The document discusses various philosophical concepts related to determining truth, including knowledge, facts, claims, arguments, and biases. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and examines statements to distinguish those that are factual from those that are opinions. The document also discusses logical fallacies and biases that can influence arguments. It emphasizes that understanding the difference between facts and opinions is important for gaining wisdom and forming well-reasoned views. Analyzing different perspectives on issues while being aware of one's own biases can help achieve more objective evaluations.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical analysis. It discusses key concepts like knowledge, facts, opinions, arguments, logic, and fallacies. The document encourages applying systematic doubt to statements to analyze them, using examples like claims about one's identity or abilities. Readers are advised to consider whether a statement is factual, an opinion, belief, argument, or explanation in order to distinguish truth from falsehood. Philosophical tools like logic and identifying logical fallacies can guide determining the truthfulness of different types of statements.
The document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and distinguishing truth from opinion. It discusses how philosophers examine knowledge and its basis in reality or facts. Opinions are judgments or perspectives that may be influenced by bias, while arguments try to convince others of a claim using reasoning that could include fallacies. When analyzing statements, philosophy teaches us to apply systematic doubt and consider various biases that could affect perspectives. Understanding the difference between facts and opinions can guide us to wisdom in forming our own views.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical inquiry. It discusses how ancient Greek philosophers approached truth by examining the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know. It emphasizes employing systematic doubt to scrutinize all statements and determine truth, rather than taking anything as true without sufficient evidence. The document also differentiates between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions, arguments, beliefs, conclusions, explanations, and fallacies. It stresses that arguments may be based on faulty reasoning and fallacies, misleading the reader, so it is important to consider the characteristics and types of fallacies.
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
The document outlines three methods of philosophizing: 1) distinguishing opinion from truth by analyzing situations correctly, 2) realizing that philosophical methods lead to wisdom and truth, and 3) evaluating truth and opinion in different situations using the method of philosophizing.
This document provides an introduction to methods of philosophizing. It discusses various philosophical methods like the Socratic method, dialectic, and historical analysis that philosophers use to address questions. It defines key philosophical concepts like truth and knowledge. It also discusses how to distinguish facts from opinions and gives examples of common logical fallacies to avoid in reasoning. The document aims to help students learn the process of philosophizing in a systematic way and evaluate information critically.
Here are examples of statements demonstrating each type of bias:
1. Attribution effect: "He failed the exam so he must be lazy."
2. Confirmation bias: "I don't believe the studies showing vaccines are safe because I'm convinced they cause autism."
3. Framing: "The debate focuses on tax cuts and ignores spending cuts."
4. Hindsight: "In retrospect it was obvious they would get divorced."
5. Conflict of interest: "As an employee of the company, I think their practices are ethical."
6. Cultural bias: "Their parenting style is too permissive based on my cultural upbringing."
This document discusses the concepts of wisdom and truth. It begins by outlining an activity for students to do in groups. It then provides definitions and explanations of wisdom, truth, and related philosophical concepts. Examples are given of facts versus opinions. The document also discusses how to gain wisdom from God according to the Bible and examines logical fallacies and cognitive biases. At the end, students are given application and assessment questions.
This document presents a lesson on methods of philosophizing and determining what is true. It discusses how philosophers use systematic doubt to scrutinize statements and beliefs in order to determine what can be proven as true. Several examples are provided of applying this method to evaluate statements about oneself and one's identity. Students are guided through examining their senses and using facts to justify beliefs. The goal is to understand the nature of knowledge and how philosophy can help arrive at reasonable assessments of what is truthful.
Critical Thinking & TOK require questioning information and separating facts from unsupported claims. Ultimately, there are no absolute truths - knowledge claims must be scrutinized and supported by evidence while considering alternative viewpoints. We should believe things that are logically coherent and correspond with evidence, avoiding both unwarranted certainty and unfounded skepticism.
This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
The document outlines three methods of philosophizing: 1) distinguishing opinion from truth by analyzing situations correctly, 2) realizing that philosophical methods lead to wisdom and truth, and 3) evaluating truth and opinion in different situations using the method of philosophizing.
This document provides an introduction to methods of philosophizing. It discusses various philosophical methods like the Socratic method, dialectic, and historical analysis that philosophers use to address questions. It defines key philosophical concepts like truth and knowledge. It also discusses how to distinguish facts from opinions and gives examples of common logical fallacies to avoid in reasoning. The document aims to help students learn the process of philosophizing in a systematic way and evaluate information critically.
