Precedents are earlier court rulings that act as guidelines for subsequent cases. They provide flexibility in the application of laws but also create some uncertainty. Precedents are classified as authoritative, absolute or persuasive depending on the court of origin. Higher court rulings are considered absolute precedents while decisions of the same court can be conditional. Precedents can be weakened through reversal or overruling but strengthened by affirmation or long-standing use. While precedents promote consistency, they can also perpetuate errors and be applied retrospectively.
Precedents are earlier court rulings that act as guidelines for subsequent cases. They provide flexibility in the application of laws but also create some uncertainty. Precedents are classified as authoritative, such as judgments from higher courts, or persuasive. They can be strengthened by affirmation from higher courts or weakened by being overturned. While precedents promote consistency in rulings, they can also perpetuate errors and increase the complexity of legal judgments.
PRECEDENTS AS A SOURCE OF LAW
DIFFERENT DEFINITION OF PRECEDENTS
ARTICLE 141 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
HIERARCHY OF COURTS IN INDIA THE APEX COURT AT THE TOP AND OTHER COURTS AS SUBORDINATE COURTS
NATURE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF PRECEDENTS
DIFFERENT KINDS OF PRECEDENTS
DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS
DECISION SUB SILENTIO
DOCTRINE OF PROSPECTIVE OVERRULING RATIO DECIDENI OF A CASE OBITER DICTUM OF THE CASE
MERITS OF PRECEDENTS
DEMERITS OF PRECEDENTS
The key sources of constitutional law in Malaysia are:
1. The Federal Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land.
2. State Constitutions, which regulate the government of each state.
3. Legislation enacted by Parliament at the federal level and state legislative assemblies.
4. Judicial precedents set by court decisions, which provide consistency and certainty in legal principles.
This document discusses the doctrine of substantive ultra vires in administrative law. It begins by defining substantive ultra vires as when an authority exercises powers beyond what is conferred by law. The document then discusses several key aspects of substantive ultra vires, including:
- The limits of statutory powers and how an authority's actions must fall within the powers granted by statute.
- The use of ouster clauses by Parliament to restrict judicial review, and how courts narrowly interpret such clauses.
- What constitutes an error of law, and when a decision can be quashed for being ultra vires.
- The need for authorities to properly direct their discretion and not act arbitrarily when statutes provide discretionary powers.
Precedents are principles or rules established in previous landmark legal cases that courts use to decide similar future cases based on the doctrine of stare decisis. Precedents are important to maintain stability, predictability, and integrity in the legal system. There are three types of precedents - binding precedent that compels lower courts, original precedent that establishes new rules, and persuasive precedent from courts of equivalent jurisdiction but different regions. Precedents promote uniformity, check judicial whims, and help interpret statutes, but they can also add complexities, uncertainty, and restrict new ideas from emerging.
This document provides an overview of administrative law in Canada. It discusses that administrative law is concerned with the regulation of governmental power over individuals and the exercise of statutorily authorized powers. It outlines some of the key areas administrative law covers, such as regulations, licensing, labor relations, and social programs. The document then examines some of the key sources of procedural fairness rights in administrative decisions, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Bill of Rights, and specific provincial legislation. It analyzes cases that have helped develop administrative law in Canada and establish principles around when procedural fairness is owed and what it requires.
These slides are regarding Ratio decidendi, a topic from judicial process.What is ratio. Ratio decidendi. Definitions. Hierarchy of English court. Difference between ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. Shades of meaning to the expression ratio decidendi.
The Role of Ratio Decidendi in Judicial Precedent. Rules of ratio decidendi. When precedent has multiple reasons. Where there are multiple judges. Determination of ratio decidendi. Ratio decidendi in Indian Scenario. Stare decisis and Article 141 Overruling Conclusion.
The doctrine of judicial precedent developed in common-law legal system centered on the notion of ratio decidenti of a case. According to the preliminary statement of the English rules of precedent, every court is bound to follow any case decided by a court above it in the hierarchy and appellate courts(other than House of Lords) are bound by their previous decisions. The decision or judgement of a judge may fall into two parts: The ratio decidendi (reason for the decision) Obiter dictum(something said which is not part of the judgement or said by the way).
