Alternative means of assessments and evaluations in inclusive classroomsNamrata Saxena
油
1. The document discusses alternative forms of assessment such as authentic assessment and performance-based assessment that are meant to evaluate students' skills in a more holistic manner compared to traditional standardized tests.
2. Some benefits of alternative assessments mentioned include capturing complex skills, addressing realistic tasks, including good instructional tools, communicating what is truly valued, and meeting different student learning styles.
3. The document provides examples of alternative assessments like performances, writing samples, interviews, portfolios, and observations. It also discusses principles of assessment like tying assessment to curriculum, using both formative and summative evaluations, and employing a broad range of data collection methods.
This document discusses alternatives to traditional standardized tests for language assessment, including performance-based assessments, portfolios, journals, conferences, observations, and self-assessment. Performance-based assessments measure language production through projects and allow teachers to observe students' process. Portfolios are collections of student work that demonstrate progress over time. Journals provide opportunities for reflection. Conferences and observations allow for formative feedback. Self-assessment promotes learner autonomy and intrinsic motivation by involving students in evaluating their own work. These alternative assessments provide more contextualized and authentic measures of students' language abilities.
This document discusses alternatives to standardized testing for student assessment, including performance-based assessments, portfolios, journals, conferences, interviews, and observations. It provides characteristics and guidelines for implementing each alternative form of assessment in the classroom. The alternatives allow for a more holistic evaluation of students and more authentic demonstrations of their skills.
The document discusses alternative forms of assessment compared to traditional assessment methods. It provides examples of alternative assessment such as portfolio assessment, protocol analysis, learning logs, journal entries, and dialogue journals. These alternative assessments focus on evaluating students' real-life language abilities through open-ended, process-oriented methods rather than isolated skills and standardized tests. The document also addresses issues of reliability, validity and objectivity for alternative assessments.
The document discusses alternative forms of assessment compared to traditional assessment methods. It provides examples of alternative assessment such as portfolio assessment, protocol analysis, learning logs, journal entries, and dialogue journals. These alternative assessments focus on evaluating students' real-life language abilities through open-ended, process-oriented methods rather than isolated skills and standardized testing. The document also addresses issues of reliability, validity and objectivity for alternative assessments.
This document discusses inclusive teaching and assessment practices. It describes a Higher Education Academy project involving 16 universities to develop an inclusive culture with a focus on feedback and assessment. The project aims to create an inclusive assessment and feedback toolkit through staff and student engagement. Several case studies are presented that demonstrate both inclusive and non-inclusive assessment approaches. Next steps discussed include gaining senior management support, a two-phase research project, and evaluating the impact of inclusive practices through student and staff involvement.
Language Assessment - Beyond Test-Alternatives Assessment by EFL LearnersEFL Learning
油
The concept of assemble additional measures of油studentsportfolios, journals, observations, self-assessments, peer-assessments, and油the likein an effort to triangulate data about students.油
1. The document discusses alternatives to standardized testing for language assessment, including portfolios, journals, observations, conferences, interviews, and self-assessment.
2. These alternative forms of assessment require more time and effort from teachers but provide more authentic and comprehensive views of student performance and progress.
3. The document provides guidelines for implementing various alternative assessments in the classroom, including clearly stating objectives, criteria for evaluation, and providing feedback.
A short presentation with information about alternatives in assessment: (a) performance-based assessment, (b) portfolios, (c) journals, (d) conferences and interviews, (e) observations, and (f) self & peer assessment.
The document discusses alternatives to traditional assessment methods that give teachers more flexibility in evaluating student learning. It describes several classroom assessment techniques including observations, student self-assessments, peer assessments, journals, concept mapping, group discussions, interviews, and student-generated tests. These alternative methods assess higher-order thinking skills and focus on the learning process in addition to products. They provide teachers with ongoing feedback to improve instruction.
This document discusses alternative forms of assessment and provides examples of different types. It begins with an overview of alternative assessments, noting they are intended to show student growth and inform instruction rather than act as standardized tests. It then describes various alternative assessments including performance-based assessments, portfolios, journals, conferences/interviews, observations, and self- and peer-assessment. Each type is defined and characteristics or examples are provided. The document explains alternative assessments provide a more holistic view of students' skills and can be more process-oriented and related to real-life situations compared to traditional testing.
