?
1. It takes me 30 mins. to walk from
my home to school.
2. Living near the school is better
because we dont have to spend
much for transportation.
3. My sister ate the last piece of
pizza pie.
4. My sister is a selfish person
because she ate the last piece of
pizza and did not share it with me.
5. The police firmly pushed the
suspect to his knees and placed him
in handcuffs.
6. The aggressive manner by which
the policeman arrested the suspect is
an example of the brutality that
characterize our police force.
14. Opinion These statements go beyond providing facts. They also provide
conclusions or perspectives regarding certain situations. Some of the
statements even advance a belief about a certain thing or person. Opinions are
also the bases for making arguments and convincing people that a certain claim
is a fact.
Conclusion is a judgement based on certain facts.
Beliefs are statements that expresses convictions that are not easily and
clearly explained by facts.
Explanations are statements that assume the claim to be true and provide
reasons why that statement is true. Statement 4 asks the readers to simply
accept the fact that the sister is selfish.
Arguments are a series of statements that provide reasons to convince the
reader or listener that a claim or opinion is truthful. Arguments are made with
the assumption that the truth of the claim or opinion is still to be determined.
Logic is the branch of Philo. that focuses on the analysis of arguments.
15. Arguments
Arguments often take the form of statements that are either claims
or facts and are phrased in such a way that they seem reasonable.
However, a number of arguments may be based on faulty reasoning.
This kind of arguments are called: fallacies. Some of these fallacies
may be intentional, as the person making the claim is desperate to
convince you to accept his or her argument. The following are
examples of fallacies.
16. The Fallacies:
1. Ad Hominem attacking the person who presents the argument instead of the
argument itself. Ex: Of course he believes that the government is flawed, he is a
rebel and a Communist!
2. Appeal to force using threat of force or an undesirable event to advance an
argument. Ex: If this peace agreement will not be signed by the government, then
we will have no recourse but go to war!
3. Appeal to emotion using emotions such as pity or sympathy. Ex: All these
charges are baseless; this is just plain harassment can`t you see how this is
affecting my family?
17. 4. Appeal to the Popular The idea is presented as acceptable
because a lot of people accept it. Ex: Every boy your age has a
girlfriend, you should go find one!
5. Appeal to Tradition the idea is acceptable because it has been
true for a long time. Ex: You should pour alcohol in the
wound; it has been that way for a long time!
6. Begging the question assuming the thing or idea to be proven
is true; also known as circular argument. Ex: I choose
cookery because I like it, I like cookery because I choose it.
18. 7. Cause and Effect Assuming a cause-and-effect relationship
between two unrelated events. Ex: Ever since you bought that pen,
everything has been going wrong in your life. You should get rid of it.
8. Fallacy of Composition assuming that what is true of a part, is true
for the whole. The cases of cheating in this section has convinced
me that the school has become the den of tricksters and liars.
9. Fallacy of Division assuming that what is true for the whole, is true
for its parts. You came from the family of doctors and
intellectuals! Surely you can do better in these course!
19. Bias
When looking at an opinion, be aware of bias or the personal views
of the person presenting it. Biases are not necessarily errors in
reasoning but refer to the tendencies or influences which affect the
views of people. Bias cannot be avoided in any discussion or debate.
What is important is that the people engaging in the discussion are
aware of their own personal biases and have an open but critical
attitude toward other views which conflict with their own.
20. The common Biases:
1. Correspondence bias or attribution effect the tendency to judge a persons
personality by his/her own actions, without regard for external factors or influences.
Ex: These soldiers who fought in the war are all bloodthirsty murderers!
2. Confirmation bias the tendency to look for and readily accept information which
fits ones own beliefs or views and to reject ideas or views that goes against it. Ex:
How can I accept his view that there is no God! I am a Christian!
3. Framing Focusing on a certain aspect of a problem while ignoring the other
aspects. Ex: Preliminary evidence has still not pointed out the actual cause of the
plane crash, but investigators are currently focusing on the possibility of pilot error.
21. 4. Hindsight the tendency to see past events as predictable, or to ascribe a
pattern to historical events. Ex: Magellans assault on Mactan Island was a
foolhardy venture, made by an overconfident, careless man who
underestimated the valor of the native Filipinos.
5. Conflict of Interest a person or group is connected to or has vested
interest in the issue being discussed. Ex: As the daughter of the accused, I
believe I have the right to express my opinion on the issue of his alleged
corrupt practices.
6. Cultural bias analyzing an event or issue based on ones cultural
standards. Ex: I do not agree with this Western practice of placing aged
parents in retirement homes. We Filipinos take care of our family members.
22. How can understanding truth and
opinion leads to wisdom?
An understanding of opinions and facts and the means to distinguish one from the other can
further improve our understanding and appreciation of varied views and ideas. The ability to
determine truth goes hand in hand with the holistic perspective and enables us to make wiser
decisions, especially in choosing the ideas and views which we find acceptable.
An individual cannot live his/her life just agreeing with everybody he/she meets. A critical
mind aided by philosophy can help us form our own personal point of view that can guide us
in making decisions and actions when faced with a problem. Everyone's point of view is
unique, but it should be based on sound and reasonable ideas and views. Philosophy can
help us determine ideas that are truthful and acceptable, which we can then use to form our
own views regarding certain matters.