This document discusses and compares different motivational models. It notes that past models viewed employees as individuals but employees actually work in a social system and compare themselves to others. It then lists attribution models and factors affecting attribution. Finally, it states that no model is perfect but all add to understanding motivation and mentions micro and macromotivation models, with the micro focusing on individual motivation and macro on external environmental influences.
1 of 11
Download to read offline
More Related Content
RGP_motivation.pptx
1. COMPARISON MODELS
- Previous discussions of motivational models have
viewed the employee as an individual, virtually
independent of other employees;
- As pointed out, however, employees work in a social
system in which each is dependent to some degree on
the others. Employees interact with one another on
tasks and on social occasions. They observe one another,
judge one another, and make comparisons.
8. INTERPRETING MOTIVATIONAL MODEL
- All the models have strengths and weaknesses, advocates and critics. No
model is perfect, but all of them add something to our understanding of
the motivational process;
- Other models are being developed, and attempts are being made to
integrate existing approaches.
? Micromotivation Model
? Macromotivation Model
9. ? Micromotivation Model
- Focuses on motivation within one individual
organization;
- A way of ensuring each employee¡¯s motivation
levels are targeted in a manner that is specific
to that individual.
10. ? Macromotivation Model
- Focuses on environmental conditions outside
the firm that influence job performance;
- Focuses on the organizational processes that
are essential to manufacturing of a product
or delivery of service.