This document discusses criticisms of connectivism from different perspectives. One criticism is that connectivism's focus on networks may cause learners to deny the importance of individual learning. However, it is possible to take advantage of networks while also learning individually. Another criticism is that existing learning theories are sufficient to explain how technology affects learning environments, though some believe new technologies require new theories. A third criticism is that rather than a new standalone theory, connectivism would be better as a model integrating existing theories to guide online learning design, though such a model could face contradictions.
1 of 3
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Unit Eight Reflective Paper
1. Running Head: UNIT EIGHT 1
Unit Eight: Reflective Paper
Connectivists Perspective
Lauren Fowler-Carter
University of Houston Clear Lake
2. UNIT EIGHT 2
Unit Eight: Reflective Paper
Connectivists Perspective
Criticisms that have been discussed about connectivism vary depending on ones
perspective of the theory. Connectivism focuses on the power of networks, suggesting that
learning is beneficial outside of their own self-learning. A criticism suggests that connectivism
and the power of the network may begin to have a connectivist start to lose and deny the
importance of the individual and the learning that occurs inside our heads (Connectivism,
2006). I do believe that this criticism is a valid suggestion of an issue towards connectivism,
because this seems to be a plausible scenario that would happen to a connectivist. It is possible to
take advantage of the power of the network, but also in addition, learn for one self through
personal experiences. This criticism could also be tied into the connectivists personality,
because naturally there are some personalities that feed off of others (i.e. networks, learning from
others experiences). So I could see this type of personality potentially denying the learning that
occurs in their own head.
Critics, including Bill Kerr, believe that although technology does affect learning
environments, existing learning theories are sufficient (Connectivism). This criticism is one that
would depend on the persons perspective. Some people believe that the learning theories that
have already been applied for many are sufficient, but there are others that believe the opposite.
Critics also suggest that as education continuously changes and new technologies develop and
become implemented, what is not needed is a new stand-alone theory for the digital age, but
model that integrates the different theories to guide the design of online learning materials
(Connectivism). This could be an arguable statement, because even if there was a model that
integrated the different theories, basically creating a melting pot of theories, contradictions are
bound to arise within the model.
3. UNIT EIGHT 3
References
(2006, November 21st). Retrieved November 27, 2011, from Connectivism:
http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=75
Connectivism. (n.d.). Retrieved November 27, 2011, from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectivism#Criticisms