The document provides guidance for students on writing a literacy narrative assignment. It defines a literacy narrative as telling the story of developing a specific literacy skill. Students must choose a literacy they can demonstrate in class and explain its significance. The document outlines the assignment requirements, including length, format, and grading rubric. It also provides a schedule and instructions for drafting, peer reviewing, and revising the narrative. Students are instructed to brainstorm potential literacy topics and ways to demonstrate them for the assignment.
The document provides guidance for students on writing a literacy narrative paper. It defines a literacy narrative as telling the story of developing a specific literacy skill. Students must choose a literacy they can demonstrate in class and explain its significance. The paper should have an engaging introduction, vivid details in the body, and a conclusion relaying significance. Students are provided a schedule to brainstorm topics, outline their narrative, write drafts, and revise based on peer feedback before submitting their final paper.
Critical thinking is a kind of thinking in which you question, analyse, inter...NOELCACAYAN
油
Critical thinking is a kind of thinking in which you question, analyse, interpret, evaluate and make a judgement about what you read, hear, say, or write.
The document provides instructions for students on writing a literacy narrative essay assignment. It defines a literacy narrative as an essay where students share a significant experience in developing a skill or literacy. Students must choose a literacy that relates to their first speech assignment. The document outlines the purpose, audience, elements, parts, and timeline for completing the assignment. Students are to brainstorm topics, define the rhetorical situation, choose a structure, and write drafts which receive peer review before submitting the final paper.
This document provides an agenda and notes for an English class. It discusses evaluating sources, writing introductions for social action projects, and annotated bibliographies. The instructor reviews what the class has covered so far, including blog posts, social diversity narratives, and brainstorming topics. Guidance is given on peer reviewing introductions, trust in the editing process, summarizing sources, and sample annotated bibliography entries. Formatting and required elements are outlined for assignments on introductions and annotated bibliographies.
This document provides guidance for a lesson on reading academic texts. It discusses defining academic writing and distinguishing it from other types of writing. It identifies the importance of determining the structure, purpose, and audience of academic texts. The lesson objectives are for students to define academic writing, identify its purpose and style, analyze sample texts, and understand academic writing in the Philippine context. The document provides discussions and activities to help students understand academic writing.
This overviews our Key Concepts, discusses how we will be exploring those concepts in your LOI, explains what coming up with an LOI means and how to come up with a good one.
Basic text types and other text types as to purpose pptRhenidelGarejo
油
This Presentation discussed the Basic Types of text and other text types as to their purpose. The purpose of this presentation is to help you about learning the basic text types and what are their purpose.
DISCLAIMER: The information cited in this presentation is credited from their respective authors. No information is claimed by the presenter.
Teaching English Through English I Class #2lisyaseloni
油
This document provides an agenda and discussion questions for an English teaching class. The agenda includes reading student blogs, continuing discussions on reading and writing habits, and reading the first chapter of the textbook. Discussion questions focus on defining academic literacy and the writing process. Key terms from the reading are also defined, such as the cyclical nature of writing and the writing sub-processes of conceptualizing, formulating, and revising. Later, students are asked to imagine promoting a new teaching method in a brochure and practice persuasive academic writing.
This document discusses passage based writing (PBW) and provides guidance on teaching it. It begins by explaining what PBW is - an essay that must be supported by specific details from the given passage. It then outlines a 6 step learning path for teaching PBW, with steps like identifying the prompt, close reading the passage, and composing a response. The document provides examples of modeling how to unpack prompts and close read text. It emphasizes having students practice these skills through deliberate instruction. Overall, the document aims to help teachers understand and teach the skills needed for PBW.
Creating the link between reading and writingKeith Pruitt
油
This presentation will be delivered at the East TN Federal Programs conference and speaks to the need of incorporating a literacy block in the classroom where reading, writing, speaking and listening are incorporated together.
