Augustine's anthropology viewed humanity as created in God's image but fallen from grace. He believed that while humans have free will, we are restless due to our separation from God and inability to attain satisfaction on our own. For Augustine, true freedom and fulfillment can only be achieved through God's grace. He saw the human condition as fundamentally flawed due to things like desires of the flesh, but that love and opening ourselves to God's grace allows for spiritual growth and progress, if not perfection. Overall, Augustine placed God at the center of human nature and purpose, with our identity and fulfillment found through relationship with our Creator.
The document provides an overview of several major philosophers in the history of philosophy, including Augustine, Boethius, Anselm, Thomas Aquinas, and Ockham. It summarizes some of their key philosophical ideas and arguments, such as Augustine's views on time, free will, and the city of God. It also outlines Thomas Aquinas' five proofs for the existence of God and Ockham's principle of parsimony known as Ockham's razor.
This document discusses and compares different worldviews, focusing on their ability to answer life's hard questions about evil, suffering, sin, and morality. It argues that naturalism/materialism is inadequate because it cannot account for concepts like consciousness, morality, or purpose. Christianity is presented as a worldview that can satisfactorily address these questions, with evil and suffering explained as consequences of free will and the hope of an afterlife where suffering is abolished. The Christian worldview is also said to have positive social impacts and be consistent with scientific findings.
Dr. John Oakes taught on Calvinismits history, basic theology and reasons to reject its basic tenetsin Manila Jan 23, 2016. The notes and power point are included.
http://evidenceforchristianity.org/answering-calvinism/
This public lecture was given by Dr. John Oakes at the University of Stockholm in Sweden 9/5/2010. It discusses atheist arguments against the existence of God, why atheism fails and logical arguments for theism.
This document discusses the concepts of reincarnation and karma in Hindu philosophy. It provides quotes from ancient scriptures like the Bhagavad-gita supporting the idea that the soul transmigrates to new material bodies after death based on their karma. Famous figures from various religions and cultures who believed in reincarnation are listed. The subtle body containing the mind and intelligence is said to transfer between physical forms. Reincarnation is described as a merciful mechanism by which people can work to remedy sins from past lives through new experiences.
Positivism originated in Europe as a philosophy that believes true knowledge is only about observable facts that can be empirically verified through the senses. It is associated with the scientific method. Auguste Comte was a key proponent of positivism and proposed humanity progresses through theological, metaphysical, and positivist stages of understanding natural phenomena. In the positivist stage, phenomena are explained factually rather than through theological or metaphysical causes. Social sciences differ from natural sciences by studying complex human behaviors and societies as well as cultural contexts. They emphasize social structures, culture, and the decisions and interactions of individuals.
This document discusses the concepts of reincarnation and karma according to various religions and thinkers. It provides context on reincarnation being discussed in early Christian texts and the Vedas. It outlines that the soul transmigrates from one body to another according to the law of karma. The true self is the soul/consciousness and not the material body or subtle body, which are temporary. The goal is realizing one's eternal spiritual identity beyond these temporary identifications.
The document discusses several worldviews including naturalism, scientism, materialism, and postmodernism. It argues that these worldviews cannot adequately answer important questions about reality, morality, the purpose of life, and what happens after death. The document also discusses how Christianity and its assumptions about the universe enabled the development of modern science. It asserts that naturalism/materialism is based on circular reasoning and fails to make its adherents better people.
A power point for a titled What is Truth? A talk about Postmodernism, Naturalism and the Christian World View, given by Dr. John Oakes at Rutgers University 11/20-09.
Augustine of Hippo proposed a theodicy to address the problem of evil. He argued that (1) evil came about as a result of free will when Lucifer and angels rebelled against God and (2) when Adam and Eve disobeyed God by eating the forbidden fruit. Augustine saw the world as originally good but evil entered through the misuse of free will. He believed evil was a privation or lack of goodness rather than a substance. Natural evil resulted from humans upsetting the order of the universe. Later critics argued that Augustine's view did not align with modern theories of evolution and the nature of evil.
This document provides an overview and comparison of Stoic and Augustinian philosophy. Some key points:
- Stoicism, founded by Zeno around 300 BC, teaches developing fortitude and self-control to overcome emotions. It influenced early Christianity.
- Augustine's philosophy, developed in the 4th century AD, combines Platonism and Christianity. It addresses the problem of evil by arguing humans have free will but God permits evil.
- Stoics believed the universe is governed by fate and humans are responsible for their actions. Augustine argued some actions are matters of free will while others result from prior causes like God's foreknowledge.
- The philosophies agree humans are accountable for actions but differ
Richard Dawkins is considered a prominent evolutionary biologist and advocate of atheism. In his book "The God Delusion", he makes several key arguments: 1) Natural processes like evolution can spontaneously generate complexity without a designer; 2) Therefore, God is not needed to explain the universe or life; 3) Belief in God or the supernatural is a delusion caused by a "meme" infecting human thought; 4) Religion is not just false but dangerous and the enemy of science. However, the document outlines several problems with Dawkins' arguments, such as logical fallacies, biased reasoning, and assertions that cannot be scientifically proven. It argues that materialism/naturalism is based on circular logic and is ultimately false
Richard Dawkins is considered a preeminent evolutionist and popularizer of science. He is also an avowed atheist. In his book "The God Delusion", Dawkins argues that belief in God is a delusion based on several key points:
1) Natural mechanisms like evolution can spontaneously create complexity, so there is no need to invoke a designer like God.