This document discusses alternative assessment techniques for enhancing meaningful learning. It begins by defining assessment and testing, then describes alternative assessment and some common alternative assessment tools like portfolios, interviews, and anecdotal records. Portfolios are discussed in more depth, outlining how they allow students to take responsibility for their own learning and construct their own knowledge. The document contrasts traditional and alternative assessment and lists advantages of alternative assessment, such as assessing a wider range of skills. It concludes that alternative assessment techniques can enhance meaningful learning by assessing students' strengths and weaknesses.
Performance-based assessment involves having students complete projects, performances, or tasks to demonstrate their understanding of concepts rather than taking traditional paper and pencil tests. There are two key parts to performance-based assessments - a clearly defined task for students to complete and a rubric listing the explicit criteria used to assess students. Some common examples of performance-based assessments include oral reports, original stories, puppet shows, portfolios, and performances. These assessments allow students to apply their knowledge in real-world contexts and demonstrate a process rather than just a product.
This document discusses authentic assessment and compares it to traditional assessment. It defines authentic assessment as an evaluation process involving multiple forms of performance measurement that reflect a student's learning, achievements, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally relevant activities. Authentic assessment involves real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of knowledge and skills, while traditional assessment focuses more on memorization. The document lists several types of authentic assessment tools, including journals, portfolios, rubrics, and teacher observations. It emphasizes that authentic assessment allows for measuring meaningful tasks, learner-specific evaluation, and self-assessment built into tasks.
Special topic by Rosalie P. Mabana and Gemma Caranza(Authentic Assessment)yunisay13
油
This document discusses authentic assessment and compares it to traditional assessment. It defines authentic assessment as an evaluation process involving multiple forms of performance measurement that reflect a student's learning, achievements, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally relevant activities. Authentic assessment involves real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of knowledge and skills, while traditional assessment focuses more on memorization. The document lists several types of authentic assessment tools, including journals, portfolios, rubrics, and teacher observations. It emphasizes that authentic assessment allows for measuring meaningful tasks, learner-specific evaluation, and self-assessment built into tasks.
The document discusses various forms of alternative assessment including portfolios, authentic assessment, and backward design. It provides details on portfolio assessment, describing it as a continuous, multidimensional process that allows for student reflection. Portfolios can be either process-oriented to show development or product-oriented to demonstrate mastery. The advantages of alternative assessments are that they provide opportunities for student self-assessment and application of concepts to real-world expectations. However, implementing alternative assessments also presents challenges.
The document discusses various sources of data that can be used to document teaching effectiveness, including instructor self-assessment, student perceptions, student learning outcomes, peer/colleague reviews, teaching resources, and administrative perspectives. It provides examples of tools that can gather information from these sources, such as course portfolios, teaching journals, student surveys and feedback, classroom observations, peer reviews of materials, and student achievement outcomes. Graphs and matrices are suggested as ways to analyze and visualize trends in student feedback and comments over time.
Alternative Assessments
Brown and Hudson ( 1988) noted that to speak of alternatives assessment is counterproductive because the term implies some thing new and different that may be exempt from the requirements of responsible test construction.
Assessment procedures that are not like traditional tests with respect to format, performance or implementation
Traditional vs Alternative
What should alternative assessments do?
Ask Ss to perform, create, produce or do something
Tap higher level thinking skills
Use tasks that are meaningful
Invoke real world applications
People, not machines, do the scoring
Require new instructional and assessment roles for teachers
The alternatives in assessment must be:
Open ended in their time orientation and format
Contextualized to a curriculum
Referenced to the criteria ( objectives) of that curriculum and
Likely to build intrinsic motivation.
Tugas pengajaran Alternative In Assessment .pptxrevamizan
油
This document discusses various alternative assessment methods including portfolios, journals, conferences, observations, and self-assessment. Portfolios allow students to showcase their work and progress over time. Journals can be used for language learning, reflections, and self-assessment. Conferences provide opportunities for one-on-one feedback through discussions of drafts, portfolios, journals, and goal-setting. Observations allow teachers to assess students' skills through interactions and class participation. Self-assessment and peer assessment help students evaluate their own and others' work, increasing involvement in learning. Guidelines are provided for effectively implementing these various alternative assessment methods.
This document discusses assessment and evaluation in education. It defines assessment as the systematic collection of student performance data to guide instruction, while evaluation determines if program goals have been met. Formative assessment is ongoing to improve learning, while summative assessment evaluates learning. Authentic assessment involves real-world tasks evaluated using rubrics. Different types of traditional and alternative assessments are examined.