Critical Thinking PHI 210
Student Course Guide
Prerequisite: None
Quarter
Meeting Days/Time
Instructor
Instructor Phone
Instructor E-mail
Instructor Office Hours/Location
Academic Office Phone Number
Strayer Technical Support
1-877-642-2999
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL Required
Kirby, G. R., & Goodpaster, J.R. (2007). Thinking: An interdisciplinary approach to critical and creative thought (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL Supporting
The following resources provide additional background and supporting information for this course. There is no need to purchase these items for the course.
Facione, P. (1998). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: California
Academic Press.
Grossman, L. (2005, January 10). Jumping to conclusions. Time, p. 57.
Hurt, F. (1998). Achieving creativity: Four critical steps. Direct Marketing, 60, 40-44.
Useful critical thinking Websites:
揃 http://www.criticalthinking.org/
揃 http://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/articles/
揃 http://mathematics.clc.uc.edu/Vislocky/Critical%20Thinking%20part%20of%20syllabus.htm
揃 http://austhink.com/critical/
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course develops the ability to identify, analyze, and evaluate reasoning in everyday discourse.油It examines the elements of good reasoning from both a formal and informal perspective and introduces油some formal techniques of the basic concepts of deductive and inductive reasoning. It also promotes reasoning skills through油examining arguments from literature, politics, business, and the media.油This course enables students to identify common fallacies, to reflect on the use of language for the purpose of persuasion, and to think critically about the sources and biases of the油vast quantity油of information that confronts us in the Information Age.
COURSE OUTCOMES
Upon the successful completion of this course, the student will be able to:
1. Define critical thinking.
2. Explain how critical thinking improves the ability to communicate accurately, both orally and in writing.
3. Develop skills for overcoming barriers which limit objective and productive critical thinking.
4. Illustrate the importance of pre-writing, the consideration of audience and tone, organizational strategies, and the recognition of effective language in the various stages of written communication.
5. Apply the principles of argumentation to analyze, evaluate, and compose effective arguments.
6. Analyze the purpose of organizational structure in textbook passages, newspaper articles, moral油arguments, and mass media.
7. Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
8. Devise an action plan for overcoming the hindrances to the decision-making process by applying problem-solving skills to personal, professional, and academic situations and experiences.
9. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
10. Use.
1. Critical reading involves carefully examining a text to understand both its literal meaning and implicit messages.
2. The document discusses various authors' perspectives on critical reading and its importance for thinking skills.
3. It identifies three steps of critical reading: restating the text, describing its elements, and interpreting its overall meaning.
The document provides guidelines for writing a lecture report, including tips such as reading about the topic in advance, taking notes during the lecture, and discussing impressions with others who attended. It suggests commenting on the topic, speaker's presentation style, methods used, discussion provoked, and any interpretation or contribution beyond presented facts. Key details to include are the advertised topic, points covered, match with expectations, and speaker's rapport with the audience.
This document provides tips for conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an account of published work by scholars and researchers on a topic, organized around a research question or thesis. The review must synthesize results and identify areas of controversy or questions needing further research. When reviewing each source, the author should ask questions about the problem formulation, theoretical framework, argument structure, and how the source contributes to understanding the topic and research question. A conclusion states that a literature review is a cohesive discussion, not just a list of summaries.
This document discusses the writing process and how to structure content effectively. It emphasizes that writing has an intent, audience, and organization. The three main elements that shape a paragraph's content are the purpose, audience, and tone. Effective writing follows the writing process, knows the audience, and uses an organizational strategy. Paragraphs are used to separate ideas into logical chunks that each focus on one main idea and support it coherently. Consistent, engaging content that is organized into paragraphs is important for effectively communicating with the audience.
This document provides guidance on writing for prompts. It discusses the different types of prompts (narrative, expository, persuasive) and gives examples. It outlines a 5-step process for analyzing and preparing to write for a prompt: 1) carefully read the prompt, 2) underline key words, 3) restate the prompt, 4) brainstorm ideas, and 5) choose a main idea. The document provides sample prompts and shows how to apply the 5 steps. It emphasizes answering what is specifically asked while using your own experiences and opinions.
Here are some potential points you could comment on in your response:
- Summarize the main arguments/ideas presented in the article.
