This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical analysis. It discusses key concepts like knowledge, facts, opinions, arguments, logic, and fallacies. The document encourages applying systematic doubt to statements to analyze them, using examples like claims about one's identity or abilities. Readers are advised to consider whether a statement is factual, an opinion, belief, argument, or explanation in order to distinguish truth from falsehood. Philosophical tools like logic and identifying logical fallacies can guide determining the truthfulness of different types of statements.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
The document outlines three methods of philosophizing: 1) distinguishing opinion from truth by analyzing situations correctly, 2) realizing that philosophical methods lead to wisdom and truth, and 3) evaluating truth and opinion in different situations using the method of philosophizing.
The document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and distinguishing truth from opinion. It discusses how philosophers examine knowledge and its basis in reality or facts. Opinions are judgments or perspectives that may be influenced by bias, while arguments try to convince others of a claim using reasoning that could include fallacies. When analyzing statements, philosophy teaches us to apply systematic doubt and consider various biases that could affect perspectives. Understanding the difference between facts and opinions can guide us to wisdom in forming our own views.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical inquiry. It discusses how ancient Greek philosophers approached truth by examining the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know. It emphasizes employing systematic doubt to scrutinize all statements and determine truth, rather than taking anything as true without sufficient evidence. The document also differentiates between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions, arguments, beliefs, conclusions, explanations, and fallacies. It stresses that arguments may be based on faulty reasoning and fallacies, misleading the reader, so it is important to consider the characteristics and types of fallacies.
The document discusses various philosophical concepts related to determining truth, including knowledge, facts, claims, arguments, and biases. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and examines statements to distinguish those that are factual from those that are opinions. The document also discusses logical fallacies and biases that can influence arguments. It emphasizes that understanding the difference between facts and opinions is important for gaining wisdom and forming well-reasoned views. Analyzing different perspectives on issues while being aware of one's own biases can help achieve more objective evaluations.
This document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and determining truth. It discusses the importance of truth and differentiating between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions and arguments. Systematic doubt is presented as a philosophical method for establishing truth by scrutinizing and analyzing statements. Examples are provided to illustrate applying systematic doubt to determine whether a statement is factual or an opinion. Fallacies in reasoning that can undermine arguments are also defined and exemplified. The document aims to teach philosophical thinking and analysis to discern truth from falsehood.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on truth and how to distinguish truth from opinion. It explains that in phenomenology, truth is based on personal consciousness, while in existentialism it depends on choices and freedom. Postmodernism rejects absolute truth, and logic sees truth as relying on reasoning. The document also provides methods for determining truth, such as through verification using the senses, and discusses how understanding the difference between truths and opinions can lead to wisdom.
This document discusses the concepts of wisdom and truth. It begins by outlining an activity for students to do in groups. It then provides definitions and explanations of wisdom, truth, and related philosophical concepts. Examples are given of facts versus opinions. The document also discusses how to gain wisdom from God according to the Bible and examines logical fallacies and cognitive biases. At the end, students are given application and assessment questions.
The document discusses differentiating between facts and opinions. It provides examples of statements classified as either facts or opinions. Facts are verifiable statements that can be proven true or false through evidence, while opinions are subjective judgments or beliefs that are neither definitively true nor false. The key differences outlined are that facts refer to objective reality that can be observed or researched, while opinions are subjective perceptions that may differ depending on the person and are expressed with potentially biased language.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical analysis. It discusses key concepts like knowledge, facts, opinions, arguments, logic, and fallacies. The document encourages applying systematic doubt to statements to analyze them, using examples like claims about one's identity or abilities. Readers are advised to consider whether a statement is factual, an opinion, belief, argument, or explanation in order to distinguish truth from falsehood. Philosophical tools like logic and identifying logical fallacies can guide determining the truthfulness of different types of statements.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
The document outlines three methods of philosophizing: 1) distinguishing opinion from truth by analyzing situations correctly, 2) realizing that philosophical methods lead to wisdom and truth, and 3) evaluating truth and opinion in different situations using the method of philosophizing.