2) If the universe can create complexity, then the existence of a fine-tuned universe does not require a creator.
3) With no designer or supernatural being required, religious thought is simply a psychological illusion or "meme" resulting from brain evolution.
4) Religion is not just an illusion but a dangerous
This document outlines an apologetics course defending Christian theology. It covers topics like the existence of God, Jesus, prophecies about Jesus, miracles, the resurrection, the Bible's inspiration and reliability, science and Christianity, and responses to difficult questions. It also compares the Christian worldview to other perspectives like Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and naturalism/materialism. The course aims to demonstrate Christianity provides compelling answers to life's big questions and that the Christian worldview is a "good" one that is true, answers important human questions, and leads people to live better lives.
The document discusses the Egyptian concept of Kuklos Anankes (the inevitable cycle or circle of necessity) and how it relates to spiritual development. It describes ancient crypts and catacombs in Egypt and Chaldea where mystical teachings were practiced, focusing on the symbolism of serpents and conches. Esoteric students are guided to reflect on how these symbols represent the spiral nature of cosmic processes and individual evolution through multiple existences over cycles of rebirth.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on the concept of evil. It begins by outlining the deductive argument from evil, which argues that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good God. It then examines various theories that have attempted to resolve this incompatibility, such as the idea that some evils may be logically necessary for greater goods. The document also analyzes different formulations of the problem of evil, like axiological and deontological approaches. Finally, it explores specific theories of evil proposed by philosophers and thinkers like Kant, Arendt, and various dualist and privation theories.
This document outlines the history of philosophy from ancient to modern times. It discusses major philosophers and philosophical movements throughout different periods including Greek/Hellenistic, Medieval, Modern, and contemporary eras. Key philosophers mentioned include Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Locke, Kant, and existentialists. Major topics of philosophy covered include rationalism, empiricism, idealism, pragmatism, and existentialism. The document also discusses the scientific revolution sparked by Copernicus and Galileo and influence of philosophers like Bacon, Hobbes, and Rousseau during the Enlightenment era.
This document discusses several arguments regarding whether the Bible can be trusted and believed. It addresses five propositions: 1) That the Bible is scientifically unsupported and probably insupportable. It provides counter arguments to this from Genesis and Hebrews. 2) That Christianity is philosophically suspect. It argues that Christian philosophy gives a more realistic view of reality than naturalism or postmodernism. 3) That Christianity is historically fraudulent. It provides several archaeological examples that confirm the historicity of the Bible. 4) That the Bible contains myths. It acknowledges this is true but explains that the Bible contains true myths like other religious texts of the time. 5) That the Bible contains contradictions. It provides several alleged contradictions but does not resolve them in
The document discusses three main worldviews: theism, monism, and naturalism. It compares their views on origin (creator, impersonal agency, impersonal plus time), purpose (relationships, self-actualization, survival), and destiny (unbounded relational life, spiritual annihilation, physical annihilation). The document provides details on the key aspects of each worldview.
Reasons For Belief: A class taught by John Oakes, PhD at Harvard University 10/16/2009. The subject is reasons to believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God. See EFC store for the recording
The document discusses Thomas Aquinas's theory of natural law, which he developed based on the work of Aristotle. It explains key aspects of Aristotle's view that things have a natural telos (purpose) and act according to their nature. For Aristotle, human nature is defined by reason. The document then outlines Aquinas's perspective that natural law is the moral code humans are naturally inclined towards, as revealed by God. Aquinas believed the four purposes of human life are living in society, reproducing, learning, and worshipping God. Any actions that enable these purposes are considered good. The document discusses how Aquinas viewed morality, sin, intentions versus actions, and how his framework is used today, particularly regarding issues like homosexuality.
This document discusses various philosophical concepts and debates around epistemology and metaphysics. It covers Plato's theory of forms, Aristotle's four causes, rationalism vs empiricism, Descartes' foundationalism, skepticism, objective vs subjective truth, and thinkers like Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky. Key debates include the nature and limits of knowledge, whether truth resides in the intelligible or physical world, and whether truth is objective or subjective.
KAJIAN FILOSOFIS ATAS TEORI DISKURSUS JRGEN HABERMASDavid Jones
油
Pemikiran-pemikiran Habermas merupakan sebuah ide pembaharuan atas kebuntuan berpikir yang dialami oleh para pendahulunya dalam Mazhab Frankfurt. Para tokoh Mazhab Frankfurt generasi pertama terjebak dalam perangkap filsafat kesadaran yang ditandai dengan klaim monologis terhadap objek kritiknya. Dalam upaya mencari sebuah solusi yang dihadapi oleh para pendahulunya, Habermas menawarkan sebuah paradigma baru dalam memandang epistemologi subjektivitas, yaitu paradigma teori komunikasi. Dalam paradigma teori komunikatif, subjektivitas tidak lagi dilihat sebagai sesuatu yang terisolasi dalam dirinya sendiri melainkan subjektivitas lebih dipahami sebagai hasil dari proses komunikasi intersubjektif.