- Evaluate the evidence and research cited - is it sufficient and credible? Are there limitations?
- Consider any assumptions made by the author - are they valid?
- Analyze the author's reasoning and logic. Do the conclusions follow from the premises?
- Identify any biases or perspectives. Does the author adequately address alternative views?
- Relate the topic to other issues or your own experience. Does the article raise any other questions?
- Critique the style/organization. Is the information effectively communicated and structured?
- Make an overall evaluation
Discussion Board Guidelines Students must respond individuallyLyndonPelletier761
油
Discussion Board Guidelines
Students must respond individually to the Discussion Board question and forge a discussion with at least two class members.
Discussion Board postings should be "original thought" posting. Unless requested to do so, students should not use the internet to create discussion board responses.
Discussion Board postings should be 300 words minimum in length, provide evidence of reading comprehension through illustrations from the reading assignments, critical thinking, and consideration of others' views.
When Discussion Board work is assigned on the syllabus schedule, students must post their responses by the appointed time and respond to at least two class members' posts within 48 hours/at the appointed time.
Discussion Board work is time-sensitive. Late submissions will not be accepted/will receive a zero.
It is STRONGLY suggested that you visit the discussion board frequently after your work is completed to see where the discussion is going and to further respond to your group members (or your instructor) if need be.
Please see the Discussion Board Rubric for grad
Assignment
Grading Rubric
Meets/Exceeds
Expectations
(10 Pts)
Approaches
Expectations
(8 Pts)
Needs Improvement
(6 Pts)
In-complete
and/or not
done correctly
(1 Pt)
No
Marks/Missing
(0 Pts)
Purpose
Purpose is clear.
Shows awareness of
purpose.
Shows limited
awareness of purpose.
No awareness.
No
Marks/Missing
Main idea Clearly presents a
main idea and
supports it throughout
the paper.
There is a main idea
supported
throughout most of
the paper.
Vague sense of a main
idea, weakly supported
throughout the paper.
No main idea.
Student didn't
turn in
assignment.
Overall and
Style
Well-planned and well-
thought out. Includes
title, introduction, and
statement of main
idea, transitions,
conclusion, using
APA standard: correct
font, font size and no
more than 1000
words.
Good overall
organization includes
the main
organizational tools
but font is incorrect
or word count is
more than 1000
and/or line spacing
is not doubled, or no
APA style.
There is a sense of
organization, although
some of the
organizational tools are
missing and/or late.
No sense of
organization.
Student didn't
turn in
assignment.
Content Exceptionally well-
presented and
discussed; ideas are
detailed, well-
developed with
evidence & facts
based on text
information.
Well-presented and
discussed; ideas are
detailed, developed
and supported with
less evidence and
details.
Content not as clear or
solid; some ideas are
present but not
particularly developed
or supported with
minimal evidence of
clear knowledge of
subject.
Content is not
complete.
Student didn't
turn in
assignment.
Structure Sentences are clear
and varied in pattern,
from simple to
complex, with
excellent use of
punctuation.
Sentences are clear
but may ...
Teaching English Through English I Class #3lisyaseloni
油
This document provides an agenda for an English teaching session that focuses on developing critical reading and writing skills. It includes discussions on evaluating academic sources, creating lesson plans based on readings, and techniques for active reading such as annotating texts, asking questions, and connecting information to prior knowledge. Sample activities involve reflecting on and peer-editing essays about English villages in South Korea. Guidelines are provided for evaluating sources based on authority, accuracy, comprehensiveness, validity and ease of use. The session will conclude with a teaching demonstration of a reading and writing lesson plan developed from academic texts.
Critical reading involves analyzing a text beyond just understanding it at a surface level. It requires asking questions about the strengths and weaknesses of arguments presented in the text. Some key aspects of critical reading include determining an author's purpose and viewpoint, separating facts from opinions, evaluating logic and evidence, and deciding whether to accept or reject the information. To be a critical reader, one should reflect carefully on what a text says, describes, and means by asking questions about the author's qualifications, potential biases, and missing information. Taking notes, marking up the text, and reading slowly and openly are important practices for developing critical reading abilities.