Here are examples of statements demonstrating each type of bias:
1. Attribution effect: "He failed the exam so he must be lazy."
2. Confirmation bias: "I don't believe the studies showing vaccines are safe because I'm convinced they cause autism."
3. Framing: "The debate focuses on tax cuts and ignores spending cuts."
4. Hindsight: "In retrospect it was obvious they would get divorced."
5. Conflict of interest: "As an employee of the company, I think their practices are ethical."
6. Cultural bias: "Their parenting style is too permissive based on my cultural upbringing."
This document discusses the concepts of wisdom and truth. It begins by outlining an activity for students to do in groups. It then provides definitions and explanations of wisdom, truth, and related philosophical concepts. Examples are given of facts versus opinions. The document also discusses how to gain wisdom from God according to the Bible and examines logical fallacies and cognitive biases. At the end, students are given application and assessment questions.
This document presents a lesson on methods of philosophizing and determining what is true. It discusses how philosophers use systematic doubt to scrutinize statements and beliefs in order to determine what can be proven as true. Several examples are provided of applying this method to evaluate statements about oneself and one's identity. Students are guided through examining their senses and using facts to justify beliefs. The goal is to understand the nature of knowledge and how philosophy can help arrive at reasonable assessments of what is truthful.
Critical Thinking & TOK require questioning information and separating facts from unsupported claims. Ultimately, there are no absolute truths - knowledge claims must be scrutinized and supported by evidence while considering alternative viewpoints. We should believe things that are logically coherent and correspond with evidence, avoiding both unwarranted certainty and unfounded skepticism.
Blind spots in AI and Formulation Science, IFPAC 2025.pdfAjaz Hussain
油
The intersection of AI and pharmaceutical formulation science highlights significant blind spotssystemic gaps in pharmaceutical development, regulatory oversight, quality assurance, and the ethical use of AIthat could jeopardize patient safety and undermine public trust. To move forward effectively, we must address these normalized blind spots, which may arise from outdated assumptions, errors, gaps in previous knowledge, and biases in language or regulatory inertia. This is essential to ensure that AI and formulation science are developed as tools for patient-centered and ethical healthcare.
Unit 1 Computer Hardware for Educational Computing.pptxRomaSmart1
油
Computers have revolutionized various sectors, including education, by enhancing learning experiences and making information more accessible. This presentation, "Computer Hardware for Educational Computing," introduces the fundamental aspects of computers, including their definition, characteristics, classification, and significance in the educational domain. Understanding these concepts helps educators and students leverage technology for more effective learning.
How to Configure Deliver Content by Email in Odoo 18 SalesCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to configure proforma invoice in Odoo 18 Sales module. A proforma invoice is a preliminary invoice that serves as a commercial document issued by a seller to a buyer.
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
Chapter 1. Basic Concepts of Strategic Management.pdfRommel Regala
油
This course provides students with a comprehensive understanding of strategic management principles, frameworks, and applications in business. It explores strategic planning, environmental analysis, corporate governance, business ethics, and sustainability. The course integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to enhance global and ethical perspectives in decision-making.
APM event hosted by the South Wales and West of England Network (SWWE Network)
Speaker: Aalok Sonawala
The SWWE Regional Network were very pleased to welcome Aalok Sonawala, Head of PMO, National Programmes, Rider Levett Bucknall on 26 February, to BAWA for our first face to face event of 2025. Aalok is a member of APMs Thames Valley Regional Network and also speaks to members of APMs PMO Interest Network, which aims to facilitate collaboration and learning, offer unbiased advice and guidance.
Tonight, Aalok planned to discuss the importance of a PMO within project-based organisations, the different types of PMO and their key elements, PMO governance and centres of excellence.
PMOs within an organisation can be centralised, hub and spoke with a central PMO with satellite PMOs globally, or embedded within projects. The appropriate structure will be determined by the specific business needs of the organisation. The PMO sits above PM delivery and the supply chain delivery teams.
For further information about the event please click here.
Digital Tools with AI for e-Content Development.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt is useful for not only for B.Ed., M.Ed., M.A. (Education) or any other PG level students or Ph.D. scholars but also for the school, college and university teachers who are interested to prepare an e-content with AI for their students and others.