Bagaimana mau menyekolahkan anak jika biaya untuk makan sehari-hari saja kekurangan? Lalu jika ada anggota keluarga yang sakit, bagaimana mau membawa berobat, jika uang untuk berobat tidak ada? Esensi pertanyaan-pertanyaan tersebut sejalan dengan prinsip pemikiran Abraham Maslow yang mengharuskan pemenuhan kebutuhan fisik di atas kebutuhan-kebutuhan yang lain.
Positivism originated in Europe as a philosophy that believes true knowledge is only about observable facts that can be empirically verified through the senses. It is associated with the scientific method. Auguste Comte was a key proponent of positivism and proposed humanity progresses through theological, metaphysical, and positivist stages of understanding natural phenomena. In the positivist stage, phenomena are explained factually rather than through theological or metaphysical causes. Social sciences differ from natural sciences by studying complex human behaviors and societies as well as cultural contexts. They emphasize social structures, culture, and the decisions and interactions of individuals.
This document discusses the concepts of reincarnation and karma according to various religions and thinkers. It provides context on reincarnation being discussed in early Christian texts and the Vedas. It outlines that the soul transmigrates from one body to another according to the law of karma. The true self is the soul/consciousness and not the material body or subtle body, which are temporary. The goal is realizing one's eternal spiritual identity beyond these temporary identifications.
The document discusses several worldviews including naturalism, scientism, materialism, and postmodernism. It argues that these worldviews cannot adequately answer important questions about reality, morality, the purpose of life, and what happens after death. The document also discusses how Christianity and its assumptions about the universe enabled the development of modern science. It asserts that naturalism/materialism is based on circular reasoning and fails to make its adherents better people.
A power point for a titled What is Truth? A talk about Postmodernism, Naturalism and the Christian World View, given by Dr. John Oakes at Rutgers University 11/20-09.
Augustine of Hippo proposed a theodicy to address the problem of evil. He argued that (1) evil came about as a result of free will when Lucifer and angels rebelled against God and (2) when Adam and Eve disobeyed God by eating the forbidden fruit. Augustine saw the world as originally good but evil entered through the misuse of free will. He believed evil was a privation or lack of goodness rather than a substance. Natural evil resulted from humans upsetting the order of the universe. Later critics argued that Augustine's view did not align with modern theories of evolution and the nature of evil.
This document provides an overview and comparison of Stoic and Augustinian philosophy. Some key points:
- Stoicism, founded by Zeno around 300 BC, teaches developing fortitude and self-control to overcome emotions. It influenced early Christianity.
- Augustine's philosophy, developed in the 4th century AD, combines Platonism and Christianity. It addresses the problem of evil by arguing humans have free will but God permits evil.
- Stoics believed the universe is governed by fate and humans are responsible for their actions. Augustine argued some actions are matters of free will while others result from prior causes like God's foreknowledge.
- The philosophies agree humans are accountable for actions but differ
Richard Dawkins is considered a prominent evolutionary biologist and advocate of atheism. In his book "The God Delusion", he makes several key arguments: 1) Natural processes like evolution can spontaneously generate complexity without a designer; 2) Therefore, God is not needed to explain the universe or life; 3) Belief in God or the supernatural is a delusion caused by a "meme" infecting human thought; 4) Religion is not just false but dangerous and the enemy of science. However, the document outlines several problems with Dawkins' arguments, such as logical fallacies, biased reasoning, and assertions that cannot be scientifically proven. It argues that materialism/naturalism is based on circular logic and is ultimately false
Richard Dawkins is considered a preeminent evolutionist and popularizer of science. He is also an avowed atheist. In his book "The God Delusion", Dawkins argues that belief in God is a delusion based on several key points:
1) Natural mechanisms like evolution can spontaneously create complexity, so there is no need to invoke a designer like God.
2) If the universe can create complexity, then the existence of a fine-tuned universe does not require a creator.
3) With no designer or supernatural being required, religious thought is simply a psychological illusion or "meme" resulting from brain evolution.
4) Religion is not just an illusion but a dangerous
This document outlines an apologetics course defending Christian theology. It covers topics like the existence of God, Jesus, prophecies about Jesus, miracles, the resurrection, the Bible's inspiration and reliability, science and Christianity, and responses to difficult questions. It also compares the Christian worldview to other perspectives like Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and naturalism/materialism. The course aims to demonstrate Christianity provides compelling answers to life's big questions and that the Christian worldview is a "good" one that is true, answers important human questions, and leads people to live better lives.
The document discusses the Egyptian concept of Kuklos Anankes (the inevitable cycle or circle of necessity) and how it relates to spiritual development. It describes ancient crypts and catacombs in Egypt and Chaldea where mystical teachings were practiced, focusing on the symbolism of serpents and conches. Esoteric students are guided to reflect on how these symbols represent the spiral nature of cosmic processes and individual evolution through multiple existences over cycles of rebirth.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on the concept of evil. It begins by outlining the deductive argument from evil, which argues that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good God. It then examines various theories that have attempted to resolve this incompatibility, such as the idea that some evils may be logically necessary for greater goods. The document also analyzes different formulations of the problem of evil, like axiological and deontological approaches. Finally, it explores specific theories of evil proposed by philosophers and thinkers like Kant, Arendt, and various dualist and privation theories.