This document provides guidance for a lesson on reading academic texts. It discusses defining academic writing and distinguishing it from other types of writing. It identifies the importance of determining the structure, purpose, and audience of academic texts. The lesson objectives are for students to define academic writing, identify its purpose and style, analyze sample texts, and understand academic writing in the Philippine context. The document provides discussions and activities to help students understand academic writing.
This overviews our Key Concepts, discusses how we will be exploring those concepts in your LOI, explains what coming up with an LOI means and how to come up with a good one.
Basic text types and other text types as to purpose pptRhenidelGarejo
油
This Presentation discussed the Basic Types of text and other text types as to their purpose. The purpose of this presentation is to help you about learning the basic text types and what are their purpose.
DISCLAIMER: The information cited in this presentation is credited from their respective authors. No information is claimed by the presenter.
Teaching English Through English I Class #2lisyaseloni
油
This document provides an agenda and discussion questions for an English teaching class. The agenda includes reading student blogs, continuing discussions on reading and writing habits, and reading the first chapter of the textbook. Discussion questions focus on defining academic literacy and the writing process. Key terms from the reading are also defined, such as the cyclical nature of writing and the writing sub-processes of conceptualizing, formulating, and revising. Later, students are asked to imagine promoting a new teaching method in a brochure and practice persuasive academic writing.
This document discusses passage based writing (PBW) and provides guidance on teaching it. It begins by explaining what PBW is - an essay that must be supported by specific details from the given passage. It then outlines a 6 step learning path for teaching PBW, with steps like identifying the prompt, close reading the passage, and composing a response. The document provides examples of modeling how to unpack prompts and close read text. It emphasizes having students practice these skills through deliberate instruction. Overall, the document aims to help teachers understand and teach the skills needed for PBW.
Creating the link between reading and writingKeith Pruitt
油
This presentation will be delivered at the East TN Federal Programs conference and speaks to the need of incorporating a literacy block in the classroom where reading, writing, speaking and listening are incorporated together.
Critical Thinking PHI 210
Student Course Guide
Prerequisite: None
Quarter
Meeting Days/Time
Instructor
Instructor Phone
Instructor E-mail
Instructor Office Hours/Location
Academic Office Phone Number
Strayer Technical Support
1-877-642-2999
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL Required
Kirby, G. R., & Goodpaster, J.R. (2007). Thinking: An interdisciplinary approach to critical and creative thought (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL Supporting
The following resources provide additional background and supporting information for this course. There is no need to purchase these items for the course.
Facione, P. (1998). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: California
Academic Press.
Grossman, L. (2005, January 10). Jumping to conclusions. Time, p. 57.
Hurt, F. (1998). Achieving creativity: Four critical steps. Direct Marketing, 60, 40-44.
Useful critical thinking Websites:
揃 http://www.criticalthinking.org/
揃 http://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/articles/
揃 http://mathematics.clc.uc.edu/Vislocky/Critical%20Thinking%20part%20of%20syllabus.htm
揃 http://austhink.com/critical/
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course develops the ability to identify, analyze, and evaluate reasoning in everyday discourse.油It examines the elements of good reasoning from both a formal and informal perspective and introduces油some formal techniques of the basic concepts of deductive and inductive reasoning. It also promotes reasoning skills through油examining arguments from literature, politics, business, and the media.油This course enables students to identify common fallacies, to reflect on the use of language for the purpose of persuasion, and to think critically about the sources and biases of the油vast quantity油of information that confronts us in the Information Age.
COURSE OUTCOMES
Upon the successful completion of this course, the student will be able to:
1. Define critical thinking.
2. Explain how critical thinking improves the ability to communicate accurately, both orally and in writing.
3. Develop skills for overcoming barriers which limit objective and productive critical thinking.
4. Illustrate the importance of pre-writing, the consideration of audience and tone, organizational strategies, and the recognition of effective language in the various stages of written communication.
5. Apply the principles of argumentation to analyze, evaluate, and compose effective arguments.
6. Analyze the purpose of organizational structure in textbook passages, newspaper articles, moral油arguments, and mass media.
7. Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
8. Devise an action plan for overcoming the hindrances to the decision-making process by applying problem-solving skills to personal, professional, and academic situations and experiences.
9. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
10. Use.
1. Critical reading involves carefully examining a text to understand both its literal meaning and implicit messages.
2. The document discusses various authors' perspectives on critical reading and its importance for thinking skills.
3. It identifies three steps of critical reading: restating the text, describing its elements, and interpreting its overall meaning.
The document provides guidelines for writing a lecture report, including tips such as reading about the topic in advance, taking notes during the lecture, and discussing impressions with others who attended. It suggests commenting on the topic, speaker's presentation style, methods used, discussion provoked, and any interpretation or contribution beyond presented facts. Key details to include are the advertised topic, points covered, match with expectations, and speaker's rapport with the audience.
This document provides tips for conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an account of published work by scholars and researchers on a topic, organized around a research question or thesis. The review must synthesize results and identify areas of controversy or questions needing further research. When reviewing each source, the author should ask questions about the problem formulation, theoretical framework, argument structure, and how the source contributes to understanding the topic and research question. A conclusion states that a literature review is a cohesive discussion, not just a list of summaries.
This document discusses the writing process and how to structure content effectively. It emphasizes that writing has an intent, audience, and organization. The three main elements that shape a paragraph's content are the purpose, audience, and tone. Effective writing follows the writing process, knows the audience, and uses an organizational strategy. Paragraphs are used to separate ideas into logical chunks that each focus on one main idea and support it coherently. Consistent, engaging content that is organized into paragraphs is important for effectively communicating with the audience.
This document provides guidance on writing for prompts. It discusses the different types of prompts (narrative, expository, persuasive) and gives examples. It outlines a 5-step process for analyzing and preparing to write for a prompt: 1) carefully read the prompt, 2) underline key words, 3) restate the prompt, 4) brainstorm ideas, and 5) choose a main idea. The document provides sample prompts and shows how to apply the 5 steps. It emphasizes answering what is specifically asked while using your own experiences and opinions.
Here are some potential points you could comment on in your response:
- Summarize the main arguments/ideas presented in the article.
- Evaluate the evidence and research cited - is it sufficient and credible? Are there limitations?
- Consider any assumptions made by the author - are they valid?
- Analyze the author's reasoning and logic. Do the conclusions follow from the premises?
- Identify any biases or perspectives. Does the author adequately address alternative views?
- Relate the topic to other issues or your own experience. Does the article raise any other questions?
- Critique the style/organization. Is the information effectively communicated and structured?
- Make an overall evaluation
Discussion Board Guidelines Students must respond individuallyLyndonPelletier761
油
Discussion Board Guidelines
Students must respond individually to the Discussion Board question and forge a discussion with at least two class members.
Discussion Board postings should be "original thought" posting. Unless requested to do so, students should not use the internet to create discussion board responses.
Discussion Board postings should be 300 words minimum in length, provide evidence of reading comprehension through illustrations from the reading assignments, critical thinking, and consideration of others' views.
When Discussion Board work is assigned on the syllabus schedule, students must post their responses by the appointed time and respond to at least two class members' posts within 48 hours/at the appointed time.
Discussion Board work is time-sensitive. Late submissions will not be accepted/will receive a zero.
It is STRONGLY suggested that you visit the discussion board frequently after your work is completed to see where the discussion is going and to further respond to your group members (or your instructor) if need be.
Please see the Discussion Board Rubric for grad
Assignment
Grading Rubric
Meets/Exceeds
Expectations
(10 Pts)
Approaches
Expectations
(8 Pts)
Needs Improvement
(6 Pts)
In-complete
and/or not
done correctly
(1 Pt)
No
Marks/Missing
(0 Pts)
Purpose
Purpose is clear.
Shows awareness of
purpose.
Shows limited
awareness of purpose.
No awareness.
No
Marks/Missing
Main idea Clearly presents a
main idea and
supports it throughout
the paper.