Constructivism is a learning theory where knowledge is constructed by learners through experiences and interactions with teachers and peers. The teacher acts as a facilitator by providing open-ended questions, opportunities for collaboration, and authentic learning experiences that allow students to build upon their existing knowledge through problem-solving. Assessment focuses on higher-order thinking skills rather than factual recall through methods like performance-based assessments and rubrics.
A portfolio is a collection of a student's work that shows their progress and achievements in one or more subject areas. It should include student-selected samples that show growth over time. Portfolios are used for assessment because they provide a more comprehensive view of a student's skills and learning compared to standardized tests. Performance-based assessment requires students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills by creating responses or products, rather than just selecting answers. Effective performance tasks clearly identify the intended learning outcomes and require students to apply their knowledge to realistic scenarios. Rubrics are scoring guides used to evaluate performance tasks based on multiple criteria rather than a single score or grade. They provide clear standards and feedback to improve student learning.
A look at the benefits of portfolios and other forms of assessment. This presentation was given in the Pedagogy Circle on Nov 11 and Nov 12, by Joanne Chesley, Ed.D.
1. Authentic assessment is a holistic approach to evaluation that considers a student's knowledge, skills, and attitudes through engaging tasks that demonstrate real-world application. It differs from traditional assessment by measuring meaningful tasks instead of just testing memorization.
2. Authentic assessment allows students to perform tasks that genuinely engage them and are valid measures of learning. Some common forms of authentic assessment include portfolios, rubrics, observations, interviews, and projects.
3. When developing rubrics to guide authentic assessment, teachers should clearly define purposes and criteria based on standards, describe different performance levels, and ensure the rubrics can provide observable and meaningful feedback.
A short presentation with information about alternatives in assessment: (a) performance-based assessment, (b) portfolios, (c) journals, (d) conferences and interviews, (e) observations, and (f) self & peer assessment.
The document discusses alternatives to traditional assessment methods that give teachers more flexibility in evaluating student learning. It describes several classroom assessment techniques including observations, student self-assessments, peer assessments, journals, concept mapping, group discussions, interviews, and student-generated tests. These alternative methods assess higher-order thinking skills and focus on the learning process in addition to products. They provide teachers with ongoing feedback to improve instruction.
This document discusses alternative forms of assessment and provides examples of different types. It begins with an overview of alternative assessments, noting they are intended to show student growth and inform instruction rather than act as standardized tests. It then describes various alternative assessments including performance-based assessments, portfolios, journals, conferences/interviews, observations, and self- and peer-assessment. Each type is defined and characteristics or examples are provided. The document explains alternative assessments provide a more holistic view of students' skills and can be more process-oriented and related to real-life situations compared to traditional testing.
This document discusses alternative assessment techniques for enhancing meaningful learning. It begins by defining assessment and testing, then describes alternative assessment and some common alternative assessment tools like portfolios, interviews, and anecdotal records. Portfolios are discussed in more depth, outlining how they allow students to take responsibility for their own learning and construct their own knowledge. The document contrasts traditional and alternative assessment and lists advantages of alternative assessment, such as assessing a wider range of skills. It concludes that alternative assessment techniques can enhance meaningful learning by assessing students' strengths and weaknesses.
Performance-based assessment involves having students complete projects, performances, or tasks to demonstrate their understanding of concepts rather than taking traditional paper and pencil tests. There are two key parts to performance-based assessments - a clearly defined task for students to complete and a rubric listing the explicit criteria used to assess students. Some common examples of performance-based assessments include oral reports, original stories, puppet shows, portfolios, and performances. These assessments allow students to apply their knowledge in real-world contexts and demonstrate a process rather than just a product.
This document discusses authentic assessment and compares it to traditional assessment. It defines authentic assessment as an evaluation process involving multiple forms of performance measurement that reflect a student's learning, achievements, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally relevant activities. Authentic assessment involves real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of knowledge and skills, while traditional assessment focuses more on memorization. The document lists several types of authentic assessment tools, including journals, portfolios, rubrics, and teacher observations. It emphasizes that authentic assessment allows for measuring meaningful tasks, learner-specific evaluation, and self-assessment built into tasks.