This document outlines the history of philosophy from ancient to modern times. It discusses major philosophers and philosophical movements throughout different periods including Greek/Hellenistic, Medieval, Modern, and contemporary eras. Key philosophers mentioned include Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Locke, Kant, and existentialists. Major topics of philosophy covered include rationalism, empiricism, idealism, pragmatism, and existentialism. The document also discusses the scientific revolution sparked by Copernicus and Galileo and influence of philosophers like Bacon, Hobbes, and Rousseau during the Enlightenment era.
This document discusses several arguments regarding whether the Bible can be trusted and believed. It addresses five propositions: 1) That the Bible is scientifically unsupported and probably insupportable. It provides counter arguments to this from Genesis and Hebrews. 2) That Christianity is philosophically suspect. It argues that Christian philosophy gives a more realistic view of reality than naturalism or postmodernism. 3) That Christianity is historically fraudulent. It provides several archaeological examples that confirm the historicity of the Bible. 4) That the Bible contains myths. It acknowledges this is true but explains that the Bible contains true myths like other religious texts of the time. 5) That the Bible contains contradictions. It provides several alleged contradictions but does not resolve them in
The document discusses three main worldviews: theism, monism, and naturalism. It compares their views on origin (creator, impersonal agency, impersonal plus time), purpose (relationships, self-actualization, survival), and destiny (unbounded relational life, spiritual annihilation, physical annihilation). The document provides details on the key aspects of each worldview.
Reasons For Belief: A class taught by John Oakes, PhD at Harvard University 10/16/2009. The subject is reasons to believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God. See EFC store for the recording
The document discusses Thomas Aquinas's theory of natural law, which he developed based on the work of Aristotle. It explains key aspects of Aristotle's view that things have a natural telos (purpose) and act according to their nature. For Aristotle, human nature is defined by reason. The document then outlines Aquinas's perspective that natural law is the moral code humans are naturally inclined towards, as revealed by God. Aquinas believed the four purposes of human life are living in society, reproducing, learning, and worshipping God. Any actions that enable these purposes are considered good. The document discusses how Aquinas viewed morality, sin, intentions versus actions, and how his framework is used today, particularly regarding issues like homosexuality.
This document discusses various philosophical concepts and debates around epistemology and metaphysics. It covers Plato's theory of forms, Aristotle's four causes, rationalism vs empiricism, Descartes' foundationalism, skepticism, objective vs subjective truth, and thinkers like Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky. Key debates include the nature and limits of knowledge, whether truth resides in the intelligible or physical world, and whether truth is objective or subjective.
KAJIAN FILOSOFIS ATAS TEORI DISKURSUS JRGEN HABERMASDavid Jones
油
Pemikiran-pemikiran Habermas merupakan sebuah ide pembaharuan atas kebuntuan berpikir yang dialami oleh para pendahulunya dalam Mazhab Frankfurt. Para tokoh Mazhab Frankfurt generasi pertama terjebak dalam perangkap filsafat kesadaran yang ditandai dengan klaim monologis terhadap objek kritiknya. Dalam upaya mencari sebuah solusi yang dihadapi oleh para pendahulunya, Habermas menawarkan sebuah paradigma baru dalam memandang epistemologi subjektivitas, yaitu paradigma teori komunikasi. Dalam paradigma teori komunikatif, subjektivitas tidak lagi dilihat sebagai sesuatu yang terisolasi dalam dirinya sendiri melainkan subjektivitas lebih dipahami sebagai hasil dari proses komunikasi intersubjektif.
Bagaimana mau menyekolahkan anak jika biaya untuk makan sehari-hari saja kekurangan? Lalu jika ada anggota keluarga yang sakit, bagaimana mau membawa berobat, jika uang untuk berobat tidak ada? Esensi pertanyaan-pertanyaan tersebut sejalan dengan prinsip pemikiran Abraham Maslow yang mengharuskan pemenuhan kebutuhan fisik di atas kebutuhan-kebutuhan yang lain.
Penindasan dan ketidakadilan dalam masyarakat modern muncul dalam bentuk hegemoni dan ideologi yang meninabobokkan masyarakat. Usaha kritis sebagai bentuk antithesis dalam zaman ini jarang sekali ditemukan. Malahan masyarakat cenderung kehilangan daya kritisnya dan terhegemoni dalam penindasan-penindasan yang terselubung. Merasa bahwa seakan-akan semuanya baik-baik saja. Maka dari itu, diperlukan suatu bentuk antithesis baru yang mampu menjawabi permasalahan masyarakat dewasa ini. Suatu bentuk antithesis yang super kritis untuk membuka selubung-selubung penindasan tersebut. Dengan demikian, proses dialektika akan terus berlangsung guna mewujudkan suatu tatanan hidup bersama yang lebih baik.