There is a main idea
supported
throughout most of
the paper.
Vague sense of a main
idea, weakly supported
throughout the paper.
No main idea.
Student didn't
turn in
assignment.
Overall and
Style
Well-planned and well-
thought out. Includes
title, introduction, and
statement of main
idea, transitions,
conclusion, using
APA standard: correct
font, font size and no
more than 1000
words.
Good overall
organization includes
the main
organizational tools
but font is incorrect
or word count is
more than 1000
and/or line spacing
is not doubled, or no
APA style.
There is a sense of
organization, although
some of the
organizational tools are
missing and/or late.
No sense of
organization.
Student didn't
turn in
assignment.
Content Exceptionally well-
presented and
discussed; ideas are
detailed, well-
developed with
evidence & facts
based on text
information.
Well-presented and
discussed; ideas are
detailed, developed
and supported with
less evidence and
details.
Content not as clear or
solid; some ideas are
present but not
particularly developed
or supported with
minimal evidence of
clear knowledge of
subject.
Content is not
complete.
Student didn't
turn in
assignment.
Structure Sentences are clear
and varied in pattern,
from simple to
complex, with
excellent use of
punctuation.
Sentences are clear
but may ...
Teaching English Through English I Class #3lisyaseloni
油
This document provides an agenda for an English teaching session that focuses on developing critical reading and writing skills. It includes discussions on evaluating academic sources, creating lesson plans based on readings, and techniques for active reading such as annotating texts, asking questions, and connecting information to prior knowledge. Sample activities involve reflecting on and peer-editing essays about English villages in South Korea. Guidelines are provided for evaluating sources based on authority, accuracy, comprehensiveness, validity and ease of use. The session will conclude with a teaching demonstration of a reading and writing lesson plan developed from academic texts.
Critical reading involves analyzing a text beyond just understanding it at a surface level. It requires asking questions about the strengths and weaknesses of arguments presented in the text. Some key aspects of critical reading include determining an author's purpose and viewpoint, separating facts from opinions, evaluating logic and evidence, and deciding whether to accept or reject the information. To be a critical reader, one should reflect carefully on what a text says, describes, and means by asking questions about the author's qualifications, potential biases, and missing information. Taking notes, marking up the text, and reading slowly and openly are important practices for developing critical reading abilities.
How to Modify Existing Web Pages in Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to modify existing web pages in Odoo 18. Web pages in Odoo 18 can also gather user data through user-friendly forms, encourage interaction through engaging features.
How to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18. In Odoo, Init Hooks are essential functions specified as strings in the __init__ file of a module.
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
APM event hosted by the South Wales and West of England Network (SWWE Network)
Speaker: Aalok Sonawala
The SWWE Regional Network were very pleased to welcome Aalok Sonawala, Head of PMO, National Programmes, Rider Levett Bucknall on 26 February, to BAWA for our first face to face event of 2025. Aalok is a member of APMs Thames Valley Regional Network and also speaks to members of APMs PMO Interest Network, which aims to facilitate collaboration and learning, offer unbiased advice and guidance.
Tonight, Aalok planned to discuss the importance of a PMO within project-based organisations, the different types of PMO and their key elements, PMO governance and centres of excellence.
PMOs within an organisation can be centralised, hub and spoke with a central PMO with satellite PMOs globally, or embedded within projects. The appropriate structure will be determined by the specific business needs of the organisation. The PMO sits above PM delivery and the supply chain delivery teams.
For further information about the event please click here.
Blind Spots in AI and Formulation Science Knowledge Pyramid (Updated Perspect...Ajaz Hussain
油
This presentation delves into the systemic blind spots within pharmaceutical science and regulatory systems, emphasizing the significance of "inactive ingredients" and their influence on therapeutic equivalence. These blind spots, indicative of normalized systemic failures, go beyond mere chance occurrences and are ingrained deeply enough to compromise decision-making processes and erode trust.
Historical instances like the 1938 FD&C Act and the Generic Drug Scandals underscore how crisis-triggered reforms often fail to address the fundamental issues, perpetuating inefficiencies and hazards.