Special topic by Rosalie P. Mabana and Gemma Caranza(Authentic Assessment)yunisay13
油
This document discusses authentic assessment and compares it to traditional assessment. It defines authentic assessment as an evaluation process involving multiple forms of performance measurement that reflect a student's learning, achievements, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally relevant activities. Authentic assessment involves real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of knowledge and skills, while traditional assessment focuses more on memorization. The document lists several types of authentic assessment tools, including journals, portfolios, rubrics, and teacher observations. It emphasizes that authentic assessment allows for measuring meaningful tasks, learner-specific evaluation, and self-assessment built into tasks.
The document discusses various forms of alternative assessment including portfolios, authentic assessment, and backward design. It provides details on portfolio assessment, describing it as a continuous, multidimensional process that allows for student reflection. Portfolios can be either process-oriented to show development or product-oriented to demonstrate mastery. The advantages of alternative assessments are that they provide opportunities for student self-assessment and application of concepts to real-world expectations. However, implementing alternative assessments also presents challenges.
The document discusses various sources of data that can be used to document teaching effectiveness, including instructor self-assessment, student perceptions, student learning outcomes, peer/colleague reviews, teaching resources, and administrative perspectives. It provides examples of tools that can gather information from these sources, such as course portfolios, teaching journals, student surveys and feedback, classroom observations, peer reviews of materials, and student achievement outcomes. Graphs and matrices are suggested as ways to analyze and visualize trends in student feedback and comments over time.
Alternative Assessments
Brown and Hudson ( 1988) noted that to speak of alternatives assessment is counterproductive because the term implies some thing new and different that may be exempt from the requirements of responsible test construction.
Assessment procedures that are not like traditional tests with respect to format, performance or implementation
Traditional vs Alternative
What should alternative assessments do?
Ask Ss to perform, create, produce or do something
Tap higher level thinking skills
Use tasks that are meaningful
Invoke real world applications
People, not machines, do the scoring
Require new instructional and assessment roles for teachers
The alternatives in assessment must be:
Open ended in their time orientation and format
Contextualized to a curriculum
Referenced to the criteria ( objectives) of that curriculum and
Likely to build intrinsic motivation.
Tugas pengajaran Alternative In Assessment .pptxrevamizan
油
This document discusses various alternative assessment methods including portfolios, journals, conferences, observations, and self-assessment. Portfolios allow students to showcase their work and progress over time. Journals can be used for language learning, reflections, and self-assessment. Conferences provide opportunities for one-on-one feedback through discussions of drafts, portfolios, journals, and goal-setting. Observations allow teachers to assess students' skills through interactions and class participation. Self-assessment and peer assessment help students evaluate their own and others' work, increasing involvement in learning. Guidelines are provided for effectively implementing these various alternative assessment methods.
This document discusses assessment and evaluation in education. It defines assessment as the systematic collection of student performance data to guide instruction, while evaluation determines if program goals have been met. Formative assessment is ongoing to improve learning, while summative assessment evaluates learning. Authentic assessment involves real-world tasks evaluated using rubrics. Different types of traditional and alternative assessments are examined.
Constructivism is a learning theory where knowledge is constructed by learners through experiences and interactions with teachers and peers. The teacher acts as a facilitator by providing open-ended questions, opportunities for collaboration, and authentic learning experiences that allow students to build upon their existing knowledge through problem-solving. Assessment focuses on higher-order thinking skills rather than factual recall through methods like performance-based assessments and rubrics.
A portfolio is a collection of a student's work that shows their progress and achievements in one or more subject areas. It should include student-selected samples that show growth over time. Portfolios are used for assessment because they provide a more comprehensive view of a student's skills and learning compared to standardized tests. Performance-based assessment requires students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills by creating responses or products, rather than just selecting answers. Effective performance tasks clearly identify the intended learning outcomes and require students to apply their knowledge to realistic scenarios. Rubrics are scoring guides used to evaluate performance tasks based on multiple criteria rather than a single score or grade. They provide clear standards and feedback to improve student learning.
A look at the benefits of portfolios and other forms of assessment. This presentation was given in the Pedagogy Circle on Nov 11 and Nov 12, by Joanne Chesley, Ed.D.
1. Authentic assessment is a holistic approach to evaluation that considers a student's knowledge, skills, and attitudes through engaging tasks that demonstrate real-world application. It differs from traditional assessment by measuring meaningful tasks instead of just testing memorization.
2. Authentic assessment allows students to perform tasks that genuinely engage them and are valid measures of learning. Some common forms of authentic assessment include portfolios, rubrics, observations, interviews, and projects.
3. When developing rubrics to guide authentic assessment, teachers should clearly define purposes and criteria based on standards, describe different performance levels, and ensure the rubrics can provide observable and meaningful feedback.