Demokrasi pancasila perpaduan antara liberal dan komunisDavid Jones
油
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang sistem demokrasi pancasila di Indonesia yang merupakan perpaduan antara sistem liberal dan komunis. Dibahas pula landasan teori dari ketiga sistem tersebut beserta ciri-ciri dari sistem demokrasi pancasila di Indonesia."
Status ontologis (eksistensi) kejahatan on. wordDavid Jones
油
Kejahatan tidak memiliki eksistensi ontologis menurut Agustinus. Ia menolak pandangan Manikheisme bahwa kejahatan adalah substansi. Menurut Agustinus, kejahatan hanyalah ketiadaan kebaikan, bukan entitas tersendiri. Kejahatan berasal dari kehendak bebas manusia untuk menolak kebaikan. Agustinus membedakan kejahatan moral yang disengaja, dan kejahatan fisik seperti cacat yang tidak disengaja.
Dalam kehidupan sehari-hari seringkali kita mendengar ungkapan: Ah, Teori.mana prakteknya? Seringkali kali juga kita melihat, ada orang yang suka berteori namun minim dalam hal praktek (tindakan). Begitu pula sebaliknya, ada orang yang suka bertindak (aktifis) namun minim dalam hal teori/konsep-konsep. Lalu ada pula yang mengatakan: Ah, teori-teori yang saya pelajari sewaktu kuliah tidak berguna sama sekali dalam dunia kerja saya sekarang. Kalau memang benar demikian, maka tak perlu kuliah untuk bekerja, mengingat bahwa ada orang yang dapat sukses dalam perkerjaan tanpa merasakan bangku kuliah.
Kemajemukan bagaikan pisau tajam bermata dua. Jika diakomodir dengan baik, maka akan memperkaya inetgrasi nasional. Namun jika tidak dapat diakomodir dengan baik, maka dapat mengarah pada disintegrasi.
Science Communication beyond Journal Publications WorkshopWAIHIGA K.MUTURI
油
Science Not Shared is Science Lost: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Impact 鏝
In the heart of Africa, where innovation meets resilience, lies an untapped reservoir of scientific brilliance. Yet, too often, groundbreaking research remains confined within the walls of journals, inaccessible to the communities it seeks to serve. This February, I am thrilled to join the "Science Communication Beyond Journal Publications" workshop at the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) as one of the lead trainers. Together, we will unravel the power of storytelling, creative media, and strategic communication to amplify science's voice beyond academia.
Science is not just about discoveryit's about connection. Imagine a researcher in Kampala whose work could transform public health policy but struggles to translate their findings into actionable insights for policymakers. Or a young scientist in Nairobi whose groundbreaking study on climate resilience could inspire farmers but remains buried in technical jargon. These stories matter. They hold the potential to change lives and rewrite Africas narrative on poverty and development.
At this workshop, we will explore how scientists can collaborate with communicators to craft compelling stories that resonate with policymakers, communities, and global audiences alike. From podcasts that bring lab discoveries to life ァ to press releases that spark media attention and digital tools that democratize knowledge we will empower participants to make their research accessible and impactful.
This mission aligns deeply with my belief that Africa MUST change the way it tackles poverty. Science communication is not just about sharing knowledge; it's about driving action. When researchers effectively communicate their work, they empower communities with solutions rooted in evidence. They influence policies that prioritize sustainable development. They inspire innovation that addresses grassroots challenges.
Let us humanize scienceinfuse it with stories of hope, struggle, and triumphand ensure it reaches those who need it most. Because when science connects with people, it transforms lives.
To my fellow scientists and communicators: this is our call to action. Lets bridge the gap between discovery and impact. Lets co-create stories that not only inform but inspire action across Africa and beyond.
Panel discussion: The current and future skills landscape
This panel will explore how Historic Environment Scotland, National Museums Scotland, and Museums Galleries Scotland support training and development across the culture sector. Speakers will highlight areas including access to training, workforce confidence, and the importance of understanding and meeting the sectors needs.
Panel discussion with Q&A: Sustainable co-production
The Sustainable Co-production Fund, developed by MGS as part of the Delivering Change programme, supports museums to collaborate with communities and help all people to access culture. Participating museums are working with community groups to engage with wider audiences and increase the representation of people who have been systematically excluded from museums.
Attendees will learn about the experiences of Fund recipients and discover the benefits of adopting a sustainable co-production method.
The opening session of the Symposium starts with a keynote speech by Professor David Olusoga OBE and an address by Angus Robertson MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Culture.
At the plenary session, speakers scan the horizon and discuss shared challenges and opportunities for Scotlands museum sector.
This is followed by a sector showcase: get a snapshot of key areas shaping current museum practice with these insights from Museums Galleries Scotland staff and sector colleagues. Topics include repatriation, LGBTQ+ inclusion, Intangible Cultural Heritage, and Modern Apprenticeships.
This session starts with a presentation from our guest speakers on what an anti-racist curriculum can mean in practice. This will be followed by an interactive workshop on how museums can support efforts to promote and embed race equality and anti-racism in the curricula in a meaningful, effective, and sustainable way.
Red blood cell (RBC) indices measure your red blood cells' size, shape, and quality. Red blood cells are also known as erythrocytes. They are made in your bone marrow (the spongy tissue inside your large bones). They contain hemoglobin, an iron-rich protein in your red blood cells that carries oxygen from your lungs to every cell in your body. Your cells need oxygen to grow, reproduce, and make energy.