ITI Turner Question Paper MCQ E-Book Free DownloadSONU HEETSON
油
ITI Turner Question Paper MCQ Book PDF Free Download. All Questions collected from NIMI Mock Test, CTS Bharat Skills Question Bank, Previous Exam papers. Helpful for CTS Trade Theory 1st & 2nd Year CBT Exam,油Apprentice test, AITT, ISRO, DRDO, NAVY, ARMY, Naval Dockyard, Tradesman, Training Officer, Instructor, RRB ALP CBT 2,油Railway Technician, CEPTAM, BRO, PWD, PHED, Air India, BHEL, BARC, IPSC, CISF, CTI, HSFC, GSRTC, GAIL, PSC, Viva, Tests, Quiz油& all other technical competitive exams.
How to Configure Flexible Working Schedule in Odoo 18 EmployeeCeline George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to configure flexible working schedule in Odoo 18 Employee module. In Odoo 18, the Employee module offers powerful tools to configure and manage flexible working schedules tailored to your organization's needs.
3. In todays society, we encounter a lot of information
Media and our interactions with our friends,
family, and members of the community.
Most of the information we receive is helpful,
but some may mislead us or may even be utterly
false.
Every day we are confronted with news, claims
and announcements from our peers, family
members, figures of authority, the
government, and media.
How do we know if they telling the truth?
3
4. In todays society, we encounter a lot of information
Philosophers often wrestle with the concept of
truth.
Knowledge must be truthful to gain validity
and acceptance.
For example, when we answer a True or False
test, we judge if the statements we read are
true or false. This means that statements may
have truth or may not have truth.
Statements about the world or reality are
called propositions and these propositions
may or may not carry truth. Propositions are
usually stated as short statements or sentences.
4
6. 1.
KNOWLEDGE
The clear awareness and understanding of
something. It is the product of questions that
allow for clear answers provided by facts.
Our knowledge is comprised of ideas and
beliefs that we know to be true.
7.
I know that...
I know why...
I know how...
One important aspect of knowledge- it is based on
reality. This simply means that what we know is
what is observable or evident in the real world.
7
9.
Example: I know that fish live in water.
How do we know?
Because fish really do live in water.
9
10. 3.
CLAIM
Statements that are not evidently or
immediately known to be true
They require further examination to
establish whether it is true or false.
11.
Example:
I know that my school is the best school in the
city.
You may know that reading is a better activity than
playing basketball but the truth of your statement
will be contested by other people.
11
12. How do we know if something is TRUE?
Ancient Greek Philosophers approached the
problem of truth by looking at the nature
of knowledge and how we know what we
know.
We assume that everything we know about
this world is true. But philosophers who
pondered upon the origins of knowledge
doubted everything there is to know
about themselves and the world.
12
13. EXAMPLE:
I am alive.
I have a body.
I can breathe.
13
14. As it drives our desire to discover truth. In
philosophy, systematic doubt is employed to
determine truth. This means that every
statement, claim, evidence, and is scrutinized
and analysed.
Nothing is taken as true unless there is
sufficient reason and evidence to prove that
is indeed true.
Doubt has very important purpose in philosophy
14
15. EXAMPLE:
Am I alive?
Do I have a body?
Can I breathe?
15
16. Do you have a pulse? Can you feel your
heartbeat?
Do you have arms, legs and feet?
Try to take a deep breath, then exhale.
Were you ble to do it?
If your answer is yes then you can
conclude with certainty that.....
Now, Examine yourself
16
17. you can now say...
I am alive!
I have a body!
I can breathe!
17
18. 1.
A BELIEF is true if...
it can be justified or provE THROUGH
the use of ones senses.
18
19. EXAMPLE:
I am a Filipino.
Can we use our senses to prove this
satements as fact?
19
20. Filipino (noun):
-A native of the Philipine Island.
-A citizen of the Reublic of the
Philippines
We can look at a dictionary
20
29. EVIDENCE
especially documents can be forged or
falsified.
A person may be issued
with documents
but it may contain wrong information
or typographical error.
29
30. if your name is mispelled in your
birthcertificate
DOES YOUR IDENTITY CHANGE?
30
31. Example:
I can ride a bike/ Can I ride a
bike?
I can fry an egg/ Can I fry an egg?
31
32. The obvious answer would be, is to
actually ride it cook it.--- BUT, some would
argue that the proof is not only in the act but
also in the product.
This means that you should not only show
that you can fry an egg but that also you can
make delicious fried eggs.
How will you prove that you can really cook an egg?
32
33. 5.
A BELIEF is true if...
a person can prove a statement through
an action.
33
36. 1. It takes me 30 minutes to walk from my home to
school.
2. Living near the school is better because we
dont have to spend much for transportation.