SOCIAL CHANGE(a change in the institutional and normative structure of societ...DrNidhiAgarwal
油
This PPT is showing the effect of social changes in human life and it is very understandable to the students with easy language.in this contents are Itroduction, definition,Factors affecting social changes ,Main technological factors, Social change and stress , what is eustress and how social changes give impact of the human's life.
Finals of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
Mate, a short story by Kate Grenvile.pptxLiny Jenifer
油
A powerpoint presentation on the short story Mate by Kate Greenville. This presentation provides information on Kate Greenville, a character list, plot summary and critical analysis of the short story.
Prelims of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
How to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18. In Odoo, Init Hooks are essential functions specified as strings in the __init__ file of a module.
APM event hosted by the South Wales and West of England Network (SWWE Network)
Speaker: Aalok Sonawala
The SWWE Regional Network were very pleased to welcome Aalok Sonawala, Head of PMO, National Programmes, Rider Levett Bucknall on 26 February, to BAWA for our first face to face event of 2025. Aalok is a member of APMs Thames Valley Regional Network and also speaks to members of APMs PMO Interest Network, which aims to facilitate collaboration and learning, offer unbiased advice and guidance.
Tonight, Aalok planned to discuss the importance of a PMO within project-based organisations, the different types of PMO and their key elements, PMO governance and centres of excellence.
PMOs within an organisation can be centralised, hub and spoke with a central PMO with satellite PMOs globally, or embedded within projects. The appropriate structure will be determined by the specific business needs of the organisation. The PMO sits above PM delivery and the supply chain delivery teams.
For further information about the event please click here.
Chapter 3. Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management.pptxRommel Regala
油
This course provides students with a comprehensive understanding of strategic management principles, frameworks, and applications in business. It explores strategic planning, environmental analysis, corporate governance, business ethics, and sustainability. The course integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to enhance global and ethical perspectives in decision-making.
How to Configure Restaurants in Odoo 17 Point of SaleCeline George
油
Odoo, a versatile and integrated business management software, excels with its robust Point of Sale (POS) module. This guide delves into the intricacies of configuring restaurants in Odoo 17 POS, unlocking numerous possibilities for streamlined operations and enhanced customer experiences.
Blind Spots in AI and Formulation Science Knowledge Pyramid (Updated Perspect...Ajaz Hussain
油
This presentation delves into the systemic blind spots within pharmaceutical science and regulatory systems, emphasizing the significance of "inactive ingredients" and their influence on therapeutic equivalence. These blind spots, indicative of normalized systemic failures, go beyond mere chance occurrences and are ingrained deeply enough to compromise decision-making processes and erode trust.
Historical instances like the 1938 FD&C Act and the Generic Drug Scandals underscore how crisis-triggered reforms often fail to address the fundamental issues, perpetuating inefficiencies and hazards.
The narrative advocates a shift from reactive crisis management to proactive, adaptable systems prioritizing continuous enhancement. Key hurdles involve challenging outdated assumptions regarding bioavailability, inadequately funded research ventures, and the impact of vague language in regulatory frameworks.
The rise of large language models (LLMs) presents promising solutions, albeit with accompanying risks necessitating thorough validation and seamless integration.
Tackling these blind spots demands a holistic approach, embracing adaptive learning and a steadfast commitment to self-improvement. By nurturing curiosity, refining regulatory terminology, and judiciously harnessing new technologies, the pharmaceutical sector can progress towards better public health service delivery and ensure the safety, efficacy, and real-world impact of drug products.
The Constitution, Government and Law making bodies .saanidhyapatel09
油
This PowerPoint presentation provides an insightful overview of the Constitution, covering its key principles, features, and significance. It explains the fundamental rights, duties, structure of government, and the importance of constitutional law in governance. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the foundation of a nations legal framework.
2. Lets Discuss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkK06hpQmt4
The Questions:
What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning?
What are the Reasons for using alternative assessment:
Provide Examples of alternative assessments?
What are some Forms of alternative assessment?
What is Performance based assessment?
3. In the beginning of the semester we talked bout the differences between
alternative and traditional assessment methods.
We agreed that alternatives to paper and pencils types of assessments
are more authentic.
We discussed the fact that alternative methods of assessment are
formative in purpose, informal in regards to paper pencil type, not
summative although, they could be formal if you have clear scoring rubric
that guide students in regards to their performance and the expectations.