Knowing the size and shape of your red blood cells can help your provider determine if you have a certain type of anemia, a condition in which your body does not make enough healthy red blood cells. There are four types of red blood cell indices:
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), which measures the average size of your red blood cells.
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), which measures the average amount of hemoglobin in a single red blood cell.
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), which measures how concentrated (close together) the hemoglobin is in your red blood cells. It also includes a calculation of the size and volume of your red blood cells.
Red cell distribution width (RDW), which measures differences in the volume and size of your red blood cells. Healthy red blood cells are usually about the same size.
If one or more of these indices are not normal, it may mean you have some type of anemia.
Other names: erythrocyte indices
What are they used for?
Red blood cell (RBC) indices are part of a complete blood count, a group of tests that measures the number and type of cells in your blood. The results of RBC indices are used to diagnose different types of anemia. There are several types of anemia, and each type has a different effect on the size, shape, and/or quality of red blood cells.
Why do I need red blood cell indices testing?
You may get this test as part of a complete blood count, which is often included in a routine checkup. You may also need this test if you have symptoms of anemia, which may include:
Shortness of breath
Weakness or fatigue
Headache
Dizziness
Arrhythmia (a problem with the rate or rhythm of your heartbeat)
Pale skin
Cold hands and feet
What happens during a red blood cell indices test?
A health care professional will take a blood sample from a vein in your arm, using a small needle. After the needle is inserted, a small amount of blood will be collected into a test tube or vial. You may feel a little sting when the needle goes in or out. This test usually takes less than five minutes.
Will I need to do anything to prepare for these tests?
You don't need any special preparations for a red blood cell (RBC) indices test.
Are there any risks to these tests?
There is very little risk to having a blood test. There may be slight pain or bruising at the spot where the needle was put in, but most symptoms go away quickly.
What do the results mean?
You will get results for each of the indices. Abnormal results may include one or more of the following:
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV)
If your red blood cells ar
Hinter diesem komplizierten Titel verbergen sich f端nf Jahre Experimente, Versuche und Schwierigkeiten mit dem OKR-Rahmen. Definitiv eine harte Nuss: XITASO hatte, wie viele andere Organisationen auch, eine schwere Zeit, es effektiv zum Laufen zu bringen aber nach einigen m端tigen und undogmatischen nderungen haben wir es geschafft. Strategisches Motto, asynchrones Drumbeating, neue Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten, Ressourcenzuteilung auf der Grundlage von Beyond Budgeting Prinzipien, Domains und Selbstorganisation XITASO spielt kein Buzzword-Bingo, sondern hat viel zu erz辰hlen! In diesem aufregenden Vortrag wird Baptiste kurz die holakratische Organisation von XITASO vorstellen (mit 260 Mitarbeitern, 16 Teams und 31 Kreisen) und zeigen, wie sie ihren eigenen OKR-Rahmen geschaffen hat, um Innovationen strategisch und effektiv voranzutreiben. All ihre Erkenntnisse werden auch als kostenlose Handouts in Form des OKR.X Guide zur Verf端gung stehen!
Speaker: Baptiste Grand
FIFA Friendly Match at Alberni Valley - Strategic Plan.pptxabuhasanjahangir
油
Let us make this match as the featured International friendly match between Team Canada and a popular World Cup-playing nation in Alberni Valley as part of the lead-up to FIFA 2026. This event will create global attention and drive economic and community benefits.
Discover how museum digitisation has both positive and negative impacts on the climate. Participants will be invited to discuss their collections, approaches to digitisation, and climate strategies with the aim of forging a way forward which benefits collections, audiences, and nature.
Satoshi Nakamoto is not a person, Satoshi Nakamoto is a partnership of two individuals.
The partners have a formal written partnership agreement which governs the activities of the partnership.
The term Satoshi Nakamoto is actually a portmanteau of the individual pseudonyms of the two partners.
Satoshi is the pseudonym of Natasha, the maternal aunt of Vitalik Buterin and former cryptologist at the CSE's Tutte Institute for Mathematics and Computing. However, she's still a member of Canada's national security and intelligence community.
Nakamoto is the pseudonym of Anastasia, the younger sister of former Edmonton police officer Elena Sinelnikova.
The two partners can verify all of this via cryptographic proof employing either the bitcoin genesis block address or the bitcoin block 9 address. The latter being the address that was used to pay 10btc to Hal Finney on January 12, 2009.
The two will also verify that they did not mine any of the so called patoshi pattern bitcoins and that bitcoin block 9 does not adhere to that mining pattern.
The two also published the proof of stake whitepapper under the pseudonym Sunny King.
See https://academy.youngplatform.com/en/crypto-heroes/who-is-inventor-proof-of-stake/
They also published the CryptoNote whitepaper using another pseudonym, that of Nicolas van Saberhagen.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryptoNote
They were also two of several individuals behind the thankful_for_today pseudonym who initiated the development of Monero.
see https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/2407/what-is-the-story-with-thankful-for-today-and-the-transfer-of-dev-control
They continued to be active in the industry they helped to initiate.