What is ratio? Meaning of ratio is the measure of a quantity in terms of another and decidendi means decision. Ratio is a ruling on a point of law and the decision on a point of law depends on facts of a case. Culling out / obtaining ratio from a judgment is difficult. A thorough reading of an entire judgment is required to identify a ratio. Essence of the decision is the ratio. Every observation found in a judgement is not the ratio.
RATIO DECIDENDI Ratio decidendi is a legal rule derived from, and consistent with, those parts of legal reasoning within a judgment on which the outcome of the case depends. The ratio decidendi is "the point in a case that determines the judgment" or "the principle that the case establishes. Ratio decidendi is a Latin phrase meaning "the reason" or "the rationale for the decision".
7. DEFINITION According to Salmond the ratio decidendi may be described roughly as the rule of law applied by and acted on by the court, or the rule which the court regarded as governing the case." Sir Rupert Cross defined the ratio decidendi as any rule of law expressly or impliedly treated by the judge as a necessary step in reaching his conclusion, having regard to the line of reasoning adopted by him(Precedent in English Law).
Ratio decidendi Ratio decidendi ordinarily means the reason for deciding the case . The reason here is not; The fact of the case. The law that the case applies. The order of the case.
HIERARCHY OF ENGLISH COURTS
MAGISTRATES COURTS TRIBUNALS COUNTY COURT HIGH COURT SUPREME COURT (House of Lords) COURT OF APPEAL CROWN COURT CIVIL CRIMINAL DIVISIONAL COURT
The presentation specifically deals with Judicial Precedent. Presentation explains the meaning of precedent, its source, its nature, kinds, and Supreme court and precetent.
This letter responds to Formal Opinion No. 49 issued by the Hawaii Supreme Court Disciplinary Board regarding the provision of legal services for medical marijuana businesses. The letter proposes two alternatives to amend Hawaii Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(d) to allow such legal services: 1) Add a comment clarifying that lawyers can advise on conduct permitted by state law, or 2) Directly amend Rule 1.2(d) to include such language. The letter also urges reconsideration of Formal Opinion No. 49 given the passage of Hawaii's medical marijuana law.
This document discusses different types of written laws and how they are interpreted. It explains that statutes, regulations, constitutions, and cases all establish rules of law but are interpreted differently. When interpreting statutes, courts may consider the legislative intent, legislative history, and current public policy. Key parts of a case include the facts, procedural history, issues presented, rules of law, application of law to facts, holding, and dissenting opinions. Stare decisis, or precedent, requires courts to follow previous holdings, though they can be overturned with justification.
The document discusses key principles of the US Constitution including separation of powers, checks and balances, limited government, federalism, and judicial review. It notes that while these principles remain, the Constitution has been modified over time through amendments, legislation, and judicial interpretation to allow it to endure. Both positive and negative views of the Constitution are provided, with positives being its emphasis on limited government and flexibility, and negatives including arguments that it provides too weak a system of government or has allowed an overly powerful federal government.
The doctrine of stare decisis is best explained by reference to the English translation of the Latin phrase. "Stare decisis" literally translates as "to stand by decided matters". The phrase "stare decisis" is itself an abbreviation of the Latin phrase "stare decisis et non quieta movere" which translates as "to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled matters".
This document discusses the need for and various rules of interpretation when interpreting taxing statutes. It notes that while tax practitioners are not lawyers, they essentially practice law when interpreting tax statutes. The rules of interpretation help the judiciary determine legislative intent when a statute's meaning is unclear.
Some key rules discussed include the literal rule of interpreting the plain meaning of words used, harmonious construction of reading provisions together, beneficial construction resolving doubts in favor of taxpayers, and the use of external aids like legislative history to help understand purpose and context. Exceptions to rules like the literal rule are mentioned. Interpretation of specific types of provisions like charging, penal and relief provisions are also covered.
Precedents are previous court cases that are used to guide future legal decisions. There are four types of precedents: 1) Authoritative precedents that judges must follow, including absolute precedents they must always follow and conditional precedents they can disregard in special cases; 2) Convincing precedents that judges can choose to follow as they see fit; 3) Original precedents that establish new legal rules; and 4) Declaratory precedents that simply apply existing rules. Precedents provide consistency, efficiency, and help adapt laws to changing social conditions.