4. What is alternative assessment?
In alternative assessment methods, students response to a question or a
task from the teacher.
These responses can come in different forms:
portfolios
journals
essays
student project
presentations/ performance assessment
group work
oral reports
interviews
5. Why alternative assessment
Alternative assessment methods help students find different paths to
demonstrate their understanding.
They help them practice managing the information in more creative and
critical thinking ways.
Help schools focus on thinking skills rather than memorization. (Spivey, 2010)
In language learning, alternative assessment methods show students ability
to use language not only knowing the language.
Real language use.
Increase motivation
Students take responsibility of their own learning.
It shows progress.
6. Table 1.1 page 13 represents distinctions between
alterative and traditional assessment methods
Page 13, discussion of the differences between the two
methods.
7. There are many resources available for teachers to help them
use alternative methods of assessment. There are many
articles and research that talked bout the importance of
assessment. There are also many websites and video clips that
provide teachers with ideas and creative assignments that
encourage differentiation of assessment in classroom.
These resources guided this lecture. (see the reference slide for
details).
8. Different types of alternative methods of
assessment
Observation checklists
Portfolios
Journals
Anecdotal records
Student project
Presentations
Group work
Oral reports
Student interviews
9. Alternative Assessment methods in language learning
All based on the Communicative language theory:
The alternative assessment methods shifted from the focus of competency to the
ability to function ( use this ability) effectively through language in particular
context in a given situation.
1-Interviews: verbal exchange between the teacher and students. Teacher asks
the questions and students response to the questions. From students responses,
teachers will know if the students know/understand/ master the materials or
not.
2-Short answers: require students to respond to specific question or a task
posed by the teacher that could require them to compare and contrast,
describe, draw, present ideas in visualized way using graphs, charts..
3-Observation: help collect data about students learning and progress.
4-Anecdotal records: are observational notes taken by the teachers to record
the experiences and the progress of a child (more used in language literacy
with children)
5-Performance based assessment: ( we talked abut this method of
assessment a lot: lecture 2, lecture 6, and today).
10. 5-Performance-based assessment: involve learners in actually performing the behavior
that we want to measure. In interactive tasks, test-takers are measured in the act of
speaking, requesting, responding, or in combining listening and speaking, and in
integrating reading and writing.
-Performance-based assessment is an alternative form of assessment that moves
away from traditional paper and pencil tests.
-The students are engaged in creating a final project that exhibits their understanding of
a concept they have learned.
-A unique quality of performance-based assessment is that is allows the students to
be assessed based on a process. The teacher is able to see first hand how the students
produce language in real-world situations. In addition, performance-based assessments
tend to have a higher content validity because a process is being measured. The focus
remains on the process, rather than the product in performance-based assessment.
Examples: portfolios, journals, presentations, oral reports, letters, stories.
Source: http://audreymerrell.net/INTASC/INTASC8/Assessment/performancebasedassessment_files/pbassessment.html
11. 6-Portfolios: A purposeful collection of student work that demonstrates
achievement or improvement.
Advantages of portfolio
Identify student weaknesses.
Can be used to view learning and development of students.
Can be used to gather information about students assignments and experiences.
One of the most important benefits of using portfolios is the enhancement of critical
thinking skills which result from the need for students to:
Develop evaluation criteria.
Can be used as study guide
Use this criteria to evaluate their work.
Engage in self-reflection about their progress
*go back to the YouTube clip : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkK06hpQmt4
12. 7- Presentation:
A presentation is a mean of communication which can be adapted
to various speaking situations, such as talking to a group,
addressing a meeting, reporting on a project, presenting findings,
or briefing a team. It is the practice of showing and explaining the
content of a topic to an audience or learner, and show students
ability to use the target language effectively.
13. Alternative assessment methods need
Rubrics
If you are using alternative methods of assessment, you need to use
rubrics. You need to grade them therefore, you need rubrics. You need an
objective way of grading. Based on the criteria you have established, you
rate your students performance: such as Unacceptable to good to
outstanding.
In this way students are aware of your expectations
You give rubric before the assessment
It is like a checklist. because you give them a chance to be
creative( outstanding ) or fill on the expectations.
(Spivey, 2010)
16. Summary
Alternative assessment methods show students ability to use the
target language , Real language use, Increase motivation,
Students take responsibility of their own learning, and It shows
progress.
Teacher needs to use rubric when using alternative assessment
methods to be objective and to be clear in her expectations and
her grading criteria.