CCSS School on Computational Social Science『計算社会科学入門』における第5章ネットワーク解説.
http://ccss.kobe-u.ac.jp/event/seminar_all/2020/202102270900.html
「計算社会科学」
https://amzn.to/3pZGt2w
NagoyaStat #9 で使用した資料です(公開に当たって口頭の内容を補完したものになります)。
「StanとRでベイズ統計モデリング」の第7章になります。
内容は単に回帰分析を行うだけではダメなケースについての取り扱い方について、著者の流儀について理解しようというものになります。
---
The title of textbook is "Bayesian statistical modeling with Stan and R", and that of Chapter 7 in textbook is "Troublesome situation in regression analysys" in English.
[Editage Seminar] Common language mistakes made by Japanese authors and essen...英文校正エディテージ
?
This document summarizes a presentation given by Yukti Bharwani on common mistakes made by Japanese authors when writing research papers in English for publication. The presentation covers mistakes made in various sections of research papers like titles, keywords, cover letters, introductions, methods, results, discussions, and references. It provides tips to avoid these mistakes by following best practices in scientific writing. The presentation emphasizes understanding the perspective of journal editors and peer reviewers as the main audience for the paper.
Checklist to avoid accidental plagiarism英文校正エディテージ
?
The document provides a 10-point checklist for avoiding accidental plagiarism when writing manuscripts. It advises acknowledging the works of others, using quotation marks for verbatim text, keeping verbatim text to a minimum, rewriting content from previous studies in one's own words, citing sources, mentioning if the paper was previously presented, following ideas from previous studies with one's own interpretation, using plagiarism detection software, and emphasizing novelty in the cover letter.
NagoyaStat #9 で使用した資料です(公開に当たって口頭の内容を補完したものになります)。
「StanとRでベイズ統計モデリング」の第7章になります。
内容は単に回帰分析を行うだけではダメなケースについての取り扱い方について、著者の流儀について理解しようというものになります。
---
The title of textbook is "Bayesian statistical modeling with Stan and R", and that of Chapter 7 in textbook is "Troublesome situation in regression analysys" in English.
[Editage Seminar] Common language mistakes made by Japanese authors and essen...英文校正エディテージ
?
This document summarizes a presentation given by Yukti Bharwani on common mistakes made by Japanese authors when writing research papers in English for publication. The presentation covers mistakes made in various sections of research papers like titles, keywords, cover letters, introductions, methods, results, discussions, and references. It provides tips to avoid these mistakes by following best practices in scientific writing. The presentation emphasizes understanding the perspective of journal editors and peer reviewers as the main audience for the paper.
Checklist to avoid accidental plagiarism英文校正エディテージ
?
The document provides a 10-point checklist for avoiding accidental plagiarism when writing manuscripts. It advises acknowledging the works of others, using quotation marks for verbatim text, keeping verbatim text to a minimum, rewriting content from previous studies in one's own words, citing sources, mentioning if the paper was previously presented, following ideas from previous studies with one's own interpretation, using plagiarism detection software, and emphasizing novelty in the cover letter.
17. 论文出版スケジュールの立て方
参考文献
1. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2011). Peer review in scientific publications Vol
1. House of Commons: London, UK.
2. Hall SA & Wilcox AJ (2007). The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: A study of papers submitted to
Epidemiology. Epidemiology 18(2):262–65.
3. Khosla A, McDonald RJ, Bornmann L, and Kallmes DF (2011). Getting to yes: The fate of neuroradiology
manuscripts rejected by Radiology over a 2-year period. Radiology 260:3-5;
doi:10.1148/radiol.11110490.
4. Schultz DM (2010). Rejection rates for journals publishing in the atmospheric sciences. Bulletin of the
American Meteorological Society, 91(2), 231-243. doi: 10.1175/2009BAMS2908.1.
5. Azar OH (2004). Rejections and the importance of first response times. International Journal of Social
Economics, 31(3), 259-74. doi: 10.1108/03068290410518247.
6. Woolley KL & Barron JP (2009). Handling manuscript rejection: Insights from evidence and experience.
Chest, 135(2), 573-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2007.
7. Armstrong AW, Idriss SZ, Kimball AB, Bernhard JD (2008). Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of
the American Academy of Dermatology. 58(4):632-5.
18. Connect
Connect with us on:
http://www.facebook.com/EditageJapan
https://twitter.com/EditageJapan
http://www.linkedin.com/company/cactus-communications