2015 u303 the role of the courts in law making1Crystal Delosa
油
This document outlines the role of courts in law-making through judicial precedent and statutory interpretation. It discusses how common law is developed through court decisions and the doctrine of precedent binds lower courts to follow higher court decisions. It also examines how judges can interpret statutes and develop the law, as well as the flexibility within the doctrine of precedent that allows courts to distinguish, reverse or overrule precedents. Both the strengths and weaknesses of law-making by courts are evaluated.
Where does a judge find the rules? The judicial imagination is not sufficient authority, even though some judicial decisions seem to suggest otherwise. There are several sources of the law, the primary ones being the Constitution, legislation, and prior judicial decisions. This last is the subject matter of this session.
This document discusses the concept of judicial precedent in Bangladeshi law. It begins by defining judicial precedent as judges following principles from similar past cases. It then outlines key elements like ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. Ratio decidendi refers to the legally binding reasoning behind a past decision, while obiter dicta is non-binding commentary. The document also examines precedent in different courts, exceptions like distinguishing cases, and how precedent relates to Article 111 of the Bangladeshi constitution regarding binding Supreme Court opinions.
This document discusses the difference between mandatory and directory statutes and provides guidelines for interpreting them. Some key points:
- Mandatory statutes must be followed strictly, while directory statutes provide guidance but are not strictly enforced. Non-compliance with mandatory statutes can invalidate proceedings.
- There is no universal rule for differentiating between the two; the legislature's intent is key. Courts examine the entire statute, its purpose, and consequences of different interpretations.
- If non-compliance causes injustice, the statute is likely mandatory. If mandatory interpretation causes serious inconvenience without furthering the statute's goals, it is directory.
- Use of prohibitive language like "shall" or "no" suggests a mandatory statute,
Introduction to legal analysis sources law dictakdouat
油
The document provides an introduction to legal concepts including stare decisis, precedents, primary and secondary sources of law, and the difference between holdings and dicta in judicial opinions. It explains that stare decisis, or precedent, refers to following past decisions and that precedents can be either mandatory/binding or persuasive/non-binding depending on factors like the court of origin. It also outlines the hierarchical relationships between different sources of law and how to analyze statutes.
LR & W COMMON LAW PROCESS - JUDICIAL PRECEDENT.pptxPatienceKosgey
油
The document discusses the doctrine of judicial precedent in common law systems. It makes three key points:
1) Judges look to precedents from earlier similar cases to help decide current cases, promoting consistency and predictability in the law. This doctrine is called stare decisis.
2) Precedents are either binding, meaning judges must follow the legal rules or principles set in earlier cases, or persuasive, where judges may consider but are not bound by the logic or reasoning of past cases.
3) The ratio decidendi, or legal rule that was essential to and led to the outcome of a past case, is what makes a precedent binding. Dicta, or non-essential statements of law, are
Judicial review refers to the process by which courts exercise control over the findings and interpretations of governmental agencies. It is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was established in Marbury v. Madison. Judicial review allows courts to determine the meaning of legislation and invalidate unconstitutional statutes. It provides guidance to agencies and acts as a check on administrative overreach. There are two major aspects - access to review, governed by concepts like ripeness, standing, and mootness, and the scope of review, regarding how much deference courts give to agency actions.
The document discusses various methods for resolving disputes, including litigation and alternative dispute resolution. It provides details on civil and criminal court processes, as well as hierarchical court structures. It also outlines pre-trial procedures, trials, judgments, and methods of enforcing judgments. Additionally, it discusses administrative law and tribunals, judicial review, and alternative dispute resolution methods like negotiation, mediation, and arbitration.
The presentation specifically deals with Judicial Precedent. Presentation explains the meaning of precedent, its source, its nature, kinds, and Supreme court and precetent.
This letter responds to Formal Opinion No. 49 issued by the Hawaii Supreme Court Disciplinary Board regarding the provision of legal services for medical marijuana businesses. The letter proposes two alternatives to amend Hawaii Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(d) to allow such legal services: 1) Add a comment clarifying that lawyers can advise on conduct permitted by state law, or 2) Directly amend Rule 1.2(d) to include such language. The letter also urges reconsideration of Formal Opinion No. 49 given the passage of Hawaii's medical marijuana law.