The narrative advocates a shift from reactive crisis management to proactive, adaptable systems prioritizing continuous enhancement. Key hurdles involve challenging outdated assumptions regarding bioavailability, inadequately funded research ventures, and the impact of vague language in regulatory frameworks.
The rise of large language models (LLMs) presents promising solutions, albeit with accompanying risks necessitating thorough validation and seamless integration.
Tackling these blind spots demands a holistic approach, embracing adaptive learning and a steadfast commitment to self-improvement. By nurturing curiosity, refining regulatory terminology, and judiciously harnessing new technologies, the pharmaceutical sector can progress towards better public health service delivery and ensure the safety, efficacy, and real-world impact of drug products.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
- Autonomy, Teams and Tension
- Oliver Randall & David Bovis
- Own Your Autonomy
Oliver Randall
Consultant, Tribe365
Oliver is a career project professional since 2011 and started volunteering with APM in 2016 and has since chaired the People Interest Network and the North East Regional Network. Oliver has been consulting in culture, leadership and behaviours since 2019 and co-developed HPTM速an off the shelf high performance framework for teams and organisations and is currently working with SAS (Stellenbosch Academy for Sport) developing the culture, leadership and behaviours framework for future elite sportspeople whilst also holding down work as a project manager in the NHS at North Tees and Hartlepool Foundation Trust.
David Bovis
Consultant, Duxinaroe
A Leadership and Culture Change expert, David is the originator of BTFA and The Dux Model.
With a Masters in Applied Neuroscience from the Institute of Organisational Neuroscience, he is widely regarded as the Go-To expert in the field, recognised as an inspiring keynote speaker and change strategist.
He has an industrial engineering background, majoring in TPS / Lean. David worked his way up from his apprenticeship to earn his seat at the C-suite table. His career spans several industries, including Automotive, Aerospace, Defence, Space, Heavy Industries and Elec-Mech / polymer contract manufacture.
Published in Londons Evening Standard quarterly business supplement, James Caans Your business Magazine, Quality World, the Lean Management Journal and Cambridge Universities PMA, he works as comfortably with leaders from FTSE and Fortune 100 companies as he does owner-managers in SMEs. He is passionate about helping leaders understand the neurological root cause of a high-performance culture and sustainable change, in business.
Session | Own Your Autonomy The Importance of Autonomy in Project Management
#OwnYourAutonomy is aiming to be a global APM initiative to position everyone to take a more conscious role in their decision making process leading to increased outcomes for everyone and contribute to a world in which all projects succeed.
We want everyone to join the journey.
#OwnYourAutonomy is the culmination of 3 years of collaborative exploration within the Leadership Focus Group which is part of the APM People Interest Network. The work has been pulled together using the 5 HPTM速 Systems and the BTFA neuroscience leadership programme.
https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/apm-people-network/about/
Finals of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
How to Configure Flexible Working Schedule in Odoo 18 EmployeeCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to configure flexible working schedule in Odoo 18 Employee module. In Odoo 18, the Employee module offers powerful tools to configure and manage flexible working schedules tailored to your organization's needs.
Prelims of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
5. Warm Up!
1. Work with a partner for this activity.
2. Go to the library. While there, look for references and read
about discourse, focusing especially on the nature and
purposes of discourse.
3. Write your notes about the topic on the left column of the
given table.
4. Summarize your notes on the right column after rereading
your notes.
5. Present your work to the class.
7. Review
What is your idea of a discourse?
Why do you think it is necessary to analyze
some forms of discourse?