The document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and distinguishing truth from opinion. It discusses how philosophers examine knowledge and its basis in reality or facts. Opinions are judgments or perspectives that may be influenced by bias, while arguments try to convince others of a claim using reasoning that could include fallacies. When analyzing statements, philosophy teaches us to apply systematic doubt and consider various biases that could affect perspectives. Understanding the difference between facts and opinions can guide us to wisdom in forming our own views.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical inquiry. It discusses how ancient Greek philosophers approached truth by examining the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know. It emphasizes employing systematic doubt to scrutinize all statements and determine truth, rather than taking anything as true without sufficient evidence. The document also differentiates between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions, arguments, beliefs, conclusions, explanations, and fallacies. It stresses that arguments may be based on faulty reasoning and fallacies, misleading the reader, so it is important to consider the characteristics and types of fallacies.
The document discusses various philosophical concepts related to determining truth, including knowledge, facts, claims, arguments, and biases. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and examines statements to distinguish those that are factual from those that are opinions. The document also discusses logical fallacies and biases that can influence arguments. It emphasizes that understanding the difference between facts and opinions is important for gaining wisdom and forming well-reasoned views. Analyzing different perspectives on issues while being aware of one's own biases can help achieve more objective evaluations.
This document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and determining truth. It discusses the importance of truth and differentiating between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions and arguments. Systematic doubt is presented as a philosophical method for establishing truth by scrutinizing and analyzing statements. Examples are provided to illustrate applying systematic doubt to determine whether a statement is factual or an opinion. Fallacies in reasoning that can undermine arguments are also defined and exemplified. The document aims to teach philosophical thinking and analysis to discern truth from falsehood.
This document discusses different philosophical perspectives on truth and how to distinguish truth from opinion. It explains that in phenomenology, truth is based on personal consciousness, while in existentialism it depends on choices and freedom. Postmodernism rejects absolute truth, and logic sees truth as relying on reasoning. The document also provides methods for determining truth, such as through verification using the senses, and discusses how understanding the difference between truths and opinions can lead to wisdom.
This document discusses the concepts of wisdom and truth. It begins by outlining an activity for students to do in groups. It then provides definitions and explanations of wisdom, truth, and related philosophical concepts. Examples are given of facts versus opinions. The document also discusses how to gain wisdom from God according to the Bible and examines logical fallacies and cognitive biases. At the end, students are given application and assessment questions.
The document discusses differentiating between facts and opinions. It provides examples of statements classified as either facts or opinions. Facts are verifiable statements that can be proven true or false through evidence, while opinions are subjective judgments or beliefs that are neither definitively true nor false. The key differences outlined are that facts refer to objective reality that can be observed or researched, while opinions are subjective perceptions that may differ depending on the person and are expressed with potentially biased language.
Music is an art form that uses elements like melody, harmony, rhythm, and dynamics to evoke emotions and convey ideas. It encompasses many styles and genres created by manipulating pitch, tempo, and timbre. Music has the power to evoke emotions, capture memories, and express the complexities of life. The presentation also discussed several traditional Kapampangan songs from the Philippines, including lullabies, courtship songs, and folk songs, expressing ideas like love and sadness.
The document provides an overview of contemporary art forms and practices from various regions of the Philippines. It discusses objectives to describe contemporary art forms, discuss various art forms found in the country, and evaluate art forms based on elements and principles. It then covers various traditional and modern art forms from the Ethnic Tradition, Spanish Colonial Tradition, and Modern Art periods. Examples discussed include the Manunggul Jar, Angono Petroglyphs, Banga dance, Langit Lupa at Impyerno painting, St. Paul Metropolitan Cathedral, The Making of the Philippine Flag painting, and Bayanihan by Carlos Botong Francisco painting.
The document discusses caring for the environment and its importance for health, well-being, and sustainable development. It defines key terms like environment, health, and well-being. Health is described as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, while well-being includes additional emotional and life satisfaction components. Sustainable development is defined as meeting present needs without compromising future generations' ability to meet their own needs. The document emphasizes that environmental care through ordinances and acts helps achieve these goals.
This document outlines a lesson plan for reading and discussing the short story "Morsels of Memory" by Charlotte Aninion-De Guzman. The objectives are for students to note important details, learn new vocabulary words, and provide interpretation and reflection. During the lesson, students will do a silent reading, discuss unfamiliar words, and answer questions about the plot and themes. The lesson aims to help students understand the story and identify the values it conveys.
