�ݺ�ߣ

Editor's Notes

• #3: Może można od razu cos powiedziec o moim projekcie i ze tworzenie wiedzy jest jego tematem? Może można po prostu zrobic slajd z tego kim jestem i czym się zajmuje i drugi o kontekscie projektu i dlaczego mnie ten wlasnie temat/te tematy interesuje/interesuja?
• #7: Można usunac np. ostatnia informacje i po tym puscic film z tego jak to bylo
• #9: Tutaj może przed tym film a ten slajd jako podsumowanie
• #10: Tutaj może przed tym film a ten slajd jako podsumowanie
• #12: Tutaj może być krotka reklama, np., w pierwszym przypadku np., za pomoca narzedzia protege, w drugim chcemy napisac wtyczke do tego narzedzia i zrobic to pol-automatycznie, a dzisiaj chce mowic o trzecim temacie
• #14: In the last few years researchers from different scientific disciplines investigated the grounds of the success of community-driven content creation. Although these studies reveal that the inner motivations that drive people to participate are heterogeneous and strongly context-specific, several main categories can be identified: Reciprocity and expectancy Reciprocity means that contributors receive an immediate or long- term benefit in return for spending their time and resources on performing a certain task. An example of this is tagging, where the user organizes her knowledge assets, such as bookmarks or pictures, and while doing so, reuses tag classifications of other users. Reputation Reputation is an important factor within (virtual) communities: it can drive users to invest time and effort to improve the opinion of their peers about them. It has shown that this is an important motivation for, for instance, Wikipedia users [75]. Competition Competition is a relevant incentive in the context of games (rankings), but it can also be a strong driver in community portals where the user with the, for example, most contributions, or highest status is awarded. Conformitytoagroup Throughimitationandempathypeopletendtoconformtothesocialgroup they belong to, therefore making available information about members behaviors is a way to spur people to act according to this information. Staying with the example of Wikipedia as a strong community, studies have shown that the feeling of belonging to a group makes users be more active and supportive. They feel needed and thus obliged to contribute to the joint goals of their community [75]. Altruism People contribute to a joint endeavor because they believe it is for a good cause, without expecting anything in return. Self-esteem and learning People contribute to a certain endeavor in order for them to grow as individuals, either in terms of their own self-perception or to increase their knowledge and skills. Fun and personal enjoyment People get engaged in entertaining activities. The most popular ap- proach in this context hides a complex task behind casual games [114, 132]. Implicit promise of future monetary rewards People typically act in order to increase their own human capital and to position themselves to gain future rewards (money or better roles). Rewards Peoplereceiveadirectcompensationwhichcanobviouslyplayalargeroleinexplainingthe rationale for contributing effort toward a goal. Examples of this are crowdsourcing platforms, such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk2 or InnoCentive.3
• #15: I tutaj o tym, ze wg tego pana najwazniejsza motywacja jest nie altruism i pieniadze ale wlasnie to radosc z grania
• #17: described as a series of interconnected questions (or challenges), which the players will need to answer during the game. The questions depend on the input, which is taken from the knowledge corpus the game processes and may be closed or open scale. The problem solved through the game needs to be highly decomposable into tasks which can be approached in a decentralized fashion by answering different questions. The questions themselves can have a varying level of difficulty, but in general it is assumed that an average player will be able to answer them in a matter of a couple of minutes. The input used to generate the questions needs to be verbalized and translated into simple, unambiguous questions. When the input is generated automatically, for instance because it contains results computed by algorithms that need to be validated by the players, it is essential that the quality of these results is not too low—otherwise the game experience will be less entertaining, as many of the questions will probably not make any sense at all. One important aspect to be considered is how to assign questions to players. The basic approach is to do this randomly, though optimizations are possible when information about the performance of players in previous game rounds is available In addition, in a multi-player game, the game developer might want to customize the ways players are matched to play against each other. The output of a game with a purpose is an aggregated, manually cleansed form of the players’ answers. In a first step, the game developer needs to be able to match the contributions of the players; this is a not an issue for those challenges in which the set of allowed solutions are known, but it is less trivial in open-scale questions, where one has to deal not only with different spelling and spelling errors, but also synonyms and the like. As a second step, the game developer needs ways to be able to identify correct answers with as little effort as possible, ideally automatically. Once accurate answers are identified, the game developer needs to translate them into a semantic format, using existing ontologies and Semantic Web representation languages. The most basic game elements are points and leader boards.
• #18: Tutaj wymienione te kategorie od eleny lub z insemtives itp..