This document discusses Seoul's Construction Cost Sharing (CCS) system, which discloses information on public construction projects through a website called Allimi. It notes that over 164,000 people accessed Allimi in 2015. The CCS system was recognized with a Human Technology Award for its transparency. Key factors in CCS's success included political will, civil society input, dedicated staff, and reforms to encourage transparency. Overall lessons included standardizing processes to reduce corruption risks, providing real-time information for accountability, and ongoing system upgrades and funding. The document recommends effective enforcement, sufficient resources, data standardization, offline community outreach, and anti-corruption policies to prevent issues.
This document provides an overview of Seoul's One-PMIS (Project Management Information System) and the construction information disclosure system called "Allimi". It describes the workflow and users of One-PMIS, the various modes for different project types, and the main menus and categories for progress management, reporting, and document management. It also explains how construction site information like real-time webcam images, daily work reports, and project schedules are integrated into the systems and made available to the public through Allimi.
The document summarizes Seoul's Clean Construction System which was introduced to improve construction project efficiency and transparency. It has four components: One-PMIS, an online project management system; Allimi, a public information disclosure system; an automated subcontractor payment system; and an electronic human resources system. One-PMIS allows real-time monitoring of construction materials, workers, and processes. Allimi is a public portal providing contract details, photos, stakeholders, and allowing citizen participation. Seoul made One-PMIS use mandatory for large public projects and provides training and support to promote its institutionalization.
1) In 2014, Ukraine reformed its administrative services by creating Citizen Administrative Services Providers (CASPs) at the city and district levels to provide basic public services. While CASPs improved access, only 5% of citizens positively rated service quality in 2014.
2) The project supported CSOs to monitor CASPs through seed grants, trainings, and documenting best practices. It also assessed e-governance in 100 cities. Lessons showed a need for quality standards, ICT use, and awareness.
3) Plans for 2015 include advocating for real service transfers to CASPs, enhancing CASP and CSO capacities, supporting quality policies, and nurturing cooperation between CASPs and CSO
1) In 2014, Ukraine reformed its administrative services by creating Citizen Administrative Services Providers (CASPs) at the city and district levels to provide basic public services. While CASPs improved access, only 5% of citizens positively rated service quality in 2014.
2) The project supported CSOs to monitor CASPs through seed grants, trainings, and documenting best practices. It also assessed e-governance in 100 cities. Lessons showed a need for quality standards, ICT use, and awareness.
3) Plans for 2015 include advocating for real service transfers to CASPs, enhancing CASP and CSO capacities, supporting quality policies, and nurturing cooperation between CASPs and CSO