This document discusses different types of written laws and how they are interpreted. It explains that statutes, regulations, constitutions, and cases all establish rules of law but are interpreted differently. When interpreting statutes, courts may consider the legislative intent, legislative history, and current public policy. Key parts of a case include the facts, procedural history, issues presented, rules of law, application of law to facts, holding, and dissenting opinions. Stare decisis, or precedent, requires courts to follow previous holdings, though they can be overturned with justification.
The document discusses key principles of the US Constitution including separation of powers, checks and balances, limited government, federalism, and judicial review. It notes that while these principles remain, the Constitution has been modified over time through amendments, legislation, and judicial interpretation to allow it to endure. Both positive and negative views of the Constitution are provided, with positives being its emphasis on limited government and flexibility, and negatives including arguments that it provides too weak a system of government or has allowed an overly powerful federal government.
The doctrine of stare decisis is best explained by reference to the English translation of the Latin phrase. "Stare decisis" literally translates as "to stand by decided matters". The phrase "stare decisis" is itself an abbreviation of the Latin phrase "stare decisis et non quieta movere" which translates as "to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled matters".
This document discusses the need for and various rules of interpretation when interpreting taxing statutes. It notes that while tax practitioners are not lawyers, they essentially practice law when interpreting tax statutes. The rules of interpretation help the judiciary determine legislative intent when a statute's meaning is unclear.
Some key rules discussed include the literal rule of interpreting the plain meaning of words used, harmonious construction of reading provisions together, beneficial construction resolving doubts in favor of taxpayers, and the use of external aids like legislative history to help understand purpose and context. Exceptions to rules like the literal rule are mentioned. Interpretation of specific types of provisions like charging, penal and relief provisions are also covered.
Precedents are previous court cases that are used to guide future legal decisions. There are four types of precedents: 1) Authoritative precedents that judges must follow, including absolute precedents they must always follow and conditional precedents they can disregard in special cases; 2) Convincing precedents that judges can choose to follow as they see fit; 3) Original precedents that establish new legal rules; and 4) Declaratory precedents that simply apply existing rules. Precedents provide consistency, efficiency, and help adapt laws to changing social conditions.
2015 u303 the role of the courts in law making1Crystal Delosa
油
This document outlines the role of courts in law-making through judicial precedent and statutory interpretation. It discusses how common law is developed through court decisions and the doctrine of precedent binds lower courts to follow higher court decisions. It also examines how judges can interpret statutes and develop the law, as well as the flexibility within the doctrine of precedent that allows courts to distinguish, reverse or overrule precedents. Both the strengths and weaknesses of law-making by courts are evaluated.
Where does a judge find the rules? The judicial imagination is not sufficient authority, even though some judicial decisions seem to suggest otherwise. There are several sources of the law, the primary ones being the Constitution, legislation, and prior judicial decisions. This last is the subject matter of this session.
This document discusses the concept of judicial precedent in Bangladeshi law. It begins by defining judicial precedent as judges following principles from similar past cases. It then outlines key elements like ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. Ratio decidendi refers to the legally binding reasoning behind a past decision, while obiter dicta is non-binding commentary. The document also examines precedent in different courts, exceptions like distinguishing cases, and how precedent relates to Article 111 of the Bangladeshi constitution regarding binding Supreme Court opinions.
This document discusses the difference between mandatory and directory statutes and provides guidelines for interpreting them. Some key points:
- Mandatory statutes must be followed strictly, while directory statutes provide guidance but are not strictly enforced. Non-compliance with mandatory statutes can invalidate proceedings.
- There is no universal rule for differentiating between the two; the legislature's intent is key. Courts examine the entire statute, its purpose, and consequences of different interpretations.
- If non-compliance causes injustice, the statute is likely mandatory. If mandatory interpretation causes serious inconvenience without furthering the statute's goals, it is directory.
- Use of prohibitive language like "shall" or "no" suggests a mandatory statute,
Introduction to legal analysis sources law dictakdouat
油
The document provides an introduction to legal concepts including stare decisis, precedents, primary and secondary sources of law, and the difference between holdings and dicta in judicial opinions. It explains that stare decisis, or precedent, refers to following past decisions and that precedents can be either mandatory/binding or persuasive/non-binding depending on factors like the court of origin. It also outlines the hierarchical relationships between different sources of law and how to analyze statutes.