3. My sister ate the last piece of pizza.
4. My sister is a selfish person because she ate the
last piece and didnt share it with me.
5. The police firmly pushed the suspect to his
kneed and placed him in handcuffs.
6. The aggressive manner by which the police
arrested the suspect is an example of brutality
that characterizes our police force.
Let us Analyze
36
37. Which of the following statements are
similar?
Let's rearrange them.
38. It takes me 30 minutes to walk
from my home to school.
Living near the school is
better because we dont
have to spend much for
transportation.
My sister ate the last piece of
pizza.
My sister is a selfish person
because she ate the last piece
and didnt share it with me.
The police firmly pushed the
suspect to his kneed and
placed him in handcuffs.
The aggressive manner by
which the police arrested the
suspect is an example of
brutality that characterizes
our police force.
Which column has statements that are more factual?
38
39. It takes me 30 minutes to walk
from my home to school.
Living near the school is
better because we dont
have to spend much for
transportation.
My sister ate the last piece of
pizza.
My sister is a selfish person
because she ate the last piece
and didnt share it with me.
The police firmly pushed the
suspect to his kneed and
placed him in handcuffs.
The aggressive manner by
which the police arrested the
suspect is an example of
brutality that characterizes
our police force.
Which column has statements that are more factual?
39
FACTUAL OPINION
41. OPINION
Comprised of statements which not
only give facts but also provide
conclusions or perspectives regarding
certain situations.
They may advance a belief about
certain things or provide
explanations.
The bases for making arguments
and convincing people that a
certain claim is a fact. They are
often influenced by bias.
43. beliefs
Statements that express convictions that are not
easily and clearly explained by facts.
Tojudge the truthfulness of a belief, we must also
consider things such as the persons experiences
and views.
44. beliefs
Example: I believe that God put me on this Earth
to spread his message of love.
45. Explanation
Statements that assume the claim to be true and
provide reasons why the statement is true.
Example: Statement 4: My sister is selfish
because...
46. Arguments
Series of statements that provide reasons to convince
the reader or listener that a claim or opinion is
truthful.
They often take the form of statements that are
either claims of facts and are phrased in such a way
that they seem reasonable.
48. LOGIC
- Is the branch of philosophy that focuses on the
analysis of arguments.
49. 3rd JOURNAL
OUTPUT
A. Imagine that you are part of
the conversation, how will you
react to the statements?
B. Give a reaction to the article
Describe how you will
determine the truth of the
claims given
PAGE: 28-29
49
51. Arguments
Series of statements that provide reasons to convince
the reader or listener that a claim or opinion is
truthful.
However, a number of arguments may be based on
faulty reasoning.
52. FALLACY
(Kamalian)
An idea that a lot of people think is true but is
in fact false
A misleading argument
53. FALLACY CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Ad hominem Attacking the person
instead of the
argument itself
Of course he believes that the
government is flawed, he is a
rebel and a Communist
Ad baculum
(appeal to force)
Using the threat of force
or an undesirable event
to advance an argument
If you do not agree with my
political opinions, you will
receive flat 70 on your
card.
Ad misericordiam
(appeal to pity)
Using emotions such as
pity and sympathy
You cant fire me, I have a
wife and 12 kids who will go
hungry if I lose this job.
Ad populum
(appeal to majority
or bandwagon)
The idea is presented as
acceptable because a
lot of people accept it
Every boy your age already has
a girlfriend, you should go find
one!
Ad antiquitatem
(appeal to
tradition)
The idea is acceptable
because it has been
true for a long time
Marriage has traditionally been
between a man and a woman;
therefore, gay marriage should
not be allowed.
Ad verecundiam misusing an
authority
4 out of 5 dentists agree that brushing your
teeth makes your life meaningful.
Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist and
perhaps the foremost expert in the field, says
that evolution is true. Therefore, it's true.
(appeal to
authority)
54. FALLACY CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Fallacy of
Composition
Assuming that what is true
of a part is true for the
whole
Each brick in that building weighs less than
a pound. Therefore, the building weighs
less than a pound.
Hydrogen is not wet. Oxygen is not wet.
Therefore, water (H2O) is not wet.
Fallacy of Division Assuming that what is true
for the whole is true for its
parts
You come from a family of doctors and lawyers! Surely,
you can do better in this course!
I heard that the Catholic Church was involved in a sex
scandal cover-up. Therefore, my 102-year-old Catholic
neighbor, who frequently attends Church, is guilty as
well!
Hasty
Generalization
The generalization is
reached too hastily. There
are too few instances or
evidences to support such a
conclusion.