They were behind the involvement of Natasha's nephew Vitalik Buterin in the founding of the Ethereum project.
They worked behind the scenes on the development of the Metis project by their sisters Natalia Ameline and Elena Sinelnikova.
They worked behind the scenes on other projects in the crypto/blockchain industry as well.
Natasha's sister Natalia Ameline is one of the cofounders of Cryptochicks.ca along with Anastasia's sister Elena Sinelnikova.
Don't take my work for it though, Natalia can be contacted at natalia.ameline@cryptochicks.ca and Elena can be contacted at elena.sinelnikova@cryptochicks.ca - give them a shout why don't you?
Natasha and Anastasia also confirm and clarify the role that the organization known as Cicada 3301 played in the origin and development of bitcoin. That is an interesting story you will not want to miss out on.
They will also confirm for you all the folks who knew the truth about the origins of bitcoin and who have been lying about it.
Natasha expressed an interest moving from the Canadian intelligence community and becoming an RCMP officer prior to revealing the truth about her involvement in the development of the industry. Her stated objective is to work in the RCMP's Federal Policing National Security Program.
Let us wish her well
Every company is at a different stage in the introduction of data science or AI. Not every use case fits every company, and finding the right one is often a challenge. Limited resources and a lack of expertise are common obstacles. This presentation will explore this challenge using an agile process to identify, develop and successfully implement impactful data science and AI projects.
1. Seminar AgustinusSeminar Agustinus
(Confessiones book)(Confessiones book)
The OntologicalThe Ontological
Status of Evil:Status of Evil:
ManichaeismManichaeism
Metaphysics of EvilMetaphysics of Evil
ActAct
Con. VII (Hlm.179 Con. VII (Hlm.179
209)209)
Oleh:Oleh:
David Jones SimanungkalitDavid Jones Simanungkalit
2. Sistematika PresentasiSistematika Presentasi
Pergulatan batinPergulatan batin
Agustinus mencariAgustinus mencari
eksistensi kejahatan.eksistensi kejahatan.
The OntologicalThe Ontological
Status of Evil:Status of Evil:
Manichaeism.Manichaeism.
Metaphysics of EvilMetaphysics of Evil
Act.Act.
Pandangan AgustinusPandangan Agustinus
tentang Kejahatan.tentang Kejahatan.
3. Pergulatan Batin AgustinusPergulatan Batin Agustinus
Mencari Eksistensi Kejahatan.Mencari Eksistensi Kejahatan.
AgustinusAgustinus bergulat denganbergulat dengan
pertanyaan tentang hakekatpertanyaan tentang hakekat
ontologis kejahatan. (Hlm.ontologis kejahatan. (Hlm.
183, 186).183, 186).
Sampai pada titik kecemasan.Sampai pada titik kecemasan.
(Hlm. 191).(Hlm. 191).
KecemasanKecemasan membawamembawa
pada pengaruh yangpada pengaruh yang
menyelamatkan. (Hlm. 192).menyelamatkan. (Hlm. 192).
Membaca tulisan-tulisan Neo-Membaca tulisan-tulisan Neo-
Platonis. (Hlm. 193).Platonis. (Hlm. 193).
Inspirasi untuk menemukanInspirasi untuk menemukan
titik terang pada masalahnya.titik terang pada masalahnya.
Kembali pada diri sendiri.Kembali pada diri sendiri.
(Hlm. 196).(Hlm. 196).
4. The Ontological Status of Evil: Manichaeism.The Ontological Status of Evil: Manichaeism.
Metaphysics of Evil Act.Metaphysics of Evil Act.
ManicheismManicheism (Mani of Persia;(Mani of Persia;
c.215-276). Moral Dualism:c.215-276). Moral Dualism:
there are two principles atthere are two principles at
work; Good and Evil.work; Good and Evil.
Confessiones Buku III, hlm. 80.Confessiones Buku III, hlm. 80.
(catatan kaki).(catatan kaki).
BaikBaik zat atau kerajaanzat atau kerajaan
terang. (Allah Baik)terang. (Allah Baik)
Buruk (jahat)Buruk (jahat) zat atauzat atau
kerajaan kegelapan. (Allahkerajaan kegelapan. (Allah
jahat).jahat).
5. Keberatan Agustinus terhadap AjaranKeberatan Agustinus terhadap Ajaran
Manikeisme (hakekat ontologis kejahatan)Manikeisme (hakekat ontologis kejahatan)
AgustinusAgustinus ><>< ontologiontologi
kejahatan Manikeisme.kejahatan Manikeisme.
Argumen 1: KeberatanArgumen 1: Keberatan
Nebridius yg disetujuiNebridius yg disetujui
Agustinus. (Allah tdkAgustinus. (Allah tdk
dapat diganggu gugat,dapat diganggu gugat,
tdk dapat rusak).tdk dapat rusak).
Argumen 2: jika yangArgumen 2: jika yang
jahat adl zat maka padajahat adl zat maka pada
hakikatnya yang jahat ituhakikatnya yang jahat itu
adl kebaikan. (dari prinsipadl kebaikan. (dari prinsip
Kitab Suci).Kitab Suci).