LR & W COMMON LAW PROCESS - JUDICIAL PRECEDENT.pptxPatienceKosgey
油
The document discusses the doctrine of judicial precedent in common law systems. It makes three key points:
1) Judges look to precedents from earlier similar cases to help decide current cases, promoting consistency and predictability in the law. This doctrine is called stare decisis.
2) Precedents are either binding, meaning judges must follow the legal rules or principles set in earlier cases, or persuasive, where judges may consider but are not bound by the logic or reasoning of past cases.
3) The ratio decidendi, or legal rule that was essential to and led to the outcome of a past case, is what makes a precedent binding. Dicta, or non-essential statements of law, are
Judicial review refers to the process by which courts exercise control over the findings and interpretations of governmental agencies. It is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was established in Marbury v. Madison. Judicial review allows courts to determine the meaning of legislation and invalidate unconstitutional statutes. It provides guidance to agencies and acts as a check on administrative overreach. There are two major aspects - access to review, governed by concepts like ripeness, standing, and mootness, and the scope of review, regarding how much deference courts give to agency actions.
The document discusses various methods for resolving disputes, including litigation and alternative dispute resolution. It provides details on civil and criminal court processes, as well as hierarchical court structures. It also outlines pre-trial procedures, trials, judgments, and methods of enforcing judgments. Additionally, it discusses administrative law and tribunals, judicial review, and alternative dispute resolution methods like negotiation, mediation, and arbitration.
K2_Curriculum Construction and Development.pptAhmadMukhsin2
油
Curriculum is the organized plan for what will be taught in schools and provides guidance for teachers. It outlines the content, rubrics, and worksheets that should be used. Curriculum development is the process of formally preparing these teaching guides, which are then made mandatory by educational authorities. While teachers have flexibility in how they teach the material, the official curriculum still influences the topics that are actually emphasized in the classroom.
1. The document defines curriculum as a plan for achieving desired goals or ends, including strategies for selecting learning experiences.
2. It discusses different types of curriculums and characteristics such as being planned, balanced, relevant, and dynamic.
3. The curriculum development process involves situation analysis, setting aims/objectives, selecting and organizing content, choosing learning activities, and evaluation.
Teks tersebut membahas tentang pengertian dan penentuan kuasa ujian statistik, termasuk definisi kuasa ujian, kesalahan tipe I dan II, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kuasa ujian, dan teknik-teknik penentuan ukuran sampel seperti menggunakan jadual Krejcie dan Morgan, rumus Cochran, dan perangkat lunak GPower dengan mempertimbangkan ukuran efek dan kuasa ujian.
This document discusses curriculum evaluation and related concepts. It begins by defining key terms like curriculum, evaluation, assessment, and measurement. It then examines different definitions and components of curriculum. The document outlines theories and models of curriculum evaluation, discussing how evaluation can occur at various stages of curriculum design and implementation. Evaluation is distinguished from assessment and measurement, with evaluation focusing on analyzing entire systems, programs, and processes rather than just student achievement. Overall, the document provides an overview of curriculum evaluation, exploring its purpose and assessing curriculum elements against guiding principles and values.
This document discusses population and sampling concepts, including:
- The difference between a population and sample, with a population being the whole group and a sample being a subset.
- Various sampling methods like simple random sampling, systematic sampling, stratified sampling, and clustered sampling.
- Factors to consider when determining sample size like confidence level, margin of error, and effect size based on past studies.
- Tables and formulas that can be used to calculate appropriate sample sizes based on the population size.
Finals of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Prelims of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
How to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to use Init Hooks in Odoo 18. In Odoo, Init Hooks are essential functions specified as strings in the __init__ file of a module.
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
SOCIAL CHANGE(a change in the institutional and normative structure of societ...DrNidhiAgarwal
油
This PPT is showing the effect of social changes in human life and it is very understandable to the students with easy language.in this contents are Itroduction, definition,Factors affecting social changes ,Main technological factors, Social change and stress , what is eustress and how social changes give impact of the human's life.