You can't speak French. I cant
speak French. Carla can't speak
French; therefore, nobody in this
school can speak French.
Post Hoc
(false cause)
Assuming a cause-and-
effect relationship
between unrelated events
Every time you wear your red
scarf, you cry. You should get
rid of it.
55. BIAS (PAGKILING)
The personal views of the person presenting it.
They are not necessarily errors in reasoning, but
refer to tendencies or influences which affect
the views of people.
56. BIAS CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Correspondence
bias
(Fundamental
attribution
error)
Tendency to judge a
persons personality by
his/her actions without
regard for external
factors or situations
The soldiers who fought
in the war are all
bloodthirsty murderers.
Confirmation bias the tendency to look for
and accept information in
a way that confirms one's
own beliefs and reject
ideas that go against it
How can I accept his view
that there is no God? I am a
Christian!
57. BIAS CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Conflict of interest A person or group is
connected to or has a
vested interest in the
issue
As the daughter of the
accused, I believe that I have
the right to express my
opinion on the issue of his
alleged corrupt practices.
Cultural bias Analyzing an event or
issue based on ones
cultural standards
I do not agree with this
Western practice of placing
the elderly in retirement
homes.
We Filipinos take care of
our family members.
Framing Focusing on a certain
aspect of a problem
while ignoring other
aspects
Preliminary evidence has
still not pointed out the
actual cause of the plane
crash, but investigators are
currently focusing on the
possibility of pilot error.
Hindsight
(knew-it-all-along
phenomenon)
Is when, after an event
occurs, we feel we
already knew what was
going to happen
When you put a glass on the
edge of a table and you start
cleaning and bumped the glass
and it fell to the ground and
58. HOW CAN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE
DIFFERNCE BETWEEN TRUTH AND
OPINION LEAD USTO WISDOM?
58
Understanding of opinions and facts and the
means to distinguish one from the other
can further improve our understanding and
appreciation of varied views and ideas. The
ability to determine truth goes hand in
hand with the holistic perspective and
enables us to make wiser decisions,
especially in choosing the ideas and views
which we find acceptable.
59. HOW CAN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE
DIFFERNCE BETWEEN TRUTH AND
OPINION LEAD USTO WISDOM?
59
An individual cannot live his or her life just
agreeing with everybody he or she meets. A
critical mind aided by philosophy can help us form
our own personal point of view that can guide us
in making decisions and actions when faced with a
problem.
Philosophy can help us determine ideas that are
truthful and acceptable which we can then use
to form our own views regarding certain
matters.
60. Let us imagine several individuals reacting to a
news in television and radio about teh recent
killings of drug pushers and addicts throughout the
country
MANG ANTONIO ATTY. MACARAIG MRS. LOPEZ
FATHER GOMEZ MR. TOLENTINO MRS. ALONZO
60
61. NOW, LET'S LOOK AT THEIR BACKGROUND
MANG ANTONIO
A citizen who lives in a
barangay where the
presence of drugs addicts is
a problem
ATTY. MACARAIG
A lawyer and a citizen
MRS. LOPEZ
A housewife whose
family lives in a
community
FATHER GOMEZ
A priest
MR. TOLENTINO
A father whose daughter
was raped and murdered
by drug addicts.
MRS. ALONZO
A mother whose son is
a drug addict.
61
62. Figuring out the backgrounds of the people who
made the statements allows us to undertand the
context by which they formed their views and
opinions on the issue.
65. Which among the opinions is most similar to your
own personal bias regarding the issue of the drug
addicts?
66. PHILOSOPHY CAN HELP US EXAMINE VARIOUS VIEWS
ON RELEVANT ISSUES AND OUR LIVES. AN OBJECTIVE
EVALUATION OF OPINIONS AND AN AWARENESS OF
OUR OWN PERSONAL BIASES CAN HELP US MAKE WISE
CHOICES RAGRDING THE MOST ACCEPTABLE VIEWS TO
ADOPT AND THE RIGHT ACTIONS TO UNDERTAKE.
66
68. 際際滷sCarnivalicons are editable shapes.
This means that you can:
Resize them without losing quality.
Change fill color and opacity.
Change line color, width and style.
Isnt that nice? :)
Examples:
68
69. Now you can use any emoji as an icon!
And of course it resizes without losing quality and you can change
the color.
How? Follow Google instructions
https://twitter.com/googledocs/status/730087240156643328
ゐю
ゐ駒乞
pィ佟
and many more...
69