8. Learn about It!
Definition of Discourse
comes from the word discursus
in medieval Latin - argument
in late Latin - conversation
formal and often lengthy discussion of a topic, where
concepts and insights are arranged in an organized and
logical manner
often associated with speech but may also be a written text
the way that language is used to convey meanings or to
propel action or provoke a specific response
9. Learn about It!
Critique
one example of a discourse
states a writers opinion about the good and the bad parts
of another piece of writing or a work of art
uses formal language
contains ideas that are arranged in an organized and
logical manner
10. Learn about It!
Diary
another example of discourse
a daily record of someones personal experiences and
thoughts
gives readers a sense of the writers character or values
11. Learn about It!
Purposes of a Discourse
To inform
provides a descriptive and comprehensive discussion on
the topic
points out what one should know about a topic or subject
12. Learn about It!
Purposes of a Discourse
To persuade
tries to convince the readers that the proposed claim or
solution is better than any other proposal
tries to convince the readers to believe in or do something
13. Learn about It!
Purposes of a Discourse
To entertain
aims to amuse its readers
provides a source of entertainment for its readers
14. Learn about It!
Analyzing a Discourse
Consider several factors that may have influenced the
writer to make certain claims.
Those factors explain the authors biases, philosophy, and
educational and professional backgrounds, among others.
15. Learn about It!
Analyzing a Discourse
Culture
The beliefs, customs, attitudes, language, and other
things that define culture may influence the authors
perspective on several issues.
Knowing about the authors culture may help the reader
understand his or her biases.
16. Learn about It!
Analyzing a Discourse
Social Environment
The authors physical surroundings and social
relationships, as well as the culture of the time may have
influenced his or her writing.
For instance, during the early decades of the 20th century,
most writers produced works that were classified as
modern because of a distinct feature: stream of
consciousness.
17. Learn about It!
Analyzing a Discourse
Experiences
Personal accounts or firsthand experience of events,
though subjective, establish credibility and reliability of
information presented in any discourse.
18. Learn about It!
7 Questions to Ask Before Hiring Your Wedding Photog
rapher
NewsUSA
19. Learn about It!
Guide Questions:
1. What is the purpose of the text? Cite evidence to support
your answer.
2. For whom was this text written? Justify your answer.
3. Who could have possibly written this text? Explain.
4. Could this text be helpful for brides and grooms? Use your
knowledge of identifying the purpose of discourse to justify
your answer.
20. Analysis
Read the text and answer the questions that follow.
Forget that Facelift - Wrap Your Face into Shape
NewsUSA
21. Analysis
1. What is the purpose of the text?
2. Who do you think could have written the text?
3. For whom is this text written?
4. State how the text caters to the said audience.
5. Is the text appropriate for the audience and its purpose?
22. Analysis
Criteria Score
Content
(The question is answered well. Textual evidence is provided.)
5 pts.
Organization
(Logical progression of details; clear transitions between ideas)
3 pts.
Language
(Use of proper spelling, mechanics, grammar, and word
choice) 2 pts.
Score: /10
23. You engage in discourse every day, be it through
conversations or by writing. How do you think you can
ensure that your input in these discourses is
meaningful and well-thought-out?
Values Integration
24. Synthesis
1. The class will be divided into three, and each division will be
assigned one of the following purposes:
a. To inform
b. To persuade
c. To entertain
2. Work with a partner from your respective division.
3. With your partner, write a paragraph about the topic The
Philippines as a Tourist Destination. Make sure that the
paragraph you write fulfills the purpose assigned to your
division.
4. You have 20 minutes to write your paragraph.
5. Present your work to the class.
25. Synthesis
6. After the activity, answer the following questions:
a. Were you able to carry out the task well? Why or why
not?
b. How has this activity helped you understand the
concept of discourse?
26. Assignment
Reread the essay used in the discussion, 7 Questions You
Should Ask Before Hiring Your Wedding Photographer. Critique
the piece using the following questions:
1. Does it fulfill its purpose?
2. What were the texts strong points?
3. What were the points for improvement?
4. Cite who you think wrote the text then answer this question:
How do you think the authors culture, social environment,
and experiences influenced the writing of the text?
5. If you were to be the writer of a text with the same topic, how
would you approach writing the text, considering its purpose?
27. Criteria Score
Content
(The critique addressed all the guide questions. Textual
evidence is given, and opinions are clearly explained.) 5 pts.
Organization
(Logical progression of details; clear transitions between
ideas) 3 pts.
Language
(Use of proper spelling, mechanics, grammar, and word
choice)
2 pts.
Score: /10