How to attach file using upload button Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to attach file using upload button Odoo 18. Odoo features a dedicated model, 'ir.attachments,' designed for storing attachments submitted by end users. We can see the process of utilizing the 'ir.attachments' model to enable file uploads through web forms in this slide.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
- Autonomy, Teams and Tension
- Oliver Randall & David Bovis
- Own Your Autonomy
Oliver Randall
Consultant, Tribe365
Oliver is a career project professional since 2011 and started volunteering with APM in 2016 and has since chaired the People Interest Network and the North East Regional Network. Oliver has been consulting in culture, leadership and behaviours since 2019 and co-developed HPTM速an off the shelf high performance framework for teams and organisations and is currently working with SAS (Stellenbosch Academy for Sport) developing the culture, leadership and behaviours framework for future elite sportspeople whilst also holding down work as a project manager in the NHS at North Tees and Hartlepool Foundation Trust.
David Bovis
Consultant, Duxinaroe
A Leadership and Culture Change expert, David is the originator of BTFA and The Dux Model.
With a Masters in Applied Neuroscience from the Institute of Organisational Neuroscience, he is widely regarded as the Go-To expert in the field, recognised as an inspiring keynote speaker and change strategist.
He has an industrial engineering background, majoring in TPS / Lean. David worked his way up from his apprenticeship to earn his seat at the C-suite table. His career spans several industries, including Automotive, Aerospace, Defence, Space, Heavy Industries and Elec-Mech / polymer contract manufacture.
Published in Londons Evening Standard quarterly business supplement, James Caans Your business Magazine, Quality World, the Lean Management Journal and Cambridge Universities PMA, he works as comfortably with leaders from FTSE and Fortune 100 companies as he does owner-managers in SMEs. He is passionate about helping leaders understand the neurological root cause of a high-performance culture and sustainable change, in business.
Session | Own Your Autonomy The Importance of Autonomy in Project Management
#OwnYourAutonomy is aiming to be a global APM initiative to position everyone to take a more conscious role in their decision making process leading to increased outcomes for everyone and contribute to a world in which all projects succeed.
We want everyone to join the journey.
#OwnYourAutonomy is the culmination of 3 years of collaborative exploration within the Leadership Focus Group which is part of the APM People Interest Network. The work has been pulled together using the 5 HPTM速 Systems and the BTFA neuroscience leadership programme.
https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/apm-people-network/about/
APM event hosted by the South Wales and West of England Network (SWWE Network)
Speaker: Aalok Sonawala
The SWWE Regional Network were very pleased to welcome Aalok Sonawala, Head of PMO, National Programmes, Rider Levett Bucknall on 26 February, to BAWA for our first face to face event of 2025. Aalok is a member of APMs Thames Valley Regional Network and also speaks to members of APMs PMO Interest Network, which aims to facilitate collaboration and learning, offer unbiased advice and guidance.
Tonight, Aalok planned to discuss the importance of a PMO within project-based organisations, the different types of PMO and their key elements, PMO governance and centres of excellence.
PMOs within an organisation can be centralised, hub and spoke with a central PMO with satellite PMOs globally, or embedded within projects. The appropriate structure will be determined by the specific business needs of the organisation. The PMO sits above PM delivery and the supply chain delivery teams.
For further information about the event please click here.
How to Configure Flexible Working Schedule in Odoo 18 EmployeeCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to configure flexible working schedule in Odoo 18 Employee module. In Odoo 18, the Employee module offers powerful tools to configure and manage flexible working schedules tailored to your organization's needs.
1. JUDICIAL PRECEDENT
Meaning:
One of the sources of Malaysian law.
Defined as: a judgment or decision of a court
of law cited as an authority for the
legal principle embodied in its
decision or
: a previous examples(cases) which is
or maybe taken as an example for
future happenings.
2. Works in 2 ways:
Vertically: the lower ct are bound to follow the
principle in previous decisions of the
superior ct.
Horizontally: its own previous decision.
: the decision of its predecessor.
VERTICALLY HORIZONTALLY
4. DISADVANTAGES:
have controversy as to what extent should the
ct be able to reform the law
Judges exercise a certain degree of discretion
Difficult to ascertain whether a particular
statement in a judgment is ratio or obiter