The document provides instructions for a week 1 story reading activity, including a pre-reading exercise asking students to recall memories, instructions to read the short story "Morsels of Memory" silently, and post-reading questions asking students to reflect on values shown in the story. It also defines several words that appear in the short story.
Chapter 3. Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management.pptxRommel Regala
油
This course provides students with a comprehensive understanding of strategic management principles, frameworks, and applications in business. It explores strategic planning, environmental analysis, corporate governance, business ethics, and sustainability. The course integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to enhance global and ethical perspectives in decision-making.
Digital Tools with AI for e-Content Development.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt is useful for not only for B.Ed., M.Ed., M.A. (Education) or any other PG level students or Ph.D. scholars but also for the school, college and university teachers who are interested to prepare an e-content with AI for their students and others.
Finals of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
The Constitution, Government and Law making bodies .saanidhyapatel09
油
This PowerPoint presentation provides an insightful overview of the Constitution, covering its key principles, features, and significance. It explains the fundamental rights, duties, structure of government, and the importance of constitutional law in governance. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the foundation of a nations legal framework.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
-Autonomy, Teams and Tension: Projects under stress
-Tim Lyons
-The neurological levels of
team-working: Harmony and tensions
With a background in projects spanning more than 40 years, Tim Lyons specialised in the delivery of large, complex, multi-disciplinary programmes for clients including Crossrail, Network Rail, ExxonMobil, Siemens and in patent development. His first career was in broadcasting, where he designed and built commercial radio station studios in Manchester, Cardiff and Bristol, also working as a presenter and programme producer. Tim now writes and presents extensively on matters relating to the human and neurological aspects of projects, including communication, ethics and coaching. He holds a Masters degree in NLP, is an NLP Master Practitioner and International Coach. He is the Deputy Lead for APMs People Interest Network.
Session | The Neurological Levels of Team-working: Harmony and Tensions
Understanding how teams really work at conscious and unconscious levels is critical to a harmonious workplace. This session uncovers what those levels are, how to use them to detect and avoid tensions and how to smooth the management of change by checking you have considered all of them.
Research & Research Methods: Basic Concepts and Types.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt has been made for the students pursuing PG in social science and humanities like M.Ed., M.A. (Education), Ph.D. Scholars. It will be also beneficial for the teachers and other faculty members interested in research and teaching research concepts.
Computer Application in Business (commerce)Sudar Sudar
油
The main objectives
1. To introduce the concept of computer and its various parts. 2. To explain the concept of data base management system and Management information system.
3. To provide insight about networking and basics of internet
Recall various terms of computer and its part
Understand the meaning of software, operating system, programming language and its features
Comparing Data Vs Information and its management system Understanding about various concepts of management information system
Explain about networking and elements based on internet
1. Recall the various concepts relating to computer and its various parts
2 Understand the meaning of softwares, operating system etc
3 Understanding the meaning and utility of database management system
4 Evaluate the various aspects of management information system
5 Generating more ideas regarding the use of internet for business purpose
How to Setup WhatsApp in Odoo 17 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
Integrate WhatsApp into Odoo using the WhatsApp Business API or third-party modules to enhance communication. This integration enables automated messaging and customer interaction management within Odoo 17.
APM event hosted by the South Wales and West of England Network (SWWE Network)
Speaker: Aalok Sonawala
The SWWE Regional Network were very pleased to welcome Aalok Sonawala, Head of PMO, National Programmes, Rider Levett Bucknall on 26 February, to BAWA for our first face to face event of 2025. Aalok is a member of APMs Thames Valley Regional Network and also speaks to members of APMs PMO Interest Network, which aims to facilitate collaboration and learning, offer unbiased advice and guidance.
Tonight, Aalok planned to discuss the importance of a PMO within project-based organisations, the different types of PMO and their key elements, PMO governance and centres of excellence.
PMOs within an organisation can be centralised, hub and spoke with a central PMO with satellite PMOs globally, or embedded within projects. The appropriate structure will be determined by the specific business needs of the organisation. The PMO sits above PM delivery and the supply chain delivery teams.
For further information about the event please click here.
Information Technology for class X CBSE skill SubjectVEENAKSHI PATHAK
油
These questions are based on cbse booklet for 10th class information technology subject code 402. these questions are sufficient for exam for first lesion. This subject give benefit to students and good marks. if any student weak in one main subject it can replace with these marks.