6. Pandangan Agustinus tentangPandangan Agustinus tentang
Eksistensi KejahatanEksistensi Kejahatan
Diwarnai oleh duaDiwarnai oleh dua
pandangan dasar;pandangan dasar;
1. Kitab Suci1. Kitab Suci
Segala yang adaSegala yang ada
baik adanya (Kejbaik adanya (Kej
1: 31).1: 31).
2. Pandangan Plato.2. Pandangan Plato.
Matter-formMatter-form
(body-mind)(body-mind)
dualism in Plato.dualism in Plato.
((PhaedoPhaedo).).
7. Pandangan Agustinus tentangPandangan Agustinus tentang
Eksistensi KejahatanEksistensi Kejahatan
If God is good, and GodIf God is good, and God
created the world, how cancreated the world, how can
there be Evil in the world?there be Evil in the world?
Moral categories of goodMoral categories of good
and bad mix with theologicaland bad mix with theological
questions.questions.
Akasioma Dasar: Segala yangAkasioma Dasar: Segala yang
ada baik adanya (Kej 1: 31).ada baik adanya (Kej 1: 31).
AgustinusAgustinus Evil doesnt exist.Evil doesnt exist.
AgustinusAgustinus Evil is theEvil is the
absence of Good. Evil has noabsence of Good. Evil has no
ontological status. (privatio).ontological status. (privatio).
8. Pandangan Agustinus tentangPandangan Agustinus tentang
Eksistensi KejahatanEksistensi Kejahatan
Asal muasal kejahatanAsal muasal kejahatan
Kehendak bebas manusia.Kehendak bebas manusia.
KejahatanKejahatan kerusakankerusakan
kemauan (kemauan (free willfree will), yang), yang
menyimpang dari zat yangmenyimpang dari zat yang
tertinggitertinggi, yaitu, yaitu AllahAllah,,
berpaling ke hal-hal yangberpaling ke hal-hal yang
paling rendahpaling rendah, membuang, membuang
intinya di dalam.intinya di dalam.
Membuang berarti pergiMembuang berarti pergi
keluar, ke hal-hal lahiriah.keluar, ke hal-hal lahiriah.
(Bdk. Sir 10: 10).(Bdk. Sir 10: 10).
PlatoPlato dunia materi adldunia materi adl
buruk.buruk.
9. Pandangan Agustinus tentangPandangan Agustinus tentang
Eksistensi KejahatanEksistensi Kejahatan
Metaphysical evilMetaphysical evil is the lacking of a perfectionis the lacking of a perfection
not due to a given nature and hence is notnot due to a given nature and hence is not
actually an evil. Under this aspect, all creaturesactually an evil. Under this aspect, all creatures
are evil because they fall short of full perfection,are evil because they fall short of full perfection,
which is God alone.which is God alone.
Physical evilPhysical evil consists in the privation of aconsists in the privation of a
perfection due to nature; e.g., blindness is theperfection due to nature; e.g., blindness is the
privation of sight in a being which ought to haveprivation of sight in a being which ought to have
sight according to the exigencies of its nature.sight according to the exigencies of its nature.
AugustineAugustine, under Platonic and Stoic influence,, under Platonic and Stoic influence,
justifies the presence of physical evil in thejustifies the presence of physical evil in the
general order of nature, in which dissonancegeneral order of nature, in which dissonance
serves to greater accentuate the generalserves to greater accentuate the general
harmony. The solution, certainly, is not veryharmony. The solution, certainly, is not very
pleasant.pleasant.
The only true evil isThe only true evil is moral evilmoral evil; sin, an action; sin, an action
contrary to the will of God. The cause of moralcontrary to the will of God. The cause of moral
evil is not God, who is infinite holiness, nor is itevil is not God, who is infinite holiness, nor is it
matter, as the Platonists would have it, formatter, as the Platonists would have it, for
matter is a creature of God and hence good.matter is a creature of God and hence good.
Neither is the will as a faculty of the soul evil, forNeither is the will as a faculty of the soul evil, for
it too has been created by God. The cause ofit too has been created by God. The cause of
moral evil is the faculty of free will, by whichmoral evil is the faculty of free will, by which
man is able to deviate from the right order, toman is able to deviate from the right order, to
oppose himself to the will of God.oppose himself to the will of God.
10. KesimpulanKesimpulan
ManikeismeManikeisme Evil is exist.Evil is exist.
AgustinusAgustinus Evil doesnt exist,Evil doesnt exist,
evil is the absence of Good.evil is the absence of Good.
Evil has no ontological status.Evil has no ontological status.
(privatio).(privatio).
EvilEvil the souce of evil is Freethe souce of evil is Free
WillWill
EvilEvil the lacking of athe lacking of a
perfection. The source ofperfection. The source of
perfection is God.perfection is God.
EvilEvil kerusakan kehendakkerusakan kehendak
bebas (bebas (free willfree will), yang), yang
menyimpang dari zat yangmenyimpang dari zat yang
tertinggitertinggi, yaitu, yaitu AllahAllah,,
berpaling ke hal-hal yangberpaling ke hal-hal yang
paling rendahpaling rendah, membuang, membuang
intinya di dalam.intinya di dalam.