Mate, a short story by Kate Grenvile.pptxLiny Jenifer
油
A powerpoint presentation on the short story Mate by Kate Greenville. This presentation provides information on Kate Greenville, a character list, plot summary and critical analysis of the short story.
Prelims of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
2. OBJECTIVES
2.1. Distinguish opinion from truth PPT11/12-Ic-2.1
2.2. Analyze situations that show the difference
between opinion and truth PPT11/12-Id-2.2
2.3. Realize that the methods of philosophy lead to
wisdom and truth PPT11/12-Id-2.3
2.4. Evaluate opinions PPT11/12-Ie-2.4
3. ACTIVITY
1. The sun is the center of the solar system.
2. Asia is the largest continent in the world.
3. God made the world in seven days
4. Man has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
5. Chinas continued presence in the Spratlys is a violation of international law.
6. A person must always consider the interest of his or her family before his or
her own happiness.
7. Citizens have the right to take up arms and overthrow an oppressive
government.
8. The President has done very little to uphold democracy and look after the
interests of the Filipino people.
Which of the following statements are TRUE?
8. KNOWLEDG
E-Is the clear awareness and understanding of
something
the product of
questioning that seeks
for clear answers
provided by facts..
our knowledge is
comprised of ideas and
beliefs that we know to
be true
12. There are
statements
that are not
evidently or
immediately
known to be
true.
These are called CLAIMS.
Further examination is
required to establish its
truthfulness.
13. TRUTHFUL STATEMENTS
Statements that are based on facts.
Science considers
truth as something
observable and
empirical. While, Philosophy has
various views.
16. Exist in Reality
INDISPUTIBLE .
- A fact is a reality
that cannot be
logically disputed or
rejected.
17. UNCHANGEABLE
- Facts are concrete
realities that no amount of
reasoning will change.
Facts are not discovered,
facts are not created, facts
are simply acknowledged.
18. How do we know if
something is true?
Can be
justified or
proven
Based on
facts
Getting a
consensus of
many people
19. Determining truth inthis case
requires apersontoprove a
statementthroughanaction.
This canbetrueif they canbe
applied inreallife.
20. Claims and beliefs
should also be
subjected to tests to
determine truth and
to prove their validity.
23. DOUBT
Has a very
important
purpose.
Doubt helps
determine
the truth
Claims, evidence and
experience is scrutinized and
analyzed
Nothing is taken as TRUE
unless there is sufficient
reason and evidence to prove
it.
25. 1.Teenagers, like you, are
emotional and irresponsible.
2. Men are more likely to cheat than
women.
3. A cheater is always a cheater.
26. FACT or OPINION???
1. It takes me 30 minutes to walk from my home to school.
2. Living near the school is better because we dont have to spend much
for transportation.
3. My sister ate the last piece of pizza pie.
4. My sister is a selfish person because she ate the last piece of pizza pie
and did not share it with me.
5. The policeman firmly pushed the suspect to his knees and placed him in
handcuffs.
6. The aggressive manner by which the policeman arrested the suspect is
an example of the brutality that characterizes our police force.
29. OPINION
- Statements that provide conclusions or perspectives
regarding certain situations
CONCLUSION
- A judgement based on certain facts but can still be
contested or questioned.
BELIEFS
- Statements that express convictions that are not easily and
clearly explained by facts.
30. ARGUMENT
- Series of statements that provide reasons to convince the
reader/listener that a claim or opinion is truthful.
LOGIC
A branch of Philosophy that focuses on the analysis of
arguments
EXPLANATION
- Statements that assume the claim to be true and provide
reasons why.
31. Fallacies
are called errors in reasoning.
Fallacy comes from the word Fallo or Fallere which
means Error in Reasoning
32. ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM
Attacking the persons character instead of the
argument itself.
Example:
Do not believe the Senator. Whatever she says
are lies because she is having an affair with her
driver and they have a video scandal.
33. ARGUMENTUM AD BACULUM
Use of threat or force to advance an
argument.
Example:
If you dont kiss me Ill post your picture on
the internet.
34. ARGUMENTUM AD MISERICORDIAM
Using emotions as pity or sympathy .
Example:
Sir, maawa na kayo, if you wont pass me in
your subject, my parents will disown me
35. ARGUMENTUM AD POPULUM OR MOB
FALLACY
An attempt to influence the judgment of people by
appealing to the prejudices and attitudes or as
endorsed by a celebrity.
Example:
Many believed that.
So, I will believe in it.
36. APPEAL TO TRADITION
An idea is acceptable because it has been
practiced for a long time.
Example:
Chinese people will only marry Chinese
people.
37. FALLACY OF HASTY GENERALIZATION OR FALLACY OF ACCIDENT
This fallacy arises as the result of the conclusion
what is true of the whole is true of the parts.
Example:
Sonny belongs to an intelligent family. For
sure he is also very intelligent.
39. FALLACY OF COMPOSITION
This fallacy arises as the result of the conclusion
what is true of the parts is true of the whole.
Example:
Sonny is a very intelligent person. I believe he
belongs to a family of intelligent people.
40. FALLACY OF WEAK ANALOGY
This fallacy rests on analogies .
Example:
There was a lady who believed she will get rich
without doing anything. So, she did become
rich. And so, shall we.
41. FALLACY OF EQUIVOCATION
Equal (Equi) sound (Vocare) but different meaning.
Example:
≒A king is a ruler.
≒A ruler is a measuring device.
42. IGNORANTIAM
An argument is true if it cannot be proven
false..
Example:
Aswang exists. If they dont, prove it.
43. BEGGING THE QUESTION OR PETITIO PRINCIPII
This fallacy occurs when the conclusion of an
argument merely restates the same query.
-circular argument
Example:
I have the right to free speech, therefore you cannot stop me
from talking
46. Improve understanding and appreciation of varied views and
ideas.
Help to form ones own personal point of view
Help determine ideas that are truthful and acceptable
HOW CAN UNDERSTANDING of the DIFFERENCE
between TRUTH and OPINION LEAD US TO
WISDOM?
72. What is that one truth that you
regret not telling someone?
(Ano yung isang katotohanan
na pinagsisihan mong hindi
nasabi sa isang tao?)
73. What is that one truth/reality in
your life that is difficult for you
to accept? (Ano ang isang
katotohanan sa buhay mo na
hindi mo matangap)
74. What is that one truth about
yourself that you wish the
others would see on you? (Ano
ang isang katotohanan sa iyo,
sa sarili mo o sa buhay mo na
ninanais mong makita rin ing
ibang tao sa iyo?)
Editor's Notes
#3: Were you able to easily judge the truthfulness of the statements? Why?
Which of the statements are obviously true? Which one required more thought to determine their truthfulness?
Which of these statements may be true for others but not true in your judgement?
Which of these statements do you personally believe to be true but maybe disputed by other people?
#4: Most of the information is helpful, some mislead or may be utterly false.
Example: Misled by claims of miracle drugs which were eventually proven no significant effects, fake news in Internet or sensational headlines which often twist and distort the truth
#7: Before we discuss truth, it is important to clarify knowledge, since it is through knowing that we are able to determine the truth.
#18: Proven through the use of senses and
FACTS - facts to guide us in our search for truth
Consensus has limitations, not all agreed upon are true
Truths are highly relative
#19: *experiences that is why truths vary. What is true to you may not be true to me.
#20: Not all truths are facts; but all facts are true
Research, Stats, Experiments are tested to prove their validity. Research is an evidence of facts. Facts are therefore true!
#21: Underlying philosophy: everything starts from within
#23: Ancient greek philosphers approached the problem of truth by looking at the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know.
Assume that everything we know is true, but philosophers doubted everything.
It is said that there are some instance that we need to unlearn something so that we may learn anew.
#29: Opinions are also bases for making arguments and convincing people that a certain claim is fact.
In judging the truthfulness of belief, we must consider a persons experiences and views.
#30: Arguments are made with assumptions that the truth of the claim or opinion is still to be determined.
It conveys ideas that can influence the thinking, actions and behavior of people. Some can have ill intentions and wish to manipulate to suit their own purpose.
#72: Before we discuss truth, it is important to clarify knowledge, since it is through knowing that we are able to determine the truth.
#73: Before we discuss truth, it is important to clarify knowledge, since it is through knowing that we are able to determ
ine the truth.
#74: Before we discuss truth, it is important to clarify knowledge, since it is through knowing that we are able to determine the truth.